0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Also; maybe a bit more thinking through the experiment... if i'm in a spaceship accelerating at 9.8 m/s^2 & i identify a point relative to the external space; it's easy to think i am accelerating that point as well; once i 'let go' of this imagined point, it's easy to conceive it falling through the floor of the ship, accelerating down at 9.8 m/s^2: gravity eats space, maybe? This is a temporally constrained description of the 'shape' of space-time. If we wanna conserve volume, we can say gravity eats space & spews time; how might that work out?
When you calculate the value of g you are calculating a value of acceleration. Just check the units. You have to be able to explain the mechanism that changes the value of an objects kinetic energy.
When you calculate the value of g you are calculating a value of acceleration. Just check the units. You have to be able to explain the mechanism that changes the value of an objects kinetic energy. What is it that causes an object to change its straight line trajectory towards a centre of mass. You will need field equations that are radically different from those of general relativity since it does not explain the mechanism of gravity. It is a pity that none of the 'new theories' posted here address this in any way.
What is particularly disturbing is the manner in which gravity has been 'divorced' from matter, as if it had nothing to do with it. This is patently false.
So what spin does a photon have? Why is that critical to the validity of your theory? If you don't know or don't understand the answer then you have no business in calling your speculations a theory.
I don't think it has been; every massive particle has its own spacetime: the universe is a sum of material spacetimes; instead of gravity divorced, universes are married to matter.
the quotidian realities of life
Take for instance the extremely simple and basic problem of how an electric current propagates in a wire. It is unfortunate but there is to date no reasonable explanation. YET a reasonable explanation does exist, if we simply give up the accepted explanation that it is electrons OR the 'electromagnetic field' that carry a current and consider a scenario where it is photons that carry out this function.
Everything falls into place .
How can you stick to 400 year old explanations for basic physics and then talk in terms of 'every massive particle having its own space time'. It doesn't make sense.
k; you gotta splain that one.
Are you aware of the explanation that involve the impedance of transmission lines, source/sink with reflections? Seems adequate to me
I'm not 'sticking' to anything except coherence.
...that is going too much into the practical workings of a circuit and ignoring the basic premises by which that circuit supposedly works.
What's the difference between a conductor & an insulator, as you understand it?
If this link works, here's a pretty good description of how a straight line gets curved:
I read a lot of irrelevant stuff and saw some pretty pictures but alas no spin numbers. For the electron you have the Pauli exclusion principle. Tell me what you think this has to do with electron spin then I might actually start to think you are not joking.
Einsteins elevator would not explain why a heavy ball on the floor of the elevator would attract another ball nearby.Thus the elevator would have to accelerate in all directions simultaneously.
Firstly matter does not attract matter. Matter is pushed together with matter as they radiate dot-waves. At the big bang the entire universe existed at the size of a single neutron. This exploded at a faster that light rate since nothing existed outside the neutron. billions of black holes formed from the single black hole and this formed a spherical surface at a distance Ru from an absolute center. they in turn exploded to form all the galaxies.
This exploded at a faster that light rate since nothing existed outside the neutron. billions of black holes formed from the single black hole and this formed a spherical surface at a distance Ru from an absolute center. they in turn exploded to form all the galaxies. As dot-waves are radiated from the galaxies, they push the universe apart. At the same time there is a kickback effect and matter is pushed by the resulting gravitational waves. thus it looks like matter attracts matter but the gravitational waves push matter together as the universe expands. Today matter is only about 4% of the universe while the gravitational waves in dark matter/dark energy consist of about 96%.
By Ru I presume you refer to the radius of the Universe, I do not know what dot waves are. In the Gestalt Aether Theory the whole of the Universe is filled with light, although that light now has such low energies that it is practically impossible to detect.