The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. On the Lighter Side
  3. New Theories
  4. The ontology of formal logic as it refers to what is logical actually.
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

The ontology of formal logic as it refers to what is logical actually.

  • 1 Replies
  • 1112 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Arcades Cinza (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 3
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
The ontology of formal logic as it refers to what is logical actually.
« on: 12/09/2020 04:25:34 »

Domain:
To observe an aspect of reality requires an equality proxy to be assumed by the observer.
A real determination cannot be made, as the observer is always involved, and the spatial, nonspatial, and thus compositional location of the interaction is finitely internally domained, meaning that the domain specificity that allows the interaction, is determined by observation, and not the domain itself. The domain itself is shown to unitarily include both the observer and the object, a separation for which only the observer accounts. Literally, the domain is non-reducible, as you cannot rationally structure an internal basis for the domain's universality from the determined actualities of units of the domain- like an observer is in reality.
Basically, if there are things to observe, then things observed are not objective forms in themselves, but are ultimately apparencies with infinite compositional latitude...

Logged
 



Offline Halc

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ********
  • 2217
  • Activity:
    27%
  • Thanked: 173 times
    • View Profile
Re: The ontology of formal logic as it refers to what is logical actually.
« Reply #1 on: 12/09/2020 04:31:46 »
I'm glad somebody finally stated all this clearly.
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.086 seconds with 37 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.