[xersanozgen (OP)]

  And the only way to do that it to accept GR. 

 

Is it be  a reason that Latin languages has a single word as "relativity" for these types ?

Relativity has some subsection.

Essentially relativity
Titular/pseudo relativity
Momentary/temporary relativity

Which one is concerning with light's motion?

[Bored chemist]

Relativity has some subsection.

Really?
Prove it.

[xersanozgen (OP)]

Relativity has some subsection.

Really?
Prove it.

Essentially relativity: An automobile on a road. It applies power to road and its speed is generated through the road. This value of speed is “essentially relative” according to road. The automobile moves away from starting point by this speed. Top limit of essentially relative speed is c (light’s velocity)

Titular/nominal/pseudo relativity: Two moving automobiles (A, B) on the same road. The speed of B according to A is “pseudo relative”; or the speed of A according to B. They do not apply any power to each other. Actually we can say that it is the increasing/decreasing speed of the distance between A and B. Top limit of pseudo relativity is 2 c.

[Bored chemist]

Top limit of pseudo relativity is 2 c.

No it isn't.

[xersanozgen (OP)]

Top limit of pseudo relativity is 2 c.

No it isn't.

Why?

[Bored chemist]

Because it's C.
It's experimentally verified that the speed of light (in vacuo) measured by any observer is c regardless of the speed of the source or the observer.
That's the point.

[xersanozgen (OP)]

Because it's C.
It's experimentally verified that the speed of light (in vacuo) measured by any observer is c regardless of the speed of the source or the observer.
That's the point.

We may think that: The photons (that are emitted at same moment T₁; source: a star or a candela) generate a spherical surface at the moment T₂ (light sphere). The radius of this light sphere increases by c and its diameter inevitably increases by 2c.

This determination is in humanity cognitive capacity. That is the point.

[Bored chemist]

Because it's C.
It's experimentally verified that the speed of light (in vacuo) measured by any observer is c regardless of the speed of the source or the observer.
That's the point.

We may think that: The photons (that are emitted at same moment T₁) generate a spherical surface at the moment T₂ (light sphere). The radius of this light sphere increases by c and its diameter inevitably increases by 2c.

This determination is in humanity cognitive capacity. That is the point.

Go and look up the meaning of the word "experimentally".

[xersanozgen (OP)]

Because it's C.
It's experimentally verified that the speed of light (in vacuo) measured by any observer is c regardless of the speed of the source or the observer.
That's the point.

We may think that: The photons (that are emitted at same moment T₁) generate a spherical surface at the moment T₂ (light sphere). The radius of this light sphere increases by c and its diameter inevitably increases by 2c.

This determination is in humanity cognitive capacity. That is the point.

Go and look up the meaning of the word "experimentally".

Nature does not care what/how an observer can see.

You can set an experiment like that: Two objects at A and B points that they get their own speeds as the value 70 % c while they pass the points A and B. Three observers (on the objects and the collision point O) perceive the collision at the same moment.
Simultaneous perceiving the collision requires that the decreasing speed of  the distance AB became 1.40 c.

Or, you put two flashs at the points A and B. You are placed at medium point O. When the flashes emitted simultaneously, you see the photons of them simultaneously. They have arrives to your eyes simultaneously. Simultaneous perceiving requires the speed as the value 2c. Because each one of them has traveled by c.

[xersanozgen (OP)]

Relativity has some subsection.

Really?
Prove it.

Essentially relativity: An automobile on a road. It applies power to road and its speed is generated through the road. This value of speed is “essentially relative” according to road. The automobile moves away from starting point by this speed. Top limit of essentially relative speed is c (light’s velocity)

Titular/nominal/pseudo relativity: Two moving automobiles (A, B) on the same road. The speed of B according to A is “pseudo relative”; or the speed of A according to B. They do not apply any power to each other. Actually we can say that it is the increasing/decreasing speed of the distance between A and B. Top limit of pseudo relativity is 2 c.

anyway, the third one of relativity:

Momentary/temporary relativity: When a player throws a ball. The speed of the ball according to player is “momentary relative”. The power has applied momentarily. After throwing, the player may go to anywhere freely; he does not need to follow the ball. Therefore, the distance between player and the ball cannot calculated with only ball’s speed; it requires considering vectorial total of their speeds. 

Which one is significant for light's motion?

[Bored chemist]

Nature does not care what/how an observer can see.

Nature defines what a person can see.

What you see is nothing going faster than c

[xersanozgen (OP)]

What you see is nothing going faster than c

Yes, If the observer is an actor of an experiment, he cannot see larger value than c.  And we cannot measure faster speed than c.

However, top limit of speed for pseudo relativity is 2c.  I explained it like mathematical certainty. You may get or not.

[xersanozgen (OP)]

I defined the essences and details of relativity types. Please allow yourself to internalize them.

Lorentz, Poincare and Einstein had not distinguished these types and they directly considered the type “essentially relativity”.

Whereas, -when we reconsider the differences- the velocity of light is “momentary relative” (for emitting moment) and for following time “titular/pseudo relative”; because the source or photon do not apply a power for motion. Photons/light travel due to space by electro-magnetic cycle.  The contribution of source is momentarily.


This definition presents transparency about light kinematics and special relativity.

[xersanozgen (OP)]

If we analyze the burning event without "oxidation" factor; we may find a theory like Sthal's "Phologiston theory" that phologiston has negative weight.

If we analyze light kinematics without that factors "the types of relativity", "sequential scale of relative and reference frames", "co-reference system for light and its source or an observer "; we may discover a theory like "Special theory of relativity"that has some fantastic inferences.

[Bored chemist]

However, top limit of speed for pseudo relativity is 2c.  I explained it like mathematical certainty. You may get or not.

I "got" it, but I'm clever enough to recognise that it isn't the speed of anything.