The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. The creation of ''substance''.
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

The creation of ''substance''.

  • 21 Replies
  • 2286 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline The Spoon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 618
  • Activity:
    0.5%
  • Thanked: 15 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: The creation of ''substance''.
« Reply #20 on: 28/10/2017 18:24:52 »
As I pointed out previously, 'eviscosity' is a made up word. Your equation that tries to explain your made up word is... well made up. Saying that a nebulous concept such as 'high frequency' divided by a vector multiplied by light equals anything is nonsense. It is like saying apples divided by sky multiplied by eggs is equal to dinosaurs.
Logged
 



Marked as best answer by on Today at 03:39:49

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21942
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 509 times
    • View Profile
  • Undo Best Answer
  • Re: The creation of ''substance''.
    « Reply #21 on: 28/10/2017 18:29:32 »
    Quote from: Bored chemist on 27/10/2017 18:51:42
    Still word salad.
    And it will remain so, regardless of my state of modesty, until you actually explain what you mean.
    Logged
    Please disregard all previous signatures.
     



    • Print
    Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
    « previous next »
    Tags:
     
    There was an error while thanking
    Thanking...
    • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
      Privacy Policy
      SMFAds for Free Forums
    • Naked Science Forum ©

    Page created in 0.088 seconds with 35 queries.

    • Podcasts
    • Articles
    • Get Naked
    • About
    • Contact us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Policy
    • Subscribe to newsletter
    • We love feedback

    Follow us

    cambridge_logo_footer.png

    ©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.