0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I suppose you have some evidence for this? I would accept as evidence: indications of other planets turning into stars (perhaps Jupiter is closest?), detection of "ethons," observation of neutron formation inside the Earth, or a theory on how ethons combine to generate BOTH mass AND energy.
Quote from: chiralSPO on 29/09/2016 19:46:02I suppose you have some evidence for this? I would accept as evidence: indications of other planets turning into stars (perhaps Jupiter is closest?), detection of "ethons," observation of neutron formation inside the Earth, or a theory on how ethons combine to generate BOTH mass AND energy.In the January/February 2006 issue of Australian Physics. - Professor Cahill argues that the Michelson Morley experiment did not produce the null result generally supposed. Fringe shifts were observed, but were much smaller than expected from the assumed velocity of the apparatus through the aether, and were thus disregarded.The modern view of this experiment (or at least the prevailing modern view)is that any aether or other absolute frame of reference is likely to remain un-detected because of the Fitzgerald-Lorentz contraction of the apparatus in the direction of travel. Professor Cahill argues, however, that if an interferometer contains gas, such as the air in the Michelson and Morley apparatus, the refractively diminished phase velocity of the light would be such that contraction effects would not exactly counter differences in travel times. Small phase shifts would thus occur of the order of magnitude of those in fact recorded.I would suggest, however, that the presence of gas in the light paths could not produce the effect described. The essential problem lies in the assumption that the reduced phase velocity of the light in "gas mode" will have the same magnitude whether observed in the laboratory frame or in an absolute frame of reference. It is true that the free space velocity is invariant but not so the reduced phase velocity. To ascertain the magnitude of that phase velocity,as observed from another frame, we must use the relativistic formula for the composition of velocities, those velocities being in this case the velocity of the interferometer and the phase velocity of the signal. The light path aligned at right angles to the direction of travel, in the laboratory frame, is not so aligned when observed in the absolute frame. However, we need only consider in the absolute frame those components of phase velocity.Wave Structure of MatterA precursor of aether physics is the Wave Structure of Matter theory by Milo Wolff. In 1986 Wolff formulated a theory that he called ‘the Standing Wave Structure of Matter’ (abbreviated to WSM theory). Independently Geoff Haselhurst came to the same conclusion about a standing wave theory for matter and they are working together as of 1998.The WSM theory is relatively simple. It proposes that matter is the focal point of a standing wave the result of two interfering waves. One is an inward wave moving towards the center and the other is an outward-bound wave moving away from the center. The waves are spherical waves in the fabric of space. The center of the two spherical waves is the ‘point particle’ center. As simple as the axiom of this theory is, the properties these standing waves can assume seem to be immense.Whereas almost all physical laws both in Newtonian and quantum physics were empirically derived from experiments, Milo Wolf says he now has theory that a priori, from theoretical principles, allows the laws of both relativity and quantum physics to be determined!If he is right the origin of the physical laws and the properties of charge, mass and gravity, for the first time can be understood. Mainstream physics could never really explain these; for one thing we still don’t know what gravity really is; we have known the physical laws of gravity since Newton; however we don’t know what’s causing gravity!String theory is trying to accomplish exactly what the WSM theory has done, to integrate quantum physics and Einstein’s relativity. String theory is mainstream physics best shot and hope for a theory of everything (T.O.E.)A wave structure of matter had already been proposed 130 years ago by William Clifford, he declared that ‘all matter is simply undulations in the fabric of space’. Unfortunately, his colleagues never took his work seriously.In the WSM theory matter is just the interference pattern of in and out waves. The in-waves of a given particle are the out-waves of another particle. In this way all matter in the universe is sustained and mutually dependent. In and out waves tie all the matter in the universe together.In conclusion : A very bad Photoshop user is more likely to discover the secrets of the universe than the most advanced scientist at CERN. This is because smashing marbles tells you very little about marbles regardless of the size of the hammer you are using. Whereas, a Photoshop user is using similar tools to that which the universe uses to create reality.Note - The human eye sees everything in terms of 3 parts. (The law of 3rds which applies to both music and visual arts). The number 3 was Tesla's favourite number because he knew that it was the key to understanding the universe.http://ryuc.info/creativityphysics/energy/pair_production.htm
... The shape of the Earth's continents clearly indicates that the Earth is expanding and has been doing so for billions of years. (See 'The Expanding Earth' video.)