The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Could you create, generate, and control a static electromagnetic field?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Could you create, generate, and control a static electromagnetic field?

  • 26 Replies
  • 5117 Views
  • 2 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PmbPhy

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3903
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 125 times
    • View Profile
Re: Could you create, generate, and control a static electromagnetic field?
« Reply #20 on: 11/06/2017 05:18:24 »
I forgot to mention that a rotating magnet can generate a static electric field.
Logged
 



Offline vhfpmr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 266
  • Activity:
    8.5%
  • Thanked: 13 times
    • View Profile
Re: Could you create, generate, and control a static electromagnetic field?
« Reply #21 on: 18/06/2017 18:09:13 »
I'm still quite lost, I'm not sure which bits PmbPhy is retracting and which not (if any).
Quote from: PmbPhy on 03/06/2017 17:16:33
There's a difference in potential between two points in a static electric field but such a field cannot produce a steady current in a resistor whereas an EMF can.
This seems to me a bit like arguing that there is a difference, in kind, between the metre used to measure the position of a point in empty space, and the metre used to measure the height of a reservoir that can generate power in a hydro plant. Distance is distance.

FWIW, and digressing a bit from electrostatic fields, my usage of the two terms as a radio engineer is that EMF is conventionally the source voltage of a Thevenin source, and the PD is the terminal voltage. My point is that these are both voltages, with no difference in kind, and the terms merely distinguish between two different locations in the equivalent circuit. (Both would be the same magnitude of course when no current flows, as with an electrostatic field.)

Re: a charged particle, if I charged a speck of dust using a van der graaf, and then placed it between two parallel plates connected to a battery, would it not be attracted to one of the plates?
Logged
 

Offline PmbPhy

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3903
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 125 times
    • View Profile
Re: Could you create, generate, and control a static electromagnetic field?
« Reply #22 on: 19/06/2017 00:17:02 »
Quote from: vhfpmr on 18/06/2017 18:09:13
This seems to me a bit like arguing that there is a difference, in kind, between the metre used to measure the position of a point in empty space, and the metre used to measure the height of a reservoir that can generate power in a hydro plant. Distance is distance.
Your analogy is flawed. In almost no difference in the examples you just gave.  To specify a point in space you need a point of reference and a displacement vector from that reference point to the point you wish to specify. The reference point is arbitrary. The magnitude of the displacement vector is the distance. The displacement vector is called the position vector. The height of a reservoir is the magnitude of the distance from the reference point to the height of the reservoir. The reference point is still arbitrary. Its usually chosen to be the point of lowest place that the water can go to. However you can also dig a well in which the water can fall further and then use the bottom of the well as the reference point.

While distance is distance, EMF is physically different than difference in potential. That's because they  are defined differently. In fact its impossible to have a difference in electric potential in the absence of an electric field but its quite possible to generate an EMF without an electric field. In fact a dynamo works by moving a conductor through a magnetic field which does work on the charged particles in the conductor which can then be used to generate energy in a circuit. But there's no need for an electric field in this case and therefore no electric potential.

Quote from: vhfpmr on 18/06/2017 18:09:13
FWIW, and digressing a bit from electrostatic fields, my usage of the two terms as a radio engineer
I don't see what being a radio engineer has to do with anything.

The definition of difference in potential and EMF as defined in physics are as follows:

An electric potential is the amount of work needed to move a unit positive charge from a reference point to a specific point inside the field without producing any acceleration.

An electromagnetic force (EMF) is defined as that which can produce energy to generate an electric current or  in another context a line integral containing a magnetic term.

There is, in fact, no requirement for an electric field or a battery to even be present to generate an EMF.

See the definition of EMF in any one of the classic texts in EM such as Jackson. Other great texts on the subject are Zangwill or Grtiffiths. All too easily people confuse the terms merely because they have the same units.
« Last Edit: 19/06/2017 02:24:13 by PmbPhy »
Logged
 

Offline PmbPhy

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3903
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 125 times
    • View Profile
Re: Could you create, generate, and control a static electromagnetic field?
« Reply #23 on: 19/06/2017 23:00:26 »
I posted the following link above: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromotive_force#Electromotive_force_and_voltage_difference

I should point out that there are misleading comments in that page. E.g. it says
Quote
The electric charge that has been separated creates an electric potential difference that can be measured with a voltmeter between the terminals of the device.
In the region surrounding a charged object there is an electric field and as such differences in potentials. But you cannot measure those differences with a volt meter.
Logged
 

Offline vhfpmr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 266
  • Activity:
    8.5%
  • Thanked: 13 times
    • View Profile
Re: Could you create, generate, and control a static electromagnetic field?
« Reply #24 on: 07/07/2017 13:46:12 »
Quote from: PmbPhy on 19/06/2017 00:17:02
In fact a dynamo works by moving a conductor through a magnetic field which does work on the charged particles in the conductor which can then be used to generate energy in a circuit. But there's no need for an electric field in this case and therefore no electric potential.
If I move a wire through a magnetic field there will be a voltage difference generated between the ends. If I were to place a speck of charged dust nearby, would it not be attracted to one end of the wire because there is now an electric field surrounding the wire?

Quote
I don't see what being a radio engineer has to do with anything.
The relevance is that radio engineers all understand the terms EMF and PD in the context of a Thevenin source, as defined above.

Quote
An electromagnetic force (EMF) is defined as that which can produce energy to generate an electric current
Ok, so how is that different from PD? Using my definitions of EMF and PD, I could construct a Thevenin source with an infinite resistance, such that the EMF can deliver energy but the PD cannot, would that not then satisfy your distinction between the two terms?
Logged
 



Offline PmbPhy

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3903
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 125 times
    • View Profile
Re: Could you create, generate, and control a static electromagnetic field?
« Reply #25 on: 07/07/2017 14:32:05 »
Quote from: vhfpmr on 07/07/2017 13:46:12
If I move a wire through a magnetic field there will be a voltage difference generated between the ends. If I were to place a speck of charged dust nearby, would it not be attracted to one end of the wire because there is now an electric field surrounding the wire
That applies only to a static situation and is indeed a difference in potential. But its not am EMF because (1) it does not conform to the definition of EMF and (2) it cannot supply

Quote
I don't see what being a radio engineer has to do with anything.
The relevance is that radio engineers all understand the terms EMF and PD in the context of a Thevenin source, as defined above.
[/quote]
Irrelevant since your responses suggest you are confusing an EMF with a legitimate PD.

I will not continue with this since there are numerous authoritative sources available online with clealy explain the differences. If you refuse to look them up then it seems to imply that you don't want to learn but would rather argue.  E.g. The line integral defining a motional EMF is the integral of vxB.
You're confusing the induced electric field for an open circuit with an EMF?

Since there's ample information online which I already pointed out and you chose to ignore. i.e.  Jackson, Zangwill and Grtiffiths I see no reason to repeat myself.
« Last Edit: 12/07/2017 05:54:05 by PmbPhy »
Logged
 

Online evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 9190
  • Activity:
    70%
  • Thanked: 917 times
    • View Profile
Re: Could you create, generate, and control a static electromagnetic field?
« Reply #26 on: 08/07/2017 01:44:17 »
How about this scenario:
- Take a 1.5V battery, which produces a 1.5V EMF
- Connect it to a parallel-plate capacitor, which now has a 1.5V Potential Difference between the plates
       - There is a static electromagnetic field between the two plates, with the field direction being pretty much a straight line between the plates
       - There is a slight fringing field extending beyond the edge of the plates, with the field direction bulging out and curving back in to the other plate
       - You can manipulate the electromagnetic field of the capacitor in various ways, eg:
       - You can increase or decrease the separation of the plates; early experiments with electrostatics mounted the parallel plates on a screw thread so you could increase or decrease the separation
       - You could change the area of the plates; analogue radios had a mechanical method of changing the amount of overlapping area of the plates
       - You could insert materials with different e values

What happens to the voltage depends whether you have the battery still connected or not; the battery will tend to maintain a constant 1.5V across its terminals, and so a current will flow to keep the voltage across the capacitor plates constant while it is connected.

However, if you disconnect the battery before manipulating the capacitor, the charge on the plates is constant, and the voltage on the plates will vary as you change the physical structure of the capacitor.

You can image the electric field strength by using commercial mathematical simulation packages.
- Or you can use a very high impedance voltmeter, with higher impedance that air leakage
- Or, in principle, you could use a device that counts the individual electrons flowing from the more positive terminal to the more negative terminal. This could use totally insulated probes and draw no current from the EMF or PD.

With an old-fashioned "pile" battery, consisting of alternating copper and zinc disks of equal size, the internal EMF may cancel the straight-line electric field between the top and bottom plate.

But if you make the top and bottom plates bigger - in fact, like a capacitor, you will have a static electric field between these plates, plus a fringing field.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: electromagnetic field  / magnetism 
 

Similar topics (5)

Would the magnetic field change if geographic north is not magnetic north?

Started by Azwan Faez Board Geology, Palaeontology & Archaeology

Replies: 1
Views: 6860
Last post 06/02/2011 23:30:37
by CliffordK
H = magnetic field, B = magnetic flux dentsity...huh?

Started by Mr AndrewBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 6
Views: 5086
Last post 16/09/2007 14:35:00
by lightarrow
Can gravitational slowing of time be in neutral gravitational field?

Started by simplifiedBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 11
Views: 7212
Last post 05/09/2011 09:59:53
by imatfaal
does candle light produce electromagnatic field....same as light bulb..?

Started by tareggBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 4
Views: 5326
Last post 15/09/2013 22:29:48
by distimpson
Does the magnoflux spin effect cause ions to spin in a magnetic field?

Started by acsinukBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 3
Views: 3574
Last post 28/05/2015 09:31:01
by acsinuk
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.19 seconds with 50 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.