0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Can you explain what you mean by massless particles "of substance"?How do you obtain massless particles that are not travelling at c from the point/time of generation?
hypothetical negative monopole particles
two massless particles but of substance
would remain stationary
Tell us something about negative energy.
Now I feel a fool..
Quote from: Thebox on 09/10/2015 23:36:25Now I feel a fool.. Then why do you keep writing foolish things?Physics is not "writing the first things that comes to mind", that is called "psychoanalysis"...--lightarrow
I feel focused on ''trying to get lucky''
Quote from: Thebox on 10/10/2015 14:28:00I feel focused on ''trying to get lucky''Ok, but to increase the probability to have luck you can give more "structure" to your thoughts, relating them to base concepts.In other words: the more your thoughts about physics are connected to real concepts of physics, the more "information" they have.Using a metaphor, you can't become rich writing a novel with words taken "at chance", you have to use a general, precise language, a style, etc, etc.In physics the language is "equations" and " precise formalization of concepts".Regards.--lightarrow
Putting scientific words in a sentence structure is not science. There's more to physics than simple word order, and if you get the physics wrong, you will not understand any other science. Mathematics is a concise means of communicating scientific ideas but won't work if you invent youir own maths - you might as well invent a new language: just calling it French won't help you communicate with people who live in France.