The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Technology
  4. How far away are robots to better sort waste for recycling?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

How far away are robots to better sort waste for recycling?

  • 12 Replies
  • 651 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jolly2 (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 811
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 6 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
How far away are robots to better sort waste for recycling?
« on: 15/01/2021 02:49:00 »
How far are we from developing robotic assistance to sort waste to better facilitate waste management and recycling?

Would a robotic waste management facility be more realistic?

Or would it be more practical and less environmentally damaging to have robotic equipment either in the home or on each street?
« Last Edit: 23/01/2021 12:01:21 by chris »
Logged
Free Julian Assange,  Free Yemen, Free Tibet. Free the Masons, or better said 'free all those enslaved in cults'.
 



Offline Hayseed

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 350
  • Activity:
    25.5%
  • Thanked: 9 times
  • Naked Science Forum Crackpot
    • View Profile
Re: How far away are robots to better sort waste for recycling?
« Reply #1 on: 15/01/2021 22:30:35 »
Right now, robotics are good for mundane repetitive tasks.  Such as assembly or mail delivery.  But there is great improvement in the field.

Much waste can not be sorted even with trained humans, because it can not be identified easily and quickly.    Damage, discoloration, or a change in composition.   Some kind of EM scanner is needed to exactly identify what's in the waste, and then switch waste to appropriate path.  We would have to use an EM spectrum catalog for materials......elements, compounds, proteins, etc.  We could start out with the nasty harmful materials first.  But we should be able to catalog every object and material shortly, with this new THz technology.

Or maybe you were referring to the waste as a neighborhood sort, for the garbage truck?

Paper, glass and cans?
Logged
The proper hardware will eliminate all theory.
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21906
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 504 times
    • View Profile
Re: How far away are robots to better sort waste for recycling?
« Reply #2 on: 15/01/2021 23:58:31 »
Quote from: Hayseed on 15/01/2021 22:30:35
with this new THz technology.
Why THz?
Why not IR?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline Petrochemicals

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1594
  • Activity:
    56.5%
  • Thanked: 30 times
  • forum overlord
    • View Profile
Re: How far away are robots to better sort waste for recycling?
« Reply #3 on: 16/01/2021 00:25:18 »

It would be far more simple to make all food packaging waste from a single material, thick enough to be recycled. It may cost more to begin with but it would be cheaper in the long run. Alot of items end up with plastic coating, a cup made from polystyrene is far easier to recycle than a paper one with a plastic lining that you may as well burn.
« Last Edit: 16/01/2021 00:31:01 by Petrochemicals »
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 

Offline Hayseed

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 350
  • Activity:
    25.5%
  • Thanked: 9 times
  • Naked Science Forum Crackpot
    • View Profile
Re: How far away are robots to better sort waste for recycling?
« Reply #4 on: 16/01/2021 16:18:05 »
Bchem........I consider the THz frequencies to be IR.  Red light is 400-480 THz.  From there, down to 1 THz, I call the THz band.  I know most call it IR.  But I like to use frequency, instead of wavelength.  It's inconvenient to use wavelength with reactance and resonance. So, I describe and explain in that manor.

Pchem......if waste was just food packaging, we wouldn't have a waste problem.  Batteries and chemicals and all kinds of crap.   Medicine, and drugs, nano materials, will probably be even a bigger problem.
Logged
The proper hardware will eliminate all theory.
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21906
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 504 times
    • View Profile
Re: How far away are robots to better sort waste for recycling?
« Reply #5 on: 16/01/2021 16:35:15 »
You may find communication easier if you don't randomly redefine words like terahertz.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terahertz_radiation
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11365
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 658 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: How far away are robots to better sort waste for recycling?
« Reply #6 on: 16/01/2021 17:39:54 »
Actually it's the food waste that causes problems. Sorting plastic, glass and metals is fairly straightforward but most domestic plastic and paper is not reusable because it is contaminated with food residues.

Industrial scrap is mostly well characterised. Recycling things like batteries and light bulbs has been going on for decades if not a century or two, and bulk single plastic waste is very useful stuff. Scrap buyers have some cool technology to spot incoming radioactive material and suchlike, and the resellers employ chemists and metallurgists to certify their product.   

Stuff pre-sorted into council tips is really ideal for manual handling  because it is mostly stuff that was made to be handled - old bicycles, cans of paint, etc.  and the human brain is very good at identifying and refining the junk.

A robotic postman is fine as long as everyone has a standardised postbox at ground floor level and no steps, and all letters are fully addressed with permanent rainproof standard typefaces or barcodes. Problem arises when Dave (let's call the robot after our local postman) has a handwritten letter for Ms Green at Orchard House. Postcode is good (it's the old orchard) but not the house name. Does he sender mean Orchard Lodge, Orchard Cottage or Orchard Grange? How would you program a Delivery of Address-Vectored Envelopes robot to deliver Ms Green's letter? Human Dave knows that the Smiths live in the Lodge, Jones's in the Cottage, and Mr Brown's wife died 3 years ago, so it's possible that Ms Green has moved in with him. Ring the Grange doorbell and ask whoever answers if they know a Ms Green.   
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Jolly2 (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 811
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 6 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: How far away are robots to better sort waste for recycling?
« Reply #7 on: 20/01/2021 23:57:57 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 16/01/2021 17:39:54
Actually it's the food waste that causes problems.

Chicken feed, compost, worm farms. Cats and dog food pretty much covers everything.  What food do you find especially difficult?

Or do you mean it covers everything else. Honestly people should be separating food waste from other waste.

Quote from: alancalverd on 16/01/2021 17:39:54
Sorting plastic, glass and metals is fairly straightforward but most domestic plastic and paper is not reusable because it is contaminated with food residues.

Industrial scrap is mostly well characterised. Recycling things like batteries and light bulbs has been going on for decades if not a century or two, and bulk single plastic waste is very useful stuff. Scrap buyers have some cool technology to spot incoming radioactive material and suchlike, and the resellers employ chemists and metallurgists to certify their product.   

Stuff pre-sorted into council tips is really ideal for manual handling  because it is mostly stuff that was made to be handled - old bicycles, cans of paint, etc.  and the human brain is very good at identifying and refining the junk.

A robotic postman is fine as long as everyone has a standardised postbox at ground floor level and no steps, and all letters are fully addressed with permanent rainproof standard typefaces or barcodes. Problem arises when Dave (let's call the robot after our local postman) has a handwritten letter for Ms Green at Orchard House. Postcode is good (it's the old orchard) but not the house name. Does he sender mean Orchard Lodge, Orchard Cottage or Orchard Grange? How would you program a Delivery of Address-Vectored Envelopes robot to deliver Ms Green's letter? Human Dave knows that the Smiths live in the Lodge, Jones's in the Cottage, and Mr Brown's wife died 3 years ago, so it's possible that Ms Green has moved in with him. Ring the Grange doorbell and ask whoever answers if they know a Ms Green.   

I was thinking that a house hold robotic bin, could sort the waste as entered. It would be more small scale and could also clean materials at the same time. Would probably need to take up some house space, household waste rooms could be added to house designs.

For public bins a machine you could throw any black sack full of all manner of rubbish in and it would be able to sort it all would be optimal.
« Last Edit: 21/01/2021 00:02:42 by Jolly2 »
Logged
Free Julian Assange,  Free Yemen, Free Tibet. Free the Masons, or better said 'free all those enslaved in cults'.
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21906
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 504 times
    • View Profile
Re: How far away are robots to better sort waste for recycling?
« Reply #8 on: 21/01/2021 10:43:55 »
Quote from: Jolly2 on 20/01/2021 23:57:57
Or do you mean it covers everything else. Honestly people should be separating food waste from other waste.
And exactly how do I remove the grease from the pizza box?

Another major problem for waste processing is things inside other things.
A plastic bag inside a paper bag is easy for a human to recognise and separate.
It's more of an issue for a machine.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 



Offline Jolly2 (OP)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • 811
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 6 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: How far away are robots to better sort waste for recycling?
« Reply #9 on: 26/01/2021 15:21:39 »
Quote from: Bored chemist on 21/01/2021 10:43:55
Quote from: Jolly2 on 20/01/2021 23:57:57
Or do you mean it covers everything else. Honestly people should be separating food waste from other waste.
And exactly how do I remove the grease from the pizza box?


You get in your hands and knees and scrub with tissue paper.

Paper recycling treatment process deals with those issues.

Quote from: Bored chemist on 21/01/2021 10:43:55
Another major problem for waste processing is things inside other things.
A plastic bag inside a paper bag is easy for a human to recognise and separate.
It's more of an issue for a machine.

Hence robotic development.
Logged
Free Julian Assange,  Free Yemen, Free Tibet. Free the Masons, or better said 'free all those enslaved in cults'.
 

Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 21906
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 504 times
    • View Profile
Re: How far away are robots to better sort waste for recycling?
« Reply #10 on: 26/01/2021 16:20:35 »
Quote from: Jolly2 on 26/01/2021 15:21:39
Hence robotic development.
No.
Hence the use of people- the machines can't do it.
Quote from: Jolly2 on 26/01/2021 15:21:39
You get in your hands and knees and scrub with tissue paper.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 21/01/2021 10:43:55
And exactly how do I remove the grease from the pizza box tissue paper?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Offline LookOut2021

  • First timers
  • *
  • 9
  • Activity:
    4.5%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: How far away are robots to better sort waste for recycling?
« Reply #11 on: 12/02/2021 10:59:38 »
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 16/01/2021 00:25:18

It would be far more simple to make all food packaging waste from a single material, thick enough to be recycled. It may cost more to begin with but it would be cheaper in the long run. Alot of items end up with plastic coating, a cup made from polystyrene is far easier to recycle than a paper one with a plastic lining that you may as well burn.

I agree with that. These whole material mixing is, what makes recycling difficult. It's also pretty nasty that this packaging materials often trick consumers into thinking there are out of paper/plastic/whatever and easy to recycle, while in reality you would need a whole industry just for seperating those things.

Personally, I would prefer pure paper over plastic but I got the idea.
Logged
I'm no wizard - I'm still learning.
 

Offline scientistlover1

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • 14
  • Activity:
    7.5%
  • Thanked: 1 times
  • Naked Science Forum Newbie
    • View Profile
Re: How far away are robots to better sort waste for recycling?
« Reply #12 on: 12/02/2021 14:36:25 »
Hey guys,

I agree with you. It might be difficult for a robot to separate the waste, because many different materials come together and have to be separated accordingly. The difficulty here would be that the robots have to recognise and separate the materials. Even people have problems with this.

But it would be an improvement and it's a nice idea. Maybe it's an option when we're about to use less plastic and more pure paper.

Best regards
Logged
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Can you mix waste water with treated water?

Started by IzzieCBoard The Environment

Replies: 2
Views: 1758
Last post 26/03/2018 22:46:19
by Bored chemist
Can we "export" fission waste ?

Started by GeezerBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 32
Views: 12000
Last post 23/12/2010 12:54:21
by yor_on
Are Plastic Roads a Feasible Solution to Dealing with Plastic Waste?

Started by CaptMoldmanBoard The Environment

Replies: 0
Views: 3448
Last post 11/08/2015 19:29:50
by CaptMoldman
Can water shortage, power shortage, & nuclear waste be simultaneously fixed?

Started by Atomic-SBoard The Environment

Replies: 4
Views: 6176
Last post 11/06/2018 06:16:38
by pradeepkumar
Is cold fusion possible, and can nuclear reactors recycle their waste products?

Started by CooliorobBoard Technology

Replies: 18
Views: 14693
Last post 14/06/2008 21:44:11
by qazibasit
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.144 seconds with 70 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.