[guest39538]

Nope. I am saying your so called n-field is nonsense as has been discussed previously to the point of tedium pigeon.

Really ? Then space-time does not exist if you say that .

Nope. I am saying your idea is nonsense. It is sloppily thought out pratting about.

Really ? Do you not realise the n-field is the interwoven fabric of time ?

No, it is something you have made up pigeon.

Really ? So you are saying a proton charge and an electron charge doesn't measure neutral , no net charge ?

Are you suggesting the very field you walk through is a positive or negative charge ?

[The Spoon]

Nope. I am saying your so called n-field is nonsense as has been discussed previously to the point of tedium pigeon.

Really ? Then space-time does not exist if you say that .

Nope. I am saying your idea is nonsense. It is sloppily thought out pratting about.

Really ? Do you not realise the n-field is the interwoven fabric of time ?

No, it is something you have made up pigeon.

Really ? So you are saying a proton charge and an electron charge doesn't measure neutral , no net charge ?

Are you suggesting the very field you walk through is a positive or negative charge ?

You have not demonstrated such a field exists. You are trying to blag it, pigeon.

[guest39538]

Nope. I am saying your so called n-field is nonsense as has been discussed previously to the point of tedium pigeon.

Really ? Then space-time does not exist if you say that .

Nope. I am saying your idea is nonsense. It is sloppily thought out pratting about.

Really ? Do you not realise the n-field is the interwoven fabric of time ?

No, it is something you have made up pigeon.

Really ? So you are saying a proton charge and an electron charge doesn't measure neutral , no net charge ?

Are you suggesting the very field you walk through is a positive or negative charge ?

You have not demonstrated such a field exists. You are trying to blag it, pigeon.

What do think stops some of the suns rays entering the earths atmosphere ?

What do you think space-time is ?

Additionally the earths oblate shape proves the existence .

[The Spoon]

Additionally the earths oblate shape proves the existence

Oh yeah? How? You do talk a lot of utter crap.
What do I think stops some of the earth's ray entering the atmosphere? Atomic absorption.

[guest39538]

Additionally the earths oblate shape proves the existence

Oh yeah? How? You do talk a lot of utter crap.
What do I think stops some of the earth's ray entering the atmosphere? Atomic absorption.

The North pole is ''falling'' to outer space but the interior spatial field pushes back , Newtons third law .

Are you suggesting there is no earth electromagnetic field being emitted ?

[The Spoon]

Additionally the earths oblate shape proves the existence

Oh yeah? How? You do talk a lot of utter crap.
What do I think stops some of the earth's ray entering the atmosphere? Atomic absorption.

The North pole is ''falling'' to outer space but the interior spatial field pushes back , Newtons third law .

Are you suggesting there is no earth electromagnetic field being emitted ?

I thought you were leaving? Cant even do that properly can you? What are those two non-sequitur statements above? Full of it arent you pigeon?

[guest39538]

Full of it arent you pigeon?

Not at all , I understand the Universe very well .

You didn't understand the statement about space-time curvature and the earth's oblate shape is because the earth is large enough to push space time and for space time to push back ?

Did you never learn about buoyancy ?

[The Spoon]

Full of it arent you pigeon?

Not at all , I understand the Universe very well .

You didn't understand the statement about space-time curvature and the earth's oblate shape is because the earth is large enough to push space time and for space time to push back ?

Did you never learn about buoyancy ?

[/quote

Full of it arent you pigeon?

Not at all , I understand the Universe very well .

You didn't understand the statement about space-time curvature and the earth's oblate shape is because the earth is large enough to push space time and for space time to push back ?

Did you never learn about buoyancy ?

Well if you do you have failed to demonstrate it. The above is crap. It is not just me pointing this out. It is everybody.
But you know that don't you 'King of the Trolls'? How many of the pseudo science nutters are your socks?

[jeffreyH]

Interwoven fabric. Sounds like knitting to me. Ever read A Tale of Two Cities? It's about people who are for the chop.

[guest39538]

Well if you do you have failed to demonstrate it. The above is crap. It is not just me pointing this out. It is everybody. But you know that don't you 'King of the Trolls'? How many of the pseudo science nutters are your socks?

I think you should learn about buoyancy and the displacement of mass using large areas such as a parachute . 
Consider the biggest boat you can think of , that is a needle considering space and the earths area .

[guest39538]

Interwoven fabric. Sounds like knitting to me. Ever read A Tale of Two Cities? It's about people who are for the chop.

Yes an interwoven fabric like Einstein thought , except he never explained what this fabric was .  There is no reason any given point of space cannot be occupied by a negative and positive point charge simultaneously , the consequent of this , interwoven points of energy that make up a field .

[The Spoon]

Well if you do you have failed to demonstrate it. The above is crap. It is not just me pointing this out. It is everybody. But you know that don't you 'King of the Trolls'? How many of the pseudo science nutters are your socks?

I think you should learn about buoyancy and the displacement of mass using large areas such as a parachute . 
Consider the biggest boat you can think of , that is a needle considering space and the earths area .

Given the amount that I sail I don't really need lessons from you. Plus you are spouting irrelevant gibberish.

[The Spoon]

Interwoven fabric. Sounds like knitting to me. Ever read A Tale of Two Cities? It's about people who are for the chop.

Read it a couple of months ago. One of Dickens best imho.

[The Spoon]

Interwoven fabric. Sounds like knitting to me. Ever read A Tale of Two Cities? It's about people who are for the chop.

Yes an interwoven fabric like Einstein thought , except he never explained what this fabric was .  There is no reason any given point of space cannot be occupied by a negative and positive point charge simultaneously , the consequent of this , interwoven points of energy that make up a field .

And you think it is nylon presumably?

[guest39538]

Well if you do you have failed to demonstrate it. The above is crap. It is not just me pointing this out. It is everybody. But you know that don't you 'King of the Trolls'? How many of the pseudo science nutters are your socks?

I think you should learn about buoyancy and the displacement of mass using large areas such as a parachute . 
Consider the biggest boat you can think of , that is a needle considering space and the earths area .

Given the amount that I sail I don't really need lessons from you. Plus you are spouting irrelevant gibberish.

It's not irrelevant , my 5d model uses this very notion , it's simply an advancement on Einstein's notions of space-time.

[guest39538]

Interwoven fabric. Sounds like knitting to me. Ever read A Tale of Two Cities? It's about people who are for the chop.

Yes an interwoven fabric like Einstein thought , except he never explained what this fabric was .  There is no reason any given point of space cannot be occupied by a negative and positive point charge simultaneously , the consequent of this , interwoven points of energy that make up a field .

And you think it is nylon presumably?

No . it's an interwoven binary energy field that N=n .  If N ≠ n then there is more field resistance .

[Bored chemist]

No idea , I don't  use that

Has anyone ever told you that liars need good memories?
You said it's what you used.

because that would be   the value of u would be the value of hydrogens u . 

What does the u mean?

Internal energy , 

Do you mean this?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_energy
Or do you mean something made up?

Of course I mean that , my theory conforms to present physics .

So, what you have posted is plainly false.
We can all stop now.
Perhaps a passing Mod might like to move this to "That can't be true" to ensure that nobody  else accidentally takes it seriously?

[guest39538]

, what you have posted is plainly false.We can all stop now.Perhaps a passing Mod might like to move this to "That can't be true" to ensure that nobody  else accidentally takes it seriously?

Mr C, my equation is a simplified equation that explains many processes .  I assume you would use your equations  if you were to do the intricate values , I also assume I would also have to use them if I wanted intricate values . I wasn't lying , it was poorly written to what I intended .

And regardless what you've said

t =

and

Δt = Δ

[Bored chemist]

Also re.

Hydrogen doesn't combust as such

Yes, it does.

So, as I said

So, what you have posted is plainly false.
We can all stop now.
Perhaps a passing Mod might like to move this to "That can't be true" to ensure that nobody  else accidentally takes it seriously?

[guest39538]

Also re.

Hydrogen doesn't combust as such

Yes, it does.

So, as I said

So, what you have posted is plainly false.
We can all stop now.
Perhaps a passing Mod might like to move this to "That can't be true" to ensure that nobody  else accidentally takes it seriously?

Yes hydrogen ''combusts''  but not in  a way that the hydrogen atom is split .  The surface of the hydrogen is on ''fire'' (which is not really fire) because of the spontaneous reaction of ignition causing a kE response . 
I have just realised science doesn't know what fire really is does it ?