0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
it's a issue just like "Racism", it starts to exist at the moment you invented the word and started talking about it...and it's sustained by the new perception of man kind that one needs to "give" or "be"... Like a model citzen walking trough the street. Sudently a Cop loose it's mind and shoot him on the arm once. Somehow the citzen managed to get in possession of the cops weapon.Now the situation diverges: Talkign about myself, if the wond was not fatal, i would try to implement logic but wouldnt exitate to do wherever it takes to "ENSURE" my heath. That also includes injure or neutralize the agressor, despise being a autority or anything. Slavery happen or tried to take place on each culturetrough history of humanity. the only difference in between africans and chineses, is that:"They did not unite themselves to ... all those irrational slavers.".Not sugesting weakness on the race itself, all humans, africans by some aspects as resitence, inteligence, longevity even superior to most of us. It was cultural, somehow african culture was not based on war and conflict on that scale. they saw no purpose into die for the other. Of course not all of them but the sucssefull sįlavery itself is proof of this fact. "They slaved." The very sentence shouldnt be possible... Turning back to the elephant on the room. The Feminist concept as a reality is twisting many things. I myself admire strong womans. Altough I do not quite understand why?:
If a woman is not happy or satisfied with the fact that "the cop shoot her", why do not sacrificate the imediate peace and solve it right away?Whitout ever consider "our" side of the issue?
Intead most are trying to organize methos and law, which is admirable and surely does work, but some do not see the loss of their souls on the process.... You're instaling "preventing laws" not for "change" but for protection, this right because your expectation seems to be that "never will" change... Is a hope insurance against the hopless man. Doesn't make any real sense...The option B is to for getabout the "world" as a reality and fix wherever need to be fix when it need to be fixed. Imediatlly. No man will ever listent to a feminist that talk abut laws, it's a moral issue, we can only listen to someone that explains her desires and objectives to us, in a manner that she's completly ignoring our understanding or not, about what she is saying... Same way I'll never understand the model citzen that when shooted irrationality by a aleatory cop, will keep looking to the wond and perplex asking himself why, subsequently, begging for him to "give" him alternative, because he do not believe he "should" react to an "autorithy", this while he bleeds to death...Cop is only a practical reference for example, of how twisted life can be, "the cop" is just a representation of any individual, male, that try to imposse some sort of autorithy that goes against your health. Why?
But take care to this detail: 30 years old. i never had to apply this metology on real life,a few almosts but nothing relevant.So, if someone come to me to me and say: DO IT! I'm the one whith the tools to think: "I wont"In the other hand, the one hopping for the "giving". It'll read this, and stated to believe that is cold, insensitive or agressive. It'll b domain by it's own imaginary and may start to feel fear. At this moment I've become a menace.It'll then slowly start to shape the world acting on my blind spot, by the meanings of commentary, conversations and more.Eventually resulting in a twisted version of the reality, where everything that I represent, must be eradicated. IT'S AGAIN'S THE LAW!There it's everyhting allowed to protect the LAW. the very laws I helped to forge to protect myself from "him", the man I "see"... Eventually thisvery law will as always turn against yourself, for there always will be someone else "imagining" you...Any law builded over reality, no need to worry, it will be simple by logic...Any law based on a lie that my ego wants to believe, will inevitable turn itself, eventually against myself...why?
For i'll eventually have to face that I was a lair implementing over, in order to "feel control" over what I could not control... The last question of such culture will inevitable be:"What will now protect me from myself?"
By the way most of my friends are women, that actually "became" my friends...I consider anything that is illogical and unfair as something undesired and somehow incorrect. I just dont get it, why do not face the situation when it's real, rather than try to prevent something that not even the enemy can...
Well if true that light reaching you is but a recording of an event, that's no longer there...
Anything else needed to add?
If the event is not occurring as it was at the same way the light is revealing it to you. No need for considerations. We certainly can only see the past position of things and we do that from our present position. Much things is uncertain yet, but this is clear as day, the only way this to be proof incorrect would require to find evidence that C is instantaneous/unlimited.
Alex you are replying to jolly not the box.
I suspect jolly believes drama is entertaining and as such loves Trump.
Me not so much.
Entertaining drama keeps your mind off of the problems. Trumps solution to problem solving.
Trump is an entertainer first and a president second.
Yes he was elected to the position by states but lost the popular vote.
He was totally against the electoral vote in favor of the popular vote. I did not want Clinton either but she got about 6 million more votes. Are you entertained yet?
About my belief in science if it were not for science. Lets say science stopped working. Half the population would be dead in 6 months. There would be hoards of people traveling looking for food of any kind and eventually other people until a new balance occurred with nature.
The first to perish would be the weak, young and money changers specifically board members and the wall street group. So yes I am a fan of science but not over population. The population is growing exponentially.
Its not going to affect me but the future is at stake. The nutrients in the soil from over production is becoming a problem even with todays population. Trump is like a drug addict only looking at today and his own lifetime. Anti science views.
Burn all the oil and hang the future. Of course many feel the same way. I do not.
The only one I liked was VP Biden.
There are conspiracy theories on both sides and I don't like either side. Trump does not even try to hide his lying and all politicians have to lie to get elected.
We get what we vote for in an election.
I talk about the soil being over used to sustain the population and you transfer that to global warming?
By measurements the Earth is warming more every year. Total warmth on the Earth is increasing by measurement. What that means may be up for debate but the Earth has gone through many cycles of freeze and warmth through time. To much warmth shuts down the ocean currents by dilution of salt. This will not affect our lifetime except to be more comfortable in the more Northern and Southern most hemisphere. But more severe weather. Are you denying the scientific measurements?
Scientists are trained to be honest in their fields.
I have seen first hand want to be scientists fired for abusing the truth. With politicians its a way of life. So yes I trust scientists to do a better job than politicians.
You appear to me as an emotion junky.
Politicians silencing opposition has been going on since socializing for the greater good began. Emotions are both the greatest and worst part of humanity.
Obviously we do not agree on the definition of a liar or who is to blame for a lie.
I do not know Trump personally so I only know him through the media. He did say women allowed him to grope them and when some came to claim this to be true he denied the acquisitions. The only way this could be true is if all the women accusers were not groped while the ones that were groped did not come forward. I do not really care about the issue of his groping but I do care that he refused to own his actions. If you do the deed own it don't lie. He is just a typical lying unpolished politician. He does not represent my ideals. If he represents your ideals good for you.
Wow hook line and sinker. You double down just like Trump.
Once again the point of his lie you are diverting is he denied the women coming forward who claimed he groped them.
So the only way he did not lie is if the women coming forward were not groped by him and the ones he did grope did not come forward. He bragged he groped women. Hook line and sinker. I trust scientists not your abuse of the facts.
1. Trump claimed he groped women.
2. Woman came forward to confirm said groping.
Now here comes the potential lie by Trump.
3. I did not grope those women.The only way he did not lie is if the women he groped did not come forward and those he did not grope came forward.
Washington- I cannot tell a lieTrump- I did not lie.His favorite saying- Believe Me This suggests to me, that person is not used to being believed.
True scientists never even suggest something so crude as believe me.
With us its here is the data. Then the data gets reran for accuracy generally by a second scientist to insure authenticity. Even then it is understood statistically as not 100% accurate.There is bias in reporting and what is being reported as important. If a person says I am going to kill another person and does it, that does not mean he or she is not a liar. I do not trust the nature of man or women trying to have power over others and control their lives. I prefer testing and data over willy-nilly choices of personal emotions. Societies are far to complex for willy-nilly.
(Men are stupid you dont have to tell me)