0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
if the red shift is as I suspect there is no real expansion or compression. Gr is the more likely reason for red shift not SR expansion as main stream believes due to their operating beliefs. Their understanding only uses SR for red shift cause. Even with the gravitational lensing affect.
jerrygg38, how does light reflect off of the surface of a thin sphere to always angle around no matter which direction we look? Relativity shows light to be straight except in gravity GR. The curve only bends around gravity. Your shell of the BB violates relativity. Science is protecting the BB at the expense of relativity. That is faith not science.Do you understand how light created in a galaxy center red shifted by GR and not necessarily red shifted by SR would suggest a more steady state. Where we are in our own galaxy GR blue shifted in comparison is like a gravity well experiment.But I am most interested in how the light always bends within the thin surface sphere? I realize because you write books you have to help maintain the BB but no one is questioning it properly with relativity.I am a simple person with average intelligence. Mechanics is my interest. The mechanics of relativity do not support us living in a shell universe where nothing exists from the center out. Fully formed galaxies 13.6 billion light years? BB is based on faith not science.
Maybe the mass don't exist, the kinetic energy is a stored energy (like an electric capacitor), kinetic energy is a potential energy. And the relativity is simply a basic 'thing' in each particle that needs to turn around itself, if the speed limit is 'c' when a particle moves in translation, it needs more and more time to make its round when the velocity increases.
Jerrygg: The dilation of space is the changes to the gravitational field. Light travels upon the fields. So the cause of the bending of light around the sun is gravity. A high speed particle will bend around the sun and so will light. You have some magical thing called space that curves and bends light but I say that all there is in space is the gravitational fields and the electromagnetic fields. They make up space. So the way I look at it, gravity attracts light. The speed of the photon remains constant but the energy within the photon continually changes.
GoC says: Dilation creates a greater path for light but the speed of energy state remains constant. The increased distance takes longer to traverse but there is no change in E=c.Jerrygg: Can’t figure out what you mean by this.GoC: Rotating electron motion of mass =c. So in the presence of mass E=mc^2 and without mass E=c. c= ~186,000 miles in a light second of space.Jerrygg: Can’t figure this out either.
GoC: Which is different distance for a measured light second where mass is involved. The distance will be different but the measurement in a vacuum will always be c. When the vacuum is less dense and dilated in the presence of mass the measuring stick mass is dilated proportionally to measure the same c in GR.Jerrygg: My engineering mind has trouble with what your words mean
Every piece of mass has its own little gravitational field.
As you add more mass the gravitational field gets more intense and space shrinks
The time clock on the other hand dilates (slows) as more mass is added to a particular point. .
It is confusing for sure.
Read my discussions on the science forum as the scientists explained things to me since I was always confused on what Einstein meant until recently
For myself I am trying to add something on to Einstein's work. So first I must understand it and then add to it. But you are trying to reinterpret it and that is basically an impossible task.
The science experts here are very knowledgeable. they appear to me to understand Einstein's work quite well.
I restudied it and compared the equations with the Einsteinian Doppler equations in the classified library. Yet I was not really that interested in relativity and general relativity.
In my hands is Relativity (The Special and General Theory) by Albert Einstein First published in 1920 and turned into pdf ebook by Jose Menendez. So I read Einstein's words and look at the experts and compare them.
You have your own ideas which gives you an understanding of the universe in terms of your ideas. They make sense to you. But millions of physicists and scientists and mathematicians in the world agree with the scientists herein
GoC #23Explain the results of the MM experiment without physical length contraction.
Explain the results of the MM experiment without physical length contraction.
Couldnt be the case that mass of an object is occuring from space, within the object, giving us the impression that the mass bellong to matter? The same couldnt be applied to dark mass, being the exposed product of the whole matter of a galaxy when observed at distance? I do acknowledge that your a realist man, and loyal to relativity and for this "mass cannot be from space".. I'm fine with that, but trying to visualize the mechanics, couldn't be the case that we are right only confused not about what mass is, but where it is originated, and when it is originated? What I have in mind, is that relativity may allowed mass being from space, if we "consider for a moment" that mass only occurs on the presence of atomic structure, how to know that the mass of a piece of rock, is not given to the rock by from the space within the atoms that forms that rock? How we know that mass is not space when it is "temporarily" not at C, due the presence of atomic structure?
I do not question relativity, no reasons for it, it's just what if our relativity is a misinterpreted version of the real one?
The very reliability of relativity is the own prove that we misinterpreted something on it, if relativity cant and most likely isn't wrong, week than we must be "separating" one of its main factors from the true source...
Couldn't be mass the product resultant of the electron and photon correlation of spinning C, happening and existing within a field of expanding linear C? If mass causes space to dilate itself, do not know if is "possible", but always sounded logic to me that: "Mass is the dilatation of space"