The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. Question of the Week
  4. QotW - 19.03.03 - Can you blame physics for odd socks?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

QotW - 19.03.03 - Can you blame physics for odd socks?

  • 5 Replies
  • 1449 Views
  • 4 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline IzzieC (OP)

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 51
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
QotW - 19.03.03 - Can you blame physics for odd socks?
« on: 04/03/2019 16:47:45 »
Chani has been in touch...

"I used to think that all those missing single socks were hanging out at some pub in the back of the dryer. But now that my kids moved out and I don't use the dryer, I realise this theory is no longer valid.
 
Is there a scientific or physical explanation for where those socks go? Why they are so unhappy in monogamous relationships?

But seriously, could it be a case of quantum entanglement?"


What do you think?
« Last Edit: 04/03/2019 16:49:47 by IzzieC »
Logged
 



Offline chiralSPO

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 3434
  • Activity:
    12.5%
  • Thanked: 428 times
    • View Profile
Re: QotW - 19.03.03 - Can you blame physics for odd socks?
« Reply #1 on: 04/03/2019 16:55:06 »
Personally, I blame entropy...
Logged
 

Offline syhprum

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 5064
  • Activity:
    9%
  • Thanked: 64 times
    • View Profile
Re: QotW - 19.03.03 - Can you blame physics for odd socks?
« Reply #2 on: 05/03/2019 19:17:55 »
You are looking in the wrong universe try one of the other 10^500
Logged
syhprum
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21241
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 485 times
    • View Profile
Re: QotW - 19.03.03 - Can you blame physics for odd socks?
« Reply #3 on: 05/03/2019 19:50:59 »
I typically blame the Tory government.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Colin2B

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 5243
  • Activity:
    33.5%
  • Thanked: 430 times
    • View Profile
Re: QotW - 19.03.03 - Can you blame physics for odd socks?
« Reply #4 on: 05/03/2019 23:49:01 »
It is well known that in the presence of washing powder in a controlled environment a pair of socks (right + left) will decay into a single sock and a lump of fluff.
Logged
and the misguided shall lead the gullible,
the feebleminded have inherited the earth.
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 10905
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 632 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: QotW - 19.03.03 - Can you blame physics for odd socks? The Rt Hon
« Reply #5 on: 06/03/2019 00:32:58 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 05/03/2019 19:50:59
I typically blame the Tory government.

quote from Hansard

The Rt Hon Teresa May: People ask why we have not negotiated an acceptable deal with Brussels or reversed climate change. Mr Speaker, we have spent the last two years tidying up the odd socks left by decades of socialist mismanagement and incompetence. It ill behoves the honorable gentleman to lay the blame for oddsockery at the feet of the present administration when he knows full well that these are big shoes to fill, and they will not be filled with run-of-the-mill, bleak, conformist, red socks. I will not dance to his tune.

Bored Chemist: Mr Speaker, if all socks were indeed run-of-the-mill, conformist and red, there could only be at most one odd sock in the entire universe. The problem is entirely of the government's making in forcing socular diversity on the suffering public who, given a clear choice in the matter, would surely vote monochrome........

et simuli ad infinitum

Editor's note: Many years ago I shared a house with a good friend Mike who only ever bought Marks & Spencer plain green socks, on the grounds that they could be worn with any color of shoes or trousers and there was no possibility of having more than one unpaired sock. AFAIK M&S no longer sell plain green socks, presumably in an effort to force rational thinkers into buying more pairs when one goes missing. So the missing sock phenomenon is in fact planned obsolescence by corrupt capitalists.   
« Last Edit: 06/03/2019 08:12:13 by alancalverd »
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: socks  / quantum  / entanglement  / entropy 
 

Similar topics (5)

How do we know that the "laws" of physics are really laws, i.e. true everywhere?

Started by rainwildmanBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 32
Views: 21331
Last post 27/04/2008 11:14:42
by bitistoll
QotW - 15.08.24 - Why do major keys sound happy and minor keys sound mournful?

Started by thedocBoard Question of the Week

Replies: 10
Views: 47011
Last post 05/04/2018 03:06:55
by Monox D. I-Fly
QotW - 08.04.06 - Better to drink wine than to drink nothing?

Started by thedocBoard Question of the Week

Replies: 33
Views: 108929
Last post 17/01/2021 17:52:40
by LaurenaS
QotW - 18.08.02 - Why are non-stick pans non-stick?

Started by Adam MurphyBoard Question of the Week

Replies: 6
Views: 42097
Last post 18/01/2020 06:33:19
by evan_au
QotW - 10.03.28 - Is a human bite worse than a dog bite?

Started by thedocBoard Question of the Week

Replies: 10
Views: 52652
Last post 13/01/2019 09:40:37
by chris
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.181 seconds with 52 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.