The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. An analysis of the de Broglie equation
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 35 36 [37]   Go Down

An analysis of the de Broglie equation

  • 724 Replies
  • 79876 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jeffreyH (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6807
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 174 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: An analysis of the de Broglie equation
« Reply #720 on: 02/10/2016 19:51:43 »
Read this then come back and tell me you know the answer.

http://spiff.rit.edu/classes/phys314/lectures/planck/planck.html
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 



Offline jeffreyH (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6807
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 174 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: An analysis of the de Broglie equation
« Reply #721 on: 02/10/2016 20:04:17 »
So then Planck's constant can be derived from experiment. Fudge sundae anyone?
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 

Offline jeffreyH (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6807
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 174 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: An analysis of the de Broglie equation
« Reply #722 on: 02/10/2016 21:59:04 »
If you were talking about the gravitational constant you would have a point. This distinction isn't trivial.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 

Offline jeffreyH (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6807
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 174 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: An analysis of the de Broglie equation
« Reply #723 on: 02/10/2016 22:20:26 »
Quote from: jeffreyH on 22/05/2016 10:59:36
OK so as was pointed out 4d36d6f3b066e23610fb32ff27cf6989.gif. Therefore in the case of the photon the energy equation becomes 9e0382d0a5b7dbf48558fa950dcd37bf.gif.

If we take our wavelength as L (1 light second) then we can show that 0462b435389f2d627d49ac8e415db311.gif. This 1 hertz wave then shows the direct relationship to the Planck constant.

Ok this may or may not post the Tex properly. If it does I will expand on this post.

In the above we have the expression h/t. If we multiply both numerator and denominator by the ratio tP/t, where tP is one Planck time, then we have an energy unit expressed at the Planck scale. Now we can consider the rate of time as constant and the Planck value as variable. What does this tell us?
« Last Edit: 02/10/2016 22:31:32 by jeffreyH »
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 

Offline jeffreyH (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6807
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 174 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: An analysis of the de Broglie equation
« Reply #724 on: 06/10/2016 22:21:29 »
In considering the thimble full of neutronium I had a thought. What if action is dilated rather than just time. Then E = h/t can be restated as u = E0*t. Where E0 is emission energy. Then we can define u = E0*t + (1/2)(E0/c2)g*r*t. Action dilation is then in joule seconds. This excludes length contraction altogether.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 35 36 [37]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.143 seconds with 43 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.