The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology
  4. Does an emitter “shrink” when radiating?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Does an emitter “shrink” when radiating?

  • 7 Replies
  • 435 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Richard777 (OP)

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 187
  • Activity:
    1%
    • View Profile
Does an emitter “shrink” when radiating?
« on: 25/01/2021 17:04:17 »
A “fundamental emitter” may be compared to a “light sponge”, it contains “photons” (or the energy equivalent of photons). If it is “squeezed” (stressed) the emitter will reduce in size (like a squeezed sponge) and some photons will be “squeezed out” (emitted).

There are two types of stress: pressure and shear. Both types are required to “activate” (squeeze) the emitter. Pressure is associated with a distribution of force over a surface area, and shear is associated with a sectional area.

Assume the emitter is spherical, while under stress it gets smaller, so the radius is changing. The instantaneous rate of change of the radius must have an exact speed: one quarter of the light constant.

The emitter may be “inactive” (not radiating) having an “inactive radius” (initial radius). If it is radiating, then it has an “active radius”. The “radius ratio” (active/inactive) must agree with length contraction.

Stress may be represented as a ratio of force and area. Force is represented as a vector, and area may also be represented as a vector giving stress as a tensor. It is convenient to simplify stress, representing it as a vector (in 3D).

If four “radiant rules” are true, then the emitter activates (shrinks) releasing photons with a “brightness” which may be calculated.

Does an active emitter shrink?
See attachment for some math.
* 43 The Fundamental Emitter.pdf (173.38 kB - downloaded 11 times.)
Logged
 



Offline Bored chemist

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 22077
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 518 times
    • View Profile
Re: Does an emitter “shrink” when radiating?
« Reply #1 on: 25/01/2021 18:04:05 »
Have you tried measuring a light bulb?
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
 

Online Petrochemicals

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1624
  • Activity:
    49.5%
  • Thanked: 34 times
  • forum overlord
    • View Profile
Re: Does an emitter “shrink” when radiating?
« Reply #2 on: 27/01/2021 06:58:05 »
Quote from: Richard777 on 25/01/2021 17:04:17
A “fundamental emitter” may be compared to a “light sponge”, it contains “photons” (or the energy equivalent of photons). If it is “squeezed” (stressed) the emitter will reduce in size (like a squeezed sponge) and some photons will be “squeezed out” (emitted).

There are two types of stress: pressure and shear. Both types are required to “activate” (squeeze) the emitter. Pressure is associated with a distribution of force over a surface area, and shear is associated with a sectional area.

Assume the emitter is spherical, while under stress it gets smaller, so the radius is changing. The instantaneous rate of change of the radius must have an exact speed: one quarter of the light constant.

The emitter may be “inactive” (not radiating) having an “inactive radius” (initial radius). If it is radiating, then it has an “active radius”. The “radius ratio” (active/inactive) must agree with length contraction.

Stress may be represented as a ratio of force and area. Force is represented as a vector, and area may also be represented as a vector giving stress as a tensor. It is convenient to simplify stress, representing it as a vector (in 3D).

If four “radiant rules” are true, then the emitter activates (shrinks) releasing photons with a “brightness” which may be calculated.

Does an active emitter shrink?
See attachment for some math.

Yea, when photons are emitted, the electron drops down a shell level.
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 9207
  • Activity:
    73%
  • Thanked: 929 times
    • View Profile
Re: Does an emitter “shrink” when radiating?
« Reply #3 on: 27/01/2021 21:35:40 »
When the light bulb filament cools down, it shrinks.
- When it heats up, the filament gets bigger
- While it is radiating (heat in = heat out), it stays the same size
- But this is just thermal expansion

In an old-style fluorescent lamp, the mercury vapor takes up considerably less space when the lamp cools down, because it (mostly) condenses to a droplet of liquid.
Logged
 

Offline Hayseed

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 350
  • Activity:
    14.5%
  • Thanked: 9 times
  • Naked Science Forum Crackpot
    • View Profile
Re: Does an emitter “shrink” when radiating?
« Reply #4 on: 27/01/2021 23:29:52 »
It depends on what kind of emitter.  X-ray emission is different then light emission and different than radio emission.

Isolated charge can only emit x-ray and higher.  The emission ALWAYS EXPANDS the particle,.........even under acceleration, with a rising chirp........each little component chirp........is an expansion of the particle.  Even though after the completed chirp......the particle is smaller.

Frequencies from x-ray down into the THz region.....require dipoles, atoms and molecules.  These structures can emit with no change in physical size.  And no change in energy levels.  They can also change size and energy levels with emission too.  It depends on the mode.  Because these structures have "radio repeater" properties.  They can be charged....to just under the energy level setpoint.......and immediately re-emit.  The emission frequency, can be different than the inducement frequency.  Allowing the structure to remain the same color.

Then there is radio.  Antennas do not shrink with emission.  Antenna emission comes from a current field.  The current field is dis-associated quickly, allowing the field to propagate.

Fundamental matter always shrinks upon absorption(energy input) and expands upon emission(energy output).  A particle can only spin at certain rates.  If you charge it to just under the next level, it will throw that energy back out with emission, and reset to previous expanded stable level.

Logged
The proper hardware will eliminate all theory.
 



Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 11468
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 684 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: Does an emitter “shrink” when radiating?
« Reply #5 on: 27/01/2021 23:37:17 »
Brilliant! You should write political manifestoes, New Wave Alternative Therapy texts, or books on philosophy.
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Hayseed

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • 350
  • Activity:
    14.5%
  • Thanked: 9 times
  • Naked Science Forum Crackpot
    • View Profile
Re: Does an emitter “shrink” when radiating?
« Reply #6 on: 28/01/2021 00:10:18 »
It's already been done.  Not one of my comments on the site has been "new" or unknown......and my comments are not authored by me.

Watch a circuit dipped in ferrofluids.  Watch a moon travel thru a debris field.  Then read Parson's Magneton.

The Parson's model was developed before the existence of neutrons and anti-matter.  And before Einsteins pronouncement that emission is discreet and intermittent.

And this model continues to give a mechanical explanation of all........including gravity and entanglement.

Modern science can not explain reality, but the history of physics can.

Logged
The proper hardware will eliminate all theory.
 

Offline yor_on

  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • *******
  • 28759
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 65 times
  • (Ah, yes:) *a table is always good to hide under*
    • View Profile
Re: Does an emitter “shrink” when radiating?
« Reply #7 on: 31/01/2021 15:07:46 »
Eh, PC, the electron is considered to be a point particle :)
Logged
"BOMB DISPOSAL EXPERT. If you see me running, try to keep up."
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

why and how does a penis "shrink" in the cold?

Started by paul.frBoard Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 1
Views: 9878
Last post 29/06/2008 22:10:52
by Make it Lady
Does rapid or slow weight loss effect the resilience of the skin to shrink back?

Started by Karen W.Board Physiology & Medicine

Replies: 11
Views: 13384
Last post 11/01/2007 15:28:06
by Karen W.
Can we pull heat from the ceiling with materials that shrink when heated?

Started by McKayBoard Technology

Replies: 5
Views: 6440
Last post 13/04/2015 21:43:32
by wolfekeeper
Do an astronaut's telomeres shrink faster than those of a person on Earth?

Started by chrisBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 8
Views: 1975
Last post 23/05/2017 22:18:16
by chris
If I can shrink myself into a size of Quantum particles what would happen ?

Started by ScientificBoysClubBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 10
Views: 9738
Last post 04/03/2009 04:03:25
by Kryptid
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.211 seconds with 56 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.