The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Geology, Palaeontology & Archaeology
  4. Would it be a time to rewrite history of earth or what do you think about these?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Would it be a time to rewrite history of earth or what do you think about these?

  • 9 Replies
  • 2097 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Magnetic views (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 16
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Would it be a time to rewrite history of earth or what do you think about these?
« on: 17/05/2018 09:14:50 »
I would like to get some explanations and opinions, especially of geologists and palaeontologists, about these formations and objects in South African bedrock in Calvinia. How is it possible, that there are clear giant artifacts petrified in the Proterozoic bedrock? And enormous fossils etc. In my humble opinion, science isn´t science anymore, but some weird senseless think thank society with no idea about reality. 

https://aijaa.com/5H14D9 [nofollow]
https://aijaa.com/tHHbM4 [nofollow]
https://aijaa.com/S8CGwu [nofollow]
https://aijaa.com/RF8z8r [nofollow]

Not to talk about giant (Proterozoic) fossils, with artificially made locks which were made clearly to keep them stable and many other things. More in the video.




 

* ancient machine tms.png (588.27 kB, 538x546 - viewed 177 times.)

* nscientists.png (227.99 kB, 439x242 - viewed 173 times.)
« Last Edit: 17/05/2018 09:48:12 by Magnetic views »
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21973
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 510 times
    • View Profile
Re: Would it be a time to rewrite history of earth or what do you think about these?
« Reply #1 on: 17/05/2018 19:23:01 »
It's a rock, not an alien.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 5269
  • Activity:
    9%
  • Thanked: 438 times
    • View Profile
Re: Would it be a time to rewrite history of earth or what do you think about these?
« Reply #2 on: 18/05/2018 09:20:08 »
Quote from: Magnetic views on 17/05/2018 09:14:50
How is it possible, that there are clear giant artifacts petrified in the Proterozoic bedrock?
It isn’t, it is all in your imagination. I’m afraid science has a better grip on reality than you do.
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 

Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 5751
  • Activity:
    99%
  • Thanked: 240 times
    • View Profile
Re: Would it be a time to rewrite history of earth or what do you think about these?
« Reply #3 on: 18/05/2018 17:22:38 »
This is pareidolia. Nothing more.
Logged
 

Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 151 times
    • View Profile
Re: Would it be a time to rewrite history of earth or what do you think about these?
« Reply #4 on: 19/05/2018 05:49:12 »
It's face-on-Mars all over again .
Logged
 



Offline Magnetic views (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 16
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: Would it be a time to rewrite history of earth or what do you think about these?
« Reply #5 on: 19/05/2018 12:14:34 »
I would like to have some well-founded and reasoned answers of geologists and paleontologists. Everyone has opinions, but clear objects seen in the video and in the photos are not anything "moon on the Mars" , even if some may think it sounds cool.

On the other hand, many researchers have wondered why giants- even with many giant bones found by respected scientists- have been censored from "standard science", for example in this article http://www.sydhav.no/giants/secret.htm [nofollow]
  Well, "The Naked Scientists" is an award winning BBC weekly radio programme. In an interview with Lee Berger in 2007 he shows the host Dr. Chris Smith a fossilized bone of an individual that should be over 7 feet tall and says that they have found a lot of them and everywhere they find then they are enormous: - These individuals are extraordinary, they are giants, he says. 
  And yes; Professor Berger has confirmed in an e-mail to me that the interview indeed is real.
      When it comes to finding remains of one of the oldest human ancestors everybody applauds him but when he is telling that we have been through a period of gigantism it seem like nobody wants to listen or take a look at the proof. Why?


Personally, I have come to the conclusion, that ape evolution is only one trait and doesn´t include the whole humanity. Instead, there was very likely also an other, much more ancient trait with giants and less giants, Sumerians and Ancient Egyptian ruling class being their descendants. They (Sumerians etc.) created and developed sciences, as we all know, but nowadays we have any hunter-gatherer descendant of analphabet ancestors explaining in the name of democracy and equality that there was nothing more than ape- humans and hunter gatherers. You just need to put it in a larger perspective. Without knowing history we can´t understand present. 
« Last Edit: 19/05/2018 13:14:34 by Magnetic views »
Logged
 

Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 151 times
    • View Profile
Re: Would it be a time to rewrite history of earth or what do you think about these?
« Reply #6 on: 19/05/2018 12:31:09 »
Quote from: Magnetic views on 19/05/2018 12:14:34
... Well, "The Naked Scientists" is an award winning BBC weekly radio programme. In an interview with Lee Berger in 2007 he shows the host Dr. Chris Smith a fossilized bone of an individual that should be over 7 feet tall and says that they have found a lot of them and everywhere they find then they are enormous: - These individuals are extraordinary, they are giants, he says ...

There are people over seven feet tall alive today, see ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_players_in_National_Basketball_Association_history ,
so evidently such a height is possible for humans.

However the square–cube-law makes seventy foot high humans impossible, see ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square%E2%80%93cube_law#Biomechanics

The tallest ever person, Robert Wadlow, (8' 11''), had to wear leg braces and use a stick to walk ...


* (132.2 kB . 1023x1363 - viewed 2211 times)
[ check out the caption  :)  ]
« Last Edit: 19/05/2018 13:38:08 by RD »
Logged
 

Offline Bill S

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 3631
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 108 times
    • View Profile
Re: Would it be a time to rewrite history of earth or what do you think about these?
« Reply #7 on: 19/05/2018 13:19:24 »
Remember when the remains of Noah's Ark turned out to be an eroded anticline?

Of course, things like that should be investigated by those who are interested, and should not be ridiculed by those whose interests lie elsewhere.  There were those who ridiculed Wegener's ideas, but those ideas led to the rewriting of much of Earth's geological history.

The important thing is that new ideas have to be backed by sound scientific thinking.
Logged
There never was nothing.
 

Offline Magnetic views (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 16
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: Would it be a time to rewrite history of earth or what do you think about these?
« Reply #8 on: 05/06/2018 06:53:43 »
And yes, these weird Pre-Cambrian fossils are "rock", because they are petrified. It´s known that very alkaline water petrifies living bodies instantly. We also know, that salty, alkaline water covered (at least) big parts of Europe at the end of the Ice Age. There is still a very alkaline lake in Africa, which petrifies animals when they touch water. This is not "pareidolia", but reality.

 https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/this-alkaline-african-lake-turns-animals-into-stone-445359/ [nofollow]

There is also a petrified sailor, which was petrified in ONE WEEK! Imagine, he was on his boat and died by heart attack. His petrified body was found after few days. Pareidolia? And these pareidolia -people say they present science. https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/649211/MUMMIFIED-in-a-WEEK-Bizarre-autopsy-finding-over-how-German-sailor-was-petrified-on-boat [nofollow]


A big fossil with a cone head was shot by a projectile and bullets. These bullets remind a lot of "out- of- place"-artifacts found in South Africa, dated to be 2,8 billions of years old. This matches more or less with the fossil, which is part of the "Proterozoic bedrock".

Ape-human is a very late phenomena in Earth´s history, and many traces of an advanced, giant civilization in past question also "natural selection" of apes and other species. I think there was genetic manipulation by this ancient civilization. According to Sumerian records, ancestors of present ape-humans were created for simple work in mines and agriculture. These people never created any science, but Sumerians and their descendants. We still use many of their inventions and our western culture is based on THEIR culture, NOT on culture of an-alphabet hunter-gatherers. So, why these hunter-gatherer people are the loudest to shout about pareidolia when it comes to ancient culture and sciences?
« Last Edit: 05/06/2018 07:12:47 by Magnetic views »
Logged
 



Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 151 times
    • View Profile
Re: Would it be a time to rewrite history of earth or what do you think about these?
« Reply #9 on: 05/06/2018 08:07:35 »
Quote from: Magnetic views on 05/06/2018 06:53:43
...  fossil with a cone head was shot ...
trepanation goes back to the stone-age ...
http://broughttolife.sciencemuseum.org.uk/broughttolife/objects/display?id=5363&image=3
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Must ∞ monkeys on ∞ typewriters really write everything given ∞ time?

Started by chiralSPOBoard General Science

Replies: 28
Views: 24678
Last post 28/03/2020 11:42:26
by yor_on
We Know The Extent Of The Sun, What Is The Extent Of Space Time?

Started by TitanscapeBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 2
Views: 11126
Last post 27/04/2008 23:10:10
by turnipsock
What does "time-like" mean in the following sentence?

Started by scheradoBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 15
Views: 9304
Last post 09/02/2018 10:28:21
by Colin2B
If you could travel faster than light, could you travel in time?

Started by DmaierBoard Technology

Replies: 13
Views: 14276
Last post 19/03/2020 14:56:52
by Paul25
If the speed of light is constant, time must be constant too?

Started by Chuck FBoard General Science

Replies: 4
Views: 11880
Last post 19/03/2020 14:51:12
by Paul25
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.292 seconds with 60 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.