The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Can we measure the one way speed of light?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 9   Go Down

Can we measure the one way speed of light?

  • 163 Replies
  • 14529 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jeffreyH (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6807
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 174 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Can we measure the one way speed of light?
« on: 21/04/2018 20:03:29 »
The setup: Two long sheets of photographic paper on two separate conveyor systems. These move at the same rate, one clockwise and the other counter clockwise. Photons are fired at them from opposite directions. One set of photons each at each film. The spacing between photons is identical in each case. The marks on the paper should differ in spacing if the one way speed of light differs. Of course the whole apparatus must be long enough and moving fast enough for there to be a detectable effect. If this shows no difference then the one way speed of light idea is dead and buried.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 



Offline wolfekeeper

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1384
  • Activity:
    2%
  • Thanked: 55 times
    • View Profile
Re: Can we measure the one way speed of light?
« Reply #1 on: 22/04/2018 00:12:16 »
This is dead and buried. The one way speed of light is always 'c'.

You can explain this result in various ways. The way I prefer is to point out that if Newtonian mechanics is correct, and Maxwell's equations are correct as well, then given that matter is held together with electromagnetic forces, with extreme care you can derive special relativity.

The way it works is that you can show that clocks must run slow when they start to move, and rulers get Lorentz contracted, and further, due to the time dilation that clocks have there's inevitably a systematic difference in time along any length in the direction of travel ("lack of simulteneity").

If you put those three effects together you can show that the one-way speed of light is completely independent of speed, as measured from any frame of reference, moving or not.
Logged
 

Offline kpvats

  • First timers
  • *
  • 6
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: Can we measure the one way speed of light?
« Reply #2 on: 01/05/2018 16:29:17 »
If you mean practical measurement of one way speed of light, then it is going to require synchronized clocks, otherwise, it is not possible.
Logged
"There is only so much that rocket tech can do and we are reaching that limit fast" - Let us try some thing different
-KP Vats - Year 2018
 

Offline PmbPhy

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3903
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 125 times
    • View Profile
Re: Can we measure the one way speed of light?
« Reply #3 on: 02/05/2018 09:51:18 »
Hi Jeff- Great question as always. Not only can it be done but it has been done. Its required knowledge for very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) in radio astronomy. It requires having two synchronized clocks at each location of each station, Dave Cooper thought it was impossible but to me it merely seems that he lacks a full understanding of clock synchronization, There are more than one way to synchronize clocks, People always seem to think that it its not done the way Einstein explained i then its not a real synchronization. On the contrary. Two atomic clocks can be synchronized at one place and then each clock is transported at a sloe speed (driving a car perhaps) and the clocks will still read the same time within experimental limits. If the one way speed of light was different depending on direction then inconsistencies with be found in the data, None were found,
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: wolfekeeper, jeffreyH

Offline jeffreyH (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6807
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 174 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: Can we measure the one way speed of light?
« Reply #4 on: 02/05/2018 11:58:55 »
Thanks Pete. Do you have any references to papers on the subject?
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 



Offline PmbPhy

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3903
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 125 times
    • View Profile
Re: Can we measure the one way speed of light?
« Reply #5 on: 02/05/2018 13:59:11 »
Quote from: jeffreyH on 02/05/2018 11:58:55
Thanks Pete. Do you have any references to papers on the subject?
No. But I an scan that portion of Ohanian's text and put them in a PDF file and upload it here. Isn't the 21st century marvelous!! :D
Logged
 

Offline David Cooper

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2841
  • Activity:
    9.5%
  • Thanked: 37 times
    • View Profile
Re: Can we measure the one way speed of light?
« Reply #6 on: 20/05/2018 21:51:25 »
Quote from: jeffreyH on 21/04/2018 20:03:29
The setup: Two long sheets of photographic paper on two separate conveyor systems. These move at the same rate, one clockwise and the other counter clockwise. Photons are fired at them from opposite directions. One set of photons each at each film. The spacing between photons is identical in each case. The marks on the paper should differ in spacing if the one way speed of light differs. Of course the whole apparatus must be long enough and moving fast enough for there to be a detectable effect. If this shows no difference then the one way speed of light idea is dead and buried.

I can't work out from that what your alignments are for the paths of the photons relative to these conveyor systems. Should I assume that its a shallow angle from the end aimed with high precision half way along sheet of photographic paper? I'm also imagining that the whole apparatus is moving along through space in the same direction as the conveyor systems are aligned, so one sheet of photographic paper is moving forwards more quickly than the other.

If that's what you had in mind, then you have to length-contract your photographic paper appropriately for its speed of travel through space, and once you've applied the right amount of contraction, you'll find that the light pulses hit the paper in such a way that when you stop the experiment and measure the distances between them carefully, they'll have identical spacings between them on both sheets of paper (i.e. the same separation distance on both sheets). [If you're shooting both sheets with photons from both ends, you'll have two lots of dots recorded on each sheet with different separations, but these two separation values will be the same for the patterns of dots on both sheets of paper.] You can't cheat relativity. Incidentally, both conveyor belts will length-contract equally, but the contraction applying to the paper on different sides will not match - there will be more paper on one side than the other at any moment in time while the system is moving through space.
« Last Edit: 20/05/2018 21:56:35 by David Cooper »
Logged
 

Offline David Cooper

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2841
  • Activity:
    9.5%
  • Thanked: 37 times
    • View Profile
Re: Can we measure the one way speed of light?
« Reply #7 on: 20/05/2018 22:15:18 »
Quote from: PmbPhy on 02/05/2018 09:51:18
Dave Cooper thought it was impossible but to me it merely seems that he lacks a full understanding of clock synchronization,

What did I think was impossible? If you're going to name someone and attribute a failing to them, spell out clearly what that error is and link to some evidence to back your claim. There is no difficulty in synchronising clocks (using a wide variety of methods), except for one little problem: they are only genuinely synchronised if you're synchronising them for the absolute frame (which you can't identify).
Logged
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 28558
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 65 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: Can we measure the one way speed of light?
« Reply #8 on: 26/05/2018 21:38:26 »
Well David, Don't know a 'absolute frame', but if you by it might mean being in a 'absolute' same frame of reference then I think even a slow moving car will fail that requirement, unless both are in it at a 'same frame of reference' at all times. Then again, the question reminds me a lot of the idea of what I think is called 'weak experiments', where you expect something intermediate to have no discernible effect on the main process/system/interaction (whatever that might imply) you want to observe.
Logged
"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
 



Offline Bill S

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3631
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 108 times
    • View Profile
Re: Can we measure the one way speed of light?
« Reply #9 on: 26/05/2018 21:55:57 »
Yor_on; I'm confused (happens often).  Are you saying that the experiment to which Pete refers would be classed as a "weak experiment"?
Logged
There never was nothing.
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 28558
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 65 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: Can we measure the one way speed of light?
« Reply #10 on: 26/05/2018 22:16:05 »
Yes, that's my view of it. Doesn't mean it's 'wrong'. It's about you defining your 'system', and from there draw conclusions, as light actually 'moving', not only 'propagating'.
Logged
"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
 

Offline David Cooper

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2841
  • Activity:
    9.5%
  • Thanked: 37 times
    • View Profile
Re: Can we measure the one way speed of light?
« Reply #11 on: 27/05/2018 19:53:27 »
Quote from: yor_on on 26/05/2018 21:38:26
Well David, Don't know a 'absolute frame', but if you by it might mean being in a 'absolute' same frame of reference then I think even a slow moving car will fail that requirement, unless both are in it at a 'same frame of reference' at all times. Then again, the question reminds me a lot of the idea of what I think is called 'weak experiments', where you expect something intermediate to have no discernible effect on the main process/system/interaction (whatever that might imply) you want to observe.

"Absolute frame of reference" has a very specific meaning, being the frame in which light travels at c in all directions relative to a stationary object. Clock ticks are only genuinely simultaneous if the clocks synchronised for that frame, but because we can't identify that frame, we just have to pick a convenient frame and synchronise them for that instead. I took part in a long discussion about this in another thread somewhere (which I can't now find), and I assume I'm being accused of making some kind of error there, but what I said there stands, so the error is an imaginary one either based on someone's misunderstanding of what was said there or on a mangled recollection. This accusation of an error comes from someone who ended his post by saying:-

Quote
If the one way speed of light was different depending on direction then inconsistencies with be found in the data, None were found,

That shows a complete failure to understand what LET and the MMX say about how the maths of this works, because no inconsistencies should be found in the data. This has been understood for a very long time, but still some people have not caught up with the facts.
Logged
 

Offline jeffreyH (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6807
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 174 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: Can we measure the one way speed of light?
« Reply #12 on: 27/05/2018 21:41:13 »
David makes an excellent point above about the absolute frame of reference. It is subtle but necessary to understand. I will have more to say when I have some free time.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 



Offline Bill S

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3631
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 108 times
    • View Profile
Re: Can we measure the one way speed of light?
« Reply #13 on: 27/05/2018 22:25:57 »
I’m obviously going to have to look again at the idea of an absolute frame of reference. 

My understanding is that an absolute frame of reference is some fixed reference frame that every observer in the universe would agree is at rest, and that relativity ruled this out.

Quote
"Absolute frame of reference" has a very specific meaning, being the frame in which light travels at c in all directions relative to a stationary object.

I thought that light travelled at c (in a vacuum) relative to any stationary (or relatively moving) object.  Wouldn’t that mean that the whole Universe was an absolute frame of reference?
Logged
There never was nothing.
 

Offline jeffreyH (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6807
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 174 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: Can we measure the one way speed of light?
« Reply #14 on: 27/05/2018 22:47:13 »
Don't let what I say sway you. Challenge me!
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 

Online alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11437
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 672 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: Can we measure the one way speed of light?
« Reply #15 on: 27/05/2018 23:01:12 »
If VAB ≠ VBA then the value measured by any experiment will depend on the direction of AB.

This is not found by experiment.

Therefore the "one-way" speed of light  is the same as the "two-way" speed.
« Last Edit: 27/05/2018 23:03:54 by alancalverd »
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 
The following users thanked this post: jeffreyH

Offline jeffreyH (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6807
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 174 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: Can we measure the one way speed of light?
« Reply #16 on: 28/05/2018 10:08:52 »
In an inertial frame, and without looking for external indicators, we cannot tell if we are moving or in what direction that motion may be. Galaxies that recede from us will shift their light into the red end of the spectrum. They do tell us which way they are traveling. Would an object moving away inertially also red shift its light or is acceleration a necessity?
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 



Offline PmbPhy

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3903
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 125 times
    • View Profile
Re: Can we measure the one way speed of light?
« Reply #17 on: 28/05/2018 13:12:48 »
Jeff - Sorry for the delay but here's what I promised:
http://www.newenglandphysics.org/other/Ohanian.pdf

Suggestion: Don't confused something being tested with something being proved. Physics is not about proving things: See: http://www.newenglandphysics.org/common_misconceptions/Alan_Guth_04.mp4
Logged
 

Offline David Cooper

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2841
  • Activity:
    9.5%
  • Thanked: 37 times
    • View Profile
Re: Can we measure the one way speed of light?
« Reply #18 on: 28/05/2018 18:45:01 »
Quote from: Bill S on 27/05/2018 22:25:57
My understanding is that an absolute frame of reference is some fixed reference frame that every observer in the universe would agree is at rest, and that relativity ruled this out.

There is no such universal absolute frame - the expansion of the space fabric means that the absolute frame of reference at one location isn't necessarily the same frame as the absolute frame of reference at another location far away. The absolute frame is the frame at any point where a stationary object is stationary relative to the local fabric and where light passes that object in all directions at c relative to it.

Quote
I thought that light travelled at c (in a vacuum) relative to any stationary (or relatively moving) object.  Wouldn’t that mean that the whole Universe was an absolute frame of reference?

Light travels at c (in a vacuum and outside of any gravity well) relative to any stationary object, but two stationary objects a long way apart can be moving relative to each other due to the expansion of space, so the whole universe cannot have a single absolute frame of reference other than within an exterior space within which our space fabric is expanding, but it's beyond the ability of physics to access that at the moment, so it moves into mere speculation. Many people will tell you that discussing an absolute frame is also a step into mere speculation, but a correct interpretation of the Michelson-Gale-Pearson experiment says otherwise.
Logged
 

Offline David Cooper

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2841
  • Activity:
    9.5%
  • Thanked: 37 times
    • View Profile
Re: Can we measure the one way speed of light?
« Reply #19 on: 28/05/2018 18:51:54 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 27/05/2018 23:01:12
If VAB ≠ VBA then the value measured by any experiment will depend on the direction of AB.

This is not found by experiment.

Therefore the "one-way" speed of light  is the same as the "two-way" speed.

Wow - you're still clinging to that old mistake after all this time! Have you still not bothered to crunch the numbers in the way LET tells you you should so that you take into account length contraction (caused by the phenomenon of relativistic mass) and clocks being slowed by their movement through space (due to the lengthened round-trip communication distances)? When you do that, you find that no experiment will be capable of detecting any difference no matter how widely the one-way speed of light varies relative to the apparatus in opposite directions.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 9   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

If we put a mirror millions of light years away and reflected earth, could we see what earth looked like millions of years ago?

Started by thedocBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 9
Views: 11539
Last post 20/05/2018 00:53:37
by raf21
What is "light" pressure?

Started by sorincosofretBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 34
Views: 27691
Last post 13/02/2018 19:46:54
by Bill S
What is a halogen light bulb? What halogen is used and why is this better?

Started by chrisBoard Technology

Replies: 4
Views: 9486
Last post 02/02/2010 11:17:45
by Mazurka
Is solar energy the same as light energy?

Started by FeliciaBoard Technology

Replies: 6
Views: 19749
Last post 19/03/2020 15:17:27
by Paul25
What is Time? If there was no light would Time cease to be?

Started by londounkmBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 291
Views: 100070
Last post 27/06/2020 13:55:35
by Bill S
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.298 seconds with 83 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.