The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Chemistry
  4. Reading thermometers, burettes etc. - SIMPLE QU!
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Reading thermometers, burettes etc. - SIMPLE QU!

  • 1 Replies
  • 4925 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline E_Sin_Ohm (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Reading thermometers, burettes etc. - SIMPLE QU!
« on: 29/12/2004 21:49:55 »
Hello!
Got a problem below which has been troubling me for a few days...

I realised I don't know how to round values from thermometers, burettes etc. if the measurement is inbetween the divisions but you have to (because the teacher has said so) have a value which is +-0.05 i.e. the last digit / 2nd d.p ends in 0 or 5 e.g. 25.05cm3, 13.20cm3 are acceptable, 25.04cm3 are NOT.
---

If one has to measure a reading on a burette to 0.05 i.e. the last 2nd decimal place number must be a 0 or a 5, but the burette only has divisions every 0.1ml, e.g. 20.0, 20.1, 20.2, then where does one apply the 20.5 reading?
[I have been told by my school that to get the marks in the practical exams, I must read the burette to +-0.05! NOT to 0.01!]

I have heard of a number of different approaches from various people, and was wondering if the chemists here could offer a definitive opinion. :)
[The following examples assume that the bottom of the meniscus is between the divisions e.g. 20.0 and 20.1cm3] N.B. I have ignored the fact that burettes have their numbers from top down to bottom :)

Approach A] If the bottom of the meniscus is "below" halfway between the divisions, then you round DOWN to 20.00; else if it is above the halfway point, you round DOWN to 20.05 cm3.
However, another approach suggested by some is: B] If the bottom of the meniscus is "below" halfway between the divisions, then you round UP to 20.05; else if it is above the halfway point (i.e. in the upper half of the region between marked divisions on the burette), you round UP to 20.10 cm3.

Another approach (we'll call it approach C) I have heard is to split the area between 20.0 and 20.1 - i.e. between the divisions -into 3 regions (mentally that is) i.e. in the lower 1/3 you assume that the value is 20.00, in the middle 1/3 you assume that the value is 20.05, in the uppermost 1/3, you assume the value is 20.10.

Last but not least, another approach (which I think is a tad inaccurate), that I have heard from many is the following rule: If it is on the division / line itself, it's 20.00 or 20.10 etc. If it isn't on the line, then it's 20.05,20.15 etc. regardless of how close it may be to the upper or lower regions inbetween the divisions.

If you've read this, thanks, you've got a lot of patience :-)

Here's a picture to help you understand me:
[Some people have suggested the left approach, others have suggested the right :(].

Thus, I would be *most grateful* if anyone could tell me which one of these approaches is "official" or the one to use in labs (at least, for secondary school labs).

Thank you. Many thanks.
E
Logged
 
 



Offline Ylide

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 905
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
    • http://clem.mscd.edu/~mogavero
Re: Reading thermometers, burettes etc. - SIMPLE QU!
« Reply #1 on: 30/12/2004 05:22:39 »
The correct way to read graduated measurements are to approximate the first significant digit of the measurement that does not have a graduation on the measuring device.  For instance, if you are reading a buret that is demarcated every 0.1 ml, say the liquid falls between 25.1 and 25.2 ml, you would approximate the 1/100 ml place.  If it looked precisely halfway between, you would approximate 25.15 ml.  Any less or any more and you would have to use your judgement as to which digit to use in this position.  Bear in mind that the uncertainty of the measurement is greater than any variance your eye might have, so it's not terribly important as long as you're close.  IF you really really need more accuracy, you have to use better equipment.  



This message brought to you by The Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People
Logged
This message brought to you by The Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

"Simple" Rocket Science: Where have I gone wrong?

Started by harrogate22Board General Science

Replies: 2
Views: 6101
Last post 06/01/2008 16:33:26
by lyner
Simple Motor - Homopolar motor - Kitchen Science

Started by thedocBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 0
Views: 3880
Last post 24/11/2016 23:55:16
by thedoc
How simple can I make the electrical interface for Diesel grid-tied generator?

Started by peppercornBoard Technology

Replies: 6
Views: 5952
Last post 05/07/2010 20:47:22
by SeanB
Expressing simple electrical theory correctly in English

Started by felixtheferretBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 6
Views: 4713
Last post 27/06/2007 12:09:37
by lyner
Efficiency question: Barco Jackhammer - Simple old technology

Started by peppercornBoard Technology

Replies: 50
Views: 24689
Last post 24/08/2009 11:43:22
by lyner
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.079 seconds with 38 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.