The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. Is faux fur environmentally friendly?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Is faux fur environmentally friendly?

  • 2 Replies
  • 1189 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline katieHaylor (OP)

  • Naked Scientist Producer
  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • ********
  • 470
  • Activity:
    9.5%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
    • The Naked Scientists
Is faux fur environmentally friendly?
« on: 23/07/2018 17:00:23 »
Michael asks:

Is faux fur more or less environmentally friendly, as I believe faux fur is made of synthetic petrochemicals. Does this have a greater impact on the planet versus traditional farming or hand-me-down family heirlooms?

What do you think?
Logged
 



Offline chiralSPO

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 3455
  • Activity:
    2%
  • Thanked: 434 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is faux fur environmentally friendly?
« Reply #1 on: 23/07/2018 18:14:34 »
That is a very tricky question! (and I don't know the answer)

Making these types of comparisons is very important, but it is also very complex, and often depends highly on what issues one takes into account, and how they are compared.

A good general approach is to address the following (for each of the items you wish to compare):

• What goes into producing the item and getting it to you? (energy, materials, source of those materials, human labor etc... these impacts actually often track fairly well with price, but sometimes it is WAY off)
• What else is produced while making the item? (does its manufacture produce hazardous waste? Are the raw materials a byproduct of another process that is happening anyway (ie is the fur a byproduct of the meat/dairy industry?), or are some of the byproducts of its manufacture useful for other industries, etc.)
• How long does the product last? (If one product is 5 times worse for the environment on a "per product" basis, but last 20 times longer than the alternative, then it is 4 times better on a "per time" basis)
• What are the effects of using the product? (Perhaps one type of fur more insulating that the other, allowing for less energy use for heating? I also suspect that washing the faux fur may release plastic microfibers into the environment, which might be a significant portion of the overall impact, depending on several other factors, but real fur may need to be dry cleaned--which comes with its own set of impacts)
• How is the product disposed of at the end of its "life"? (can it be recycled, repurposed, or reused? is it hazardous waste? is it going to sit in a landfill for 2,000 years?)

These are all questions that can be answered fairly unambiguously, given enough research. Then you have to balance the various pros and cons. How does one calculate the tradeoff between greenhouse gas emissions and number of fish killed? Do we consider only the damages done over the next year, decade, century, millennium? How does one count land use implications of land that will be used for one industry or another (ie this particular plot of land that is currently forested will be clearcut and turned into a chinchilla ranch if demand for fur remains high, but if that demand is not high, it will be cleared for a monster truck arena...)

You get the idea...
Logged
 

Offline chiralSPO

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 3455
  • Activity:
    2%
  • Thanked: 434 times
    • View Profile
Re: Is faux fur environmentally friendly?
« Reply #2 on: 24/07/2018 14:50:13 »
For more info on life cycle assessment (or life cycle analysis, conveniently both shortened to LCA), see here:

https://www.gdrc.org/uem/lca/life-cycle.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life-cycle_assessment
http://wap.sciencenet.cn/home.php?mod=attachment&id=4637 (pdf download--125 kb)
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

How does the body tell friendly good bacteria from unfriendly bad bacteria?

Started by jack_Board Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 3
Views: 1198
Last post 25/03/2019 19:55:25
by syhprum
Can science create more eco-friendly farming practices?

Started by katieHaylorBoard General Science

Replies: 21
Views: 3183
Last post 04/09/2017 02:47:09
by Xandyr1214
Could a friendly bacteria or virus work against the coronavirus?

Started by nudephilBoard COVID-19

Replies: 1
Views: 595
Last post 01/04/2020 11:02:31
by set fair
Could an electric cow be an eco-friendly power generator?

Started by another_someoneBoard Technology

Replies: 22
Views: 16085
Last post 14/06/2008 21:47:25
by qazibasit
Space travel and why we need to take friendly bacteria with us.

Started by Alan McDougallBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 1
Views: 1410
Last post 26/05/2016 11:20:16
by evan_au
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.087 seconds with 40 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.