The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Is it possible to define infinity?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7]   Go Down

Is it possible to define infinity?

  • 124 Replies
  • 7922 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bill S (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3420
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 97 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is it possible to define infinity?
« Reply #120 on: 03/12/2017 11:18:11 »
Hi Justin, welcome.

You are right, there are countable and uncountable infinities in mathematics.  My (non-mathematical) understanding of that is that this works well because we can put things/concepts into one-to-one relationships; or be unable to do so; in finite perception; then we imagine we can extrapolate that to infinity, which, of course, we cannot.   Even Cantor could not do that.
Logged
There never was nothing.
 



Offline Bill S (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3420
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 97 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is it possible to define infinity?
« Reply #121 on: 17/12/2017 13:22:31 »
I've not abandoned this thread.  Some technical difficulties, plus non-related problems, combined with my not being entirely happy with my material, conspire to delay progress. 
Logged
There never was nothing.
 

Offline puppypower

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 992
  • Activity:
    13%
  • Thanked: 86 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is it possible to define infinity?
« Reply #122 on: 17/12/2017 20:59:02 »
Quote from: Bill S on 20/11/2017 20:46:25
Where do we stand on: “can there ever have been nothing”?

There seems to be a fairly general feeling that there can never have been nothing, with some even saying so.  However, there are some doubts, but efforts to discover any example of something coming from nothing have drawn a blank.

The nearest we have come so far is: “Brian Cox said that it is possible that there was nothing before the Big Bang.”  (#82).  Seemingly he does not say how this could be possible.

Or; (#83) “If Cox speculated about a quantum fluctuation “before” the Big Bang, I think someone should say, “Welcome to the world of infinite regress”, i.e., what caused the quantum fluctuation?” Of course, “infinite regress” is another form of the infinite sequence, with all its problems.

IMO, “nothing” and an infinite “something” are incompatible, so the question of whether or not there is an infinity that transcends maths is linked to the question of “nothing”; but let’s take one part at a time.


One way to create something from nothing is an artifact of waves. Say we had a wave tank, with wave generators on either side of the tank, each 180 degree out of phase with the other. Although energy is being pumped into the tank from both sides, the cancelling of the two waves creates stillness in the center of the tank. The energy is hidden due to wave addition. If we hid the wave generators and allowed the tank to reach steady state, and then had an audience look at the tan they will assume, no energy, since it is hidden.

We can makes this energy reappear, like magic, if we placed a partition in the stillness. Say we place a broad in the middle. One wave would rise on one side of the partition, and another wave will appear to sink on the other side. The audience would marvel since it appears like we have opened a worm hole.

In the case of the BB, the needed partition was the induction of particle matter. If we started with just waves without particles we can hide all the energy. Particles are different from waves, in the sense that particles cannot occupy the same space. Particles always need to add, whereas waves can add or subtract.

The question becomes how can you partition the stillness, to release the energy for the primordial particles? One such partition is the speed of light, which is distinct from slower inertial references; mass particles exist <C but cannot cross over into C. This can be done by introducing time and space to the universe; departure from the original C ground state of the hidden potential energy.

According to Special Relativity it would take infinite energy for a mass particle to cross over from inertial to C. If we go the other way, there is a lot of potential energy to release.
« Last Edit: 17/12/2017 21:01:31 by puppypower »
Logged
 

Offline Bill S (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3420
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 97 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is it possible to define infinity?
« Reply #123 on: 18/12/2017 13:19:43 »
Quote from: Puppypower
One way to create something from nothing is an artifact of waves. Say we had a wave tank, with wave generators on either side of the tank.....

 I hesitate to believe you are really saying that waves, tanks generators etc are "nothing"; and even that "we" are nothing.

Something from nothing must require an initial "nothing".
Logged
There never was nothing.
 

Offline Bill S (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3420
  • Activity:
    11%
  • Thanked: 97 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is it possible to define infinity?
« Reply #124 on: 18/12/2017 13:31:59 »
Quote from: Puppypower
According to Special Relativity it would take infinite energy for a mass particle to cross over from inertial to C. If we go the other way, there is a lot of potential energy to release.

This seems to say that a massive particle cannot accelerate from subluminal speed to c (agreed), but if a massive particle travelling at c were to decelerate to subluminal speed, it would release a lot of energy. (?)

Are you referring to tachyons?
Logged
There never was nothing.
 



  • Print
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Is infinity what you get when youu place to plan mirrors parallel to each other?

Started by The ScientistBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 39
Views: 12463
Last post 30/12/2010 15:39:41
by Bill S
Are infinity or eternity impossible facts of reality?

Started by Alan McDougallBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 0
Views: 1286
Last post 09/06/2016 03:49:25
by Alan McDougall
Would the photon lose all its energy at infinity?

Started by jeffreyHBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 248
Views: 86967
Last post 06/07/2015 23:07:23
by jccc
The Infinity: a symbol or reality.

Started by socratusBoard General Science

Replies: 3
Views: 3533
Last post 13/05/2006 19:30:02
by tanian
Eternity and infinity importance

Started by LamonteBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 5
Views: 4857
Last post 16/06/2011 13:00:00
by Don_1
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.101 seconds with 45 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.