0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The topic of discussion is not new. I am not a physicist, I however I endeavor to comprehend GR and contemplate it often.I have identified the most probable cause of GR and a singularity solution by identifying a root cause of the problem and working out many aspects of this problem on my own through my favored tool of choice: logic.GR (General Relativity) is an oversimplified solution developed by Albert Einstein to address some issues w/gravity and mass relationships.To ignore a problem does not make it go away. All application of GR that I'm aware of refer to mass as its center as a point (Center of Mass (COM) as a specific point in a spacial coordinate system to resolve spacial relationship in 3/4D space.One simply cannot solve the problem of a singularity solution, when the problem starts with a singularity solution, when one wishes to address problem the singularity solution.Sounds ambiguous, but its not intended to. The problem (as I see it) is that mass size is yet another dimension of the problem, but is conveniently (or inconveniently) ignored from the start.NOTHING NEW. I have not invented a new thing yet! Identifying a problem and distilling it down to its most basic "points" (sorry, couldn't resist) is something I'm fairly good at. (Pun intended, tho I dare not contemplate it's existence. I'm trying to resolve another issue.)Now I do have an invention (of my own) that is an extrapolation of one somebody else (dont know who) made with the rubber sheet experiment and gravity. I will assume the reader is familiar with the concept. I don't have a drawing readily available, tho I will remind the reader, you are on the internet, so you can find one promptly should you desire: google "rubber sheet experiment" will likely reveal the image/concept.Example extrapolation explained, please allow me to describe it.The rubber sheet subtracts one dimension from 3D space to equal 2D space. Space is represented as a rubber sheet in this fashion, to afford simplification of a description of gravity (we're so complex when we simplify).My invention is to extend this extrapolation further by increasing the decrease from 3D to 1D now space is represented by a string (not to be confused with string theory, it has little to do with that). The author notes a striking resemblance and wishes to avoid confusion therein.3 dimensions of 3D space (up, left, side) all share the exact same properties (AFAIK) so this is a fair analogy. But we're not starting w/3D space, we start with 4D of space-time. So we require 2D space representation. (My simple invention is becoming more complex...)Now the topic may be misleading or not I don't know. I possess only a semi grip on where I'm going with this. I've noted that a singular is a problem exists. I still haven't fully come to grips with how to resolve the issue with my invention. I've drawn three different lines based on the experiment, but I fear they do correctly identify the issue at hand, nor address it.Size of mass is ignored by equating it to a COM (center of mass) object. Size is another dimension completely and conveniently ignored through association of COM concept.I don't know how to resolve it with my invention. Knowing how math works 3, 2, 1, 0, -1, -2, -3 the Lorenz transformation, tensors all go away in 1D space, but to add size and time and figure out what a new 3D space represents is a problem I have (need to give it function, to see what it forms). Skipped adding in size as a dimention (DOH) when I drew my picture (wonder why???) I only thought I needed to add one dimension and used divergence from straight to represent time.We all know size matters, you cant be a man and not worry about it, even the exceptionally gifted have issues... (punny?)I believe my "invention" will help simplify an ongoing problem, I'd like to see rectified. But I'm no einstein. I put it forth for discussion.In the attachment, I was trying to figure out a probable "correct" extrapolation of space-time. calculation of GR breaks at a singularity point because mixing 1 negative multiple positives makes no sense. I'm trying to conceptualize the idea through drawing it by hand. The three lines are three different possible extrapolations I'm toss out for example.I think the bottom line is best candidate to closest to a full extrapolation of the rubber sheet toward completion. The center of the lines are intended to be presence of potential singularity point distortion. They are all guesstimates, I haven't run the math. Picture is hand drawn for example purpose only.
You needed to post this in new theories , I have already done the singularity part, slightly different to definition , Cambridge university has already discovered this a while back what you are saying it is not a new idea. Quite easy and multi-dimensional
But I do not present a new theoryQuote from: Thebox on 29/03/2016 19:04:06You needed to post this in new theories , I have already done the singularity part, slightly different to definition , Cambridge university has already discovered this a while back what you are saying it is not a new idea. Quite easy and multi-dimensionalOnly a simplified tool that can be applied existing theory.At first I thought it belonged in new theories. But it simply is not.I've not seen space-time reduced as one dimension and applied to visualize a black hole.
You mention singularity that is a theory, and what you mentioned Cambridge have already done this and apparently can destroy GR.
Singularities are points in the gravitational field where infinities occur in the mathematics causing undefined results in the equations. That is the simple interpretation. There are equations that can quite happily operate past these singularities. Kruskal geometry is one such instance that describe wormholes through the horizon plus 'another universe'. However the mathematics bar access to this hidden universe. Whether or not access to the wormhole is barred is anyone's guess. The other end of this wormhole is theorized to lead to a white hole.
There is no 'cause' of general relativity. It is a model of the way that spacetime is expected to behave in the presence of mass. Various experimental and observational verifications of GR have been found. The latest being the detection of gravitational waves.
infinitival point in calculus
You could try "singularity", "infinite" or "approaches infinity"?