0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I was wondering if anyone knew the effects of of passive smoke to someone that is exposed for around 1 hour a day for their whole lives?cheers 
OK. so if you remove human variation in terms of susceptability to disease and take the general population as a whole, and say inhale the equivalent of 1 cigarette a day (inhaling deeply and frequently of the most tar laden cigarettes)and never missing a day for 30 years. They are 50 years of age, average in every way in terms of general health/fitness for a western country. What is the likelihood of someone with this background developing COPD or lung cancer by the time of their demise?NB. They have not been exposed to asbestos or other carcinogens any more than the average person, their eyes are blue, they enjoy playing squash and their favourite tipple is lemonade.
I was wondering if anyone knew ("I was wondering" past tense, "knew" past tense, correct grammar the subjunctive! And certainly not if someone "know") the chances of posting a reasonable question on this site and not receiving a pedantic response which states the obvious, implicit in the question, from people with the apparent comprehension of a cabbage, where the value of the content of the response is inversely proportioned to the conceit and the intellectual inferiority complex with which it expressed.
You quite obviously responded to Ichnos' post by denying that data acceptable to you exists, which did not respond to the original question. You made a negative assumption about the original post apparent through the condescending explanation of probability. If you can assume that Ichnos is ignorant and deflect the discussion onto reliability of data and a patronizing explanation of probability, why refuse to assume the probable and clear implication of contemporary knowledge in the original question. There was more probability of contemporary knowledge being sought than there was not, and you claim to have considered both possibilities. It seems the temptation to patronize overwhelmed your desire to address all possibilities in respect of intellect and scientific understanding.