The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. Gravity In Relative Motion - is there any solution?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Gravity In Relative Motion - is there any solution?

  • 3 Replies
  • 2001 Views
  • 4 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CrazyScientist (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Gravity In Relative Motion - is there any solution?
« on: 19/03/2020 03:04:37 »
Hello! I would like to present you the only correct model of gravity and energy distribution in relative motion. I've spent around 6 weeks and wasted some 8 pages format a5 on calculations, while looking for the right formula - it took me so long, because I did such things for the first time in some 20 years or so and also, this was that part of physics, which as far as I remeber, I've always hated at most... I wonder, what then can explain all those generations of professional physicsts, who didn't even think about trying to calculate such things... If you really want to show me, that theoretical physicists aren't only just a bunch of overconfident snobs, then show me, that mainstream science can actually deal with the problem, which I present below:

Here's a simple scenario: 4 objects with masses:
m1=4, m2=1, m3=4, m4=1
Objects m1 and m3 move in relation to eachother at v=0,2c (1c=1d/1t)
Distances between m1 and m2, just as between m3 to m4 are equal to 2d. Due to gravitational attraction m1 makes m2 to accelerate at a1=1 (where 1a=0,1d/t^2) and attraction between m3 and m4 is just as strong.
Can you calculate the kinetic energies or acceleration (a2) for object m2 in relation to object m3 or for m4 in relation to m1? I can do it, but I had to find my own way...


Frame of m1

Frame of m3

I will wait a day or two for you to make any attempt of solving this problem and then I will begin to show you, how to do it my way... :)
« Last Edit: 19/03/2020 03:07:36 by CrazyScientist »
Logged
 



Offline Kryptid

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 5466
  • Activity:
    46%
  • Thanked: 234 times
    • View Profile
Re: Gravity In Relative Motion - is there any solution?
« Reply #1 on: 19/03/2020 04:48:30 »
Quote from: CrazyScientist on 19/03/2020 03:04:37
If you really want to show me, that theoretical physicists aren't only just a bunch of overconfident snobs

Not a good way to start off your membership here.

Assuming this is new idea, I have moved it to New Theories.
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21186
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 485 times
    • View Profile
Re: Gravity In Relative Motion - is there any solution?
« Reply #2 on: 19/03/2020 08:30:39 »
Quote from: CrazyScientist on 19/03/2020 03:04:37
I would like to present you the only correct model of gravity and energy distribution in relative motion. I've spent around 6 weeks and wasted some 8 pages format a5 on calculations


Quote from: CrazyScientist on 19/03/2020 03:04:37
a bunch of overconfident
Are you seeking to join them?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21186
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 485 times
    • View Profile
Re: Gravity In Relative Motion - is there any solution?
« Reply #3 on: 19/03/2020 08:34:29 »
Quote from: CrazyScientist on 19/03/2020 03:04:37
Here's a simple scenario: 4 objects
Four objects, a blue one, a green one, a yellow one and two red ones.

Quote from: CrazyScientist on 19/03/2020 03:04:37
I wonder, what then can explain all those generations of professional physicsts, who didn't even think about trying to calculate such things.
Because they have proof that it is, in the general case, impossible.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-body_problem
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: gravity  / physics  / theory  / model 
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.108 seconds with 42 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.