The Naked Scientists
  • Login
  • Register
  • Podcasts
      • The Naked Scientists
      • eLife
      • Naked Genetics
      • Naked Astronomy
      • In short
      • Naked Neuroscience
      • Ask! The Naked Scientists
      • Question of the Week
      • Archive
      • Video
      • SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
  • Articles
      • Science News
      • Features
      • Interviews
      • Answers to Science Questions
  • Get Naked
      • Donate
      • Do an Experiment
      • Science Forum
      • Ask a Question
  • About
      • Meet the team
      • Our Sponsors
      • Site Map
      • Contact us

User menu

  • Login
  • Register
  • Home
  • Help
  • Search
  • Tags
  • Recent Topics
  • Login
  • Register
  1. Naked Science Forum
  2. Non Life Sciences
  3. Chemistry
  4. Scaling up biofuel tech: chemical versus biological processes
« previous next »
  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Scaling up biofuel tech: chemical versus biological processes

  • 3 Replies
  • 6095 Views
  • 0 Tags

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline peppercorn (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1466
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • solar
Scaling up biofuel tech: chemical versus biological processes
« on: 27/05/2008 12:34:36 »
Since reading sometime ago about technologies for producing higher alcohol biofuels, such as butanol, I've been interested in whether purely chemical processes would be a better route for large-scale manufacture of next generation fuels.

Ethanol is, as I'm sure has been discussed in many other threads, the political flavour of the month: probably driven on in the main by the US corn lobby, but I digress...

These higher alcohols are chemically far closer to petroleum fuels (by the number of C's & H's) with subsequently comparable volumetric energy density & hydroscopy; unlike ethanol.

The big question is:
   Does the increased complexity of two stage anaerobic bacterial processes required for bio-butanol (and others) production render these methods uncompetitive?
-Although I know Dupoint & BP are having a go...

More to the point: how come all the chemical processes (pyrolysis for example) appear to require far more external energy than their biological counterparts?

Can we not emulate nature's methods?
I have an amateurish knowledge of microbiology, but it appears that it is mostly a question of ion-transport (excuse my simplicity!)...
Fuel cells also involve ion-transport; can we not develop similar small-scale structures that are "programmed" to convert sugars, etc into alcohols at low temps/pressures?

Thanks.
Logged
Quasi-critical-thinker
 



Offline peppercorn (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1466
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • solar
Scaling up biofuel tech: chemical versus biological processes
« Reply #1 on: 27/05/2008 12:43:09 »
Additionally, I've come across research on 2,5-Dimethylfuran (DMF) as fuel from biomass:
http://www.news.wisc.edu/13881

This has the perceived advantage of being a purely chemical process, but there seems to be questions over its toxicity.
Also the article claims DMF is 40% more energy dense than ethanol. Where do they get this figure? Is there a table for such things?
Further, is DMF compatable with IC engines?
Logged
Quasi-critical-thinker
 

Offline chris

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 8061
  • Activity:
    1.5%
  • Thanked: 306 times
  • The Naked Scientist
    • The Naked Scientists
Scaling up biofuel tech: chemical versus biological processes
« Reply #2 on: 30/05/2008 19:07:05 »
We interviewed Jim Dumesic, who came up with the DMF synthesis pathway, last year. This link contains a transcript of that interview in which he discusses its strengths:

http://www.thenakedscientists.com/HTML/content/interviews/interview/758/

Chris
Logged
I never forget a face, but in your case I'll make an exception - Groucho Marx - https://www.thenakedscientists.com/
 

Offline peppercorn (OP)

  • Naked Science Forum King!
  • ******
  • 1466
  • Activity:
    0%
  • Thanked: 2 times
    • solar
Scaling up biofuel tech: chemical versus biological processes
« Reply #3 on: 31/05/2008 12:39:26 »
Thanks Chris for the link to the DMF interview: Very interesting stuff!
Logged
Quasi-critical-thinker
 



  • Print
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
Tags:
 
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...
  • SMF 2.0.15 | SMF © 2017, Simple Machines
    Privacy Policy
    SMFAds for Free Forums
  • Naked Science Forum ©

Page created in 0.412 seconds with 35 queries.

  • Podcasts
  • Articles
  • Get Naked
  • About
  • Contact us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Subscribe to newsletter
  • We love feedback

Follow us

cambridge_logo_footer.png

©The Naked Scientists® 2000–2017 | The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks created by Dr Chris Smith. Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.