0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Don't hesitate if you have any question
My theory about the gravitation needs a device that can create the energy. So I try to find the device that can increase its potential energy alone. I found my last errors, I'm not the best for equation :p but I have ideas. I studied the sum of energy for a small angle of rotation of the wheel, it's easy to see if the energy is constant or not.
I started another thread a long time ago to explain that theory: http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=57580.0Maybe with this device:
Hi, I resumed here a lot of my thoughts, like that you have a brief summary:1/ Mass don't exist: it is an electromagnetism repulsive force follows by an electromagnetic attraction, the sum is not 0 and the frequency is high2/ The kinetics energy don't exist, it is the modification of the potential energy stored in the electrostatic matter, like a capacitor when the distance between plates are increasing. When the velocity increases, the shape of capacitors changes so the potential energy too.3/ Relativity is the time for the system for make its full round, like the clock of a microprocessor4/ The Dark Matter don't exist because the mass can change, it's the amplitude of the signal5/ Inertial mass = Gravitationnal mass because it's the same thing: the shape of the capacitor6/ The formula of gravitation is like the formula of electrostatic and it's logical7/ Galaxies can repulse themselves because the gravitation is the cosinus of the phase angle8/ The photon is attracked by gravity because the photon has an electrostatic field
I am trying to create and destroy energy
Look the device at the last message post please.
Without studying all the details of your equations, you start with some motion and this motion converts into the motion of other things and then returns to the original motion. It looks like you have conceived of a different form of a pendulum. The pendulum such as a weight on a string starts at potential energy at a high point. As the weight comes down to a lower level, potential energy turns into the motion of kinetic energy at maximum speed. Then the pendulum rises up again and creates potential energy from kinetic energy. And for a low friction pendulum, this can go on for quite a long time. So yes potential energy can be increased without supplying new energy but something must start the potential energy in the first place. If you want to increase the potential energy above the existing energy level, this becomes quite difficult. In electrical circuits you can take a twelve volt battery and get 10,000 volts out of it. But the twelve volts operates at a large current whereas the 10,000 volts has a very small current. We are always limited by the fact that energy cannot be created or destroyed. Energy in = energy out plus heat loss. So your calculations can be quite correct as long as energy in equals energy out assuming the friction is very small in the short term.
You're right, english is not my first language, but all forums in physics ban new theories. I found only this forum. And forums where people believe it is possible to create over-unity devices are more interesting with videos (fakes) than physics. If you don't understand something I can explain with others words and phrases, the device is not complex.
I consider the mass at 0 like the friction, if you want you can consider the mass very small. The potential energy at start comes from the springs, even the mass of the spring is small the kinetic energy exist.
To believe or not to believe ? some people believe in god (I see your personal message about Jesus) I believe it is possible to create the energy and it is not exclusive, people can believe 2 beliefs
...sorry, you cannot view external links. To see them, please
REGISTER or LOGIN
So the springs start out in a state of tension, right? That's where the initial input energy comes from? Okay.
Are all of the blue spheres attached to the ground by springs or only those that are right next to the ground?
When you say that you "move out" the blue spheres, what mechanism are you using to remove the spheres from the container and then return them to the container?
Is this a cycle or a single-step process?
With an external device, I didn't draw it. But the I count the energy needed for move in the spheres and the energy recovered to move out the spheres. The volume is always the same.
Yes, this is a cycle. At start there is a potential energy Ep1, at final the potential energy is Ep2, the walls recover the energy Ep1-Ep2. Ep2<Ep1. The energy from the difference of lengths L1/L2 is an additional energy that I don't find where I lost it.
Then, you remove some blue spheres from one side of the white disk so that the pressure on one side of the disk is now greater than the pressure on the other side, which causes it to move.
Once it has moved, you return the blue spheres to a place behind the white disk. Is this what happens?
So the cycle goes from a distorted container to an undistorted container and then back to a distorted container again to repeat the cycle?
Like the mass of the blue spheres is near 0, I think the sum of forces from the blue spheres on the white disk is 0. The white disk don't have a force and like its mass is near 0 I don't need an energy to move it (in theory). I move in/out the blue spheres in the same time:
I move out the blue spheres in the same time I move in the others. For that, I need, at start, an extra layer of blue spheres with springs to move in because I can't move out and move in the same spheres in two different places. There is always a layer of blue spheres outside the device. The last layer of blue spheres moving out becomes the layer outside, ready to be used for another move-in/out. Like that the pressure don't change because I move in/out the blue spheres.
I study the sum of energy only from the left position to the right position.
I don't repeat the cycle.
If the blue spheres exert no pressure or force on the white disk then what causes the disk to move?
Presumably, you are measuring the energy by measuring the length of the springs in each case?
Then it isn't actually a cycle. Cycles repeat.
Yes, I count all the energies stored in the springs.
So when the container is in a distorted position, the springs are longer/stretched, and when the container goes to the undistorted position, the springs are relaxed and no longer in a state of tension?
I supposed the force from each spring don't change with the length of the spring, just to simplify the thinking of the device. So at start the force from a spring is F and at final the force of a spring is F. It is theoretical device but just because like that it is easier to resolve or to find the error.
If you weren't planning on storing energy in the springs then how were you planning on storing it? No force = no energy. You might not need to calculate the force, but it most certainly needs to be there in order to be sensible.
The energy is well stored in the springs at start. With a standard spring, the force is k*x but here I use the equation F=k. Some springs exist:...sorry, you cannot view external links. To see them, please
REGISTER or LOGINIt is possible to think with the force = k to simplify the device.