[puppypower]

Before talking about distance potential or the D, in the MDT model, let me reiterated the main observational premise. In the twin paradox, the moving twin returns to earth having aged less. Besides human biology being tweaked by special relativity, material properties of the ship, clocks, computers, etc., will adjust, and if the space ship had been fueled by any energy source, including nuclear, that too would adjust. All this change occurred because we used energy to create velocity in space-time, and we approached the speed of light, the kinetic energy potential manifests itself as three relativistic potentials one each in mass, distance and time. Conceptually, all we need is three variables to do everything in physics. While simplicity is closer to perfection.

Let me see if I can explain D or distance potential, in the MDT theory. The closest existing concept to distance potential is connected the second law, which states that the entropy of the universe has to increase. This is due, in part to distance potential.

Entropy is a state variable, which means for any given state of matter *temperature and pressure for example, there is a very specific amount of entropy associated with that state. Absolute zero is a state where entropy reaches a minimum. Entropy increases is associated with greater complexity. If we increase temperature from absolute zero, complexity increases.

Entropy, at a base level is connected to how things are spread out and orientated in space. The a nuclei, atoms and electrons of a molecule, are in various modes of motion, forming a distinct distribution pattern in space at any given state. If we stopped time, so everything freeze frames, an orientation in space still remains, even without time, with a given amount of entropy; state. 

An increase entropy, via the second law, adds complexity, such that the orientation in space changes. This potential for a new state of higher complexity, within space, is driven by distance potential. Distance potential is sort of like a blue print of what can be in terms of quantum states. The second law is more than pure distance potential, since entropy increases by adding energy which contain distance potential and time potential; wavelength and frequency.

In terms of entropy and the added energy needed for entropy to increase, the time potential within the added energy is primarily connected to force and acceleration, with acceleration d,t,t or one part distance and two parts time. The distance potential; extra d, maintains the core orientation in space; quantum facade.

Kinetic energy is 1/2 MV2, with V2=d,t,d,t or in this case, acceleration d/t/t plus d; distance potential. The second law is an example, where distance and time potential, do not have to always be in proportion for each affect, as they are in the concept of space-time. In other words, different ratios of M, D and T create different phenomena and affects. Energy, as photons, is where distance and time potential are in proportion.

[puppypower]

A useful application of the concept of distance potential is the observation called the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.

The uncertainty principle is one of the most famous (and probably misunderstood) ideas in physics. It tells us that there is a fuzziness in nature, a fundamental limit to what we can know about the behaviour of quantum particles and, therefore, the smallest scales of nature. Of these scales, the most we can hope for is to calculate probabilities for where things are and how they will behave. Unlike Isaac Newton's clockwork universe, where everything follows clear-cut laws on how to move and prediction is easy if you know the starting conditions, the uncertainty principle enshrines a level of fuzziness into quantum theory.

The uncertainty principle says that we cannot measure the position (x) and the momentum (p) of a particle with absolute precision. The more accurately we know one of these values, the less accurately we know the other.

The uncertainty principle is connected to using energy; photons, to measure position and momentum. We shine a light on a phenomena and know it properties by how the light reflects back to our collection instruments  Energy and space-time are based on equal proportions of distance and time potential. In the observations connected to the uncertainty principle, the fuzzy affect  in distance and momentum. implies there is extra distance potential, beyond energy.

Heisenberg's observation and his uncertainty theory proved distance potential as a separate potential. Distance potential, superimposed onto classic energy based observations of position and momentum, adds fuzzy dice to the classic distance parameter; delta, that is common to both position and momentum. However, this is not fuzzy, if is assumed that distance potential can act as  separate potential, that can be superimpose for other affects.

Einstein originally proposed his theory of Special Relativity in 1905. Heisenberg published his theory in 1927. It is interesting how history works out.  They both had what they needed to simply and unify physics, but the boat was sailing another way leading to greater differentiation of nature via quantum theory. It was not trying to compact but expand.

What I found is all states in physics, can be defined simply by using the three variables in the MDT theory in various proportions. Energy as photons, contain equal parts of distance and time potential; wavelength and frequency, with the magnitude different for different wavelengths.

A back hole approaches zero distance potential, being composed of mostly of mass and time potentials. Energy is not given off by a black hole, since energy needs equal parts of distance potential to be expressed. There is no distance potential for energy expression. Although we cannot see energy escaping, this is not to say a black holes cannot give off time potential, which will not be visible using traditional energy collecting apparatus.

The early universe phenomena called inflation is where spacetime appears expand faster than the speed of light. This is where extreme distance potential adds to space-time. It creates an uncertainty in position and momentum based on what we assumed are the speed light limits. However, there is no violation of the speed of light, since distance potential is not under that speed limit. That applies to energy and matter. A probability function in classic theory allowed for here and there at the same time; volume.

In the MDT model of the universe, we begin with mass potential; singularity. Conservation laws apply with mass potential partially converting to distance potential; inflation, and then further converting to time potential; energy and space-time, stabilizing. In the MDT theory there are six possible combinations of the three variables or six universe formation theories, depending on the order of the potentials.

If we applied a DTM sequence model for universe formation we would get distance potential appearing first. This would be similar to a Creationist style model where the blue print of the universe forms out toward infinity; entropic potential are set for the states of the universe; second law. There is not yet time and mass potential; brooding over the deep. If we add time potential, energy appears when the time potential is in proportion to the distance potential; let there be light. Then mass potential appears for substance in the energy field. In an DTM model the universe layout appears first. There is an instant inflation toward infinity before light and substance, and when that appear, the universe gets filled in. The ancients did not have the modern astral physics data to confirm this possible scenario. However, they appeared to have had something similar to the MDT model allowing them to define a possible scenario in MDT.

The last variable I need to explain is time potential. I will do this next time.

[Soul Surfer (OP)]

Puppypower

Firstly I have taken the trouble to scan through your vast number of words and come to the following conclusions.

What you are writing has nothing to do with any sort of analysis of the topic that I started.

It appears to have been written using a science and cosmology keyword random text generator and is total garbage.

It is therefore not worth the effort of taking apart and is best ignored by others.   

I would request that if it is possible all the conversations and flaming after my initial presentations on the main topic be deleted or moved to another location by the administrators because it is just not worthy of this site's attention.

[puppypower]

Puppypower

Firstly I have taken the trouble to scan through your vast number of words and come to the following conclusions.

What you are writing has nothing to do with any sort of analysis of the topic that I started.

It appears to have been written using a science and cosmology keyword random text generator and is total garbage.

It is therefore not worth the effort of taking apart and is best ignored by others.   

I would request that if it is possible all the conversations and flaming after my initial presentations on the main topic be deleted or moved to another location by the administrators because it is just not worthy of this site's attention.

Your original topic question was, "Is an Evolutionary Cosmology and complete theory of everything possible? You went on to show how complex this was and offered a sequence of steps that might lead to the goal. You set up a map for the quest.

Many people feel the answer is yes? However, your outline, as thorough as it was, made the journey appear overwhelming, in light of all the things we currently know. This is not to say this much planning is not good, but it made the task seem very daunting.

I am on the same page with you, in terms of the final goal.  I asked many of the same questions and I finally came to the conclusion, that if Einstein could not do this, using current theory, I am not going to be able to do it either. It is a huge undertaking, even more so for a non-expert who has to come up to steam on their own. This is not to say I did not make an effort. What I was able to do was find a seam that simplified the task. It found a short cut through the mountains.

To repeat the basic premise of the simplification, in Special Relativity, and thought experiments like the twin paradox, velocity creates relativistic potentials in mass, distance and time. According to the twin paradox, these three potentials, stemming from only velocity, can adjust all the laws of physics, simultaneously. If not, the twin that returns would be dead and/or mutant and his rocket twisted, amalgamated with missing parts. To me this clean and comprehensive tweak implied it should be possible to redefine the laws of physics in just these three variables, since these three variable did everything. This would make an impossible task more doable. 

The practical problem, that you are addressing, is this approach is totally alien and odds, since this is not how we do physics, today, and these three variables are not part of any published literature. I got too far ahead of the curve, since I could not wait for the resistance to be appeased.

I can see your preference for wanting to retain traditional variables, since there is less resistance and negative feedback from the environment. But that approach is very difficult, eluding even the best minds in Physics for over 100 years. My approach is more compact, which will make it more doable, once one gets use do the three variables using applications. 

For example, the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is based on observation and correlation. It can be modeled with statistical math. However, it still has no logical explanation using existing theory even after almost 90 years. We can model it with statistics, but that is not the same as explaining why it occurs. This hole in the why, impacts others things. This gap leave is a hole in existing theory, that will create a structural defects in a unified theory. Instead of a fastener we have fuzzy dice without nails. In the simplified model, this has a logic connected to distance potential, which is one of the variables in Special Relativity.

The Uncertainty Principle could be mathematically modeled. The principle says we cannot measure both position and momentum, at the same time. However, we can model this in terms of probability functions. In these functions, things can appear to be in more than one place at any given time, with some places in the distribution appearing more often in time; higher probability. It occupies a volume in time, instead of a point in time.

A simple concept like being able to move in distance, apart from time, says the same thing as the probability function in the uncertainty application. In the simplified model, this is called distance potential. Once distance detaches from time; distance potential, something can be in many places at the same time since it is outside of time. Now we no longer have the concept of speed, so there is no violation of speed limits even for quantum jumping. Distance potential, such as in the inflation period of cosmology, is an application of the uncertainty principle and distance potential. This compacts apparently unrelated things.

[Halc]

Puppypower

Firstly I have taken the trouble to scan through your vast number of words and come to the following conclusions.

What you are writing has nothing to do with any sort of analysis of the topic that I started.

It appears to have been written using a science and cosmology keyword random text generator and is total garbage.

I am on the same page with you

I agree with Surfer's assessment.  You are not on the same page.  The page you are on is the one that has been run through the shredder.  Kindly push your MDT posts with its own thread instead of using this one.

I would request that if it is possible all the conversations and flaming after my initial presentations on the main topic be deleted or moved to another location by the administrators because it is just not worthy of this site's attention.

I'd do it, but seem incapable of moving things.  I'd support this being done by those that know how.  Everything from post 6 on can be moved to something a topic titled "What is MDT" in the 'can't be true' section, or in New-Theories if the moderator that does it is in a generous mood.

[puppypower]

The topic is about a theory of everything. The topic, when started, lingered for many days with SoulSurfer outlining what he felt was a organized way to approach this historical yet difficult problem. I decided to offer help by showing a way to simplify the task.

The problem appears to be, that although I remained on topic, I did not approach this in the traditional way. I did it differently because that path has never worked in the past, even though some of the best minds of Physics, attempted it over the past 100 years. I felt we needed to think outside the box, and crack some traditional eggs to make an omelet. 

The approach I took was based on Einstein's theory of Special Relativity; SR, which he published in 1905. This is considered proven science and therefore was as solid foundation. In this theory, velocity creates relativistic changes in mass, distance and time. This math is well understood and the theory has been proven by various experiments. It is used all the time in astral physics. If this foundation was wrong, then we would have unpublished a lot of papers and books. It would be like getting and keeping a Pulitzer Prize in Journalism for what proves to be wrong.

Conceptually, in thought experiments of SR, like the twin paradox, velocity, via SR, creates three new variables; relativistic mass, distance and time, which when working together can tweak thousands of parameters in a reference, to make it possible for one twin to age slower. Aging is more than just a clock slowing down. It would need to involve complex physical biochemistry.

Einstein said the laws of physics are the same in all references, which means that the tweak in space, time and mass,, will require all the laws change in a coordinated way. If we had to slow the aging of a twin, piecemeal by means other than SR, it  would take thousands of separate experiments. Yet three variables can do the same thing.

If my logical extrapolation is incorrect, than SR and its variation thought experiments have been a hoax, and what we think we know of SR is very deficient. You cannot have it both ways. Either I have found a simplification schema using SR, or I have disproven assets of special relativity. Which is it?

I worked under the assumption that SR was proven science and that my extrapolation was logically consistent. Was I wrong to assume SR is correct? Or is SR nothing more than a reference illusion used to support imaginary and self serving theory in Physics? I am open either way since I would have done a service to science either way.

[Soul Surfer (OP)]

Puppypower your latest statements are slightly more coherent and on topic but still do not show a proper understanding of what I am trying to get over to the experts in the field.

Let me explain.  My whole professional life has been involved successfully in creating innovation in areas of systems science and technology in advance of the developments of technology at its growing points together with persuading businesses to adapt and develop their products and skills to make use of them as they become available.  As part of this I have had to keep up with scientific advances over a very broad field as well as exercising my personal interest in the fundamental limits of physics and astronomy.  One of the main things is to find "holes" through which totally new industries and products can emerge.

I do not dispute any of the established science and mathematical theories.  These involve a great deal of skills and knowledge and also a lot of painstaking observations.

The message I am trying to get over is that there is a very important blind spot or gap where theoretical and experimental study is possible.   That is the behaviour of material inside the event horizon of a black hole from shortly after it formed to a short period later when conditions reach the limits of experimental science.  These are well researched and understood for the big bang but are not considered for what I will call for want of better words "the medium sized crunch"!

To my mind this is about the same as saying that the future of our universe is uninteresting because it is perfectly obvious that it will all end in the heat death after a suitably long time.

The possibility of an Evolutionary Cosmology leading to a theory of everything is an interesting aspect that could make putting effort into the study of this critical period more attractive.   However even if this is not possible it could result in further insight into the potential choices in string theoretical and quantum gravitational studies and break down the current impasse brought about by the generalities and multiple solutions caused by unlimited mathematical synthesis.

What is needed is some good ideas to generate suitable boundary conditions for the equations and geometries involved.

[Soul Surfer (OP)]

There are two other very imoportant additional benefits to the approach to cosmology that I am suggesting

Firstly it explains why our large universe consists largely of matter when most theories of origins suggest that when matter is created it from energy is always in particle pairs with one matter and its corresponding antimatter particle.  The tendency is to suggest that there is a slight imbalance in favour of matter and that most of the matter and antimatter created during the big bang has annihilated releasing energy.  There are hints of a very slight asymmetry between matter and antimatter in Tau particles but this is very small.

The matter in this concept is locked into the compacted dimensions of what was space and is now time.

Secondly the fact that the multidimensional compacted time dimensions are common to all particles at all times allows the wilder concepts of quantum physics to be explained and understood as all the matter particles in our universe have their antimatter partners locked in these compacted time dimensions which are colocated.