The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. General Science
  3. General Science
  4. Evolutionary niche
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Evolutionary niche

  • 4 Replies
  • 404 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pytor (OP)

  • First timers
  • *
  • 2
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Evolutionary niche
« on: 02/12/2020 19:59:22 »
  Given that any environmental niche will be exploited by life,could we create an environment,as yet unknown and,given enough time see what evolution would fill it with.
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: charles1948



Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 151 times
    • View Profile
Re: Evolutionary niche
« Reply #1 on: 02/12/2020 21:49:47 »
Logged
 

Offline charles1948

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 346
  • Activity:
    80.5%
  • Thanked: 9 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: Evolutionary niche
« Reply #2 on: 02/12/2020 21:58:45 »
Quote from: Pytor on 02/12/2020 19:59:22
  Given that any environmental niche will be exploited by life,could we create an environment,as yet unknown and,given enough time see what evolution would fill it with.

This is an interesting suggestion.  The trouble is that evolution generally takes a long time to work.  At  least it does with big, slow-breeding,  multicellular organisms, such as fish. These took millions of years to evolve into amphibians, then reptiles, and eventually to mammals and birds.  So a research program based on these organisms might take too long to produce practical results.

 Faster results could be expected with smaller organisms such as insects.  Or better still - bacteria.

For example, I've read that some bacteria can survive, and even thrive, in very hostile conditions, such as in the cooling water surrounding a nuclear reactor.  This is an artificial radioactive environment which was "unknown", to use your word, until created by humans in  the last century.  It's interesting that bacteria have been able to occupy this new niche.

How far could the bacteria be "pushed", in terms of increasing radiation in the niche, before it became untenable to them.  Would stronger, more radiation-resistant bacteria continually evolve? Or would they reach an end-point where adaptation was no longer possible.  What would the maximum dosage of radiation be for bacteria in the form that we know them.  Would the bacteria evolve into some new form, as yet unknown?

I'd be rather surprised if experiments along these lines haven't been conducted.  Perhaps not just for scientific purposes, but with some military aim in view.  Is there any evidence of it?
 

Logged
Science is the ancient dream of Magic come true
 

Online Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21949
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 509 times
    • View Profile
Re: Evolutionary niche
« Reply #3 on: 02/12/2020 22:01:58 »
Quote from: charles1948 on 02/12/2020 21:58:45
Is there any evidence of it?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_breed
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 
The following users thanked this post: charles1948

Offline RD

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 9094
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 151 times
    • View Profile
Re: Evolutionary niche
« Reply #4 on: 02/12/2020 22:57:01 »
Quote from: charles1948 on 02/12/2020 21:58:45
... I've read that some bacteria can survive, and even thrive, in very hostile conditions, such as in the cooling water surrounding a nuclear reactor  ...

Some fungi are loving it ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiotrophic_fungus
Logged
 
The following users thanked this post: charles1948



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Big Bang (or Evolutionary?) Theory versus Steady State questions...

Started by Scott MayersBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 0
Views: 1684
Last post 21/10/2016 20:11:50
by Scott Mayers
Moral Dilemma Explained By Evolutionary Biology. Do You Agree ?

Started by blue_cristalBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 1
Views: 3241
Last post 25/05/2007 12:40:53
by another_someone
Human Sexual Instincts and Evolutionary Reproductive Strategies

Started by blue_cristalBoard General Science

Replies: 1
Views: 5443
Last post 15/09/2008 18:40:42
by Evie
What is the rate of Evolutionary change in every generation of present time ?

Started by ScientificBoysClubBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 5
Views: 5053
Last post 12/04/2009 02:18:59
by kenneth
Is it maladaptive, in evolutionary terms, to pay too much heed to the past?

Started by lukaradulovicBoard Plant Sciences, Zoology & Evolution

Replies: 7
Views: 4490
Last post 20/01/2012 18:41:27
by Bored chemist
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.138 seconds with 49 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.