The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. What came first, speech or writing?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

What came first, speech or writing?

  • 10 Replies
  • 4620 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline thedoc (OP)

  • Forum Admin
  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 510
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 17 times
    • View Profile
What came first, speech or writing?
« on: 24/11/2016 19:53:01 »
kristian bruce asked the Naked Scientists:
   What came first, speech or writing?
What do you think?
« Last Edit: 24/11/2016 19:53:01 by _system »
Logged
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 8008
  • Activity:
    44.5%
  • Thanked: 483 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: What came first, speech or writing?
« Reply #1 on: 24/11/2016 22:04:57 »
All animals talk, very few write. So it's probable that we evolved from a talking but non-writing species.
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Semaphore

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 98
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • View Profile
Re: What came first, speech or writing?
« Reply #2 on: 24/11/2016 22:12:28 »
Grunting, followed by speaking, followed by painting and then writing.

And much later by grammar....
Logged
 

Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 4459
  • Activity:
    15.5%
  • Thanked: 377 times
    • View Profile
Re: What came first, speech or writing?
« Reply #3 on: 24/11/2016 22:32:38 »
Quote from: Semaphore on 24/11/2016 22:12:28
And much later by grammar....
Much, much later. Some time in the future maybe.
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 
The following users thanked this post: Semaphore

Offline Ethos_

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1332
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 17 times
    • View Profile
Re: What came first, speech or writing?
« Reply #4 on: 24/11/2016 23:26:07 »
Quote from: Colin2B on 24/11/2016 22:32:38
Quote from: Semaphore on 24/11/2016 22:12:28
And much later by grammar....
Much, much later. Some time in the future maybe.
Truly Colin................If the current trend is any indicator, we may need to go "Back to the future". Good grammar appears to be a thing of the past, if I might say.
Logged
"The more things change, the more they remain the same."
 



Offline chris

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7661
  • Activity:
    9.5%
  • Thanked: 249 times
  • The Naked Scientist
    • View Profile
    • The Naked Scientists
Re: What came first, speech or writing?
« Reply #5 on: 25/11/2016 08:45:52 »
Speech is what we call the series of animal calls made by our species. It's something that we are innately able to do, superimposed on which is added detail passed on through generations of refinement and learning. So it's a meme on top of an innate skill. Writing is not really that different in the sense that more primitive people certainly appreciated the importance of visual signals and used such for the purposes of tracking prey (following a trail), finding their friends, marking territories and showing the way to resources like water and so on. It's not so unlikely that people would have extended the repertoire of signals they drew or made to communicate more things, and then ultimately established a grammar so that the burgeoning array of such signals and messages continued to mean the same thing to everyone.

I am not a linguist of an anthropologist, but I would speculate that actually the two probably evolved side by side on a background of our basic abilities in sound and vision.
Logged
I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception - Groucho Marx - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/
 

Offline puppypower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 992
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 86 times
    • View Profile
Re: What came first, speech or writing?
« Reply #6 on: 25/11/2016 12:04:26 »
Writing is new and was invented about 3200 BC. Speech goes way back to the pre-humans. If you do the math, writing more or less times out with the time scale of Genesis of the bible.The bible says, in the beginning was the word and the word was God. It is possible that the word "God" was the original written word, analogous to, "Watson can you hear me", being the first message over a telephone. The time of the invention of writing could well make Genesis the first published scientific theory of cosmology, geology and life.

Written language allowed civilization to persist and altered the human psyche to form modern man. To explain how, consider a student going to class where there is no writing so you can take notes, no writing on the blackboard to see what the teacher decides is important and no written textbooks  to take home for study. All you can do is listen to the teacher for 1 hour. Without writing, there will be no consistency in terms of what students absorb, comprehend or remember, since there is no tangible record. At test time, it may come down to hearsay, might is right, or con artists rule. Before 3200 BC there were signs of civilization, but these all aborted. The children could not agree on the creative elements of their fathers, causing them to return to instinct. This is called paradise, since it was creative anew, while being an instinctive time for the pre-humans. This is like children at play with new toys.

With the invention of writing, the ideas of the founding fathers could persist. Mesopotamia, who invents writing,  becomes the first persistent civilization. The negative side affect was, with memory able to be reinforced by writing, natural instincts become repressed. Instinct will try to erase memory but the written word allows one to learn anew.

The result unconscious potential and impulses begin to appear due to the repression of instinct. For example, the needs of the group may require all people store food, and not eat as they go, like a natural hunter gatherer. This cause a repression of hunger. If you get hungry enough, you become more agitated and may start to steal food. New rules appear in the written record, which compounds the problem, since these lead to repression of the solutions to repression of natural instinct. Before writing, natural instinct could gradually erase memory and allow natural instincts to reappear.  But with writing, this can't happen. Instead a new type of human emerges, who has will power and choice, apart from instincts, which leads to a different set of problems. 
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: chris

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 7651
  • Activity:
    25.5%
  • Thanked: 751 times
    • View Profile
Re: What came first, speech or writing?
« Reply #7 on: 25/11/2016 21:45:02 »
We have examples of pictures and sculpture that were used long before the earliest examples of writing. (30,000 years vs 5,000 years).

Civilizations around Mesopotamia wrote on clay tablets, which are rather temporary when damp - until their cities burnt down, baking their post-it notes into pottery.  Older civilizations may have written on even less-permanent materials, like dirt (the Greeks), knotted strings (central America) or bamboo (Asia), which have not been preserved.

There have been (debatable) claims of what may be tally-marks (numbers) associated with cave-art pictures. If proven, this would be an earlier symbolic representation than Mesopotamia.

...but I think speech preceded them all (as suggested by the imprint left by our speech centers on the skull cases of hominid fossils).

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cave_of_Forgotten_Dreams
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: chris

Offline syhprum

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 4815
  • Activity:
    7.5%
  • Thanked: 56 times
    • View Profile
Re: What came first, speech or writing?
« Reply #8 on: 11/12/2016 20:35:30 »
I think that "boobs" as a source of sexual stimulation is a relatively recent development much later than Eve.
Mermaids did not have bras pre Disney
Logged
syhprum
 



Offline snorkfort

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 40
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
Re: What came first, speech or writing?
« Reply #9 on: 12/12/2016 05:11:24 »
Quote from: Ethos_ on 24/11/2016 23:26:07
Quote from: Colin2B on 24/11/2016 22:32:38
Quote from: Semaphore on 24/11/2016 22:12:28
And much later by grammar....
Much, much later. Some time in the future maybe.
Truly Colin................If the current trend is any indicator, we may need to go "Back to the future". Good grammar appears to be a thing of the past, if I might say.

This is incorrect. The current population is more literate and more educated than at any time in history, and there are currently more people with good English grammar than at any time in the past. In the past, "educated" people had good grammar, but very few people were educated. And the "uneducated" people did not tend to communicate often in writing. What you have now is a greater number of relatively illiterate people communicating in writing than ever before, via social media, etc. By "illiterate", I mean people who tend not to read books. So people with bad grammar are now more visible to those with good grammar. In addition, we also have a greater number of ESL (English as a second language) speakers than at any time in history. The combined presence of relatively illiterate people and ESL speakers on social media may result in some evolution in our language. Languages are constantly evolving. English tends to be slightly intolerant of deviation and unconventional
syntax in comparison to some other languages, but current evolutionary trends may result in an increased tolerance of such deviation after several decades.
Logged
 

Offline syhprum

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 4815
  • Activity:
    7.5%
  • Thanked: 56 times
    • View Profile
Re: What came first, speech or writing?
« Reply #10 on: 12/12/2016 21:13:22 »
I am always amazed by the attitude of the media to boobs, an "actress" can show 90% of her grossly enlarged artificial boobs but if a nipple is shown shock horror.
* Wardrobe problem 2.pdf (8.43 kB - downloaded 189 times.)
Logged
syhprum
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

How can I improve my research paper writing skills?

Started by bennypoleBoard Geek Speak

Replies: 1
Views: 4848
Last post 21/02/2011 06:42:43
by Geezer
Is there any useful writing on whether human reproductive cloning should be allowed?

Started by thedocBoard Cells, Microbes & Viruses

Replies: 4
Views: 2165
Last post 09/09/2016 01:50:53
by Villi
Help with writing a FLASH POWDER combustion rxn??

Started by bigggmike1Board Chemistry

Replies: 7
Views: 7385
Last post 15/08/2006 11:43:10
by lightarrow
Has anyone considered re-writing the bible scientifically?

Started by Paul Anderson Board That CAN'T be true!

Replies: 6
Views: 5706
Last post 02/10/2008 19:09:44
by Bored chemist
How can we get children writing computer programs?

Started by thedocBoard Technology

Replies: 5
Views: 3293
Last post 24/09/2013 08:37:30
by syhprum
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.244 seconds with 66 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.