The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. What are the mechanics of Time dilation - how and why does it work?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down

What are the mechanics of Time dilation - how and why does it work?

  • 56 Replies
  • 4473 Views
  • 3 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TyroJack (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 31
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
What are the mechanics of Time dilation - how and why does it work?
« on: 30/05/2019 15:50:25 »
This  has caused me some puzzlement:
If a clock takes longer to 'tick' - if it takes more time for each 'tick' -  then we say it runs slow.
Yet if we measure a clock to be running slow, it is measuring less time than a clock keeping the correct time.
So how can a clock measuring more time be running slow?

If the clock takes longer to tick then it will measure fewer ticks; yet the same clock, stationary relative to observer A and moving relative to observer B is but one clock and both observers are observing and counting the same number of 'ticks'.

So observer B will measure more time for each 'tick' but the same number of 'ticks' and, therefore, a greater quantity of time passing than observer A will measure.  So could we say that the clock must have run faster measured by observer B as it measured a greater time? Or slower because each 'tick' took longer?

I am not doubting anything about relativity, only pointing out how difficult it is to apply use the language of classic mechanics when we speak of relativity.

It seems to me that using a term like slowing adds connotations due to the way we use everyday language to describe something counter intuitive.
« Last Edit: 01/06/2019 11:30:03 by chris »
Logged
 



Offline Halc

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2227
  • Activity:
    27.5%
  • Thanked: 186 times
    • View Profile
Re: What are the mechanics of Time dilation - how and why does it work?
« Reply #1 on: 30/05/2019 17:06:50 »
Quote from: TyroJack on 30/05/2019 15:50:25
This  has caused me some puzzlement:
If a clock takes longer to 'tick' - if it takes more time for each 'tick' -  then we say it runs slow.
Well put.   "Ticks slow" is an absolutist term, which means that it takes more absolute time between ticks than does a different clock.  In relativistic (non-absolute) interpretation, a clock that ticks slow is inaccurate, and thus not really a clock.  There is simply more or less time between a pair of events in one frame as compared to another frame which orders those same events differently.  Nothing physical really changes for anything.

Quote
Yet if we measure a clock to be running slow, it is measuring less time than a clock keeping the correct time.
Only under an absolutist interpretation is there a concept of 'correct time', and since they cannot produce a standard of it, it seems like a pretty poor interpretation.  For instance, how long does it really take for Earth to make one sidereal revolution?  Relativity has no 'correct time', so the question is meaningless.  An absolute interpretation does have that, so the question is simply unanswered.

Quote
So how can a clock measuring more time be running slow?
If a clock ran slow, it would measure less time, not more.  It wouldn't really be a clock if it didn't accurately measure what it is supposed to.

Quote
If the clock takes longer to tick then it will measure fewer ticks; yet the same clock, stationary relative to observer A and moving relative to observer B is but one clock and both observers are observing and counting the same number of 'ticks'.
I cannot really parse that.  A clock that is stationary and local relative to an observer will appear to run at normal full rate, per principle of relativity.  Ones that move relative to some frame will measure less time in that frame, but not necessarily appear to run slower to a stationary observer.  An approaching clock appears to run faster for instance, but that's mostly due to blue shift.

Quote
So could we say that the clock must have run faster measured by observer B as it measured a greater time? Or slower because each 'tick' took longer?
You need to state the situation in terms of frames, not in terms of observers, since a clock not present at the observation has a frame dependent time that it reads but not a frame dependent time that is observed at that observation event.

So under absolute interpretation, the observers have nothing to do with anything.  A clock that moves takes longer to do a tick.  Under relativity, all clocks measure time accurately: the temporal distance between two events along the worldline of the clock.  These are frame independent measurements, and thus nothing 'ticks slow'.

Quote
I am not doubting anything about relativity, only pointing out how difficult it is to apply use the language of classic mechanics when we speak of relativity.
Use the relativistic language then.  Speak of frames and events, and not objective (lacking a relation) speeds or of appearances.
« Last Edit: 30/05/2019 17:10:23 by Halc »
Logged
 

Online Janus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 789
  • Activity:
    15%
  • Thanked: 194 times
    • View Profile
Re: What are the mechanics of Time dilation - how and why does it work?
« Reply #2 on: 30/05/2019 23:19:58 »
Quote from: TyroJack on 30/05/2019 15:50:25
This  has caused me some puzzlement:
If a clock takes longer to 'tick' - if it takes more time for each 'tick' -  then we say it runs slow.
Yet if we measure a clock to be running slow, it is measuring less time than a clock keeping the correct time.
So how can a clock measuring more time be running slow?

If the clock takes longer to tick then it will measure fewer ticks; yet the same clock, stationary relative to observer A and moving relative to observer B is but one clock and both observers are observing and counting the same number of 'ticks'.

So observer B will measure more time for each 'tick' but the same number of 'ticks' and, therefore, a greater quantity of time passing than observer A will measure.  So could we say that the clock must have run faster measured by observer B as it measured a greater time? Or slower because each 'tick' took longer?

I am not doubting anything about relativity, only pointing out how difficult it is to apply use the language of classic mechanics when we speak of relativity.

It seems to me that using a term like slowing adds connotations due to the way we use everyday language to describe something counter intuitive.
I think your confusion arises from trying to treat "time" as being absolute. 
 
If I measure a clock moving relative to me to be ticking slower than my own clock, It may only tick once for every tow ticks of my own clock,  If one tick is one second fro me than the other clock takes two sec between ticks  But this only according to me. There is no absolute measure of time against which to judge the other clock.   For that clock own perspective, it is ticking once per sec. It is just that the same time period the other clock measures as being one sec, I will measure as being two sec.
 In addition, someone at rest with respect to that clock would measure my clock as only ticking once for every two ticks of that clock. His clock measures one sec per tick and mine takes two sec per tick.

As Einstein but it " Time is what clocks measure".    In that vein, there is no absolute measure of time only what each clock measures as time.( keeping in mind that we are considering "ideal" clocks; clocks that essentially keep perfect time.)

People many times get the idea that Relativity says that a "moving" clock will run slow, as in  the motion physically alters the manner in which the clock works.    This isn't what is happening.  An observer will measure a clock that has a relative motion with respect to the observer to tick slower than the observer's own clock.    It isn't that motion physically effects the clocks, it is that observers in relative motion with respect to each other also measure time differently than each other.  And neither observer's measurement of time is any more valid than the other's.
   
Logged
 

Online evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 9206
  • Activity:
    73.5%
  • Thanked: 926 times
    • View Profile
Re: What are the mechanics of Time dilation - how and why does it work?
« Reply #3 on: 30/05/2019 23:23:21 »
Quote from: TyroJack
If a clock takes longer to 'tick' - if it takes more time for each 'tick' -  then we say it runs slow.
We are used to a clock indicating a time of day; the ticks come in discrete intervals. But that's not the only type of clock.

Another kind of clock is the frequency of a spectral line in a star's radiation or a radio transmitter; the radiation is "continuous".
- We can compare this by saying that the frequency emitted by one source is higher or lower than the frequency emitted by another source, one of which could be a reference in our laboratory (in our frame of reference).

Note that in either clock, you must disentangle the different rates due to relativity from the (usually much larger) effect of Doppler shift.

One relativistic time variation that is easier to disentangled from Doppler shift is gravitational redshift.

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_redshift
Logged
 

Offline TyroJack (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 31
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: What are the mechanics of Time dilation - how and why does it work?
« Reply #4 on: 31/05/2019 11:45:58 »
Clock A's worldline passes through events P and Q.
Event P is the start of a tick and Q is the end of the tick. The tick takes one second.
From Frame B each tick of clock A is measured to be 2 seconds.
Clock A ticks between P and Q
Measured by A this takes 1 second.
Measured by B moving clock A takes 2 seconds to tick, but that is two seconds in frame A. Clock B is an ideal clock in an inertial frame, measured by a resting observer, so will measure the same time (postulate 1) as clock A, 1 second.
So, one might say that from B, A did not tick slower, but measured more time for each tick - so time passed quicker for frame A, measured by frame B, 2 seconds instead of one second, during each tick.
Logged
 



Offline Halc

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2227
  • Activity:
    27.5%
  • Thanked: 186 times
    • View Profile
Re: What are the mechanics of Time dilation - how and why does it work?
« Reply #5 on: 31/05/2019 12:09:16 »
Quote from: TyroJack on 31/05/2019 11:45:58
Clock A's worldline passes through events P and Q.
Event P is the start of a tick and Q is the end of the tick. The tick takes one second.
From Frame B each tick of clock A is measured to be 2 seconds.
Clock A ticks between P and Q
Measured by A this takes 1 second.
Measured by B moving clock A takes 2 seconds to tick, but that is two seconds in frame A.
It is one second in frame A, as you stated above.  "Measured by A this takes 1 second".  It is two seconds in frame B, and frame B is not a proper measurement between events P and Q since the B clock is not present at both events P and Q.  The A clock is present at both of them, as you stated on the first line.

You don't specify, so let's say clock B's worldline passes through events P (0), R (0.5) and S(2) in a straight line.  In frame A, events Q and R are simultaneous.  In frame B, events S and Q are simultaneous.  That difference in event ordering is what relativity is about.

Quote
Clock B is an ideal clock in an inertial frame, measured by a resting observer, so will measure the same time (postulate 1) as clock A, 1 second.
Both clocks are ideal clocks (how is an ideal clock distinct from a clock anyway?), both in inertial frames, with separate observers next to each if you find that useful, but they're stationary in different frames, so neither clock measures the same length-of-worldline as the other.
Clock A measures the proper time between events P and Q because it is present at both events and its worldline between those events is straight.  Clock B is not measuring proper time between those two events because it is not present at both of them, but is instead measuring proper time between events P R and S.

Quote
So, one might say that from B, A did not tick slower, but measured more time for each tick - so time passed quicker for frame A, measured by frame B, 2 seconds instead of one second, during each tick.
Or one might stop using absolute language and not talk about tick rates at all.
From frame B, clock A is dilated.  From frame A, clock B is dilated.  Neither clock ticks slow or measures any different time than one second per second.  The time shown is the actual temporal length the worldline measured.
« Last Edit: 31/05/2019 12:34:23 by Halc »
Logged
 

Online Janus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 789
  • Activity:
    15%
  • Thanked: 194 times
    • View Profile
Re: What are the mechanics of Time dilation - how and why does it work?
« Reply #6 on: 31/05/2019 18:47:24 »
Quote from: TyroJack on 31/05/2019 11:45:58
Clock A's worldline passes through events P and Q.
Event P is the start of a tick and Q is the end of the tick. The tick takes one second.
From Frame B each tick of clock A is measured to be 2 seconds.
Clock A ticks between P and Q
Measured by A this takes 1 second.
Measured by B moving clock A takes 2 seconds to tick, but that is two seconds in frame A. Clock B is an ideal clock in an inertial frame, measured by a resting observer, so will measure the same time (postulate 1) as clock A, 1 second.
So, one might say that from B, A did not tick slower, but measured more time for each tick - so time passed quicker for frame A, measured by frame B, 2 seconds instead of one second, during each tick.

For a little more clarity, I put events P and Q three ticks(sec) apart rather then one.  I also added event "R" which represents three sec according to clock B.  A and B both start event P. Relative speed is  0.8c This is relative speed. both diagrams below describe exactly the same scenario, just from different frames of reference.

World lines for A and B from the rest frame of A.


* Image21.png (7.42 kB . 602x302 - viewed 2038 times)

By the in the Time clock A goes from event P to Q( three sec as measured by clock A),  clock R has not yet ticked off three sec.   Event R has not happened yet according to A and event P happens before event R. Light signals ( yellow lines) leave both A and B after 1 tick has past on each clock.  Each signal reaches the other clock when it reads 3 ticks (sec)

World lines for A and B according to B's rest frame.

* Image23.png (7.12 kB . 603x301 - viewed 3124 times)

In the time it takes for B to go from P to R( three sec as measured by clock B), A has not yet reached ticked off three sec. Event Q has not happened yet according to B, and event R occurs before event Q.

The light signals sent by each clock when it has ticked off one sec each reach the other clock when that clock reads 3 sec.
Logged
 

Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6807
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 175 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: What are the mechanics of Time dilation - how and why does it work?
« Reply #7 on: 01/06/2019 10:32:59 »
I can select a reference frame such that A and B are traveling at identical velocities. From my point of view both frames have the same clock rate. Who is dilated more 1 A, 2 B, 3 Neither? Someone has to be physically dilated more. Otherwise the twins thought experiment makes no sense.

Also GPS makes no sense and shouldn't work. Time dilation has physical effects. All the arguments about everything being totally relative dodges the issue.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 

Offline Halc

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2227
  • Activity:
    27.5%
  • Thanked: 186 times
    • View Profile
Re: What are the mechanics of Time dilation - how and why does it work?
« Reply #8 on: 01/06/2019 13:01:34 »
Quote from: jeffreyH on 01/06/2019 10:32:59
I can select a reference frame such that A and B are traveling at identical velocities.
Identical speeds at least, yes.  Velocity is a vector quantity so in this frame, A and B are travelling at opposite velocities.
Quote
From my point of view both frames have the same clock rate. Who is dilated more 1 A, 2 B, 3 Neither? Someone has to be physically dilated more. Otherwise the twins thought experiment makes no sense.
A and B are dilated identically in that frame.  You're the one who is dilated not at all.  One is never dilated in one's own frame.

The twins scenario cannot be illustrated in that example since A and B will never meet again at that velocity.  To meet again, somebody needs to change velocity.

Quote
Also GPS makes no sense and shouldn't work. Time dilation has physical effects. All the arguments about everything being totally relative dodges the issue.
The GPS satellites actually run faster than us on Earth, but that's mostly due to GR effects, not SR.  The average speed of a GPS satellite is larger than your average speed in any inertial frame, and it being totally relative doesn't change that.
Logged
 



Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6807
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 175 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: What are the mechanics of Time dilation - how and why does it work?
« Reply #9 on: 01/06/2019 13:14:16 »
Quote from: Halc on 01/06/2019 13:01:34
Quote from: jeffreyH on 01/06/2019 10:32:59
I can select a reference frame such that A and B are traveling at identical velocities.
Identical speeds at least, yes.  Velocity is a vector quantity so in this frame, A and B are travelling at opposite velocities.

Yes, speed. My apologies.

Quote
Quote
From my point of view both frames have the same clock rate. Who is dilated more 1 A, 2 B, 3 Neither? Someone has to be physically dilated more. Otherwise the twins thought experiment makes no sense.
A and B are dilated identically in that frame.  You're the one who is dilated not at all.  One is never dilated in one's own frame.

The twins scenario cannot be illustrated in that example since A and B will never meet again at that velocity.  To meet again, somebody needs to change velocity.

And there is the problem. Stating that acceleration has to occur for a difference in dilation to be a physical thing. A change in velocity is only required for it to be observable. This guarantees the proximity of observer and observed. If the twin just travels in a straight line for t amount of time and never returns he will still be time dilated. It is just that you will never be able to detect it.

This is the big issue I have with opinions on SR.

Quote
Quote
Also GPS makes no sense and shouldn't work. Time dilation has physical effects. All the arguments about everything being totally relative dodges the issue.
The GPS satellites actually run faster than us on Earth, but that's mostly due to GR effects, not SR.  The average speed of a GPS satellite is larger than your average speed in any inertial frame, and it being totally relative doesn't change that.
« Last Edit: 01/06/2019 13:20:21 by jeffreyH »
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 

Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6807
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 175 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: What are the mechanics of Time dilation - how and why does it work?
« Reply #10 on: 01/06/2019 13:17:22 »
BTW This follows from time dilation in SR being a function of velocity and NOT acceleration.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 

Offline Halc

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2227
  • Activity:
    27.5%
  • Thanked: 186 times
    • View Profile
Re: What are the mechanics of Time dilation - how and why does it work?
« Reply #11 on: 01/06/2019 18:08:56 »
Quote from: jeffreyH on 01/06/2019 13:14:16
Quote from: Halc
The twins scenario cannot be illustrated in that example since A and B will never meet again at that velocity.  To meet again, somebody needs to change velocity.
And there is the problem. Stating that acceleration has to occur for a difference in dilation to be a physical thing.
I didn't say that.  I said that no objective comparison can be made between clocks not in each other's presence.  The acceleration itself does nothing.
Quote
BTW This follows from time dilation in SR being a function of velocity and NOT acceleration.
Exactly so, yes.  I can have two clocks here on Earth, both at identical speeds and depth in gravity well, but one with arbitrarily higher acceleration than the other.  SR says they will stay in sync.
Logged
 

Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6807
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 175 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: What are the mechanics of Time dilation - how and why does it work?
« Reply #12 on: 02/06/2019 00:29:51 »
OK To reiterate: Who is dilated more 1 A, 2 B, 3 Neither? Someone has to be physically dilated more.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 



Offline pzkpfw

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • 67
  • Activity:
    0.5%
  • Thanked: 5 times
    • View Profile
Re: What are the mechanics of Time dilation - how and why does it work?
« Reply #13 on: 02/06/2019 01:38:15 »
Quote from: jeffreyH on 02/06/2019 00:29:51
OK To reiterate: Who is dilated more 1 A, 2 B, 3 Neither? Someone has to be physically dilated more.

You're mixing frames.

If we assume A is the "stay at home" twin and B moves away, then yes there could be a C for whom both A and B are the same speed relative to them. Note that C would also have to be moving, according to both A and B.

According to A, C is moving away at half the speed B is moving away.
According to B, C is moving away at half the speed A is moving away.
According to C, A and B are both moving away at the same speed (in opposite directions).
At this time, according to C, time dilation is the same for A and B.

Then there's the turn-around. B heads back to A. For your addition of C, C will also now need to head back ...

According to A, C is moving closer at half the speed B is moving closer.
According to B, C is moving closer at half the speed A is moving closer.
According to C, A and B are both moving closer at the same speed.
At this time, according to C, time dilation is the same for A and B.

During the two times of plain inertial movement, everyone can consider themselves as at rest, and their clocks will tick at one second per second - according to them. And also, according to them, the other peoples' clocks will tick slower. Your addition of C does not change this.

That B (and C) will be younger than A when they all get back together is not about some "real" physical dilation happening to one but not the other during the travel. That would imply some absolute rest, where A is "really" at rest and B is "really" moving.

It's an effect of one of them staying in a single inertial frame the whole time while the other (or others) do not.

(Although acceleration is needed to have B change direction, the effect is not specifically "caused" by the acceleration. Alternate methods of this experiment involve someone else coming back, and B passing them their clock reading as they cross paths. The clock that returns to A will still read less.)

While B moves away (according to A) the situation is symmetrical, i.e. B can consider A moving way.
While B moves closer (according to A) the situation is symmetrical, i.e. B can consider A moving closer.
(And this is where the "paradox" of "twins' paradox" comes from.)
But ... the overall scenario is not symmetrical, someone (A) just sat in their chair holding their clock and a cup of coffee. Someone else (B) had to change frames; they either spilled their coffee (by accelerating) or had to pass their clock to someone else to return to A.
« Last Edit: 02/06/2019 01:46:56 by pzkpfw »
Logged
 

Offline Halc

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2227
  • Activity:
    27.5%
  • Thanked: 186 times
    • View Profile
Re: What are the mechanics of Time dilation - how and why does it work?
« Reply #14 on: 02/06/2019 02:15:41 »
Quote from: jeffreyH on 02/06/2019 00:29:51
OK To reiterate: Who is dilated more 1 A, 2 B, 3 Neither? Someone has to be physically dilated more.
Dilation is relative.  Nobody is dilated more, absent that relation.  The principle of relativity demands this.
Logged
 

Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6807
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 175 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: What are the mechanics of Time dilation - how and why does it work?
« Reply #15 on: 02/06/2019 12:21:21 »
Quote from: Halc on 02/06/2019 02:15:41
Quote from: jeffreyH on 02/06/2019 00:29:51
OK To reiterate: Who is dilated more 1 A, 2 B, 3 Neither? Someone has to be physically dilated more.
Dilation is relative.  Nobody is dilated more, absent that relation.  The principle of relativity demands this.

So we can pick a frame to make the problem with GPS go away then. If dilation is truly relative this has to be the case. This, however, doesn't solve the problem for the guy on the surface of the earth.
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 

Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6807
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 175 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: What are the mechanics of Time dilation - how and why does it work?
« Reply #16 on: 02/06/2019 12:26:38 »
Quote from: pzkpfw on 02/06/2019 01:38:15
Quote from: jeffreyH on 02/06/2019 00:29:51
OK To reiterate: Who is dilated more 1 A, 2 B, 3 Neither? Someone has to be physically dilated more.

You're mixing frames.

If we assume A is the "stay at home" twin and B moves away, then yes there could be a C for whom both A and B are the same speed relative to them. Note that C would also have to be moving, according to both A and B.

According to A, C is moving away at half the speed B is moving away.
According to B, C is moving away at half the speed A is moving away.
According to C, A and B are both moving away at the same speed (in opposite directions).
At this time, according to C, time dilation is the same for A and B.

Then there's the turn-around. B heads back to A. For your addition of C, C will also now need to head back ...

According to A, C is moving closer at half the speed B is moving closer.
According to B, C is moving closer at half the speed A is moving closer.
According to C, A and B are both moving closer at the same speed.
At this time, according to C, time dilation is the same for A and B.

During the two times of plain inertial movement, everyone can consider themselves as at rest, and their clocks will tick at one second per second - according to them. And also, according to them, the other peoples' clocks will tick slower. Your addition of C does not change this.

That B (and C) will be younger than A when they all get back together is not about some "real" physical dilation happening to one but not the other during the travel. That would imply some absolute rest, where A is "really" at rest and B is "really" moving.

It's an effect of one of them staying in a single inertial frame the whole time while the other (or others) do not.

(Although acceleration is needed to have B change direction, the effect is not specifically "caused" by the acceleration. Alternate methods of this experiment involve someone else coming back, and B passing them their clock reading as they cross paths. The clock that returns to A will still read less.)

While B moves away (according to A) the situation is symmetrical, i.e. B can consider A moving way.
While B moves closer (according to A) the situation is symmetrical, i.e. B can consider A moving closer.
(And this is where the "paradox" of "twins' paradox" comes from.)
But ... the overall scenario is not symmetrical, someone (A) just sat in their chair holding their clock and a cup of coffee. Someone else (B) had to change frames; they either spilled their coffee (by accelerating) or had to pass their clock to someone else to return to A.

This wasn't a twins experiment scenario. In my scenario there is no turn around point. You will never know if anyone's clock is running slower than the others. That is the whole point. I think we should admit when we actually don't know something. Rather than arguing in circles. That would be much more productive.

Knowing what the state of anyone's clock is requires close proximity. If we don't have close proximity then we don't know it's state. We are making an assumption.
« Last Edit: 02/06/2019 12:29:32 by jeffreyH »
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 



Offline jeffreyH

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 6807
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 175 times
  • The graviton sucks
    • View Profile
Re: What are the mechanics of Time dilation - how and why does it work?
« Reply #17 on: 02/06/2019 12:42:22 »
Space station A and space station B are a distance X apart. This is known in advance. Probe C is traveling between them at 0.8c. The speed itself is only significant because of the relativistic effects it will produce. As the probe moves along it records the number of seconds that have elapsed since it passed the first space station. When the probe reaches the destination it sends the count to the destination space station. The crew then check it against what they would expect in the absence of time dilation and at the speed the probe was traveling. What do they find?
« Last Edit: 02/06/2019 13:03:49 by jeffreyH »
Logged
Even the most obstinately ignorant cannot avoid learning when in an environment that educates.
 

Offline Halc

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2227
  • Activity:
    27.5%
  • Thanked: 186 times
    • View Profile
Re: What are the mechanics of Time dilation - how and why does it work?
« Reply #18 on: 02/06/2019 13:23:26 »
Quote from: jeffreyH on 02/06/2019 12:21:21
So we can pick a frame to make the problem with GPS go away then. If dilation is truly relative this has to be the case. This, however, doesn't solve the problem for the guy on the surface of the earth.
Dilation due to motion is truly relative.  GPS dilation is due mostly to depth of gravity well, which is absolute, so the GPS clocks are less dilated than the Earth clocks in any frame.
Quote from: jeffreyH on 02/06/2019 12:26:38
This wasn't a twins experiment scenario. In my scenario there is no turn around point. You will never know if anyone's clock is running slower than the others.
Sure you can, but you need to pick a frame to do it. 
Quote
That is the whole point. I think we should admit when we actually don't know something.
The answer is frame dependent.  Being frame dependent doesn't mean that you can't know.

Quote
Knowing what the state of anyone's clock is requires close proximity.
Proximity is required for an objective comparison since the comparison is the same in any frame.  For separated events, the comparison is dependent on how the frame orders those events.  That ordering of events is not a physical difference, only an abstract one.  Thus neither clock runs physically slower or faster due to relative motion.
Logged
 

Offline TyroJack (OP)

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 31
  • Activity:
    0%
    • View Profile
Re: What are the mechanics of Time dilation - how and why does it work?
« Reply #19 on: 02/06/2019 13:44:34 »
Quote from: Janus on 31/05/2019 18:47:24

World lines for A and B according to B's rest frame.

* Image23.png (7.12 kB . 603x301 - viewed 3124 times)
This diagram raises another thing that I wonder about.
This is what I believe to be a Minkowski diagram.
Why is the time scale for the moving one out of scale? Is it because the light paths are at 45 degrees?
This bothers me for it seems that is Newtonian mechanics with absolute space and time:

Imagine 2 identical light clocks, A and B, moving apart at speed v.
Seen from clock A the light from clock B moves up at ct while clock B moves away at vt, so the light as seen from the stationary clock can be moving vertically if v is vanishingly small
If B is moving away at approaching light speed, the time measured by clock B, will be almost zero.

If clock B travels at 0.866 c, for 1 second, measured by A, its light will have travelled 1 light second, measured by A, but only 0.5 light seconds, within clock B (this of course is the time clock B is shewing - its proper time).

So clock A, measures 1 time dilated second to have passed for clock B, when clock B reads 0.5 seconds.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: clocks slow  / time  / relativity 
 

Similar topics (5)

What are "energy" and "work" ?

Started by The ChampBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 108
Views: 54578
Last post 31/12/2018 20:54:40
by yor_on
What is a transistor? How does a transistor work?

Started by chrisBoard Technology

Replies: 9
Views: 18599
Last post 12/01/2010 01:48:55
by Geezer
Why do we have a jet stream, and how does the jet stream work?

Started by Joe L. OganBoard The Environment

Replies: 4
Views: 8440
Last post 03/06/2020 22:30:12
by evan_au
What are neutrinos and how do neutrinos work?

Started by chrisBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 8
Views: 10288
Last post 08/01/2014 09:27:20
by evan_au
Must ∞ monkeys on ∞ typewriters really write everything given ∞ time?

Started by chiralSPOBoard General Science

Replies: 28
Views: 24795
Last post 28/03/2020 11:42:26
by yor_on
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.278 seconds with 82 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.