Ok... I'm attempting here to juggle some established physics maths into a different format in order to express my idea of the existence of an additional inverted time dilation. Inverted Time Theory (ITT). The consequences of which result in a closed system, non expanding cyclic universe that finds its beginnings and ends of cycle within the black hole phenomenon.

Please note that I am making significant adjustments to the 'physics norm' here. My idea does away with energy mass equivalence. Mass remains set at rest mass and does not change with the addition or subtraction of energy... e=mc2 is energy inherent to mass, gravity potential is the energy of the gravitational force exerted by bodies of mass upon each other at distance,(f=ma) and the non zero energy of the vacuum is described as having energy that is proportional to the 'frequency' of gravity, and is inversely proportional to the energy inherent in mass. ITT employs a different means of calculating the factor of kinetic energy, and includes an addition to the equivalence principal stating that as well as the speed of light being constant, the speed of light cannot exceed the local rate of time.

So...

In the first equation we see E=mc2 = KE+m0c2.

This is saying that to establish E, kinetic energy must be added to the equation: 'rest mass' times speed of light squared.

The equation is then presented in another form...

So, for a particle of zero rest mass: p=E/c, and p is traditionally calculated via mv=p, which for light is mc=p. To calculate p for light we are saying that for light to have energy, it must have relativistic mass equal to e=mc2.

ITT states that particles of zero mass, such as the photon, are subject to the non zero energy of their location. That this non zero energy affects the gravitational shift, which in itself is inherent with an inverted time dilation.

To explain what is meant by inverted time dilation we must look at gravitational time dilation and the caesium atom.

The caesium atomic clock keeps a standard second of time at a frequency of 9,192,631,770 Hz. If you elevate the clock into a weaker gravitational field, the frequency of the clock increases and the length of a standard second decreases causing time to run faster. Therefore the caesium atom gains energy proportionally to its increase in frequency within the scenario of a decreasing gravitational gradient, and it loses energy proportionally to its decrease in frequency within the scenario of an increasing gravitational gradient.

This is known as gravitational time dilation. On the basis of this phenomenon of gravitational time dilation, it is thought that a gravitational field (body of mass) slows time, and that time will run faster in a weaker gravitation field. (space)

ITT states that this concept is wrong. A body of mass at distance from another body of mass will be experiencing an increase in energy due to:

My theory of an additional inverted time dilation is based on the concept that when we measure time via the caesium atom in a gravitational gradient, that we are only measuring what time is doing for the caesium atom, and we are not measuring what time is doing for the location of gravitational gradient that the caesium atom is elevated at. ITT states that it is the frequency of massless light matching the frequency of the gravitational field that is indicative of what time is doing for the location of a gravitational gradient.

The caesium atom does however provide us with a standard second when operating at frequency 9,192,631,770 Hz. (Because this frequency is subject to change within a subtle gravitational gradient of less than a meter, one assumes that a standard second must also come equipped with a standard elevation in relation to sea level. (?).) The standard second is used to measure all time related considerations and all inverted time dilation considerations need to be related back to the caesium atom at frequency 9,192,631,770 Hz.

Going back to the De Broglie hypothesis:

So...for the photon:

We can see that Planck's constant h=6.62606957×10^−34 joules*seconds, has been employed to calculate energy:

E=hv=hc/lambda

Lambda was what Einstein retracted from relativity, and frequency-wavelength, ie: redshift, is what Hubble stated as proof of expansion of the universe and became the basis of the Big Bang theory. These days lambda is associated with the cosmological constant and equations concerning frequency are denoted with the letter f. I shall use f.

E=hv=hc/f ...so... p=hc/cf=h/f ... and... f=h/p being the De Broglie wavelength.

Frequency is a time integral. The time measurement is a constant of 1 standard second, and 1 standard second is equal to 299 793 458 meters as per the constancy of the speed of light.

So...on the basis that vt=d, or d/t=v, or d/v=t, we can divide 299 792 458 meters (d) by frequency (f standing in for v, as in frequency being the velocity of time) which on the basis that frequency is a time integral holding both a standard second and the distance of 299 792 458 meters constant in relation to the constant speed of light, can be denoted as d/fc=t~ whereby t~ dependant on frequency, may be a longer or shorter second than our standard second.

ITT states that because light has no mass it will not be subject to the force energy of gravitational attraction and will only be affected by gravity via the non zero energy and frequency of the gravitational field itself, which ITT states as inverted time dilation.

I repeat, it is via the non zero energy and frequency (proven via Pound Rebka) of the gravitational gradient itself that is the cause of inverted time dilation... Gravitational field energy denotes the gravitational shift in the energy of light, and it is the subsequent change in the frequency of the light that denotes the change in the length of a second, with any contraction or expansion of lights wave'length' being time related rather than distance related.

Light takes form in many different frequencies and associated wavelengths all of which will be affected by these changes of non zero energy within the gravitational gradient.

ITT is suggesting a direct relationship between energy and the phenomenon of time itself!

If the phenomenon of time is energy related and more energy denotes a faster rate of time, then an electrons frequency and subsequent wavelength can be calculated at the quantum level with the electrons exact position and momentum simultaneously. Perturbation (this itself being a time integral) will not be necessary.

Now the factor of kinetic energy must be addressed.

ITT suggests that there are 4 types of energy that need to be considered.

1: inherent energy within mass

2: non zero energy of the gravitational field

3: the energy of the force of gravitational attraction between bodies of mass

4: kinetic energy due to motion

(In lights case only no2: the non zero energy of the gravitational field will apply)

This constitutes a matrix of 4 energy considerations that operate on a sliding scale of proportionality to other factors. 1, 2 and 3 are positive and must be added together and 4, kinetic energy is negative and must then be subtracted for a slowing of time due to motion.

This matrix may be used in conjunction with the space time matrix whereby there are 3 positives of space and one negative of time. The resulting calculation of the energy matrix based on the co-ordinates of the 3 dimensions of space of the space time matrix, becomes the corresponding time aspect of the space time matrix for those co-ordinates.

Finally, the constancy of the speed of light in relation to the local rate of time:

We can cause man made light to shift frequency in a non changing gravitational field by adding or subtracting energy via temperature or charge. The rate of time is constant in the non changing gravitational field, but we still observe that the frequency wavelength relationship holds so how can a longer or shorter wave'length' be inverted time dilation related?

I counter this argument by asking how a photon can travel up and down wavelengths of differing frequencies and still get from a to b, this being a distance of 299 792 458 meters, in 1 second?

You may point out to me the 'boat analogy' whereby the photon is a boat and its wavelength the boats 'wake', to which I would reply that for there to be any change in the wake of a boat, a change in the boats speed must occur!

In any case, ITT states that light must travel at the speed of light, 299 792 458 meters per second, and that the speed of light cannot exceed the local rate of a second of time, and consequently the rate of the photons time will slow for a photon that is moving in line motion, (ie: Michelson Morley experiment). And the rate of the photons time will speed up for a photon of low energy, and low frequency, in order that it travel at the speed of light in relation to the local rate of second. (Please remember that we 'play' with light in ways that would not necessarily be naturally occurring)

The speed of light is a constant. ITT states distances and lengths are also constant, but the rate of time is highly variable.

It is variable between the scale of all masses, their energies and the non zero energies of the gravitational field, and runs at a faster rate where there is more energy, and at a slower rate where there is less.

The consequences of this concept result in a closed system, non expanding, cyclic universe that finds its beginnings and ends of cycle within the black hole phenomenon.

This concept relies solely upon the Standard Model and requires no unobserved entities in order to explain its mechanics.