0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
a photon, has the helicity of it momentum, this can be righthanded or lefthanded. a neutrino is strictly lefthanded.
a photon cannot transverse matter in the same way a neutrino transverses matter, basically unobstructed.
the effect of matter on a photon is different then the effect of matter (energy'momentum} on a neutrino,
where matter, energy and momentum, have no effect on neutrinos.
the fact that a higgs field also doesn't couple with a massless photon is not pertinent to a discussion about neutrinos.
please explain how neutrinos transverses the earth unaffected if they are under gravity's auspices.
photons have a wave property. i have not heard of neutrinos demonstrating a wave property. photons and neutrinos are apples and oranges. would you conduct an experiment on one element and declare the results pertinent for other elements?
although the transmutations of neutrinos donot take place as nuclear transmutation, requiring excessive amounts of energy but rather they transmute Innocuously, depending on the local matter environment.
neutrinos like proton are their own antiparticle.
transmutations of neutrinos donot take place as nuclear transmutation, requiring excessive amounts of energy but rather they transmute Innocuously, depending on the local matter environment.
neutrinos are only lefthanded chiral
Quote from: esquire neutrinos like proton are their own antiparticle.There are protons and anti-protons; they are different particles.yes, please understand that a typo is difficult for a dyslectic to detect. photon not proton. lolIt is very hard to study neutrinos, as they are slippery little suckers...- It's hard to get neutrinos to interact with matter - that's why Ice Cube is monitoring a billion tons of matter for them to interact with...- It is even harder to get neutrinos to interact with each other- Given this, at present, it is not clear if neutrinos have separate particles & anti-particles (like a proton) or the neutrino is its own antiparticle (like a photon)again, for clarification, if the discussion is pertinent to photons and not protons, even an average intelligent person makes the connection. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majorana_fermionQuotetransmutations of neutrinos donot take place as nuclear transmutation, requiring excessive amounts of energy but rather they transmute Innocuously, depending on the local matter environment.I think the technical term you are looking for is "neutrino oscillation" rather than "neutrino transmutation".- Unlike nuclear decay, neutrino oscillation is not a 1-way process, but more a quantum uncertainty about the "flavor" of a neutrino at any point in time- Neutrino oscillation (or almost anything about neutrinos) is not greatly affected by its matter environment- The symptoms of Neutrino oscillation were first detected as a shortfall in the number of neutrinos emitted by the Sun - they detected about 1/3 of the expected quantity. Eventually this was explained by the fact that 2/3 of the neutrinos produced in the Sun changed into other flavors of neutrino before they reached Earth, and were undetectable by this apparatus (very pure dry cleaning fluid). So the oscillation occurred in 150 million km of vacuum (not matter).- More recent experiments conducted near nuclear reactors have been able to study neutrino oscillation in more detail, as the neutrinos pass through the air. - For a visible photon, there is little difference between vacuum and air; for neutrinos, there is little difference between vacuum and the element Lead. So I don't see what difference matter makes (although I read that neutrinos may be affected by the Hydrogen core of the Sun, which is far denser than lead).See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino_oscillationkidkrypt is the one that chose "nuclear transmutation" as a example in an attempt to prove particles change their elemental states. my original point was that neutrinos alter their states without an excessive amount of energy employed. as a neutrino transverses different densities it does if fact alter its energy signature. this is the coping mechanism for neutrino coupling to alter between it's three flavors. the difference between a vacuum and air, and a vacuum and lead is substantial. this goes to the point that kidkypt was attempting to compare photon and neutrino, apples and oranges, in an attempt to dispute my original point. Quoteneutrinos are only lefthanded chiralIn theory, Neutrinos must have the opposite chirality to Anti-neutrinos.- It's true that only left-handed neutrinos have been observed to date, and only right-handed anti-neutrinos.- But this is tied in to the (currently unanswered) question about whether neutrinos are their own antiparticle.It is possible that neutrinos propagate as an oscillation of left and right chirality. If so, it's because they are traveling so close to the speed of light that very few Solar neutrinos have changed chirality before they reach detectors on Earth.See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino#Chirality
my original point was that neutrinos alter their states without an excessive amount of energy employed.
charge parity appear to be violated by neutrinos and anti neutrinos, as such, their properties are not reflective. this means they are incapable of an explosive interaction. this inability to interact, again defies gravity.
the fact that neutrinos unlike particles can occupy the same point in space and time
again defies gravity.
this excludes it from being a particle.
if is not a particle and it is not a boson, the simplest solution is that neutrinos are holes in the fabric of spacetime. this implies that neutrinos and anti neutrinos pass though each other.
uranium 238 is transmuted by a fast neutron in a fission process, external energy required!.
gravity is what causes the attraction between particles and anti particles, which result in an explosion.
neutrinos and anti-neutrinos don't interact a cp violation. gravity doesnot produce an attraction between neutrinos and anti-neutrinos.
neutrinos occupy the same spacetime location.
this transmution and subsequent reversion is one neutrino joining another to result in a higher energy neutrino.
a boson is not a fermion particle
bosons are now classified as particle because not to do so, would refute the higgs boson's experimental finding of an energy charge signature.
researcher are clueless to explain.
a field within a field, a wave with a wave, has no fermion basis.
it is a charge devoid of matter, a hole with a spin. not bound by gravity
not the first contradictory statement uttered in science!
bosons belong in the quantum realm, they are zero mass, zero charge, with a twist(spin) i.e. a photon. zero mass = not a particle.
a photon is a particle that lack a basis for it's charge!
is the warping of space/time a homogenous feature without imperfections, some academics, obviously think so!
kyptid"Photons don't have a charge." van physics.illinois.edu/qa/listing.php?id=2348&t=photons-as-carriers-of-the-electromagnetic-force"high-energy photons produced in particle accelerators may collide with themselves readily." this insinuates a contradicts in regards to a charged photon.
me - it's a reference to space time foam or bubbles or holes. many with your level or greater expertise favor this.
yet a neutrino which you claim to have gravitational mass is not attracted to an anti neutrino.
a neutrino is a bosonic...
I don't believe science is 100% certain as to the status of the neutrino*