The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Would it be possible to directly detect spatial expansion?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Would it be possible to directly detect spatial expansion?

  • 9 Replies
  • 594 Views
  • 4 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Kryptid (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 5517
  • Activity:
    69%
  • Thanked: 234 times
    • View Profile
Would it be possible to directly detect spatial expansion?
« on: 19/08/2020 21:47:49 »
Would it be possible with current technology (or at least foreseeable technology) to directly detect the expansion of space using a laser set-up somewhat like that used at LIGO to detect gravitational waves?

The Hubble constant is measured as being somewhere between 67 and 73 kilometers per second per megaparsec (I'll use 70 km/s/mpc (70,000 m/s/mpc) as an average value) . A megaparsec is 1 million parsecs, and a parsec is 3.0857 x 1016 meters, so a megaparsec is 3.0857 x 1022 meters. 70,000 m/s/mpc / 3.0857 x 1022 meters = 2.2685 x 10-18 meters/second/meter.

Assuming I did that math right, then the space between two objects in free space separated by a meter is expanding at a rate of about 2.6% of the proton charge radius (8.751 x 10-16 m) every second. At a separation of 1 kilometer, the expansion rate is about 2.6 times the proton charge radius per second. At 23 million kilometers, it's about the radius of a hydrogen atom every second. Since it takes light about 76.7 seconds to travel 23 million kilometers, it should experience an increase of wavelength on the order of 38 hydrogen atom diameters.

I've read that LIGO could detect mirror movements on the order of one-ten-thousandth of the diameter of a proton. Does that mean we meet the detection threshold? I understand that this might be slightly different, as what we are looking for is a change in red-shift instead of mirror movements. Is it not really the same, then?
« Last Edit: 19/08/2020 21:50:18 by Kryptid »
Logged
 



Offline Halc

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2161
  • Activity:
    31.5%
  • Thanked: 163 times
    • View Profile
Re: Would it be possible to directly detect spatial expansion?
« Reply #1 on: 19/08/2020 22:17:57 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 19/08/2020 21:47:49
70,000 m/s/mpc / 3.0857 x 1022 meters = 2.2685 x 10-18 meters/second/meter.
It is a useful exercise to reduce the terms in that figure. You have meters both in the numerator and the denominator. Doing so illustrates why Hubble's constant isn't a constant.

As to the question asked, certainly technology is probably capable of detecting the change in distance you describe, but the question is, how would one distinguish mere motion of the far mirror from an increase of space between here and the far mirror?  If you attach it to a rod, space can expand all it wants and the mirror isn't going to get any further away.
« Last Edit: 19/08/2020 22:22:35 by Halc »
Logged
 

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 9000
  • Activity:
    75%
  • Thanked: 883 times
    • View Profile
Re: Would it be possible to directly detect spatial expansion?
« Reply #2 on: 19/08/2020 22:38:16 »
Quote from: OP
directly detect the expansion of space using a laser set-up somewhat like that used at LIGO?
LIGO obtains its extreme sensitivity by using destructive interference between two light paths at right-angles to each other.

If the gravitational wave source is optimally placed, one arm will get shorter while the other gets longer (and vice versa). This causes the interference pattern to be cancellation vs not cancelled.

The cosmic expansion of space is uniform for galaxies in all directions, so you don't benefit from this very sensitive oscillation between cancellation/non-cancellation between two arms of the detector. Both arms of the detector are equally affected.

Another problem with the LIGO configuration is that it has a limited frequency range, about 50Hz to 1kHz. It can't detect a 0Hz steady expansion of the universe.
Logged
 

Offline Kryptid (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 5517
  • Activity:
    69%
  • Thanked: 234 times
    • View Profile
Re: Would it be possible to directly detect spatial expansion?
« Reply #3 on: 19/08/2020 22:55:24 »
I didn't mean to make it exactly like LIGO, but rather use something similar (because LIGO is extremely sensitive). As an example idea: use the beam splitter to create two laser beams from the original source. One laser beam is sent directly to the detector, whereas the second is sent at a right angle to the first laser beam, bounces off of a mirror so that it travels parallel to the first beam, then bounces off a second mirror that causes it to come back and intersect the first beam at a 90 degree angle. For this reason, the track of the second beam is longer than the first and thus spatial expansion would cause it to red-shift more.

In LIGO's detector, the two beams are set to destructively interfere with each other so that the detector doesn't pick up anything initially. We could use a similar set-up such that destructive interference between two beams of perfectly equal frequency cancel out in the direction of the detector. However, the slight increase in red-shift on the longer arm of the journey would mean that the lasers are no longer perfectly matched and thus a tiny signal should get through equal in intensity to the difference between the strength of the two beams.

A better set-up would be so that each arm starts off as being equal in length, and that the mirrors on one of the arms could be moved in order to make the distance either shorter or longer than the first arm. This would allow for the relative difference between the red-shift to be directly measured as the mirror distance is varied.
Logged
 

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 9000
  • Activity:
    75%
  • Thanked: 883 times
    • View Profile
Re: Would it be possible to directly detect spatial expansion?
« Reply #4 on: 19/08/2020 23:13:27 »
Using 1 arm of LIGO might work: Compare the wavelength of the transmitted laser light to the wavelength of the light after it has passed down the length of one LIGO arm.

The mirrors are very reflective at the wavelength of operation, so the light bounces backwards and forwards several hundred times before being absorbed or lost. So the effective length of the LIGO arms is hundreds of times longer than it appears on Google Earth.
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21323
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 485 times
    • View Profile
Re: Would it be possible to directly detect spatial expansion?
« Reply #5 on: 19/08/2020 23:20:19 »
Quote from: Kryptid on 19/08/2020 21:47:49
2.2685 x 10-18 meters/second/meter.
I think you got the maths right but, as you say, what you are looking for is a fractional change in wavelength- a red shift.
And , just looking at the dimensions, I think you need to divide that very small number by the speed of light to get a fractional change per metre.
You are looking for wavelength a change of 1 in 10^26
Good luck.
Mössbauer spectroscopy will get you about 1 part in 10^12
This gets you about 1 in 10^16
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NIST-F1
and that's about as good as it gets.
So you would need a path of about 10^11 metres
Can you put a clock on Pluto?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Kryptid (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 5517
  • Activity:
    69%
  • Thanked: 234 times
    • View Profile
Re: Would it be possible to directly detect spatial expansion?
« Reply #6 on: 19/08/2020 23:55:27 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 19/08/2020 23:20:19
Can you put a clock on Pluto?

I was indeed wondering if we'd need astronomical distances to make this work. The amount of laser divergence from Earth to Pluto might be too extreme for this to work. Unless we use an exceptionally powerful laser. Then the issue of precision over such a distance becomes an issue.

Are perfectly reflective mirrors possible? I thought I read on this very board once that superconductors are capable of perfectly reflecting light (maybe only under specific circumstances). If so, bouncing a laser beam back and force between two perfect mirrors for long enough might make the red-shift detectable.
« Last Edit: 19/08/2020 23:57:39 by Kryptid »
Logged
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21323
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 485 times
    • View Profile
Re: Would it be possible to directly detect spatial expansion?
« Reply #7 on: 20/08/2020 09:02:36 »
Things like general relativity would completely screw it up.
The best clocks are so precise that a shift  of a few inches up or down in Earth's gravity affects the frequency.
You are hoping to get the same gravity (and zero relative velocity (WRT Earth) on Pluto. (Or something like that distance).
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Elliott

  • First timers
  • *
  • 1
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: Would it be possible to directly detect spatial expansion?
« Reply #8 on: 21/08/2020 06:22:30 »
Fruit flies respond to panoramic retinal patterns of visual expansion with robust steering maneuvers directed away from the focus of expansion to avoid collisions and maintain an upwind flight posture. Panoramic rotation elicits comparatively weak syndirectional steering maneuvers, which also maintain visual stability.
Logged
 



Offline Kryptid (OP)

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 5517
  • Activity:
    69%
  • Thanked: 234 times
    • View Profile
Re: Would it be possible to directly detect spatial expansion?
« Reply #9 on: 21/08/2020 06:24:36 »
Quote from: Elliott on 21/08/2020 06:22:30
Fruit flies respond to panoramic retinal patterns of visual expansion with robust steering maneuvers directed away from the focus of expansion to avoid collisions and maintain an upwind flight posture. Panoramic rotation elicits comparatively weak syndirectional steering maneuvers, which also maintain visual stability.

Keep up the spam and you'll get banned.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags: expansion  / universe  / space  / physics 
 

Similar topics (5)

Expansion force versus reaction force and the Rotary Pulse Jet.

Started by McQueenBoard Technology

Replies: 9
Views: 8756
Last post 02/06/2008 17:39:39
by lyner
How Does A Smoke Detctor Detect Smoke ?

Started by neilepBoard Technology

Replies: 6
Views: 8124
Last post 11/12/2018 00:01:57
by Petrochemicals
When building parts of aircraft carriers in differerent temperatures, how do they acount for thermal expansion?

Started by thedocBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 2
Views: 1684
Last post 31/10/2016 17:38:28
by Colin2B
Aren't measurements of the expansion of the Universe based on out of date data?

Started by Bruce Williamson Board Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 3
Views: 3895
Last post 13/04/2009 12:15:47
by yor_on
Science is questioning Dark Energy,what is causing expansion of Universe?

Started by Joe L. OganBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 13
Views: 7331
Last post 20/06/2010 23:44:08
by razatlaby
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.146 seconds with 58 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.