The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Does Plank mass represent a “special characteristic” of space-time?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Does Plank mass represent a “special characteristic” of space-time?

  • 1 Replies
  • 1116 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Richard777 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 187
  • Activity:
    1.5%
    • View Profile
Does Plank mass represent a “special characteristic” of space-time?
« on: 18/09/2017 21:21:01 »
A gravitational field may be considered as an “attractive acceleration” surrounding a massive object at any distance (r) from the center of the object.

Assume that;
-   acceleration is due to a “deformation” of local space-time
-   energy is required to deform space-time
-   local space-time is considered to be “pressurized” by the object
-   energy is required to pressurize space-time

The Newton equation may be written using potential energies (E1 , E2);
   
E1 = rmPg1       and   E2 = rmPg2 

 mP is Plank mass   
 g1 and g2 are gravitational fields associated with each object.

mP seems to represent space-time as another object.

Can Plank mass may be assumed to be an “equivalent massive charge” of space-time?
Does a massive object impose a “continuum pressure” upon local space-time?
* Reference.pdf (156.51 kB - downloaded 87 times.)
Logged
 



Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6807
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 174 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: Does Plank mass represent a “special characteristic” of space-time?
« Reply #1 on: 18/09/2017 21:44:57 »
Is that a 2 x 4 plank?
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Must ∞ monkeys on ∞ typewriters really write everything given ∞ time?

Started by chiralSPOBoard General Science

Replies: 28
Views: 24737
Last post 28/03/2020 11:42:26
by yor_on
What does "time-like" mean in the following sentence?

Started by scheradoBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 15
Views: 9331
Last post 09/02/2018 10:28:21
by Colin2B
If you could travel faster than light, could you travel in time?

Started by DmaierBoard Technology

Replies: 13
Views: 14309
Last post 19/03/2020 14:56:52
by Paul25
If the speed of light is constant, time must be constant too?

Started by Chuck FBoard General Science

Replies: 4
Views: 11902
Last post 19/03/2020 14:51:12
by Paul25
If gravity is a warping of time, why are we trying to detect gravity?

Started by thedocBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 10
Views: 5072
Last post 19/03/2020 14:48:11
by Paul25
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.214 seconds with 38 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.