0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
My discussion forum is: www.youforum.co.uk/believersingravityshielding
It might be difficult to search an area using the set-up you describe. You would have to suspect that a certain place might be a gravity hill. Then you would need to know of another place that was not of the same incline. []
It would only take one of many hundred sites to be real to change the world for ever.
Quote from: common_sense_seeker on 05/05/2009 15:09:29It would only take one of many hundred sites to be real to change the world for ever. Yet you have zero evidence that any of the hundreds of sites are real and there is a ton of evidence that many of them (most of them, all of them) are mere illusions.Revel in the amusement and amazement they provide. Stop looking for non-existent phenomena.
Surely this isn't a paradox? It's a question to which we do not know the answer.
I can measure the effect of gravity on the eath's surface - for example with a grandfather clock.I can do this at different altitudes and I can also measure the effect of the eath's gravity out in space by watching the paths of satellites.On the ground there is a lot of stuff between the clock and the centre of the earth. In space there's the same ground and a lot of nothjing.Comparing these data should show up any effect of gravity shielding by "stuff" (like the earth), comppared to vacuum (like space). If there's a sheilding effect then the inverse square law shouldn't work.Since no such effect has ever been noted it's fair to say that gravity sheilding either doesn't exist, or is very small.
Quote from: Ophiolite on 05/05/2009 21:29:44Quote from: common_sense_seeker on 05/05/2009 15:09:29It would only take one of many hundred sites to be real to change the world for ever. Yet you have zero evidence that any of the hundreds of sites are real and there is a ton of evidence that many of them (most of them, all of them) are mere illusions.Revel in the amusement and amazement they provide. Stop looking for non-existent phenomena.We know that there are gravitational anomalies that are not illusions. They are caused by materials of different density close to the surface. But the difference is very small and would not be noticed without sensitive instrumentation.
Quote from: Vern on 06/05/2009 21:08:05Quote from: Ophiolite on 05/05/2009 21:29:44Quote from: common_sense_seeker on 05/05/2009 15:09:29It would only take one of many hundred sites to be real to change the world for ever. Yet you have zero evidence that any of the hundreds of sites are real and there is a ton of evidence that many of them (most of them, all of them) are mere illusions.Revel in the amusement and amazement they provide. Stop looking for non-existent phenomena.We know that there are gravitational anomalies that are not illusions. They are caused by materials of different density close to the surface. But the difference is very small and would not be noticed without sensitive instrumentation.I am not sure what you are trying to say here. A primary technique of geophysical surveying is to measure the local value of g. This reveals, as you say, anomalies. But also, as you say, these anomalies are not detectable without sensitive instruments. Therefore there is no similarity between these large scale illusions and the small scale realities.
OK then, we just have to wait for those results. BTW, when they don't show the effect that you seem to expect what are you going to do?