[evan_au]

The Event Horizon Telescope team has announced a big Event coming over the Horizon next week - a press conference.

If they have managed to take a picture of the Event Horizon around the Milky Way's supermassive black hole, will you believe it then?
See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Event_Horizon_Telescope
...but presumably you should see it in most forms of news the day after the press conference!

[jsaldea12 (OP)]

Reiterating, do try to understand: because it has been written for a long time, it is correct?. UNLESS THERE IS POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE. THERE IS NO TV, RADIO, LIGHT!!! Positive and negative are  directional. Point it to the right, it is positive, point it the left, it is negative. Cut and cut a bar magnet into smaller cuts, and  NOTE THE SMALLER CUTS SELF-DIVIDE INTO POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE. THESE ARE FACTS AND  REALITY. BELIEVE IT BECAUSE YOUR EYES CAN  FOLLOW IT AS THE  SMALLER CUTS SELF-DIVIDE AUTOMATICALLY  INTO POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE.  AS i SAID READ MY ARTICLE: WHY GRAVITY OF EARTH IS ALL ATTRACTION, NO REPULSION" REGARDS. jsa 4/5/19

[Kryptid]

Typing in all caps doesn't increase how correct you are (and you're wrong because individual electrons are electric monopoles).

[jsaldea12 (OP)]

Nsft: Typing in all caps doesn't increase how correct you are (and  you're wrong because individual electrons are electric monopoles).
Jsa: Electrons are fundamental particles? Particles when they manifest into matter obey the universal law of the universe: possess inseparably positive and negative which  behavior  is directional. On one electrical wire the direction of electrons are negative and on the opposite electrical wire, the direction is positive. When these two wires meet, electrical bulb lights! It is like that.. Electrons are monopole in that in it both positive and negative . But it is not monopole in the context that it is a particle that is all  positive or a particle that is  all negative. There is no such monopoles . Regards. Jsa 4.5.19

[evan_au]

Cut and cut a bar magnet into smaller cuts, and  NOTE THE SMALLER CUTS SELF-DIVIDE INTO POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE

This is because a magnet is a collection of dipoles. Cut it in half and you have a (smaller) collections of dipoles.

Particles when they manifest into matter obey the universal law of the universe: possess inseparably positive and negative

Electrons however are monopoles. Take a collection of electrons and divide it into two parts, and it still has a negative charge.

Collision of electrons at even the highest energies show no internal structure to the electron - there is no internal positive and negative.

On one electrical wire the direction of electrons are negative and on the opposite electrical wire, the direction is positive. When these two wires meet, electrical bulb lights!

In an electrical circuit made of copper wires, the negative electrons always head towards the positive terminal. They don't suddenly change direction when they hit a light bulb.

However, there is a scenario where charge carriers travel in opposite directions to produce light, and that is in a LED.

A LED is made of two types of semiconductors:
- "n-type", where the charge is carried by negative electrons, attracted towards the positive terminal
- "p-type", where the charge is carried by positive "holes", attracted towards the negative terminal
- so they travel in opposite directions
- when they meet, an electron falls into a hole, releasing energy in the form of a photon.

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light-emitting_diode_physics#Electroluminescence

[Bored chemist]

Point it to the right, it is positive, point it the left, it is negative.

Take an electron, it's negative.
Point it to the left, it's negative; point it to the right it's still negative.

Do you understand that fact?

Also, please try to use the quote function.
It makes it much easier for others to follow what you are trying to say.

[Kryptid]

Electrons are monopole in that in it both positive and negative . But it is not monopole in the context that it is a particle that is all  positive or a particle that is  all negative.

Electrons have a net negative charge so that makes you wrong. That is something that we know from experimental evidence.

[evan_au]

On one electrical wire the direction of electrons are negative and on the opposite electrical wire, the direction is positive. When these two wires meet, electrical bulb lights!

In this speculative theory of electricity, I am wondering how it represents the flow of electrons in a circuit with two light bulbs in series?
- In particular, what is flowing in the copper wire between the two light bulbs?
- Is it electrons traveling in a positive direction, or in a negative direction, or not flowing at all?
- And if they are not flowing at all, how can a light bulb light up? Surely it will just fill up with electrons, and repel any further electrons from entering?
- What if there are 3 light bulbs in series? Do these intermediate wires contain 1/3 electrons travelling in a positive direction, and 2/3 traveling in a negative direction?

Science can help you avoid these nonsensical conclusions, because in reality, there is a flow of negative electrons in a single direction around the circuit, from the negative terminal of the battery towards the positive terminal of the battery.
- In a circuit with multiple lights in series, each of the copper wires carries an identical current of electrons, traveling in the same direction.

These descriptions of the behavior of DC (Direct Current) circuits should not be confused with the behavior of AC (Alternating Current) circuits, where the polarity of the electrical supply changes 100 or so times every second. In  the AC case, the electrons travel a short distance in one direction, and then reverse and travel a short distance in the other direction. But at any given point in time, the electrons in all the copper wires are traveling in the same direction, from the negative terminal to the positive terminal.

[Bored chemist]

Cut and cut a bar magnet into smaller cuts, and  NOTE THE SMALLER CUTS SELF-DIVIDE INTO POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE.

Actually, after a while (once you get beyond a critical size) they don't.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_domain

[Kryptid]

The first revealed picture of a black hole has only reinforced the fact that they exist. Here are some simulated images of what the black hole at the center of M87 was expected to look like based on relativistic physics: https://www.eso.org/public/images/akiyama_m87/

Now compare those to the actual picture that was acquired: http://time.com/5566225/first-black-hole-picture-photo/

So the predictions based on existing physics knowledge were spot-on. Unlike your prediction that the object at the center of these galaxies should be a brightly-glowing, super-hot object, the object photographed is actually very dark. It's much darker than the ring of light around it.