the area relatively contracts to a 0 point and no dimension, it becomes a singularity with no ''width'' visually in any direction

Here is another instance where you take something which is a mundane, quite comprehensible and finite zero, and call it a singularity.

This use of "singularity" to mean "zero" is singularly unhelpful to your readers or your cause.

Please, Mr Box, if you mean "zero", say "zero". If you mean "infinity", say "infinity". Don't say "singularity", *at all*.

Because when you say "singularity", we can't tell if you mean zero or infinity (which are opposites).

Don't forget the singularity is n-dimensional zero

00000

00100

00000

00100

00000

and also don't forget it is about light and gives us an accurate universal model.

n(r=1)(2r=4)(3r=8)(4r=16)(5r=32)(4r=16)(3r=8)(2r=4)(r=1)n

[attachment=21255]

I am stating the frequency of light propagating through space is zero and has no dimensions, light only gains a frequency from its polymorphic zero state when interacting with mass creating 3 dimensional light that we observe of objects.

I am also stating that when an object relatively moves away from you, in connection with the Lorentz transformations, the area of the object visual contracts. An object close up to you that you can see in 3 dimensional form at distance ? loses it visual xyz and becomes an xy 2 dimensional area relatively to sight.

The inverse square law by considering both observers perspective collapses to a zero dimension that is also a dimensional whole in the space where there is no mass interaction to create 3 d light

Simple experiments show this to be true.

Courtesy of google

[attachment=21257]

So why are you still pretending you don't know what I am talking about.

In the above picture and in reality if we were observing the scene, we are observing a relative quantum tunnel that collapses to a point of zero the greater the r.

[attachment=21259]