0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Usually when a sex scandal that is based almost entirely on testimony, there is room for doubt. The last time I was in the UK, a little more than a year after "the cigar-chomping hypocrite's" death, Saville's name seemed to be a byword for all things perverse (or "buggery", to use one UK's favorite words), and doubt was nowhere to be found. Even his family wasn't discounting his actions. Saville's most loyal fans apparently felt the evidence against him was too powerful to rebuke. In science, testimony only has little, if any, power in determining truth. To this day UFOers only supply testimony and their version of logic, to prove their claims.
Actively seeking the company of serial-killers is exceptional behaviour ...https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jimmy-savile-frank-bruno-reveals-1430910[ https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Sutcliffe ]
... donald makintyre, piers morgan ...
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 15/05/2020 02:40:16... donald makintyre, piers morgan ...The above were paid to interview murderers, whereas Jimmy's only reward would have been vicarious thrills.
A good proportion of the mental profession are fascinated by sociopaths psycopaths, to the point of everyone becomes a nut. There own ego requires it.