Onesimpleprinciple

  • 113 Replies
  • 56141 Views

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #50 on: 28/11/2007 12:16:17 »
Magnetism*
When an iron item is brought close to a magneto, the energybundles opening up from them have interaction with each other.The energybundles opening up from a magneto slow down the energybundles that come from an iron item and the energybundles coming from the iron item slow down the energybundles coming from the magneto.

This way their speed does not accelerate. When the energybundles coming from the magneto get inside the iron item and energybundles coming from the ironitem get inside the magneto, they make the atomcores of the magneto and iron item themselves to go to the orbit so that they turn around scant half a round and then are thrown to the same direction where they came from. The speed has accelerated in a same than the speed of a sounder does while passing the planet.

Now the energybundles are directed straight towards some expanding atoms core and they explode there.

This is why we can feel how the magneto and a iron item aspire towards each other when they locate close enough each other.

The repulsion of two magnetos can be explained so, that the magnetos make eac others atomcores to explode their energy towards each other. Perhaps a part of the energybundles are directed straight towards the atomcore of a magneto nextby.



Let us think that the atoms of a magneto and iron item are galaxies.

If there comes from outside an energyconsentration towards the centre of the galaxy, does this energyconsentration get so much energy as waves from the stars of the external circle of the galaxy. Now these energywaves make this energyconsentration to explode its energy away from the galaxy centre. The orbit of the energyconsentration bends according to the galaxy centre.

Energybundles come also towards the energyconsentration from the centre of the galaxy. These energubundles are more massive and they have less external surface. The longer time the energycentre locates nearby the hot centre of the galaxy, the more the massive energybundles coming from the galaxy centre begin to have interaction with the atomcores of the energyconsentration.

The denser energywaves the atomcores of the energyconsentration do open, the more the energybundles coming from the galaxy centre get hits towards thenselves and the more they do explode their energy towards the atomcores of the energyconsentration and also the more they move their kinetic energy
towards the atomcores of the energyconsentration.

Now the speed of the energyconsentration begins to accelerate and it pushes itself away from the galaxy centre faster than the "surface" of the galaxy centre. The further the energyconsentration pushes itself from the galaxycentre, the more it has stars behind it and the more its speed accelerates away from the galaxy centre.

This way we can explain without using the drawing force, how the energybundles coming from the magneto and from an iron item turn around the atomcore inside the magneto and an iron item scant half a round and are then thrown powerfully towards some atomcore, where they explode and move their
kinetic energy towards it.


:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #51 on: 29/11/2007 06:33:01 »
The overquantity and underquantity of the electrons



The so called electron quantity of atoms is based on how dense energywaves open up from the atomcore.

These waves make the energybundles that move in an area between atomcores to explode their energy towards the atomcores ect.

If some energybundle that moves in an area between atomcores cleans up with itself more energy opening up from the atomcore than it opens itself towards the atomcore, the atom can have a dificit of electron that stays.

That happens because from the atomcore there does not come so much energy that it would make the energybundles passing by the atomcore to explode their energy as much towards the atomcore ect.

If an energybundle that explodes in an atomcore is directed to the atomcore, it will open now more energy from the atomcore and this way the overquantity of the electron stays.

The overquantity of the electron stays because a denser energywave from the atomcore makes the energybundles passing by to explode more of their energy to the core of the atom ect.



:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #52 on: 30/11/2007 08:02:58 »
External pressure*
A stronger external pressure is directed to the black hole than to the other orbs.

This is because the massive and a little external surface possessive energybundles opening up from the black hole don´t have interaction with the expanding energybundles that pass by the black hole.

Now the expanding energybundles passing by the black hole push each other towards the black hole with the energywaves opening up from themselves. This is why more three-dimentionally expanding energybundles go towards the black hole.

They also move their kinetic energy more towards the pieces that locate nearby the black hole than the energybundles opening up from the black hole can move their kinetic energy towards the pieces close to the black hole.



:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #53 on: 14/12/2007 12:47:21 »
The charge of a corpuscule*

Why does the positively charged corpuscule bend at its track in a magnetic field?

The track of a corpuscule can bend only when the corpuscule explodes its energy more towards one side than the opposite.

The corpuscule holds its charge because the energy opening up from it makes the small energybundles coming towards it to unite as in cold fusion.

The energybundles opening up from the corpuscule clean the energywaves of the smaller energybundles that come towards the corpuscule with them away from the corpuscule. Now the small expanding energybundles coming towards the corpuscule don´t push themselves away from each other. They expand and reach out each other without actually moving towards each other.

The corpuscule itself continues to expand and this way it gets more exploding energybundle hits. This is why the corpuscule is able to keep its charge, still opening up energywaves, which make the energywaves coming towards the corpuscule thicker and the energybundles passing by to bend towards the corpuscule ect.

Let us think about that different kind of energywaves come from the magneto and these energywaves have for example lots of extremely small expanding energybundles. Now the energywaves that open up from positively charged corpuscule won´t be able to make the much smaller enrgybundles to bend towards the corpuscule.

This way the positively charged corpuscule explodes more of its energy away from the magneto and the orbit of a corpuscule bends a little towards the magneto.

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #54 on: 19/12/2007 10:39:55 »
Corpuscule?!?


The charge of a particle*
Why does the positively charged  particle bend at its track in a magnetic field?

The track of a particle can bend only when the particle explodes its energy more towards one side than the opposite.

The particle holds its charge because the energy opening up from it makes the small energybundles coming towards it to unite as in cold fusion.

The energybundles opening up from the particle clean the energywaves of the smaller energybundles that come towards the particle with them away from the particle. Now the small expanding energybundles coming towards the particle don´t push themselves away from each other. They expand and reach out each other without actually moving towards each other.

The particle itself continues to expand and this way it gets more exploding energybundle hits. This is why the particle is able to keep its charge, still opening up energywaves, which make the energywaves coming towards the particle thicker and the energybundles passing by to bend towards the particle ect.

Let us think about that different kind of energywaves come from the magneto and these energywaves have for example lots of extremely small expanding energybundles. Now the energywaves that open up from positively charged particle won´t be able to make the much smaller enrgybundles to bend towards the particle.

This way the positively charged particle explodes more of its energy away from the magneto and the orbit of a cparticle bends a little towards the magneto.

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #55 on: 21/12/2007 14:33:08 »
Photon in a optical fiber cable*
The light is possible to make move along the optical fibre cable even though the cable is wavekind bend.

The photons move in accordance with the cable, because in a curve they get more energy from the outer circle of the curve and this is how the photon explodes its energy towards the outer circle of the curve and makes the orbit to bend in accordance with the cable. Surely the cable is in an inner edge denser. The photon aspires to continue its movement straight ahead, but in a curve more energy comes towards it from the outer circle. Now the frontside of a photon that locates in a curve side begins to explode more of
its energy away from the photon and this way the orbit of a photon bends in accordance with the optical fibre cable.

In an double-slit experiment a sensitive sensor opens up denser energy from some zones and when a photon falls into a zone where denser energy comes towards, the photon starts to explode more of its energy forwards from its other side and this way it twists itself towards a zone where denser energy comes towards it. So in a space there exists in a away immaterial "optical fiber cables", through which the photons are guided towards certain zones in a sensitive sensor.

When one remembers that the photons themselves are three-dimentionally expanding, so to say exploding concentrations of energy its easy to understand that they make these zones to explode their energy more away from the sensitive sensor ect.

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #56 on: 24/12/2007 10:51:45 »
Maybe, maybe not?!?



E = m * c^2 * RT/(pV) * |c|


Units are E = kg * (m/s)^2 * 1 * 1

Now for the arithmetical operations' unit can have E = Joule (in other words J = kg * m^2 / s^2 )

?

Savor

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #57 on: 04/01/2008 10:37:11 »
Post from my friend



" Dear Sir,
>
> Here is a new theory suggesting that everything is energy.
>
> E = (mgh * ½mv^2) * RT/(pV) * |c|
>
>
> mgh = potential energy
> ½mv^2 = kinetic energy
> R = (gas) constant
> T = temperature
> p = pressure
> V = volume
> |c| = mass specific heat capacity, absolute value only
>
>
>
>
> Feel free to use, copy, review, do what ever You would like to do with this theory."

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #58 on: 10/01/2008 08:05:08 »
What about now?

E = (mgh + ½mv^2) * nRT/(pV) * |c|

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #59 on: 16/01/2008 05:42:35 »
GRAVITATION*
1. The surface of the expanding globe pushes us away from the centre of the globe in the same relation as we and everything else expand.

2. Energy flows as waves between the atomcores of the globe and the expanding eneregybundles in these waves get hits towards themselves from the from the energybundles that open up from the atomcores. That is why they open up their energy towards the atomcores and move this way their kinetic energy to the expanding atomcores.

3. There comes energywaves also from the space and these waves have energybundles that have had interaction with eachother by the energywaves that open up from themselves. From these energywaves that open up they have received themselves energyfields at the same principle than the centers of the galaxies have received energyfiels around them from the stars. So the stars have arised from the energywaves that come from the giant energy concentraions of the galaxy centres and can be assumed to be particles of a substance of larger size.  This way the energybundles comimg from the space move their kinetic energy more towards the atomcores of the globe than the energybundles that move between the atomcores of the globe do.

4. When one remembers that for example the energywaves opening up from the globe have interaction with the energywaves coming towards the globe, one can easily understand this theory. In other words to say, the energybundles that push themselves away from the globe clean / absorb with themselves the opening energywaves coming from the energybundles that move towards the globe. Now the energybundles moving towards the globe expand without pushing themselves away from each other. That is why a larger amount of them move towards the globe than would have moved if the globe did not open up energy as waves away from itself.

The external pressure towards the orb is so based on what kind of energywaves the orb itself opens up away from itself, because the energywaves opening away make the energy in a way to bend towards the orb.

The interior pressure pushing away from the orb is based on how massive small energybundles the piece itself opens up away from itself.

The smaller energybundles are, the less they get hits from the expanding energywaves of  the atomcores. The massiver and the smaller energybundles the orb itself opens up, the less they have interaction with the atomcores of the pieces nearby the orb and the less they move their kinetic energy towards them.

Simply it does not exist any so called drawing force. That is why it is unnecessary to even try to make an explanation how the so called drawing force would transfer.


:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #60 on: 31/01/2008 05:42:25 »
Freezing water*
Let us imagine that the expanding footballs are water molecules which open up expanding table tennis balls, so to say energy as waves in every direction.

When the temperature of the water is over four degrees, the table tennis balls are partly directed beyond the footballs nextby. Then a different amount of energy (=table tennis balls) is directed towards the footballs from different directions.

When the temperature of the water gets down under  four degrees, those table tennis balls are directed all the time less and less beyond the footballs nextby.

This happens because the table tennis balls coming towards twitch with them even smaller balls that open up from the table tennis balls and then these table tennis balls that move to a same direction don´t push themselves away from each other at the same relation as they expand themselves. Then the footballs expand faster than the table tennis balls coming towards them do spread.

Now a bigger and bigger part of the expanding table tennis balls hit to the expanding football nextby and this way the footballs finally lock out to expand side by side so to say the water freezes.

The more table tennis balls hit directly to the footballs nextby, the more energic the expanding footballs have strenght to push themselves away from each other and this is why the water expands when its temperature gets down under four degrees.

This is when towards the water there doesn´t come so much energy as waves outwards and this way the water molecules can find a well-balanced way to expand side by side.

PS. I describe the water molecules bigger than the energybundles locating in energywaves opening up from them are. Surely for example there exists a lot more energy in the atom cores than there is in electrons, but still the electrons cover the space more than the atom cores do. In so called electrons there exists considerably less dense energy than the energy in atom cores is.

When an electron coming from the atomcore nextby reaches the expanding atomcore, it moves to a denser form. The energywaves opening up from the separate expanding energybundles of the electron burn out when they meet energybundles opening up from the atomcore and then snatch themselves along them away from the atomcore towards which the electron is heading.This way the capacity of the
electron is reduced in a relation to the atomcore and finally the electron itself burns out to the energy
opening up from the atomcore and snatches with it away from the atomcore that it had just headed.

Later from that and from all the other energy coming outwards from the atomcore rises new electrons (according to my theory).

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #61 on: 17/02/2008 00:36:21 »
Entropy = Expanding stuff

Its meaning stuff who expanding all a time


It is that simple

Peace and love

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #62 on: 14/03/2008 22:27:03 »
A logical story
How do the particle coming from the space move their kinetic energy more
towards the atomcores of heavier substaces?

According to my theory this is how it should be, because a hammer drops to
the surface of the moon at the same time as the feather does!

The massiver the atomcore is, the denser energywaves it opens up and the
more it possesses so called electons.

The denser energywaves the expanding atomcore opens up, the more it makes
the expanding particle passing by to explode energy towards itself.

And this is how all the atoms get an equal amount of kinetic energy
(towards that piece in whose neighbourhood the atom locates) from the
expanding particles coming from the space.

When for example the surface of the globe simultaneously pushes itself away
from the centre of the globe, we don´t have to try to explain how the globe
draws the items towards itself. Everything can be explained with the
variation of the pressure. The pressure pushes all the expanding atoms of
the expanding globe away from the centre of the globe and the external
pressure keeps us on the surface of the expanding globe.

So you can forget all about the gravitation and start to wonder how the
universe really works.

The accelerating movement of all the substance away from one certain point
that is really far away from the visible universe, may take the visible
universe in a moment away from the space where it locates now and at the
same time all energy concentrations have had room to expand
three-dimentionally.

The speed of the galaxygroups that move ahead us accelerate faster than our
speed and their speed accelerates more the further they are from us. The
speed of the galaxygroups behind us accelerates in relation to us slower the
further behind us they move. Because of the expanding of the sector the
galaxygroups moving by the side of us draw away faster the further they
locate from us and this is how the common redshift can be explained without
a magical expanding of the space.

When the stars formely arised relatively all at the same time, the new light
did not meet with the light coming towards and this is how the expanding
photons could make their speed to accelerate easily at the same relation as
they expanded three-dimentionally. So the expanding photons also open up
energywaves with which they push eacother away from eachother. The old light
assembles for example when it comes towards the sun, because it meets energy
that comes towards it and makes the photons to explode their energy more
forwards in relation to the motiontrack. Still the common redshift of the
light does not vanish entirely from the old light.

Peace and love!

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #63 on: 03/04/2008 08:03:22 »
For example in the sun the energy is denser than outside the sun. In the
atom cores of the sun the energy is denser tham in an area between the atom
cores. In the protons and in the neutrons the energy is denser than in an
area between them. In the quarks the energy is denser than in an area
between the quarks ect.

When one can understand that all the energyconsentrations do expand  and
emit their energy, one can also understand that there is less dense energy
in the area between the energyconsentrations than in the
energyconsentrations themselves.

There is no reason to doubt that the neutrinos and the photons also do
expand and emit their energy according to the entropy.


Peace and love

:);):)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #64 on: 14/04/2008 09:43:14 »

*

Offline Alan McDougall

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1285
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #65 on: 06/07/2008 10:49:39 »
What???????????????????????????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Truth remains the Truth regardless of our beliefs or opinions the Truth is always the Truth even if we know it or do not know it (The Truth remains the Truth)

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #66 on: 10/07/2008 19:51:39 »
What ?

It that I am he which invented how macrocosm seriously functioned.

Truly this small truth from all to prove its that we are one and same energy. We him which experiences all matters our by way of and like this you too you are small part we him which experiences all our by way of.

Tätä Onesimpleprinciple thought was initially nice to work and develop! Just now when understand that all energy is quite probably one and same energy, understands that each from the thought hearing gets for itself burden!   If we are one and same energy, so then all which we do to our another, comes with the same done rather like to our self. Also all prayers of all persons are directed to us all. Then is futile accuses some outsider God from all dreadfulness. Then is futile to believe somewhere to the outside God.   Then should believe to his self and then held (?) Tell to all people this small truth from all, whereby knowledge of mankind grows and perhaps by way of that try better time to the all mankind!?!    Are we bad God / Luoja/Älykäs or silly ) designer?   We which Want to forget self ourselves and finally find ourselves?   If, so we are probably notso good mortal? What dreadfulness olemmakaan made self to our self? It is difficult to understand to make war, violence etc.    On the other hand eternity is rather long time. In eternity have time to experience one and another.   If we are one and same energy, so then we he we have at least experienced by way of the mankind, really in the rich colours pleasure and grief!   Everything is difficult to accept and understand!   Just are we he got punishment from each our act at the same time? If each act is directed to us to our self in other words if we he experiences all matters our by way of, so then so is!    If Onesimpleprinciple.com on the sides presented thought is right, so then everyone which slow to common knowledge coming of this thought, slows its time whereby persons around world start to help another each others unselfishly. Time whereby we do matters together to our self in other words to all people! Time whereby person is not predator to another to people!    If you are sure that with these on the sides presented thought pictures wrong mode of action of macrocosm. You can forget its happily. The self find _________________ Olemmeko ourselves? Do they be connected different religions and science already our during?   
      
 Savor




Man/Woman can fall ill so that together in the human body is many different person. If one from the persons to perceive that perhaps they also are all the same person, can this one person continues in the same body their condition other with different persons , without trying tell them truth so that they are all the same person? If different persons besides try to damage another each others even though they have same body, so do hold possible truth seer to become silent and try to live own canting their truth, piittamatta from right truth? Or should he after all try to tell this possible truth to the even one different person?   



*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #67 on: 30/08/2008 17:33:51 »
More than in this proof to it from the expansive Sun radiates expansive neutrino, which move to their kineticenergy Globe to expansive to the atoms' cores. Neutrino so expand and radiate enegy away towards themselves. Produce radiation can't observe. Let think about galaxies to be big neutrino! In the galaxies' centres are colossal particle which is developed themselves round from the energy field's star which radiate extremely small particle in the relationship galaxy centre to colossal energiaconcentration (to big vestige). Galaxies so are big particles which are originated really a long distance visible outside visible universe , as being energy from concentrating on which still to explode and radiates energy waves which have galaxies personality. On his journey galaxies centres explode energyconcentration have interacted themselves avutuvien with the energy waves , which have atom personality. Stars so are originated from the galaxy's centre and they radiate to their energy and so on. At same time in the way to the neutrino born around themselves energy field and to the herring!

Now pioneerproblem gets their explanation so that from Sun come neutrino interact it with the more atoms cores, what further off from Sun they get, because they have time to interact with each other and develop for itself energy field which radiates neutrino business energy to the atoms' cores!

In other words should pioneerprobes of expansive speed then accelerate according to this thought ? Yes, but expansive gas planets the pace picks up more and like this pioneerprobes is observed towards the inexplicable acceleration, Sun!

In other words expansive neutrino don't move to their kineticenergy of fixed to the atoms' cores so much as gaseous ingredients.

Crucial is of course understand it that in the planets' centre is hard pressure and neutrino move to their business energy to the planets' centres powerfully and from there its come across atom from the atom to all to the planets' atoms and also to the planets' moons. Truly moons atoms get business energy from the neutrino also direct!

http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?no_d2=1&sid=08/08/29/1227239

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #68 on: 23/09/2008 07:38:32 »
The evidence is increasing all the time!

The entire visible universe of energy is coming from one direction and moving in any direction.

Now, the background radiation has been detected differences in support for this idea!


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7440217.stm


Detailed measurements made by the satellite have shown that the fluctuations in the microwave background are about 10% stronger on one side of the sky than those on the other.

Sean Carroll conceded that this might just be a coincidence, but pointed out that a natural explanation for this discrepancy would be if it represented a structure inherited from our universe's parent.

Meanwhile, Professor Carroll urged cosmologists to broaden their horizons: "We're trained to say there was no time before the Big Bang, when we should say that we don't know whether there was anything - or if there was, what it was."

If the Caltech team's work is correct, we may already have the first information about what came before our own Universe.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnmQWMLv53Q



.

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
It is time to wake up, you cardboard!
« Reply #69 on: 25/09/2008 18:57:57 »
Evidence of the claims / predictions!





Opposition 1

Neutrino transfer the kinetic energy of atoms in kernels.

Proof

http://arxivblog.com/?p=596

Opposition 2

The entire visible universe of energy is moving away from one point on which is really far away from the visible universe outside!

Proof 1

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7440217.stm

Proof 2

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/080923-dark-flows.html
« Last Edit: 05/05/2009 21:25:40 by BenV »

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #70 on: 26/09/2008 07:27:41 »
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l2

"Because the MOVEMENT takes place towards a less dense area, then the visible universe MOVES as an entity away from that one point that is really far away from the visible universe and where the energy is much denser than it is in a visible universe."







As if the mysteries of dark matter and dark energy weren't vexing enough, another baffling cosmic puzzle has been discovered.

Patches of matter in the universe seem to be moving at very high speeds and in a uniform direction that can't be explained by any of the known gravitational forces in the observable universe. Astronomers are calling the phenomenon "dark flow."

The stuff that's pulling this matter must be outside the observable universe, researchers conclude.

When scientists talk about the observable universe, they don't just mean as far out as the eye, or even the most powerful telescope, can see. In fact there's a fundamental limit to how much of the universe we could ever observe, no matter how advanced our visual instruments. The universe is thought to have formed about 13.7 billion years ago. So even if light started travelling toward us immediately after the Big Bang, the farthest it could ever get is 13.7 billion light-years in distance. There may be parts of the universe that are farther away (we can't know how big the whole universe is), but we can't see farther than light could travel over the entire age of the universe.

Mysterious motions

Scientists discovered the flow by studying some of the largest structures in the cosmos: giant clusters of galaxies. These clusters are conglomerations of about a thousand galaxies, as well as very hot gas which emits X-rays. By observing the interaction of the X-rays with the cosmic microwave background (CMB), which is leftover radiation from the Big Bang, scientists can study the movement of clusters.

The X-rays scatter photons in the CMB, shifting its temperature in an effect known as the kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect. This effect had not been observed as a result of galaxy clusters before, but a team of researchers led by Alexander Kashlinsky, an astrophysicist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., found it when they studied a huge catalogue of 700 clusters, reaching out up to 6 billion light-years, or half the universe away. They compared this catalogue to the map of the CMB taken by NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) satellite.

They discovered that the clusters were moving nearly 2 million mph (3.2 million kph) toward a region in the sky between the constellations of Centaurus and Vela. This motion is different from the outward expansion of the universe (which is accelerated by the force called dark energy).

"We found a very significant velocity, and furthermore, this velocity does not decrease with distance, as far as we can measure," Kashlinsky told SPACE.com. "The matter in the observable universe just cannot produce the flow we measure."

Inflationary bubble

The scientists deduced that whatever is driving the movements of the clusters must lie beyond the known universe.

A theory called inflation posits that the universe we see is just a small bubble of space-time that got rapidly expanded after the Big Bang. There could be other parts of the cosmos beyond this bubble that we cannot see.

In these regions, space-time might be very different, and likely doesn't contain stars and galaxies (which only formed because of the particular density pattern of mass in our bubble). It could include giant, massive structures much larger than anything in our own observable universe. These structures are what researchers suspect are tugging on the galaxy clusters, causing the dark flow.

"The structures responsible for this motion have been pushed so far away by inflation, I would guesstimate they may be hundreds of billions of light years away, that we cannot see even with the deepest telescopes because the light emitted there could not have reached us in the age of the universe," Kashlinsky said in a telephone interview. "Most likely to create such a coherent flow they would have to be some very strange structures, maybe some warped space time. But this is just pure speculation."

Surprising find

Though inflation theory forecasts many odd facets of the distant universe, not many scientists predicted the dark flow.

"It was greatly surprising to us and I suspect to everyone else," Kashlinsky said. "For some particular models of inflation you would expect these kinds of structures, and there were some suggestions in the literature that were not taken seriously I think until now."

The discovery could help scientists probe what happened to the universe before inflation, and what's going on in those inaccessible realms we cannot see.


http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/080923-dark-flows.html

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Re: It is time to wake up, you cardboard!
« Reply #71 on: 26/09/2008 07:30:31 »
"Because the MOVEMENT takes place towards a less dense area, then the visible universe MOVES as an entity away from that one point that is really far away from the visible universe and where the energy is much denser than it is in a visible universe."

As if the mysteries of dark matter and dark energy weren't vexing enough, another baffling cosmic puzzle has been discovered.

Patches of matter in the universe seem to be moving at very high speeds and in a uniform direction that can't be explained by any of the known gravitational forces in the observable universe. Astronomers are calling the phenomenon "dark flow."

The stuff that's pulling this matter must be outside the observable universe, researchers conclude.

When scientists talk about the observable universe, they don't just mean as far out as the eye, or even the most powerful telescope, can see. In fact there's a fundamental limit to how much of the universe we could ever observe, no matter how advanced our visual instruments. The universe is thought to have formed about 13.7 billion years ago. So even if light started travelling toward us immediately after the Big Bang, the farthest it could ever get is 13.7 billion light-years in distance. There may be parts of the universe that are farther away (we can't know how big the whole universe is), but we can't see farther than light could travel over the entire age of the universe.

Mysterious motions

Scientists discovered the flow by studying some of the largest structures in the cosmos: giant clusters of galaxies. These clusters are conglomerations of about a thousand galaxies, as well as very hot gas which emits X-rays. By observing the interaction of the X-rays with the cosmic microwave background (CMB), which is leftover radiation from the Big Bang, scientists can study the movement of clusters.

The X-rays scatter photons in the CMB, shifting its temperature in an effect known as the kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect. This effect had not been observed as a result of galaxy clusters before, but a team of researchers led by Alexander Kashlinsky, an astrophysicist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., found it when they studied a huge catalogue of 700 clusters, reaching out up to 6 billion light-years, or half the universe away. They compared this catalogue to the map of the CMB taken by NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) satellite.

They discovered that the clusters were moving nearly 2 million mph (3.2 million kph) toward a region in the sky between the constellations of Centaurus and Vela. This motion is different from the outward expansion of the universe (which is accelerated by the force called dark energy).

"We found a very significant velocity, and furthermore, this velocity does not decrease with distance, as far as we can measure," Kashlinsky told SPACE.com. "The matter in the observable universe just cannot produce the flow we measure."

Inflationary bubble

The scientists deduced that whatever is driving the movements of the clusters must lie beyond the known universe.

A theory called inflation posits that the universe we see is just a small bubble of space-time that got rapidly expanded after the Big Bang. There could be other parts of the cosmos beyond this bubble that we cannot see.

In these regions, space-time might be very different, and likely doesn't contain stars and galaxies (which only formed because of the particular density pattern of mass in our bubble). It could include giant, massive structures much larger than anything in our own observable universe. These structures are what researchers suspect are tugging on the galaxy clusters, causing the dark flow.

"The structures responsible for this motion have been pushed so far away by inflation, I would guesstimate they may be hundreds of billions of light years away, that we cannot see even with the deepest telescopes because the light emitted there could not have reached us in the age of the universe," Kashlinsky said in a telephone interview. "Most likely to create such a coherent flow they would have to be some very strange structures, maybe some warped space time. But this is just pure speculation."

Surprising find

Though inflation theory forecasts many odd facets of the distant universe, not many scientists predicted the dark flow.

"It was greatly surprising to us and I suspect to everyone else," Kashlinsky said. "For some particular models of inflation you would expect these kinds of structures, and there were some suggestions in the literature that were not taken seriously I think until now."

The discovery could help scientists probe what happened to the universe before inflation, and what's going on in those inaccessible realms we cannot see.


http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/080923-dark-flows.html
« Last Edit: 05/05/2009 21:26:13 by BenV »

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark
« Reply #72 on: 27/09/2008 06:20:03 »
Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of undeclared?

Would you have been able to predict in this video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t4ywHC71P7c

through

Dark flow phenomenon?

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/080923-dark-flows. html





*

Offline DoctorBeaver

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 12656
  • A stitch in time would have confused Einstein.
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple predicting the flow of Dark
« Reply #73 on: 27/09/2008 08:11:13 »
That YouTube video is just plain ridiculous. Whoever made it understands neither physics nor cosmology. Quasars could be galaxies beyond the visible universe? If they're beyond the visible then, by definition, they must be invisible. And what does "invisible" mean? Yes, WE CAN'T SEE THEM!

The 2nd link doesn't work.
Fledgling science site at http://www.sciencefile.org/SF/content/view/54/98/ needs members and original articles. If you can help, please join.

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Re: It is time to wake up, you cardboard!
« Reply #74 on: 28/09/2008 14:17:02 »
You should look about that video and some other!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pF41G3gGYHA

http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=Etimespace

Here i told 28.5.2008, there can be phenomena like dark flow. Lets using google translation!

"The baby Galaxies

http://www.ursa.fi/blogit/ta/index.php?title=hubble_paljasti_massiiviset_vauvagalaksi&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1


Maybe these baby galaxies are from different energyconcentration than older galaxies. If so, then the baby galaxies could be moves to detect this.

Both concentrations of energy, therefore, are located in the visible universe outside and they are expanded, and emit energy waves with a galaxy nature.

Heitämpä So ilmoille suspicion here!

RemonttiJukteri"
« Last Edit: 05/05/2009 21:26:37 by BenV »

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Redshifting ( no doppler) with entropy
« Reply #76 on: 13/11/2008 07:30:42 »
When star born, it was different kind of situation for light what we have today!

When the stars are born, was moving in space, much less fotoneita than today. The old light is not faced with very little light to the future! How does that seemed to light and how the current situation now affects arising from the light?



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrePNnvzvQg



.

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Bose-Einstein condensate!
« Reply #77 on: 18/02/2009 12:51:18 »
Bose-Einstein condensate!

Could it be possible that the particles of a laserbeam absorb the energy
radiating from the expanding qvarks with them?
This way energy radiating from the separate atomcores can not reach the
expanding atomcores nextby?

After that expanding qvarks of the separately expanding atomcores overlapp.

An energyconcentration that has composed of very dense energy has born and its hot / dense energy is able to keep itself hot / dense.
This way the energy of Bosen-Einstein condensate does not radiate nearly at all its energy away from itself!

(Maybe later The expanding qvarks have locked themselves to expand side by side?)

In the area between the expanding qvarks the moving photon meets so much dense energy that its movement slows down significantly.

For example the speed of a runner slows down involuntarily when the runner meets a traffic jam, but as soon as the runner meets a less dense space that does not transform, he can accelerate his speed. To accelerate his speed the runner must transform his body energyto a less dense energy! In other words the runner must make the substance that he consists of to transform faster than usually in a certain area to a less dense energy.

If the energy f a photon passing through the Bosen-Einstein condensate does not transform it is based on the fact that the particules are able to
recycle the energy they meet! Also the cores of expanding atoms are able to recycle the energy coming towards the core!













Did you know that everything that exists, it is one and the same thing which we canname energy.

This energy is not the matter, instead it is what exists inside of the atomic
nucleus of the matter and its density changes all the time to less density.

When there is no energy coming from outside, then it gets cold because the energy emission does not get from the atomic nucleus more of this energy to burst.For this reason, throughout expanding atomic nucleus do not push themselves away from each other so powerfully as earlier, at which point that into the atomic nucleus comes more of this energy in particles.

At the end, the so called quarks existing in different atomic nucleus interlace and form a quark unit.
Also, the energy existing inside the quarks changes all the time to less dense energy,moreover quarks burst out energy waves.

In the center of a quark unit big enough arises a sufficient pressure, whereupon quarks get to burst a lot of
energy towards each other. Therefore this quark unit starts to emit abondant energy from itself.
This way from the absolute zero we jump straight to high temperatures.

Let's talk about temperature in the absence of atom's oscillations, but rather how much energy one piece emits.
Also there is a meaning about the density of the emission: How the particles are and how close they are to one another.







.






Hot in the direction of cold!

Dense in the direction of a less dense space!

The space does not change!

The energy transforms to a less dense energy!

At the same time an energy that is transforming to a less dense energy, pushes itself towards an area where exists less energy. This happens because the energy transforming to less dense doesn´t have te room to stay in a equally small area that doesn´t change.

Also the energy in the qvarks transforms all the time into a less dense energy.

From outside there doesn´t come almost at all energy towards the atomcores when reaching the absolute zero point. To atomcores in which the energy transforms all the time into a less dense energy. This way the expanding
atomcores do not expload their energy towards each other and they don´t push themselves away from each other so powerfully.

Eventually the qvarks of the separate atomcores interlock with each other. A big consentration of the qvarks has developed. Also in the middle of the centre a pressure has been developed. This pressure is based on a fact that
the qvarks radiate their energy towards each other. With this energy they push themselves away from each other according to the same relation as they expand.

An adequate pressure is developed in the middle of the big expanding consentration of the qvarks and this pressure makes the qvarks to explode a lot of their energy towards each other.

This is why a lot of energy begins to burst / radiate from the qvark consentration.

This is how extremely cold turns in a moment into extremely hot.

The heath is not a atomcores. The vibration of the atoms is consequence of outward coming energy that reaches the atomcores.

The so called "Caloric" is not a chemical element.

"Caloric" is the one and the same thing that exists in all atomcores. It can be called energy. Or with any other name.
Energy transforms all the time to a less dense energy in a space that does not change.

Also the movement of all the atoms of the world happens towards cold in other words towards a space where is less energy!
The expanding atoms push themselves towards a less dense area in space.

The energy of the planets push themself away from the sun in a curved orbit. There is more and denser energy than outside the sun.

The stars push themselves in a curved orbit away from the centre of the galaxy where is more and denser energy than in the outside of the galaxy.

The energy of the visible universe pushes itself away from the area that exists really far outside the visible universe.In that area there exists more and denser energy than in the visible universe. Outside that area energy is less denser.

The energy of the visible universe pushes itself towards the cold. In other words towards a less dense area in a space that does not change.
« Last Edit: 20/02/2009 06:45:22 by JukriS »

*

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
Re: Bose-Einstein condensate!
« Reply #78 on: 18/02/2009 16:28:29 »
The modern theory of Quantum_chromodynamics is your mainstream competitor in Quark theory.

I notice you spell your hypothetical particles qvarks. I'm not sure if it is an invention of yours, or are you developing a new version of QCD?  It might be helpful if you look over the huge body of experimental evidence that exists. Any new theory would have to be compatible with those experiments.

Quote from: the link
Quantum chromodynamics (abbreviated as QCD) is a theory of the strong interaction (color force), a fundamental force describing the interactions of the quarks and gluons making up hadrons (such as the proton, neutron or pion). It is the study of the SU(3) Yang–Mills theory of color-charged fermions (the quarks). QCD is a quantum field theory of a special kind called a non-abelian gauge theory. It is an important part of the Standard Model of particle physics. A huge body of experimental evidence for QCD has been gathered over the years.
« Last Edit: 18/02/2009 16:33:47 by Vern »

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Re: Bose-Einstein condensate!
« Reply #79 on: 20/02/2009 06:44:52 »
Sorry! Quarks, of course! I think, that quarks are same kind o expanding energyconcentration who emit expanding energy...



I write that for some other dude!

"
You cant see, heard, taste, feel or smell space or

angel, doll, seraph, cherub

So, it is empty statement to say. space expanding!

You cant make any test with space!
If some thing changing in any way, it stay some location/position, where that thing can changing.

Energy changing in space who dont changing, you know?

If space changing, space post to be some place, where space can changing.

So, you have a very stupid theory!

You have a energy who change in space who change some place?


Maybe our energy it is that space who expanding in back space who dont change!


If you are stupid like people before Kopernikus and Calileo Calilei, who believe that Sun take a round, you can forget my right idea.


You BELIEVE expanding space, even you cant make any test with space!



You cant see how space expanding!

You see how old light it is redshifting, because photons expanding and emit energy and with that energy expanding photons pushing themselfs and thats why old light it is redshifting!



And yes. Sun energy making now energyball, who have a 9 - 10 billion light years diameter/splitter.

So, thats proof, Sun energy expanding all a time!

Also all atoms nucleus energy expanding all a time.


You cant told how atom nucleu can hang electrons some orbit!

Electrons dont stay outside atom nucleus!

Electrons moving to next atom nucleus and get that expanding more energy outside expanding atom nucleus......"

.

*

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
Bose-Einstein condensate!
« Reply #80 on: 20/02/2009 12:26:22 »
You must be losing a lot of content in the translation to English; it is difficult for me to get the gist of your post. You say you don't like the idea of space expanding; I don't like that idea either. So now we have a problem. How do we explain the observations that seem to indicate that space is expanding?

Right now an alternative good and solid explanation does not exist. So, whether we accept the expansion as real or not, we have to pay attention to it. Most physicists seem to feel strongly that the expansion of space is real.

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #81 on: 07/03/2009 07:46:33 »
Solar commas / gas planets commas / tornadoes hurricanes

sunspots / gasplanets spots / tornados / hurricanes

The pressure variation.

Pressure changing.


Space counting particles that penetrate the solar / gasplanets and rock planets in.

they increase the amount of energy that comes out of the sun / gas planets / rock planets!

Sometimes, the energy starts to be diverted out from a specific region. This creates the river of energy that causes these phenomena. When the sun out of future energy river is up, the weather Sunspot.

Jupiter in this energy river continues to flow out of the same area all the time. Jupiter's red spot, you know!


www.onesimpleprinciple.com site is the old text. I need to update your site such as the phenomena of context!


Atoms nucleus expanding, emit energywaves who have a nature of expanding electrons and expanding particle who also emit expanding energy!

We can explain everything with pressure fo changing!


.
« Last Edit: 07/03/2009 07:49:07 by JukriS »

*

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #82 on: 07/03/2009 13:43:59 »
If we dont know how gravity working, we have to ask, is there any gravity at all
I am confident you are correct. There is no gravity: the Earth sucks.

Very appropriate; I vote best post in thread [:)]


*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Maybe that new idea from Savo is right one?

http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/41615/description/Effects_of_the_weather%2C_underground

Atoms nucleus expanding and emit energywaves who have a nature of expanding electrons and expanding particle who also emit expanding energy!

Electrons just moving with light speed to the next expanding atoms nucleus and get this one expanding energy normal quiclier etc. In liguid and gas, that energy can moving long way and get some molecul expanding more energy some other direction and thats why molecul can moving between other expanding molecul in liguid and gas!

http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l2


*

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
That is an interesting link JukriS. I mean the one about detecting muons from deep within an old iron mine. I can't get much out of your concept, however. I can't imagine electrons moving at the speed of light. It has been suggested in some speculative musings that negotiation for photon exchange between electrons might take place at the speed of light, then once the deal is made, the actual transfer is instantaneous.

If I glean correctly, you seem to be suggesting that everything in the universe is expanding. So we here on earth feel the earth's expansion as gravity. I have trouble making that scenario work. How would the property of matter called inertia fit into that concept?

Your link about the underground weather study brings a thought to mind; in the study they measure muons. Muons are just a small piece of the air molecule that underwent fission. All the other constituents of the air molecule must be somewhere undetected.
« Last Edit: 12/03/2009 12:44:33 by Vern »

*

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
Well, you have had a busy time making videos [:)] I have so far looked at five or so of them. Let me see if I have the concept.

The major premise seems to be that space is expanding; this includes the space inside molecules, atoms, and quarks. With that premise you explain gravity as acceleration we feel from the expanding earth. Then you go on to show that the premise can explain other observables in the universe.

First, I would ask: Why do you find it necessary to rethink physics? There must be some part of the mainstream thinking that you find totally unacceptable. You need to explain what that is. I would find it difficult to accept the notion that all of space is expanding at an expanding rate, and has been doing so for billions of years.


*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Dark energy and Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #86 on: 14/03/2009 10:58:04 »
Space is not expanding or curving.

Atoms expand in space, which is not expanding!

if you do the test particles, and you want to see them pass on the kinetic-energy songs, you have to remember also expanding particles and radiating energy.

The new particles are the hot / dense and have little external surface in relation to the amount of energy which they contain.

That is why the new particles do not affect the interaction of atoms with the cores.

Old-particle interactions seem more. To transfer energy to atoms nucleus. (kinetic energy or heat energy. Whatever you want.)

This explains why the dark energy does not exist. There is only one and the same energy.

Distant galaxy will be the particles are changed travel during not so much high-density energy. They are bigger in relation to the amount of energy which they contain. They radiate their energy faster. They share more energy, that makes them explode more energy away from self, etc. New hot / dense particle time is slow!


The old light photons have time to become less high-density energy, and they are radiating energy to each other. In the energy of photons are pushing each other out away from each other. In this way the light is stretched. Overall, the Red has moved/redshifting, you know!
« Last Edit: 05/05/2009 23:02:07 by BenV »

*

Offline BenV

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 1503
    • View Profile
Re: Dark energy and Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #87 on: 14/03/2009 12:51:36 »
Jukri - please keep the discussion of one topic to one thread, rather than starting new ones - it helps people to follow and understand if all of the replies are in one place.

I'll lock this thread  and merge the others together.

Thanks!

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #88 on: 14/03/2009 19:15:09 »
For example, the Sun will change with time by red giant!

The same phenomenon in a micro world. Also the particles are changing with time by "red giant". Receive more hits and more explosive energy away from themselves! Kinetic energy, you know!

Just think, a little explosion microcosmos supernova! Begins to move the kinetisenergy, with power!
« Last Edit: 14/03/2009 19:16:54 by JukriS »

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #89 on: 14/03/2009 19:15:39 »
Space is not expanding or curving.

Atoms expand in space, which is not expanding!

if you do the test particles, and you want to see them pass on the kinetic-energy songs, you have to remember also expanding particles and radiating energy.

The new particles are the hot / dense and have little external surface in relation to the amount of energy which they contain.

That is why the new particles do not affect the interaction of atoms with the cores.

Old-particle interactions seem more. To transfer energy to atoms nucleus. (kinetic energy or heat energy. Whatever you want.)

This explains why the dark energy does not exist. There is only one and the same energy.

Distant galaxy will be the particles are changed travel during not so much high-density energy. They are bigger in relation to the amount of energy which they contain. They radiate their energy faster. They share more energy, that makes them explode more energy away from self, etc. New hot / dense particle time is slow!


The old light photons have time to become less high-density energy, and they are radiating energy to each other. In the energy of photons are pushing each other out away from each other. In this way the light is stretched. Overall, the Red has moved/redshifting, you know!


http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l2

*

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #90 on: 14/03/2009 22:18:18 »
Okay; I think I'm getting the concept. You have flat space-time in the classic sense. Space is not expanding but everything in space is expanding.

I'll have to work on understanding how that develops into the explanations you provide.

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Onesimpleprinciple
« Reply #91 on: 16/03/2009 12:24:01 »


Black holes time is very slowly!

Also black holes expanding and emit high energy particle who also expanding slowly and thats why they dont interactive with expanding atoms nucleus. They dont giving kineticenergy for atoms nucleus!

Thats why expanding black holes eat everything! because black holes dont push expanding stuff far away from expanding black holes!

There is mystery for today science. High energy particle. There is coming some wave of high energy particle and then is take a time and finally coming new wave etc. Just remember, black holes time is very slowly!



Space* » Black holes*
Black holes*
The Interaction / The Black Holes

How do the orbs interact with each other?

They open up energywaves, by which they interact with each other.

The less the orb has exterior surface, the less it interacts with other pieces. Also the density of energy matters as well.

In a energy concentration there can be a lot of energy, although it would have just a little exterior surface in relation to other orbs.

The denser the energy in an orb is, the less it has exterior surface in relation to the quantity of energy.

The less exterior surface, the slower the energy opens up away from the orb and the less it interacts with other orbs.

The denser the energy of a piece is, the more efficient it stops to itself for example the neutrinos coming from the stars and also the less there comes neutrinos away from the piece.

There woun´t come any neutrinos of the stars from the direction of a black hole, because they stop themselves to a black hole.

However, towards the black hole there move neutrinos all the time and they expand and open up energywaves, while transfering their kinetic energy with them to the orbs.

From the pieces that move near the black hole loose more neutrinos from the side that it away from the black hole. This is how a certain exterior pressure is formed around the black hole.

The closer to the black hole the piece is, the less energybundles come from backside of the black holes and the stronger the exterior pressure is.

When one understands that all the energy concentrations expand and open up energywaves that have the nature of expanding energyconcentration, one can undestand that the black hole does not draw other pieces towards itself. It devours all the other pieces, because it expands and pushes pieces that locate nearby away from itself slower than the pieces and the black hole itsel do expand.

However, some of the black holes are in a way in a diet. They push the gas that locates nearby away from themselves faster than they expand.

Someone may wonder, why the black hole finally begins to reject the pieces that approach the black hole faster than the black hole and the piece themselves expand. It is based on a fact, that allthough the black hole opens up slowly its energy, do these dense energywaves have large energic particles, which also transfer their kinetic energy with energywaves opening up from themselves towards the expanding atomcores of other orbs.

The modern physics does not understand these large energic particles. According to my theory, the speed of these large energic particles has accelerated just because of the fact, that they also do expand and open up energywaves by which they can make the large energic particles in front of them to speed up all the time.Their speed accelerates slower than the speed of the photons. Correspondingly their speed slows down slower than the photons speed when they move for example towards the sun. The speed of a ship accelerates slower than the speed of a boat. The speed of the ship also slows down slower than the speed of a boat.

This way it is easy to understand how the expanding star that pushes itself away from the expanding black hole explodes a lot of its energy towards the black hole. Those opening and expanding energybudles that come from the expanding black hole make the expanding atoms of a star explode faster than normally. It achieves an illusion that the black hole absorbs with some kind of gravitation from a star the mass of a star towards itself.

In fact, the energy coming from the black hole makes the expanding star to explode its energy much stronger than normally. With this energy that explodes towards the black hole it pushes itself away from the expanding black hole in a curved orbit.

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Nanoclusters seem to skirt physics law
« Reply #92 on: 18/04/2009 11:42:50 »
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/42877/title/Nanoclusters_seem_to_skirt_physics_law



"In simulations, tiny loophole allows colliding nanoclusters to increase speed after impact
By Laura Sanders
Web edition : Friday, April 17th, 2009
font_down font_up Text Size
access
Enlargemagnify
FAST GETAWAYIn simulations, nanoclusters made up of several hundred atoms occasionally rebounded with more energy than each started with.Hiroto Kuninaka and Hisao Hayakawa

Nobody’s above the law. But tiny clusters of colliding atoms may duck below the second law of thermodynamics. In simulations, researchers in Japan found that in rare cases, tiny clusters of atoms ricochet off each other faster than their approaching speeds. The results, which appeared in the March Physical Review E, seem to violate the second law’s requirement that any work squanders a little bit of energy in the form of waste heat, leaving the system a little more disheveled, with higher entropy.

In collisions big enough to see, like those between a tennis ball and a gym floor, the speed of an object’s approach is always faster than its speed after impact. A tennis ball dropped against the floor bounces a little slower and comes up shorter on each bounce because a small amount of the ball’s energy is siphoned off in the form of waste heat.

In the nanoworld, though, the new results suggest that normal rules do not always apply.

Researchers Hisao Hayakawa, of Kyoto University, and Hiroto Kuninaka, of Chuo University in Tokyo, developed a computer program to model head-on collisions of squishy clusters of several hundred atoms called nanoclusters. At speeds between 3 and 5 meters per second (less than 12 miles per hour), most of the clusters in the simulation stuck together like two candied apples in the sun. Others just bumped into each other and moved away at a slower rate than their approach, like two colliding bocce balls on a lawn.

But about 5 percent of the time, the colliding nanoclusters actually sped up after bumping, exhibiting what the researchers call a super rebound. During these rebounds, the outgoing energy exceeds the incoming energy, meaning that in these collisions, the system overall lost entropy, hence the apparent second law violation.

“It’s an interesting observation. For me, it was also counterintuitive,” comments Jörn Dunkel, a theoretical physicist at the University of Oxford in England.

This super bounce comes from the random internal fluctuations of motions in the atoms that make up each nanocluster, the study researchers say. Depending on the exact motions, some fluctuations can give the collision an extra boost, like an extra springy trampoline.

But this extra boost only works in tiny systems, not trampolines, which are made up of zillions of atoms. “Nanoscale physics involves such unexpected events,” says Hayakawa.

When the researchers increased the size of each nanocluster in the simulation to over 1,000 atoms, the super bounce disappeared entirely. “In order to see a violation of the second law, you need a very small number,” says Dunkel.

These clusters get around the second law of thermodynamics on a statistical technicality: The average speed of all the outgoing nanoclusters is less than the approaching speed. Even though individual nanoclusters appear to violate the second law occasionally, the average behavior of all the nanoclusters falls squarely in line with the law’s constraints.

The second law statistically describes large collections of atoms, like those in a tennis ball. Tiny groups of atoms, which are susceptible to large energy fluctuations, live outside of the second law. Just as a person can’t break a law that isn’t on the books, individual nanoclusters can’t really violate the second law in a meaningful way.

Furthermore, Dunkel points out, the simulation is conducted in a perfect world. The real world, however, is messy, with things like oddly-shaped objects, variable temperature, and worst of all, gravity. These confounding imperfections make a real experiment tough. 

“It’s difficult to experimentally realize the conditions,” says Dunkel. “I wouldn’t say it’s unrealizable, just demanding.” To precisely control the temperature, shape and initial speed of the nanoclusters will be a challenge.

But Hayakawa thinks that experimentalists will see this effect soon. “I believe that it will not take a long time to report the super rebound of nanoclusters in experiments,” he says.

And once researchers have observed the super rebound, Hayakawa and Kuninaka plan to test whether it is possible to extract the surplus energy from these rebounds. To do so, a macroscopic machine will be needed to convert the surplus energy from the microscale super rebounds. But such a task will be difficult, since this conversion will eat up all the energy gained in the first place, says Hayakawa."





Photon is not reflected in self-atom on.

Photon does not start up in no time at the speed of light. Its energy is the accelerated pace away from the expansion of the atomic core/nuclei.

Photon will go towards the expansion of the atomic cores, and will then in the future of energy-wave pressure variation when a new photon. In fact, the core of atom towards reaching photon to return to "the end", that is absorbed by atoms in the core for future energy-waves, etc.

This phenomenon, therefore, can be explained so that the material away from the future and more quickly than the substance of the moving atoms, have the NOT same atoms as the material moved the atoms were.

The substance is moving towards the atoms of a substance in the outer surface of the atoms with interlocked and cause hard-pressed surface of the substance of the atoms and deeper in between the atoms, when the energy becomes less strong high-density power and energy of this substance in the surface of the atoms ejected faster pace away from the material as the material gone atoms moved towards the material.

The simple matter was multiplied complicated.

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Nanoclusters seem to skirt physics law
« Reply #93 on: 18/04/2009 11:43:36 »
The mountains*
Neal Adams has developed "Theory of Expanding Planets"-model about how the planets expand three-dimentionally. According to Neal once the wasnt just one continent rounded by a sea, but the old continents were the only surface of the globe.´The three-dimentional expanding has torn apart the continents from each other. Neal doesn´t talk about accelerated expanding, so his theory needs gravitation.

According to my theory there is no observable expanding if there is not enough variation of the pressure.

Once for example a supernova explosion that happened nearby the globe brought an energywave dence enough towards the globe. The energic energybudles of this wave pushed themselves through the atomcores of the
globe deep inside the globe (for example up to ten kilometres). These energybudles cleaned with them energywaves coming from the atomcores. The expanding atoms of the globe that located outside this area, pushed the atomcores of that area closer to each other. At the same time the expanding atomcores of that area expanded close to each other like in cold fusion. This is how heavier substaces originate and in this case I mean the shelf.

If the separate energybudles of a energypulse that came towards the globe were quarks or protons/neutrons, they would have brought more substance deep underneath the globes surface. This developes a pressure that is bigger than normally to that area and this pressure accelerates the substace of that area to push itself away from the focal point of the globe. This is how the mountains developed. This excess pressure makes also the globe to expand in that area so much that it is noticeable afterwards.

*

Offline chris

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 5392
  • The Naked Scientist
    • View Profile
    • The Naked Scientists
Nanoclusters seem to skirt physics law
« Reply #94 on: 18/04/2009 12:39:55 »
What are you actually asking?

It would help if you could condense your post into a succinct question, which should also form the thread title. This is our forum policy.

This will ensure that more people respond to your post.

Chris
I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception - Groucho Marx

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Nanoclusters seem to skirt physics law
« Reply #95 on: 18/04/2009 13:27:33 »
My question.

Am I right?

Space is not expanding.

Atoms in the nucleus, the energy expands.

Atoms in the kernel/nucleus of the energy makes the whole period of work or energy straightens or explode or expand all a time in space who dont change at all!

Is this the case?

Extra space dimensions does not exist!

Is this the case?

Space is not curving!

Is this the case?

There is no dark matter at all!

Is this the case?

There is no dark energy at all!

Is this the case?
« Last Edit: 05/05/2009 23:03:58 by BenV »

*

Offline Vern

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 2072
    • View Profile
    • Photonics
Nanoclusters seem to skirt physics law
« Reply #96 on: 18/04/2009 13:40:26 »
We are all seeking answers to such questions. Many of us have a quick hunch now and then and could make assertions based upon the hunches. But when we have no evidence to back up the hunches, we usually don't make the assertions.

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Nanoclusters seem to skirt physics law
« Reply #97 on: 18/04/2009 14:03:34 »
Entropy proofs that energy expanding all a time.

Inside atoms nucleus is only expanding energy, nothing else.

We dont need expanding space or curving space or dark matter or dark energy or extra dimensions!

.

*

Offline Chemistry4me

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • 7709
    • View Profile
Nanoclusters seem to skirt physics law
« Reply #98 on: 18/04/2009 14:54:51 »
Entropy proofs that energy expanding all a time.

Inside atoms nucleus is only expanding energy, nothing else.
I do not understand.

*

Offline JukriS

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 115
    • View Profile
Nanoclusters seem to skirt physics law
« Reply #99 on: 18/04/2009 15:15:21 »
I mean energy explode all a time in space who dont change at all.

All the phenomens can be explained by one force and this force is the  pressure.


We can describe by people what happens in the atomcores all the time. For example one thousand people can go to the space and curl up close to each other. Now we have made an energyconsentration of people that covers a certain spot of the space. We know that the biggest part of the atoms is empty space. Also between people there exists empty space that does not expand or curve.

Now these people can begin to straighten or in other words to open up and this way they push themselves away from each other. One can observe the hardest pressure in the middle of this human energyconsentration and people who locate in the middle must do an enormeous job so that they woun´t
flatten in the centre. These people in the centre sweat the most. This is excactly the same thing that happens without gravitation for example in the centre of the earth and in the centre of the sun.

The density of the human energyconsentration reduces and the people push themselves away from the centre of the human energyconsentration. Now for a little while we can observe a phenomen of gravitation without a drawing force (that actually does not exist) on the surface of the human energyconsentration.

In my opinion the space does not expand or curve. If it would expand, could you describe how does the space expand?

It is easy to describe how the energy all the time turns into a less dense energy in the atomcores, so I think that it is time to forget all about the magical expanding and curving of the space. You can also forget all the spare spacedimentions, the dark substance and the dark energy.

So the space does not expand or curve!

The atomcores expand and open up expanding electrons and expanding photons and they beam their expanding energy as waves away from themselves. This is how it goes!

When you look at the galaxy, you can understand that the energy inside the galaxy is denser than outside the galaxy. If you look at a star, you can understand that energy inside the star is denser than outside the star. This way you will know for sure that the energy inside the atomcore is denser than outside the atomcore. It is not difficult to understand that the energy inside the protons / neutrons is denser than outside of them and the energy inside the qvarks is denser than outside the qvarks and so on...

It it also easy to realize that outside the visible universe the is an area, where is really much more energy than the visible universe has all together and the energy some where out there is much denser than than it is in a visible universe. Still in that area far away from the visible universe there is no centre point where the energy would be denser than outside it.

That three-dimentionally expanding energyconsentration that bems energywaves with the nature of the galaxies, is formed also from separate three-dimentionally expanding energyconsentrations ect. And so the smaller separate energyconsentrations we talk about, the denser and denser the
energy is all the time.

So the atomcore does not have a centre point, where the energy would be denser than outside it. There is no centre point also at the universe, outside which the energy would be less denser.

Because the MOVEMENT takes place towards a less dense area, then the visible universe MOVES as an entity away from that one point that is really far away from the visible universe and where the energy is much denser than it is in a visible universe.