The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Member Map
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Technology
  4. Are solar panels worthwhile?
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down

Are solar panels worthwhile?

  • 53 Replies
  • 3885 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Petrochemicals (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2604
  • Activity:
    27%
  • Thanked: 97 times
  • forum overlord
    • View Profile
Are solar panels worthwhile?
« on: 18/04/2022 07:22:50 »
Quote
The average embodied carbon in those references for monocrystalline PV was 2,560 kg CO2e per kWp. The embodied carbon of all products vary notably, so that should be appreciated with any embodied carbon values.

From https://circularecology.com/solar-pv-embodied-carbon.html

Gas generation of electricity has a co2 output of 0.429kg of carbon per kwh. That means the solar panel has to generate well over 5000kwh of electricity before it is recouping the carbon invested in it. Is solar reducing co2 emmissions or is it a white elephant?
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 



Offline SeanB

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1247
  • Activity:
    4.5%
  • Thanked: 15 times
    • View Profile
Re: Are solar panels worthwhile?
« Reply #1 on: 18/04/2022 10:52:29 »
Depends on what you use to generate the power. Coal is cheap, and common in China, where 90% plus of all solar panels are made, though hydropower is also a good part of the energy mix there, so the energy mix is somewhat different. The advantage of solar is that they can last 25 years plus, and thus will recoup the energy in production, and are also recyclable with relatively little extra effort, as now you have the components easy to separate, if somewhat labour intensive, but still worth the energy 25 to 50 years down the line.
Logged
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 14810
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 1120 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: Are solar panels worthwhile?
« Reply #2 on: 18/04/2022 12:25:37 »
Average output of a solar unit in the UK is 10% of its rated power, so that's 25600 kg of CO2 to produce 1 kW for 20 years (performance falls off towards the end of life) - 175000 kWh, say 0.156 kg CO2 per kWh. That's about 2.5 times the energy per unit CO2 that you'd get by burning coal, or 1.5 times what you'd get from diesel fuel, so it's marginally economic as long as you don't need to store the electricity, in which case the climate would probably be better off with coal.

If you need to replace all your internal combustion and gas heating systems in order to use solar electricity, and build electrical  storage systems, the carbon break even period looks more like 200 years.
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline SeanB

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1247
  • Activity:
    4.5%
  • Thanked: 15 times
    • View Profile
Re: Are solar panels worthwhile?
« Reply #3 on: 18/04/2022 13:26:45 »
True, but there are other places that are not UK weather wise, with rain most of the time (my current weather notwithstanding, there is a cyclone dumping over a half metre of water so far, which is leading to the area being declared a disaster zone, but normally you have at least 8 hours a day of full sun here) to drop output, so there are plenty of locations that offer better use of the panels.
Logged
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 14810
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 1120 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: Are solar panels worthwhile?
« Reply #4 on: 18/04/2022 14:01:43 »
Quote from: SeanB on 18/04/2022 13:26:45
normally you have at least 8 hours a day of full sun here
Somewhere on an oscillating planet? It tends to rise and set in most places.
« Last Edit: 18/04/2022 14:05:22 by alancalverd »
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 



Offline Petrochemicals (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2604
  • Activity:
    27%
  • Thanked: 97 times
  • forum overlord
    • View Profile
Re: Are solar panels worthwhile?
« Reply #5 on: 18/04/2022 16:59:34 »
Quote from: SeanB on 18/04/2022 10:52:29
. The advantage of solar is that they can last 25 years plus, and thus will recoup the energy in production, and are also recyclable with relatively little extra effort
but that means in climates of intermittent sunshine that this recoup of energy means that they are nothing but a self funding expense. If after installation and maintenance losses etcetc they only save enough carbon to produce more of themselves, solar is a major carbon expense. They are of course made in the far East where we can deny our carbon footprint.
Quote from: SeanB on 18/04/2022 13:26:45
True, but there are other places that are not UK weather wise, with rain most of the time
You must be confusing the uk with somewhere sunny. And light when it's dark outside.
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 10418
  • Activity:
    24%
  • Thanked: 1254 times
    • View Profile
Re: Are solar panels worthwhile?
« Reply #6 on: 18/04/2022 22:50:56 »
In Australia, we get better sun than the UK.
The bulk of electricity generation is from coal, which dumps a lot of other pollution into the air and ash ponds (not just carbon dioxide). So the sooner we can reliably decommission the coal-fired power stations, the better.

Quote from: OP
embodied carbon in those references for monocrystalline PV was 2,560 kg CO2e per kWp
Do you have an equivalent figure for construction of a coal-fired power station?
Logged
 

Offline Petrochemicals (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2604
  • Activity:
    27%
  • Thanked: 97 times
  • forum overlord
    • View Profile
Re: Are solar panels worthwhile?
« Reply #7 on: 19/04/2022 07:29:20 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 18/04/2022 12:25:37
Average output of a solar unit in the UK is 10% of its rated power, so that's 25600 kg of CO2 to produce 1 kW for 20 years (performance falls off towards the end of life) - 175000 kWh, say 0.156 kg CO2 per kWh. That's about 2.5 times the energy per unit CO2 that you'd get by burning coal, or 1.5 times what you'd get from diesel fuel, so it's marginally economic as long as you don't need to store the electricity, in which case the climate would probably be better off with coal.

If you need to replace all your internal combustion and gas heating systems in order to use solar electricity, and build electrical  storage systems, the carbon break even period looks more like 200 years.
I make it about 7 years before they break even, but this is without transport, back up generation or the over specification for winter demand in a dark country/installation/accessories/etc. Even at present I cannot believe that it is a carbon benefit in the UK given that they are scrapped after 25 years.

Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 

Offline Petrochemicals (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2604
  • Activity:
    27%
  • Thanked: 97 times
  • forum overlord
    • View Profile
Re: Are solar panels worthwhile?
« Reply #8 on: 19/04/2022 07:30:36 »
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/5/4/872/pdf&ved=2ahUKEwir8Z_5gJ_3AhWQfMAKHT43DzwQFnoECDIQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0EgQzRKhM5AMM_ZAyQO4P2
Quote from: evan_au on 18/04/2022 22:50:56
In Australia, we get better sun than the UK.
The bulk of electricity generation is from coal, which dumps a lot of other pollution into the air and ash ponds (not just carbon dioxide). So the sooner we can reliably decommission the coal-fired power stations, the better.

Quote from: OP
embodied carbon in those references for monocrystalline PV was 2,560 kg CO2e per kWp
Do you have an equivalent figure for construction of a coal-fired power station?
Which is ironic, far better sun yet powered by coal. Solar is vastly cheaper economically than nuclear or combustion plants if you have good sunshine, virtually free energy, Australia could do a great trade in green steel production. Plus they then have the ability to make more solar panels without using combustion sources, they are not some self perpetuating carbon expense. The carbon footprint of Nuclear power is questionable as well, a lot of concrete steel etc that is unusable again, lots of waste, difficult to process fuel.

http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2015/ph241/gerrard1/
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 



Offline wolfekeeper

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1629
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 75 times
    • View Profile
Re: Are solar panels worthwhile?
« Reply #9 on: 22/04/2022 00:53:22 »
Solar panels aren't scrapped after 25 years, they have about 0.5% loss of output per year, so they're still outputting nearly 90% of their original output after that. That's just the suggested lifespan, but they're clearly going to go a lot longer.

The fact that the panels are only producing about 10% of the time doesn't matter, because they DO produce during the day, when people are using more energy, that increase is mostly carried by natural gas, so it directly reduces the amount of natural gas burnt. Spoiler: natural gas is a LOT more expensive right now than solar power.

Note that solar installations have got a LOT cheaper. Payback can be as little as 5 years now, but 7 is probably more common. The actual panels are stupidly cheap at about £0.3/watt peak and still falling. What kind of investment pays back the initial investment in 7 years? A good one, that's what.

Note that solar panels work better in the UK than Australia during their respective summers, because the UK is such a long way north. We get over 14 hours of sunshine.
« Last Edit: 22/04/2022 01:05:30 by wolfekeeper »
Logged
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 14810
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 1120 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: Are solar panels worthwhile?
« Reply #10 on: 22/04/2022 08:24:37 »
Quote from: wolfekeeper on 22/04/2022 00:53:22
Note that solar panels work better in the UK than Australia during their respective summers, because the UK is such a long way north. We get over 14 hours of sunshine.
Not according to the folk who sell solar power systems - see the attached chart of annual equivalent sun hours. The polar regions get 24 hours of sunshine in the summer but remain covered with ice! And of course demand is maximised in winter, not summer.

The more I learn about renewable sources of electricity, the more I am convinced that their commercial success so far depends almost entirely on the flexibility of fossil fuels. If it wasn't possible to fire up a gas-powered generator quicker than coal, wind and solar would never have featured in the energy market.

* solar power map.png (273.53 kB, 1000x564 - viewed 132 times.)
« Last Edit: 22/04/2022 08:36:48 by alancalverd »
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Petrochemicals (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2604
  • Activity:
    27%
  • Thanked: 97 times
  • forum overlord
    • View Profile
Re: Are solar panels worthwhile?
« Reply #11 on: 22/04/2022 08:36:40 »
Quote from: wolfekeeper on 22/04/2022 00:53:22
.

The fact that the panels are only producing about 10% of the time doesn't matter, because they DO produce during the day, when people are using more energy
And they do produce during the winter when people need energy by far the most.?
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 

Offline evan_au

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 10418
  • Activity:
    24%
  • Thanked: 1254 times
    • View Profile
Re: Are solar panels worthwhile?
« Reply #12 on: 22/04/2022 08:49:15 »
Quote from: alancalverd
demand is maximised in winter, not summer.
Again, that depends where you live.
- Australia does have a winter peak of air-conditioning, which coincides with minimum hours of daylight
- but it also has a summer peak of air-conditioning, which coincides with maximum hours of daylight
Logged
 



Offline Petrochemicals (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2604
  • Activity:
    27%
  • Thanked: 97 times
  • forum overlord
    • View Profile
Re: Are solar panels worthwhile?
« Reply #13 on: 22/04/2022 08:58:20 »
For cloudy or hot conditions such as arizona, some sources state thin film panels are better

https://solartown.com/learning/solar-panels/advantages-make-thin-film-solar-panels-shine/

Are we rushing into solar in some locations before the technology has been  created?
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 

Offline wolfekeeper

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1629
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 75 times
    • View Profile
Re: Are solar panels worthwhile?
« Reply #14 on: 22/04/2022 10:49:01 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 22/04/2022 08:24:37
Quote from: wolfekeeper on 22/04/2022 00:53:22
Note that solar panels work better in the UK than Australia during their respective summers, because the UK is such a long way north. We get over 14 hours of sunshine.
Not according to the folk who sell solar power systems - see the attached chart of annual equivalent sun hours. The polar regions get 24 hours of sunshine in the summer but remain covered with ice! And of course demand is maximised in winter, not summer.

That's averaged over the entire year. Which bit of 'summer' didn't you understand?

Quote
The more I learn about renewable sources of electricity, the more I am convinced that their commercial success so far depends almost entirely on the flexibility of fossil fuels. If it wasn't possible to fire up a gas-powered generator quicker than coal, wind and solar would never have featured in the energy market.

As opposed to what? Nuclear?

Quote from: Petrochemicals on 22/04/2022 08:36:40
Quote from: wolfekeeper on 22/04/2022 00:53:22
.

The fact that the panels are only producing about 10% of the time doesn't matter, because they DO produce during the day, when people are using more energy

And they do produce during the winter when people need energy by far the most.?
No, but wind does.

Apparently in your heads, the UK has no electricity demand in summer, and you think that using natural gas, which gives a current electricity price of over 14p/kWh is only superior to solar which costs around 5p/kWh in the UK right now and wind that costs about 7p/kWh.

Hint: if solar panels are attached to your house, you can reduce your bills because any electricity you use only costs 5p/kWh instead of ~27p/kWh and any you don't use gets exported to the grid and reduces the electricity price.
« Last Edit: 22/04/2022 10:51:20 by wolfekeeper »
Logged
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 14810
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 1120 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: Are solar panels worthwhile?
« Reply #15 on: 22/04/2022 11:49:16 »
The retail cost of electricity has very little to do with physics and a great deal to do with profits, taxes and subsidies.

Having lived through many, I understand a good deal about UK summers. Yes, the sun is above the horizon for over 16 hours in June, but the solar angle never exceeds 62 degrees in London, 59 in Inverness, which is why it is generally colder in Scotland than in England and the north pole (24 hour sunlight) stays frozen. And we do have a lot of cloud over these Atlantic islands.

The value of mains electricity and gas is 24/7/365 availability at any level from zero to the supply rating. Until the cost of renewables includes that of maintaining an adequate overnight and strategic (say 10 day) reserve, you are not comparing apples with apples.
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Petrochemicals (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2604
  • Activity:
    27%
  • Thanked: 97 times
  • forum overlord
    • View Profile
Re: Are solar panels worthwhile?
« Reply #16 on: 22/04/2022 14:35:10 »
Quote from: evan_au on 22/04/2022 08:49:15
Quote from: alancalverd
demand is maximised in winter, not summer.
Again, that depends where you live.
- Australia does have a winter peak of air-conditioning, which coincides with minimum hours of daylight
- but it also has a summer peak of air-conditioning, which coincides with maximum hours of daylight
If I was in Australia and not in the outback I would certainly drive an electric car that I powered myself from solar power, there is also the space in australia for solar. What sort of weather do you get in Australian winters Evan?
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 



Offline Petrochemicals (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2604
  • Activity:
    27%
  • Thanked: 97 times
  • forum overlord
    • View Profile
Re: Are solar panels worthwhile?
« Reply #17 on: 22/04/2022 14:42:14 »
Quote from: wolfekeeper on 22/04/2022 10:49:01

No, but wind does.

Apparently in your heads, the UK has no electricity demand in summer, and you think that using natural gas, which gives a current electricity price of over 14p/kWh is only superior to solar which costs around 5p/kWh in the UK right now and wind that costs about 7p/kWh.

Hint: if solar panels are attached to your house, you can reduce your bills because any electricity you use only costs 5p/kWh instead of ~27p/kWh and any you don't use gets exported to the grid and reduces the electricity price.
We are discussing solar. Yes wind does, but solar is now requiring ancillary production in the UK, and that ancillary production (wind) then requires ancilliary production, all of which require carbon to set up. Australia as is in your head just as good as the UK for solar production is in my head a different kettle of fish, you would recoup the production carbon in under 2 years and the rest in under 5, plus the fact that over specification of a solar system will need to be far far less.
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 

Offline alancalverd

  • Global Moderator
  • Naked Science Forum GOD!
  • ********
  • 14810
  • Activity:
    100%
  • Thanked: 1120 times
  • life is too short to drink instant coffee
    • View Profile
Re: Are solar panels worthwhile?
« Reply #18 on: 22/04/2022 15:02:24 »
Quote from: Petrochemicals on 22/04/2022 14:35:10
What sort of weather do you get in Australian winters Evan?
Not sure where Evan is, but winter holidays in Queensland were like an English summer plus heat on the coast, and continuous sunshine inland. Hence the bloody great desert

Quote from: Petrochemicals on 22/04/2022 14:35:10
I would certainly drive an electric car
thus committing another 20 - 30 tonnes of CO2 to the atmosphere to build it.
« Last Edit: 22/04/2022 15:05:58 by alancalverd »
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
 

Offline Petrochemicals (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 2604
  • Activity:
    27%
  • Thanked: 97 times
  • forum overlord
    • View Profile
Re: Are solar panels worthwhile?
« Reply #19 on: 22/04/2022 16:30:51 »
Quote from: alancalverd on 22/04/2022 15:02:24


Quote from: Petrochemicals on 22/04/2022 14:35:10
I would certainly drive an electric car
thus committing another 20 - 30 tonnes of CO2 to the atmosphere to build it.

Plus the powerbank and solar panel carbon. If you do 10kmiles per year that is about 30 charges, or 3000kwh but call it 5000 for variance losses etc. A 100kwh powerbank and a 3kw solar array should keep your car in the pink.
Logged
For reasons of repetitive antagonism, this user is currently not responding to messages from;
BoredChemist
To ignore someone too, go to your profile settings>modifyprofie>ignore!
 



  • Print
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 

Similar topics (5)

Because we have no dark matter planet in our solar system, can we assume that dark matter is not sticking to itself?

Started by thedocBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 5
Views: 5493
Last post 06/01/2022 22:50:36
by Origin
Is solar energy the same as light energy?

Started by FeliciaBoard Technology

Replies: 6
Views: 25133
Last post 19/03/2020 15:17:27
by Paul25
Do any of the solar system satellites have satellites themselves?

Started by EvaHBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 3
Views: 1632
Last post 14/02/2021 22:23:44
by ScienceMann
Can solar energy be converted to mechanical energy in this way?

Started by thinhnghiemBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 0
Views: 3393
Last post 29/07/2016 09:40:02
by thinhnghiem
Is there an escape velocity to escape the/a solar system?

Started by Pseudoscience-is-malarkeyBoard Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology

Replies: 3
Views: 5464
Last post 04/10/2016 10:44:26
by evan_au
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.232 seconds with 80 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.