0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I would mean equal to , I would mean that energy is an entity and does not need any other process to exist.
Quote from: Thebox on 26/09/2015 13:06:47I would mean equal to , I would mean that energy is an entity and does not need any other process to exist. And there you would be wrong. Energy is a conserved parameter, not an entity.Imagine anything you like, but don't confuse imagination with science. Negative and positive are adjectives, not nouns. People who confuse adjectives with nouns end up with all sorts of problems, including religion.
"=" It is constant.
This discussion reminds me of a practical experiment my physics teacher used to teach..Imagine a cheese sandwichnow imagine you eat the cheese sandwichNow are you hungry? or do you need to imagine another cheese sandwich.Thinking you can assign a charge or energy where you have none is like eating an imaginary sandwich, you can do it all you like but it wont get you anywhere other than more hungry.I particularly like the 'ice is attracted to air that is why it floats'... this will keep me laughing for weeks..But I hope you remain positive with your theories and avoid all those negative comments.. but they do seem to attract each other!
A proton is not exclusive it absorbs emr like everything else, that is why things increase in temperature, protons have a capacitance, and once full they release the charge in the form of emr.
This is yet another result of you refusal to learn physics.