The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Chemistry
  4. Is this version of the periodic table, plotting elements by abundance, accurate?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is this version of the periodic table, plotting elements by abundance, accurate?

  • 6 Replies
  • 3633 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline joeweller (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 5
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Is this version of the periodic table, plotting elements by abundance, accurate?
« on: 10/06/2016 14:00:42 »


This is a Periodic Table by Abundance. It is an old version; is it still accurate?
« Last Edit: 10/06/2016 16:28:42 by chris »
Logged
 



Offline chiralSPO

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 3434
  • Activity:
    12.5%
  • Thanked: 428 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is this version of the periodic table, plotting elements by abundance, accurate?
« Reply #1 on: 10/06/2016 16:40:09 »
It looks like this is reporting the abundance on Earth. It looks about right except for Fr and Pt, which should both be much smaller.

Compare to: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/09/Elemental_abundances.svg/300px-Elemental_abundances.svg.png and https://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/Graphics-Geol/geochem/ptabccr.gif
« Last Edit: 10/06/2016 16:42:50 by chiralSPO »
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: joeweller

Offline chris

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7935
  • Activity:
    5%
  • Thanked: 272 times
  • The Naked Scientist
    • View Profile
    • The Naked Scientists
Re: Is this version of the periodic table, plotting elements by abundance, accurate?
« Reply #2 on: 10/06/2016 18:27:31 »
Is there really that much oxygen? I thought hydrogen was much more abundant...?
Logged
I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception - Groucho Marx - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/
 
The following users thanked this post: joeweller

Offline joeweller (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 5
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: Is this version of the periodic table, plotting elements by abundance, accurate?
« Reply #3 on: 10/06/2016 18:49:22 »
Quote from: chris on 10/06/2016 18:27:31
Is there really that much oxygen? I thought hydrogen was much more abundant...?

well I don't remeber where I saw this but I think that hydrogen is more abundant in space
Logged
 

Offline chiralSPO

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 3434
  • Activity:
    12.5%
  • Thanked: 428 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is this version of the periodic table, plotting elements by abundance, accurate?
« Reply #4 on: 10/06/2016 20:34:32 »
I think it's a question of whether we are talking about abundance by mass or by number of atoms. In Space, it's almost entirely hydrogen, with some helium, and a smattering of other elements, so this must be showing the abundance on Earth.

There is a LOT of oxygen on earth. Silica (SiO2) silicates (SiO44–) carbonates (CO32–), sulfates (SO42–) phosphates (PO43–) etc. are a significant proportion of the minerals on Earth.
« Last Edit: 10/06/2016 20:37:54 by chiralSPO »
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: joeweller



Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8969
  • Activity:
    75%
  • Thanked: 882 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is this version of the periodic table, plotting elements by abundance, accurate?
« Reply #5 on: 11/06/2016 02:13:57 »
Quote from: Chris
I thought hydrogen was much more abundant...?
Of course, if you were measuring the Solar System, it would be mostly Hydrogen, a bit of Helium, and not very much of anything else - primarily due to the Sun and Jupiter.

Another measure is by volume. If you are looking at the surface of the Earth:
  • In water, the Oxygen is much larger than the hydrogen (and much of the earth's hydrogen is bound up in water and hydrocarbons/carbohydrates).
  • Oxygen often forms an O2- ion, and it swells up considerably compared to neutral oxygen atoms.
  • If I remember my geology classes, in silicates, the Oxygen atoms take up a considerable volume, with the silicon atoms nestled in-between.

If you are looking at the core of the Earth, you would find mostly Iron and Nickel, plus elements which are soluble in these metals.
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21159
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 485 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is this version of the periodic table, plotting elements by abundance, accurate?
« Reply #6 on: 11/06/2016 11:48:16 »
Broadly, the radioactive ones are wrong. far too much Pa, Ra, Fr, Po, At and Rn etc compared to , eg U.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Is there a musical version of "Cellar Door"

Started by neilepBoard General Science

Replies: 1
Views: 2751
Last post 19/10/2012 03:32:58
by grizelda
Science Fact or Fiction: The Online Version Part I

Started by adamgBoard General Science

Replies: 14
Views: 7394
Last post 28/09/2019 04:37:02
by Monox D. I-Fly
Science Fact or Fiction: Online Version Part 2

Started by adamgBoard General Science

Replies: 16
Views: 9776
Last post 01/07/2006 11:03:57
by daveshorts
Science Fact or Fiction: Online Version Part 3

Started by adamgBoard General Science

Replies: 4
Views: 4118
Last post 03/07/2006 17:36:06
by adamg
Can any plant be turned into a bonsai version of its full-sized self?

Started by paul.frBoard Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

Replies: 9
Views: 16537
Last post 17/07/2010 23:57:07
by RD
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.177 seconds with 52 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.