[panoptos (OP)]

Although we explain things using mathematical language and reasoning, currently scientists postulate that everything comes from “The Big Bang” leading to the question of what comes before it.  As a consequence of that and other ideations, there is a need to strip our understanding of the Universe to foundational statements, a bit like Peano did for numbers.  Prior to Peano, numbers had been used and applied throughout the history of humans with various structures and nomenclature.  Yet Peano realised there must be an initial set of foundational statements from which unification of all numerical systems can be enabled.

To use an analogy, our human science seems to be at a juncture where we have determined and used the number 1 without considering the existence of zero (0).

To that end, I have not yet seen such a set of statements for Universal structures commonly referred to in peer-reviewed science or elsewhere.  Maybe I have missed something, but decided to attempt to create foundational postulates and corollaries for the Universe from which all further understandings of the Universe can be explained.  Once this foundation is established, this, as with Peano’s numerical postulates, will require the mapping of all current knowledge to it.

My goal is to create a SELF-CONSISTENT BASIS (which is not absolute) for all knowledge, but only modifiable in the extreme where new enabled potentials cannot be linked in any way with the two (2) elemental potentials.  This also includes the ongoing process of review of these potentials to ensure that any newly proposed or adopted potentials are constantly examined for links to the 2 elemental potentials to establish mutual exclusivity.

That said, please temporarily suspend your current thoughts and think, as they say, “outside the box/square/other dimensional structures”… or in other words, temporarily suspend your cognitive ideations in order to identify any inconsistencies.

Constructive comment should be preceded by reflective examination. Only then will something be legitimately called crap.  If justified beyond mere belief and unilateral claims, I will accept this label.  Now to toss a stone into the scientific pond and observe and analyse the ripples, if any.

POSTULATES/DEFINITIONS/ORIGINATORS

(0)   There is, by definition, only one Universe.  Uni means “1”
(00)   The Universe contains all that exists.
(000)   There is only one smallest Universal element called a “point” which is called “The Originating Element”.

(O1)   A point has elemental potentials.
(O2)   Elemental potentials are mutually exclusive.
(O2)   There are only 2 (two) elemental potentials  (a) Time and (b) Energy from which all of the Universal contents evolve.
(O3)   Time is the measure of relativity.
(O4)   Energy is the measure of all Universal structures.
(O5)   Points in contact enable potentialities.
(O6)   Contacting points enable potentialities.
(O7)   A Dimensions is a collection of points.
(O8)   Dimensions are (a) Intersecting (b) Co-incident or (c) Mutually Exclusive

Note (Alpha):
Due to pelop (the Perceiving Entity’s Limits Of Perception), other Elemental Potentials may exist, but need to be identified and included ONLY IF they are Mutually Exclusive with all the other defined elemental potentials and ALL of their enabled consequences and/or interactive lineages.  That is, adding another Elemental Potential is the ABSOLUTE last resort not a relative or convenient one needed to explain something, and MUST NOT be linked in any way to either Time or Energy.

COROLLARIES

(OC1)   Contacting points initiate consequences for potentialities.
(OC2)   Contacting points initiate Time, Energy or both.
(OC3)   Mutually exclusive dimensions maintain the potentiality of their constituent points.
(OC4)   Intersecting or coincident dimensions exist where points contact.
(OC5)   Singularities are instances of Points in contact.

The process I am hoping to kick start is akin to RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computing) without the ‘Computing’… Reduced Instruction Set Science (RISS ?)… other suggestions accepted, but may be not Postulated Instruction Set Science :-).

Thanks for taking the time to read my ideations.

[panoptos (OP)]

I forgot to say that I have included an inconsistency in these statements.  Can you pick it?