The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. How are space capsules designed to be so thin?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

How are space capsules designed to be so thin?

  • 2 Replies
  • 917 Views
  • 5 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jack_ (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 17
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
How are space capsules designed to be so thin?
« on: 20/03/2019 12:10:48 »
Gary has been watching space videos online and wants to know:

How are space capsules designed to be so thin?

With some space capsules being no more then a tin can or foil thickness in places, how do they hold their shape structurally given differences in pressure inside and outside the capsule?

And how is this able to shield the crew in the capsules from the cosmic rays (van Allan belts and charged partials from the sun) with no lead shielding of at least 7 inches in thickness?


What's going on, do you know how this works?
Logged
 



Offline Janus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 755
  • Activity:
    7%
  • Thanked: 180 times
    • View Profile
Re: How are space capsules designed to be so thin?
« Reply #1 on: 20/03/2019 16:23:09 »
For spacecraft with thin walls like that ( the Lunar landing module for example) the interior pressure is only a fraction of 1 Atm. You can get away with that as long as the percentage of oxygen is higher. (it is the partial pressure of oxygen that matters, not the total air pressure.)
The only craft that would have even had to worry about the Van Allen belt were the Apollo missions.   And they were put on a trajectory that took avoided the worst radiation ( the belts are somewhat torus shaped, so you can "go around" them.

While the astronauts were exposed to some higher levels of radiation, It wasn't so intense as to be fatal or give them radiation sickness or anything.  It likely did raise their chances of developing cancer later in their lives.  The radiation risk is a bit overblown.  Barring a major solar event, They didn't get that much radiation over the short period of the mission.  Most of the danger from radiation in space comes from long term exposure.
Logged
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 10987
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 634 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: How are space capsules designed to be so thin?
« Reply #2 on: 20/03/2019 17:21:42 »
Astronaut radiation doses on the ISS are typically 5 - 10 times the annual dose limit for a radiation worker, or about 5 times the annual background dose in some of the more radioactive parts of the world. At 2 sievert received over a 6 - 12 month period, we would expect to find around 10% excess cancers in the irradiated population. There is no doubt that space flight is a hazardous occupation and extended work in space ought possibly to be restricted to the over-60's on radiological grounds, but the hazards of decompression, bone demineralisation, or pyrolysis before launch or on re-entry, are demonstrably more significant. 
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: space  / capsule  / thin  / radiation  / pressure 
 

Similar topics (5)

Can anything be "still" in space?

Started by SeanyBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 31
Views: 13443
Last post 31/12/2017 16:56:38
by jeffreyH
Is "Space" distinct from "nothingness"? (and the Vacuum)

Started by geordiefBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 36
Views: 3902
Last post 30/06/2019 22:47:32
by pensador
We Know The Extent Of The Sun, What Is The Extent Of Space Time?

Started by TitanscapeBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 2
Views: 11000
Last post 27/04/2008 23:10:10
by turnipsock
If the Universe is expanding, does this mean that space is expanding?

Started by EthosBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 14
Views: 11720
Last post 27/03/2020 21:05:55
by yor_on
Is a stationary object in space really stationary?

Started by chintanBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 20
Views: 10538
Last post 19/03/2020 14:55:35
by Paul25
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.125 seconds with 41 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.