The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. Question of the Week
  4. QotW - 17.08.13 - How much green skin would we need to photosynthesise?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

QotW - 17.08.13 - How much green skin would we need to photosynthesise?

  • 8 Replies
  • 3008 Views
  • 2 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline katieHaylor (OP)

  • Naked Scientist Producer
  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • ********
  • 469
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
    • The Naked Scientists
QotW - 17.08.13 - How much green skin would we need to photosynthesise?
« on: 14/08/2017 18:05:42 »
Mark asks:

If we could genetically engineer cells to make our own energy, like plants do using chloroplasts, how much extra skin surface area would we need in order to function with similar energy levels as today's humans?


What does everyone think?
« Last Edit: 19/08/2017 07:34:55 by chris »
Logged
 



Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    1%
  • Thanked: 151 times
    • View Profile
Re: QotW - 17.08.13 - How much green skin would we need to photosynthesise?
« Reply #1 on: 14/08/2017 20:50:24 »
For a man, NHS recommended energy-intake is 2500 kCal per day.  That's ~3650MJoules per year.
Total solar energy in London over a year is ~1000kW per square meter.
=> 3650 square meters of green skin required*.  ( In ball-park figures, about 1/3 of a ball-park ).


[* assuming energy consumption was unchanged.]
« Last Edit: 14/08/2017 20:55:13 by RD »
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21923
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 508 times
    • View Profile
Re: QotW - 17.08.13 - How much green skin would we need to photosynthesise?
« Reply #2 on: 14/08/2017 21:39:48 »
A different way to get a rough handle on the answer is that it takes (very roughly) a mature oak tree to produce enough oxygen for a person.
The energy released by combining food with that oxygen is roughly the same as was needed to produce it in the first place.
So you need roughly an oak tree's leaves worth of area.
Google tells me there are roughly 200,000 leaves on a tree. (I didn't check who counted them).
if a leaf is about  5cm square then that's about 500 square metres
More or less the same ball park.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline chris

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7947
  • Activity:
    2.5%
  • Thanked: 273 times
  • The Naked Scientist
    • View Profile
    • The Naked Scientists
Re: QotW - 17.08.13 - How much green skin would we need to photosynthesise?
« Reply #3 on: 14/08/2017 22:24:06 »
The saccoglossan sea slug has done this to good effect already, and is the animal equivalent of a Prius, running on a hybrid power supply.


It has evolved to steal the chloroplasts from its algal dinner and transport them through specialised tubules to the skin so that, supported by biochemistry supplied by genes also presumably stolen from algae earlier in evolutionary history, the pinched chloroplasts are press-ganged into operation and turn the slug into a solar panel.

But, if the Sun doesn't shine, the slug can carry on grazing and make up the energy deficit just by eating a bit more. Impressive!

[Images from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elysia_chlorotica]
Logged
I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception - Groucho Marx - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/
 

Offline chris

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 7947
  • Activity:
    2.5%
  • Thanked: 273 times
  • The Naked Scientist
    • View Profile
    • The Naked Scientists
Re: QotW - 17.08.13 - How much green skin would we need to photosynthesise?
« Reply #4 on: 15/08/2017 18:02:56 »
Quote from: RD on 14/08/2017 20:50:24
For a man, NHS recommended energy-intake is 2500 kCal per day.  That's ~3650MJoules per year.
Total solar energy in London over a year is ~1000kW per square meter.
=> 3650 square meters of green skin required*.  ( In ball-park figures, about 1/3 of a ball-park ).

I thought I'd build on the "ball-park" answer from @RD

I think the accepted value for solar intensity is actually about 1kW per square metre. (From wiipedia: " the direct sunlight at Earth's surface when the Sun is at the zenith is about 1050 W/m2").

If we optimistically assume the sun shines for about 10 hours a day at this rate, that's 10h/d * 3600 s/h * 1000 W/s = about 35MJ/d * 365 d/yr = 13GJ/yr.

From wikipedia, on photosynthetic efficiency, "the theoretical maximum efficiency of solar energy conversion is approximately 11%". So the useful energy in our sunlight to a photosynthesising plant is 13GJ * 11/100 = about 1GJ per year per square metre of collecting surface.

2500kCal is about 10MJ (megajoule), so 365 days/yr * 10MJ/day = about 4GJ/yr.

Energy required / energy available = 4GJ/yr / 1GJ/yr = 4 fold under-supply.

Surface area of a human is about 2 square metres.

Therefore we would need at least 4 x 2 = 8 times the surface area of skin we do currently, and live somewhere with 10h/day of constant strong sunlight, to soak up enough energy to survive on photosynthesis.

Have I got that right?
Logged
I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception - Groucho Marx - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/
 



Offline TimBandTech

  • First timers
  • *
  • 4
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: QotW - 17.08.13 - How much green skin would we need to photosynthesise?
« Reply #5 on: 15/08/2017 19:09:04 »
Quote from: chris on 15/08/2017 18:02:56
Quote from: RD on 14/08/2017 20:50:24
For a man, NHS recommended energy-intake is 2500 kCal per day.  That's ~3650MJoules per year.
Total solar energy in London over a year is ~1000kW per square meter.
=> 3650 square meters of green skin required*.  ( In ball-park figures, about 1/3 of a ball-park ).

I thought I'd build on the "ball-park" answer from @RD

I think the accepted value for solar intensity is actually about 1kW per square metre. (From wiipedia: " the direct sunlight at Earth's surface when the Sun is at the zenith is about 1050 W/m2").

If we optimistically assume the sun shines for about 10 hours a day at this rate, that's 10h/d * 3600 s/h * 1000 W/s = about 35MJ/d * 365 d/yr = 13GJ/yr.

From wikipedia, on photosynthetic efficiency, "the theoretical maximum efficiency of solar energy conversion is approximately 11%". So the useful energy in our sunlight to a photosynthesising plant is 13GJ * 11/100 = about 1GJ per year per square metre of collecting surface.

2500kCal is about 10MJ (megajoule), so 365 days/yr * 10MJ/day = about 4GJ/yr.

Energy required / energy available = 4GJ/yr / 1GJ/yr = 4 fold under-supply.

Surface area of a human is about 2 square metres.

Therefore we would need at least 4 x 2 = 8 times the surface area of skin we do currently, and live somewhere with 10h/day of constant strong sunlight, to soak up enough energy to survive on photosynthesis.

Have I got that right?

I think that is a pretty good analysis. Good of you to include the theoretical efficiency of photosynthesis.

As I recall a human runs at about 100 watts steady state, with a high performance athlete able to deliver about four hundred watts for a limited time; maybe say an hour. Banking energy as fat ought to be in the system so a steady state figure should be OK, though the efficiencies matter tremendously and have to be multiplied.

I've done some photovoltaic design, and know that the 1000 watts per square meter figure is regarded as accurate as direct sun on a perpendicular plate; on a clear day. We then reuse this figure based on statistical sun hours in a given region. An old data set produced in the 1980's point to my location having about 4 sun hours per day averaged annually, but much shorter in the winter; down to around two sun hours per day as I recall.

The 11% efficiency shows that the 1000 watt figure happens to diminish to close to the 100 watt figure, so instantaneously a human could be solar powered at one hundred watts with just one square meter of green skin pointed straight at the sun. I won't do out the steady state figures, and would have to consider the efficiency of fat storage much like a battery backed system has to sacrifice about 15% to battery inefficiency. I wouldn't be surprised if we wound up at around ten square meters of green skin. But hey, that is way better than the acreage of space each human is consuming in food now. We've got to get this green skin thing going. Live for the sun. Stop the killing of our fellow sun worshipers.
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: chris

Offline cinka

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 16
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: QotW - 17.08.13 - How much green skin would we need to photosynthesise?
« Reply #6 on: 21/08/2017 01:25:19 »
I really don't know. Is there really a count?
Logged
 

Offline katieHaylor (OP)

  • Naked Scientist Producer
  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • ********
  • 469
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
    • The Naked Scientists
Re: QotW - 17.08.13 - How much green skin would we need to photosynthesise?
« Reply #7 on: 23/08/2017 14:53:43 »
This question has now been answered in our show, and you can listen to it here - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/articles/questions/how-much-green-skin-would-we-need-photosynthesise
Logged
 

Offline Danne

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 45
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: QotW - 17.08.13 - How much green skin would we need to photosynthesise?
« Reply #8 on: 04/10/2017 14:16:58 »
Quote from: katieHaylor on 23/08/2017 14:53:43
This question has now been answered in our show, and you can listen to it here - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/articles/questions/how-much-green-skin-would-we-need-photosynthesise

Now that is a bold claim :D !
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: skin  / photosynthesis 
 

Similar topics (5)

QotW - 15.08.24 - Why do major keys sound happy and minor keys sound mournful?

Started by thedocBoard Question of the Week

Replies: 10
Views: 47195
Last post 05/04/2018 03:06:55
by Monox D. I-Fly
QotW - 08.04.06 - Better to drink wine than to drink nothing?

Started by thedocBoard Question of the Week

Replies: 33
Views: 109225
Last post 17/01/2021 17:52:40
by LaurenaS
QotW - 18.08.02 - Why are non-stick pans non-stick?

Started by Adam MurphyBoard Question of the Week

Replies: 6
Views: 42235
Last post 18/01/2020 06:33:19
by evan_au
QotW - 10.03.28 - Is a human bite worse than a dog bite?

Started by thedocBoard Question of the Week

Replies: 10
Views: 52805
Last post 13/01/2019 09:40:37
by chris
QotW - 11.03.06 - How do pain medications target pain?

Started by thedocBoard Question of the Week

Replies: 7
Views: 15900
Last post 18/01/2018 21:08:11
by evan_au
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.176 seconds with 61 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.