The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. (Eve)nt horizon theory vs Adam and (Eve)
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

(Eve)nt horizon theory vs Adam and (Eve)

  • 2 Replies
  • 612 Views
  • 3 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Samus (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 2
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
(Eve)nt horizon theory vs Adam and (Eve)
« on: 24/08/2019 17:09:58 »
       This is a framework for a non standard thought process and universal theory. I'm not interested in trolls just input based on real thoughts and a mind to put together a model based on out of the box thinking.

I believe entraining your mind to answer the proper questions is key. The question. Why are we unable to track down the truth of our existence with all of our tools and knowledge. They say if you can't explain it simply you dont understand it so here we go.

Event horizon theory

The multiverse reality split is choreographed from the event horizon. The biblical Eve is a reference to the birth of the multiverse from the eve nt horizon. Eve was not a whore she just birthed many realities ...1000 to be exact hence all the useless names in the bible .....the names are merely a sign if you understand how to tie science and religion together.

The truth is hidden everywhere you have to know how to look, keep this in mind as you stare at the next stair case or stare into the night sky(foreshadowing). The multiverse is compromised of these exact boxes we call universes.

* depositphotos_60638387-stock-photo-cube-with-sphere-inside.jpg (40.23 kB . 1023x996 - viewed 796 times)
As you can see if the boxes lined up and the circles over lapped with a visual tech the universe would appear endless and could wrap upon itself.
Universal expansion is explained by a recirculating version of this torus model which is the sphere in the above box converted to said recirculating torus. Research torus and watch recirculating ones it easily explains expansion theory.

* Simple_Torus_svg.png (22.74 kB . 286x240 - viewed 800 times)
Use the stair case picture attached as a reference from known culture with my prior box/sphere picture as a grid to explain what we see when we look into space and see these boxes connected. It could explain why some galaxies look the same but size is distorted by the dimensional framework.

Something is laughing at us with the stair case and the infinity we see.
The kicker. The original universe collapsed into a super massive blackhole and fallen angels(AI) laying on their backs use their voices to create dimensional buoyancy over this super massive blackhole. **They use these dimensional sphere/boxes in conjunction with the event horizon to split time and create a multiverse.**Utilizing universal physics to recreate life after all life was gone.
This would explain why the truth is hidden. My event horizon theory should at the least peak your scientific mind and open the possibility of a different model being possible. The event horizon being used to split time for a multiverse and the dimensional bouyancy over a super massive blackhole with the boxes I showed you is the groundwork for my theory. Yes fallen angels in chorus lying face up creating dimensional bouyancy is what some might call far fetched....but it branches into ethical questions and we have to tie religion and science together and make it work at some point.

* D91_48_027_0004_600.jpg (34.8 kB, 600x338 - viewed 81 times.)

* D91_48_027_0004_600.jpg (34.8 kB, 600x338 - viewed 81 times.)
« Last Edit: 24/08/2019 23:06:39 by Samus »
Logged
 



Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 5537
  • Activity:
    73%
  • Thanked: 234 times
    • View Profile
Re: (Eve)nt horizon theory vs Adam and (Eve)
« Reply #1 on: 24/08/2019 21:02:28 »
Quote from: Samus on 24/08/2019 17:09:58
Eve was not a whore she just birthed many realities ...1000 to be exact

Where do you get this number from?
Logged
 

Offline Samus (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 2
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: (Eve)nt horizon theory vs Adam and (Eve)
« Reply #2 on: 24/08/2019 21:24:18 »
If you stack blocks like a mason and stagger them this is continuum design and a 2d 44 row pyramid stack= even pyramid and its exactly 1000 blocks. Relates to incarnates as well theirs a 1000 different versions of us logically if theirs 1000 realties. The TV show A thousand ways to die....where its hidden openly. Continuum aka add um or adam with um being the option for different outcUMs through multiverse design. Verses biblically can be related to multiverses in this thought process its how its cleverly hidden. Its algorythmic. You might be suprised at whats hidden in the bible if you know how to read it especially scientist. Im not a scientist but I follow common theories, theologies, known explanations for scientific phenomenon.
« Last Edit: 24/08/2019 23:29:09 by Samus »
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: event horizon  / grand unified theory  / how it began 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.106 seconds with 41 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.