The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Are all atoms transparent?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7   Go Down

Are all atoms transparent?

  • 138 Replies
  • 8285 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Are all atoms transparent?
« Reply #100 on: 04/10/2017 15:16:52 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 04/10/2017 14:56:28
It's preposterous to say that science has some how managed to "leave out" light travelling in space.
But they did, that is why I have spent years getting the answers but you don't want to listen.

added- science only ever considered white light which is a constant made by a mixture of constant frequencies.  White light is different to the randomness of the light permeating through space. We can't see randomness, not only in probability but also when discussing the nature of light. We can only see or detect things that are constant and have enough intensity and magnitude compared to the chaos.

Quote
Chaos theory is a branch of mathematics focused on the behavior of dynamical systems that are highly sensitive to initial conditions. 'Chaos' is an interdisciplinary theory stating that within the apparent randomness of chaotic complex systems, there are underlying patterns,

Quote
Permeability (electromagnetism), the degree of magnetisation of a material in response to a magnetic field

Consider the field itself as been a material relative to other fields. (N-field).

The degree of magnetisation of a field in response to a magnetic field
Logged
 



guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Are all atoms transparent?
« Reply #101 on: 04/10/2017 15:18:54 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 04/10/2017 14:56:28
t's possible that the path is chaotic- that's sometimes done deliberately.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/9806183.pdf
as far a I'm aware, it is currently in the box marked "fascinating, but useless".
The chaos arises from a chaotic substrate.

Why would a clear path - air, or even a vacuum- do that?
Or glass, because it has low permeability of the field magnitude.
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 16239
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 372 times
    • View Profile
Re: Are all atoms transparent?
« Reply #102 on: 04/10/2017 20:23:27 »
Quote from: Thebox on 04/10/2017 15:16:52
But they did, that is why I have spent years getting the answers but you don't want to listen.
No
They didn't.
They did quite a lot of work on it.
Starting with stuff like Maxwell's equations, and going on to things like microwave radar and the fibre optic communications through which you are receiving this message.
It really is preposterous to try to say they didn't .

Quote from: Thebox on 04/10/2017 15:16:52
science only ever considered white light which is a constant made by a mixture of constant frequencies. 
Clearly hogwash.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectroscopy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photochemistry
etc

There's a whole stack of stuff using lasers which only produce a single wavelength.
Holography is, perhaps, the most widely used.
Quote from: Thebox on 04/10/2017 15:16:52
We can't see randomness,
Yes we can.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speckle_imaging

Why don't you spend some time finding out what we can, and do, achieve, before trying to tell us we can't.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Are all atoms transparent?
« Reply #103 on: 04/10/2017 20:27:01 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 04/10/2017 20:23:27
Quote from: Thebox on 04/10/2017 15:16:52
But they did, that is why I have spent years getting the answers but you don't want to listen.
No
They didn't.
They did quite a lot of work on it.
Starting with stuff like Maxwell's equations, and going on to things like microwave radar and the fibre optic communications through which you are receiving this message.
It really is preposterous to try to say they didn't .

Quote from: Thebox on 04/10/2017 15:16:52
science only ever considered white light which is a constant made by a mixture of constant frequencies. 
Clearly hogwash.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectroscopy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photochemistry
etc

There's a whole stack of stuff using lasers which only produce a single wavelength.
Holography is, perhaps, the most widely used.
Quote from: Thebox on 04/10/2017 15:16:52
We can't see randomness,
Yes we can.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speckle_imaging

Why don't you spend some time finding out what we can, and do, achieve, before trying to tell us we can't.
I type in white light I get https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Light

Please provide the link to the light that is not white and permeates through space.

I will provide a link what I get when I type in clear light

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_Light
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 16239
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 372 times
    • View Profile
Re: Are all atoms transparent?
« Reply #104 on: 04/10/2017 21:05:32 »
Quote from: Thebox on 04/10/2017 20:27:01
Please provide the link to the light that is not white and permeates through space.
https://www.enotes.com/homework-help/what-monochromatic-light-how-used-468051
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Are all atoms transparent?
« Reply #105 on: 04/10/2017 21:09:33 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 04/10/2017 21:05:32
Quote from: Thebox on 04/10/2017 20:27:01
Please provide the link to the light that is not white and permeates through space.
https://www.enotes.com/homework-help/what-monochromatic-light-how-used-468051
I think you will find that ''light''permeating through space is colourless therefore it can not be monochromatic.   It has no colour, especially not white. 

Like I said science as not covered the nature of this.

You can't provide information because there is none. 

So lets discuss.

added- for the purpose of discussion are you happy calling the electromagnetic radiation that permeates through ''free space'' , clear light?

Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 16239
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 372 times
    • View Profile
Re: Are all atoms transparent?
« Reply #106 on: 04/10/2017 21:24:03 »
If it has no colour, how does it "know" to make, for example a bit of paper light up blue or green?

Just because nobody is looking doesn't stop it having a colour.

Since you are simply flat out wrong, I can't provide information about your hallucination.
Quote from: Thebox on 04/10/2017 21:09:33
added- for the purpose of discussion are you happy calling the electromagnetic radiation that permeates through ''free space'' , clear light?

It's just light; there's nothing "clear" about it.

You need to get to grips with the fact that light is light.
You only see it if it goes into your eye.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Are all atoms transparent?
« Reply #107 on: 04/10/2017 21:28:16 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 04/10/2017 21:24:03
If it has no colour, how does it "know" to make, for example a bit of paper light up blue or green?


By feedback ,



Quote
Since you are simply flat out wrong, I can't provide information about your hallucination.
Quote from: Thebox on 04/10/2017 21:09:33
added- for the purpose of discussion are you happy calling the electromagnetic radiation that permeates through ''free space'' , clear light?


It's just light; there's nothing "clear" about it.

You need to get to grips with the fact that light is light.
You only see it if it goes into your eye.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 04/10/2017 21:24:03
If it has no colour, how does it "know" to make, for example a bit of paper light up blue or green?
The magnitude of feedback.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 04/10/2017 21:24:03
It's just light; there's nothing "clear" about it.
Huh, no, it is very clear in appearance between my eyes and object, the light is invisible/clear between eye and observation. You are quite mad if you think it is not. I can see it is.
Logged
 

Offline The Spoon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 506
  • Activity:
    2%
  • Thanked: 13 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: Are all atoms transparent?
« Reply #108 on: 04/10/2017 22:12:49 »
Quote from: Thebox on 04/10/2017 20:27:01
Quote from: Bored chemist on 04/10/2017 20:23:27
Quote from: Thebox on 04/10/2017 15:16:52
But they did, that is why I have spent years getting the answers but you don't want to listen.
No
They didn't.
They did quite a lot of work on it.
Starting with stuff like Maxwell's equations, and going on to things like microwave radar and the fibre optic communications through which you are receiving this message.
It really is preposterous to try to say they didn't .

Quote from: Thebox on 04/10/2017 15:16:52
science only ever considered white light which is a constant made by a mixture of constant frequencies. 
Clearly hogwash.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectroscopy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photochemistry
etc

There's a whole stack of stuff using lasers which only produce a single wavelength.
Holography is, perhaps, the most widely used.
Quote from: Thebox on 04/10/2017 15:16:52
We can't see randomness,
Yes we can.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speckle_imaging

Why don't you spend some time finding out what we can, and do, achieve, before trying to tell us we can't.
I type in white light I get https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Light

Please provide the link to the light that is not white and permeates through space.

I will provide a link what I get when I type in clear light

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_Light
So you have never seen light shining on a surface from the sun for example? Is the light on the surface clear? Of course it isnt Mr. Pigeon.
Logged
 



guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Are all atoms transparent?
« Reply #109 on: 05/10/2017 12:38:27 »
Quote from: The Spoon on 04/10/2017 22:12:49
Quote from: Thebox on 04/10/2017 20:27:01
Quote from: Bored chemist on 04/10/2017 20:23:27
Quote from: Thebox on 04/10/2017 15:16:52
But they did, that is why I have spent years getting the answers but you don't want to listen.
No
They didn't.
They did quite a lot of work on it.
Starting with stuff like Maxwell's equations, and going on to things like microwave radar and the fibre optic communications through which you are receiving this message.
It really is preposterous to try to say they didn't .

Quote from: Thebox on 04/10/2017 15:16:52
science only ever considered white light which is a constant made by a mixture of constant frequencies. 
Clearly hogwash.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectroscopy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photochemistry
etc

There's a whole stack of stuff using lasers which only produce a single wavelength.
Holography is, perhaps, the most widely used.
Quote from: Thebox on 04/10/2017 15:16:52
We can't see randomness,
Yes we can.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speckle_imaging

Why don't you spend some time finding out what we can, and do, achieve, before trying to tell us we can't.
I type in white light I get https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Light

Please provide the link to the light that is not white and permeates through space.

I will provide a link what I get when I type in clear light

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_Light
So you have never seen light shining on a surface from the sun for example? Is the light on the surface clear? Of course it isnt Mr. Pigeon.
Of course the light that glares off an object is not clear, we are not taking about the visible light of interaction.  We are discussing the light that permeates through ''free space''.
Logged
 

Offline The Spoon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 506
  • Activity:
    2%
  • Thanked: 13 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: Are all atoms transparent?
« Reply #110 on: 05/10/2017 17:04:00 »
Quote from: Thebox on 05/10/2017 12:38:27
Quote from: The Spoon on 04/10/2017 22:12:49
Quote from: Thebox on 04/10/2017 20:27:01
Quote from: Bored chemist on 04/10/2017 20:23:27
Quote from: Thebox on 04/10/2017 15:16:52
But they did, that is why I have spent years getting the answers but you don't want to listen.
No
They didn't.
They did quite a lot of work on it.
Starting with stuff like Maxwell's equations, and going on to things like microwave radar and the fibre optic communications through which you are receiving this message.
It really is preposterous to try to say they didn't .

Quote from: Thebox on 04/10/2017 15:16:52
science only ever considered white light which is a constant made by a mixture of constant frequencies. 
Clearly hogwash.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectroscopy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photochemistry
etc

There's a whole stack of stuff using lasers which only produce a single wavelength.
Holography is, perhaps, the most widely used.
Quote from: Thebox on 04/10/2017 15:16:52
We can't see randomness,
Yes we can.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speckle_imaging

Why don't you spend some time finding out what we can, and do, achieve, before trying to tell us we can't.
I type in white light I get https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Light

Please provide the link to the light that is not white and permeates through space.

I will provide a link what I get when I type in clear light

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_Light
So you have never seen light shining on a surface from the sun for example? Is the light on the surface clear? Of course it isnt Mr. Pigeon.
Of course the light that glares off an object is not clear, we are not taking about the visible light of interaction.  We are discussing the light that permeates through ''free space''.
Oh I see. So it is the special kind of light that you have made up that we are talking about? Not the light that everybody else is referring to? Good diversion pigeon.
Logged
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Are all atoms transparent?
« Reply #111 on: 05/10/2017 20:46:12 »
Quote from: The Spoon on 05/10/2017 17:04:00
Quote from: Thebox on 05/10/2017 12:38:27
Quote from: The Spoon on 04/10/2017 22:12:49
Quote from: Thebox on 04/10/2017 20:27:01
Quote from: Bored chemist on 04/10/2017 20:23:27
Quote from: Thebox on 04/10/2017 15:16:52
But they did, that is why I have spent years getting the answers but you don't want to listen.
No
They didn't.
They did quite a lot of work on it.
Starting with stuff like Maxwell's equations, and going on to things like microwave radar and the fibre optic communications through which you are receiving this message.
It really is preposterous to try to say they didn't .

Quote from: Thebox on 04/10/2017 15:16:52
science only ever considered white light which is a constant made by a mixture of constant frequencies. 
Clearly hogwash.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectroscopy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photochemistry
etc

There's a whole stack of stuff using lasers which only produce a single wavelength.
Holography is, perhaps, the most widely used.
Quote from: Thebox on 04/10/2017 15:16:52
We can't see randomness,
Yes we can.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speckle_imaging

Why don't you spend some time finding out what we can, and do, achieve, before trying to tell us we can't.
I type in white light I get https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Light

Please provide the link to the light that is not white and permeates through space.

I will provide a link what I get when I type in clear light

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_Light
So you have never seen light shining on a surface from the sun for example? Is the light on the surface clear? Of course it isnt Mr. Pigeon.
Of course the light that glares off an object is not clear, we are not taking about the visible light of interaction.  We are discussing the light that permeates through ''free space''.
Oh I see. So it is the special kind of light that you have made up that we are talking about? Not the light that everybody else is referring to? Good diversion pigeon.
huh.... are you reading something else.
Logged
 

Offline The Spoon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 506
  • Activity:
    2%
  • Thanked: 13 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: Are all atoms transparent?
« Reply #112 on: 05/10/2017 21:08:51 »
'we are not taking about the visible light of interaction.  We are discussing the light that permeates through ''free space''. '

Utter nonsense.
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: Bored chemist



guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Are all atoms transparent?
« Reply #113 on: 05/10/2017 21:58:10 »
Quote from: The Spoon on 05/10/2017 21:08:51
'we are not taking about the visible light of interaction.  We are discussing the light that permeates through ''free space''. '

Utter nonsense.
Huh. quite clearly you have lost it. Do you not know the difference between visible light and light?
Logged
 

Offline The Spoon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 506
  • Activity:
    2%
  • Thanked: 13 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: Are all atoms transparent?
« Reply #114 on: 06/10/2017 11:18:19 »
Quote from: Thebox on 05/10/2017 21:58:10
Quote from: The Spoon on 05/10/2017 21:08:51
'we are not taking about the visible light of interaction.  We are discussing the light that permeates through ''free space''. '

Utter nonsense.
Huh. quite clearly you have lost it. Do you not know the difference between visible light and light?
A good definition of light can be found in your favourite (and only) source of information:
'Light is electromagnetic radiation within a certain portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. The word usually refers to visible light, which is visible to the human eye and is responsible for the sense of sight'
We are referring to the usual definition. No doubt you are referring to your own definition which nobody else on the planet recognises as usual to ensure you get some attention and continue this farce.
Logged
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Are all atoms transparent?
« Reply #115 on: 06/10/2017 11:25:36 »
Quote from: The Spoon on 06/10/2017 11:18:19
Quote from: Thebox on 05/10/2017 21:58:10
Quote from: The Spoon on 05/10/2017 21:08:51
'we are not taking about the visible light of interaction.  We are discussing the light that permeates through ''free space''. '

Utter nonsense.
Huh. quite clearly you have lost it. Do you not know the difference between visible light and light?
A good definition of light can be found in your favourite (and only) source of information:
'Light is electromagnetic radiation within a certain portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. The word usually refers to visible light, which is visible to the human eye and is responsible for the sense of sight'
We are referring to the usual definition. No doubt you are referring to your own definition which nobody else on the planet recognises as usual to ensure you get some attention and continue this farce.
It is quite clear to me now that you are just trolling me like Mr Chemist, so no longer will I be replying to your replies.   In fact I won't be bother replying again  in general.  I can not beat religion , I mean science.
Carry on believing your own lies about the Universe, I can't be bothered anymore wasting my very precious time of life, this is getting me nowhere so time to move on into something else.
Logged
 

Offline The Spoon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 506
  • Activity:
    2%
  • Thanked: 13 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: Are all atoms transparent?
« Reply #116 on: 06/10/2017 11:29:34 »
Quote from: Thebox on 06/10/2017 11:25:36
Quote from: The Spoon on 06/10/2017 11:18:19
Quote from: Thebox on 05/10/2017 21:58:10
Quote from: The Spoon on 05/10/2017 21:08:51
'we are not taking about the visible light of interaction.  We are discussing the light that permeates through ''free space''. '

Utter nonsense.
Huh. quite clearly you have lost it. Do you not know the difference between visible light and light?
A good definition of light can be found in your favourite (and only) source of information:
'Light is electromagnetic radiation within a certain portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. The word usually refers to visible light, which is visible to the human eye and is responsible for the sense of sight'
We are referring to the usual definition. No doubt you are referring to your own definition which nobody else on the planet recognises as usual to ensure you get some attention and continue this farce.
It is quite clear to me now that you are just trolling me like Mr Chemist, so no longer will I be replying to your replies.   In fact I won't be bother replying again  in general.  I can not beat religion , I mean science.
Carry on believing your own lies about the Universe, I can't be bothered anymore wasting my very precious time of life, this is getting me nowhere so time to move on into something else.
In other words, the definition does not conform to what you think it should do, the world does not conform to what you think it should, evidence does not confirm your deluded beliefs so you accuse people who point out your mistakes of trolling. Amazing how many people you accuse of trolling really. You remind me of Donald Trump but without the intellect.

ETA. This is not an airport so there is no need to announce your departure.
« Last Edit: 06/10/2017 12:58:54 by The Spoon »
Logged
 



guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Are all atoms transparent?
« Reply #117 on: 06/10/2017 13:49:30 »
Quote from: The Spoon on 06/10/2017 11:29:34
Quote from: Thebox on 06/10/2017 11:25:36
Quote from: The Spoon on 06/10/2017 11:18:19
Quote from: Thebox on 05/10/2017 21:58:10
Quote from: The Spoon on 05/10/2017 21:08:51
'we are not taking about the visible light of interaction.  We are discussing the light that permeates through ''free space''. '

Utter nonsense.
Huh. quite clearly you have lost it. Do you not know the difference between visible light and light?
A good definition of light can be found in your favourite (and only) source of information:
'Light is electromagnetic radiation within a certain portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. The word usually refers to visible light, which is visible to the human eye and is responsible for the sense of sight'
We are referring to the usual definition. No doubt you are referring to your own definition which nobody else on the planet recognises as usual to ensure you get some attention and continue this farce.
It is quite clear to me now that you are just trolling me like Mr Chemist, so no longer will I be replying to your replies.   In fact I won't be bother replying again  in general.  I can not beat religion , I mean science.
Carry on believing your own lies about the Universe, I can't be bothered anymore wasting my very precious time of life, this is getting me nowhere so time to move on into something else.
In other words, the definition does not conform to what you think it should do, the world does not conform to what you think it should, evidence does not confirm your deluded beliefs so you accuse people who point out your mistakes of trolling. Amazing how many people you accuse of trolling really. You remind me of Donald Trump but without the intellect.

ETA. This is not an airport so there is no need to announce your departure.
How about I be totally blunt with you, you are stupid.  You are not a clever person, you can only do remembrance of subjective dogma,

End of continue to be stupid.
Logged
 

Offline The Spoon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 506
  • Activity:
    2%
  • Thanked: 13 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: Are all atoms transparent?
« Reply #118 on: 06/10/2017 13:51:59 »
Quote from: Thebox on 06/10/2017 13:49:30
Quote from: The Spoon on 06/10/2017 11:29:34
Quote from: Thebox on 06/10/2017 11:25:36
Quote from: The Spoon on 06/10/2017 11:18:19
Quote from: Thebox on 05/10/2017 21:58:10
Quote from: The Spoon on 05/10/2017 21:08:51
'we are not taking about the visible light of interaction.  We are discussing the light that permeates through ''free space''. '

Utter nonsense.
Huh. quite clearly you have lost it. Do you not know the difference between visible light and light?
A good definition of light can be found in your favourite (and only) source of information:
'Light is electromagnetic radiation within a certain portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. The word usually refers to visible light, which is visible to the human eye and is responsible for the sense of sight'
We are referring to the usual definition. No doubt you are referring to your own definition which nobody else on the planet recognises as usual to ensure you get some attention and continue this farce.
It is quite clear to me now that you are just trolling me like Mr Chemist, so no longer will I be replying to your replies.   In fact I won't be bother replying again  in general.  I can not beat religion , I mean science.
Carry on believing your own lies about the Universe, I can't be bothered anymore wasting my very precious time of life, this is getting me nowhere so time to move on into something else.
In other words, the definition does not conform to what you think it should do, the world does not conform to what you think it should, evidence does not confirm your deluded beliefs so you accuse people who point out your mistakes of trolling. Amazing how many people you accuse of trolling really. You remind me of Donald Trump but without the intellect.

ETA. This is not an airport so there is no need to announce your departure.
How about I be totally blunt with you, you are stupid.  You are not a clever person, you can only do remembrance of subjective dogma,

End of continue to be stupid.
Yep. Like 'the Donald'. Where facts are inconvenient to your belief, they are 'fake news'. Enjoy your delusion Pigeon.
Logged
 

guest39538

  • Guest
Re: Are all atoms transparent?
« Reply #119 on: 06/10/2017 13:58:54 »
Quote from: The Spoon on 06/10/2017 13:51:59
Quote from: Thebox on 06/10/2017 13:49:30
Quote from: The Spoon on 06/10/2017 11:29:34
Quote from: Thebox on 06/10/2017 11:25:36
Quote from: The Spoon on 06/10/2017 11:18:19
Quote from: Thebox on 05/10/2017 21:58:10
Quote from: The Spoon on 05/10/2017 21:08:51
'we are not taking about the visible light of interaction.  We are discussing the light that permeates through ''free space''. '

Utter nonsense.
Huh. quite clearly you have lost it. Do you not know the difference between visible light and light?
A good definition of light can be found in your favourite (and only) source of information:
'Light is electromagnetic radiation within a certain portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. The word usually refers to visible light, which is visible to the human eye and is responsible for the sense of sight'
We are referring to the usual definition. No doubt you are referring to your own definition which nobody else on the planet recognises as usual to ensure you get some attention and continue this farce.
It is quite clear to me now that you are just trolling me like Mr Chemist, so no longer will I be replying to your replies.   In fact I won't be bother replying again  in general.  I can not beat religion , I mean science.
Carry on believing your own lies about the Universe, I can't be bothered anymore wasting my very precious time of life, this is getting me nowhere so time to move on into something else.
In other words, the definition does not conform to what you think it should do, the world does not conform to what you think it should, evidence does not confirm your deluded beliefs so you accuse people who point out your mistakes of trolling. Amazing how many people you accuse of trolling really. You remind me of Donald Trump but without the intellect.

ETA. This is not an airport so there is no need to announce your departure.
How about I be totally blunt with you, you are stupid.  You are not a clever person, you can only do remembrance of subjective dogma,

End of continue to be stupid.
Yep. Like 'the Donald'. Where facts are inconvenient to your belief, they are 'fake news'. Enjoy your delusion Pigeon.
You is the one who is delusional and some way thinks they are clever.. Why not face reality and accept you can not do any science.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.148 seconds with 76 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.