The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. Europe moves ahead with Mars mission, kills asteroid lander
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Europe moves ahead with Mars mission, kills asteroid lander

  • 1 Replies
  • 2022 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Garry Mcneill (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
    • View Profile
Europe moves ahead with Mars mission, kills asteroid lander
« on: 05/12/2016 11:36:27 »
Europe’s ExoMars 2020 lander will go ahead as scheduled, despite the failure of the test-run Schiaparelli lander this past October, the European Space Agency (ESA) said today at the end of a council meeting at which government ministers from its 22 member states agreed on budgets for the next several years. ESA won a total of €10.3 billion for a wide range of projects extending into next decade but because the agency had requested €11 billion, some belt tightening will be required. And there was one notable casualty: the Asteroid Impact Mission (AIM), which planned to study in detail and land on a near-Earth asteroid in 2022, did not win enough support from member governments to proceed.

There will be huge relief that ministers supported going ahead with ExoMars 2020 as planned, because it has been on the books at ESA for more than a decade. The mission carries a rover that will be able to, for the first time, drill as deep as 2 meters below the surface in search of present or past life. The first part of the ExoMars program—the Trace Gas Orbiter (TGO)—successfully entered Mars orbit in October. It carried with it Schiaparelli, a demonstrator designed to test landing technology. But after a faultless atmospheric entry, a software error caused Schiaparelli to think it was on the surface when it was still kilometers from landing and it subsequently crashed.

Because Schiaparelli was able to transmit data during the landing to the TGO, ESA engineers believe they can avoid a similar mishap in 2020. But it remained to be seen whether ESA members agreed with them. They did; today, ministers approved the €440 million funding needed to complete the ExoMars mission, but with caveats. Some €97 million of the total must come not from the ExoMars budget line, but from ESA’s central funding, which pays for other science missions. That could potentially lead to conflicts down the line.

“Today I am very confident we will do it. We have some contingency,” ESA Director General Jan Wörner told a postcouncil press conference today.
ESA’s central funding won a modest increase of 1% per year before inflation. Wörner pointed out that, with inflation as low as it is today, that does represent some growth in funding, but it doesn’t mean life will be easy.

“We are in a little bit of a difficult situation: That increase will be eaten up by ExoMars. We didn’t get a free ticket from the member states,” he said.
If inflation increases, then the trouble will mount, because it will eat into the budget for science missions which, with €508 million in 2017, form the biggest budget line in ESA’s central funding.

Despite the strained circumstances, ESA Director of Science Alvaro Giménez Cañete told reporters that:

We can do what we’re committed to and can launch what we’re planning to launch up to 2021.
ESA science missions due for launch in that time span include the Cheops mission to study exoplanet transits, the BepiColombo probe to Mercury, the Solar Orbiter, and the Euclid dark energy mission.

ESA member states also reasserted their commitment to the International Space Station (ISS) by approving nearly €1 billion in funding to remain part of the project beyond the current 2020 agreement to 2024. As part of the current deal, ESA is building a service module for NASA’s Orion capsule. The module will provide electricity, water, oxygen, and nitrogen for astronauts, as well as propulsion once Orion is in orbit. By agreeing to extend ISS operations, ESA commits itself to building a second-service module as part of a barter arrangement with NASA.

Asteroid researchers will be dismayed to hear of the demise of AIM. The mission intended to send a small spacecraft to a 170-meter lump of rock nicknamed Didymoon, because it orbits around a slightly larger asteroid called Didymos. Didymoon is interesting because a NASA mission called Double Asteroid Redirection Test is intending to smash into it at 6 kilometers per second to see what effect that has on its motion. AIM would have observed the condition of the asteroid before and after the collision. Wörner said he will be traveling to Washington, D.C., next week to discuss with NASA what the AIM cancellation means for the joint mission.

Looking further ahead, Wörner said the agency was looking into the possibility of building a “moon village.” This would not be a solely European effort but a multiparty collaboration with contributions from space agencies and industry. The concept doesn’t have a budget line but it has

“started already,” says Wörner, adding: “ESA needs visionary programs for the future.”

Source - https:// brutalist.press /posts/957/europe-moves-ahead-with-mars-mission-kills-asteroid-lander?cab741=994a99ac-e550-43db-8450-41be4158e9a4
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Bill_



Offline chris

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7939
  • Activity:
    5%
  • Thanked: 273 times
  • The Naked Scientist
    • View Profile
    • The Naked Scientists
Re: Europe moves ahead with Mars mission, kills asteroid lander
« Reply #1 on: 30/12/2016 15:30:41 »
That's very interesting; but what's your question?
Logged
I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception - Groucho Marx - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

How long do I have to work out for to work off a Mars bar?

Started by thedocBoard General Science

Replies: 11
Views: 11852
Last post 13/01/2018 17:42:38
by Bored chemist
Discuss: Mars InSights, rings around Saturn and satellite docking games...

Started by thedocBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 1
Views: 3650
Last post 12/09/2012 12:22:44
by thedoc
Could micro-organisms be released on Mars in preparation for human occupation?

Started by Paul Anderson Board Cells, Microbes & Viruses

Replies: 4
Views: 6921
Last post 28/12/2009 11:10:44
by LeeE
What are the ramifications of moving Mars into the Earths orbit lagged 180 degrees?

Started by ChrisBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 6
Views: 5927
Last post 04/01/2019 04:24:20
by Professor Mega-Mind
Has NASA found the food source for early life on Mars?

Started by chrisBoard General Science

Replies: 3
Views: 1645
Last post 16/08/2018 20:28:05
by rami999
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.106 seconds with 38 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.