The Naked Scientists

The Naked Scientists Forum

Author Topic: Are we able to detect motion?  (Read 1300 times)

Offline machmarosz

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 73
    • View Profile
Are we able to detect motion?
« on: 07/11/2015 16:59:57 »


THEORY :James Clerk Maxwell, in 186164, published his theory of electromagnetic fields and radiation, which shows that light has momentum and thus can exert pressure on objects.

SI units :
ENERGY / SPACE  =  [ Joul / cubic meters  = Newton *meter / cubic meters  =  N/m^2 ]



LIGHT is PUSHING  WALLS !
Where the signal started ? 
Where is Bulb Right now ?









Galilean relativity ???????????????????? *****************************************Imagine a person inside a ship which is sailing on a perfectly smooth lake at constant speed. This passeneger is in the ship's windowless hull and, despite it being a fine day, is engaged in doing mechanical experiments (such as studying the behavior of pendula and the trajectories of falling bodies). A simple question one can ask of this researcher is whether she can determine that the ship is moving (with respect to the lake shore) without going on deck or looking out a porthole.Since the ship is moving at constant speed and direction she will not feel the motion of the ship. This is the same situation as when flying on a plane: one cannot tell, without looking out one of the windows, that the plane is moving once it reaches cruising altitutde (at which point the plane is flying at constant speed and direction). Still one might wonder whether the experiments being done in the ship's hull will give some indication of the its motion. Based on his experiments Galileo concluded that this is in fact impossible: all mechanical experiments done inside a ship moving at constant speed in a constant direction would give precisely the same results as similar experiments done on shore.
The conclusion is that one observer in a house by the shore and another in the ship will not be able to determine that the ship is moving by comparing the results of experiments done inside the house and ship. In order to determine motion these observers must look at each other. It is important important to note that this is true only if the ship is sailing at constant speed and direction, should it speed up, slow down or turn the researcher inside can tell that the ship is moving. For example, if the ship turns you can see all things hanging from the roof (such as a lamp) tilting with respect to the floor
Generalizing these observations Galileo postulated his relativity hypothesis:

any two observers moving at constant speed and direction with respect to one another will obtain the same results for all mechanical experiments
(it is understood that the apparatuses they use for these experiments move with them).
In pursuing these ideas Galileo used the scientific method (Sec. 1.2.1): he derived consequences of this hypothesis and determined whether they agree with the predictions.
This idea has a very important consequence: velocity is not absolute. This means that velocity can only be measured in reference to some object(s), and that the result of this measurment changes if we decide to measure the velocity with respect to a diferent refernce point(s). Imagine an observer traveling inside a windowless spaceship moving away from the sun at constant velocity. Galileo asserted that there are no mechanical experiments that can be made inside the rocket that will tell the occupants that the rocket is moving . The question ``are we moving'' has no meaning unless we specify a reference frame (``are we moving with respect to that star'' is meaningful). This fact, formulated in the 1600's remains very true today and is one of the cornerstones of Einstein's theories of relativity.************************************







« Last Edit: 08/11/2015 14:02:45 by chris »


 

Offline machmarosz

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 73
    • View Profile
Re: Red Blue Force and Gallileo ( Am I moving ? )
« Reply #1 on: 07/11/2015 17:03:02 »
0,001 mm  sheet has got near 100 m^2  area !!!


 

Offline machmarosz

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 73
    • View Profile
Re: Red Blue Force and Gallileo ( Am I moving ? )
« Reply #2 on: 07/11/2015 17:07:08 »








WE SPEAK ABOUT CLASSICA MECHANIC EXPERIMENT !!!!

 

Offline machmarosz

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 73
    • View Profile
Re: Red Blue Force and Gallileo ( Am I moving ? )
« Reply #3 on: 07/11/2015 17:11:58 »


MY SIMPLE TEST CONFIRMED MACH's  theory about motion

Mach's Far Far Star = My Close close Bulb


I have many more informations about my bulb !!!

 

Offline machmarosz

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 73
    • View Profile
Re: Red Blue Force and Gallileo ( Am I moving ? )
« Reply #4 on: 07/11/2015 17:16:03 »
Day by day ( 3 years my work ) I see more and more new problems !!!

we have  "normal" Air's preasure
future ( I hope bfore my die - I'm 35 yo )

We will have normal EM preasure ( static and dyamic )



Each Material need separate MASTER !!!

 

Offline machmarosz

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 73
    • View Profile
Re: Red Blue Force and Gallileo ( Am I moving ? )
« Reply #5 on: 07/11/2015 17:29:54 »
AFTER MY FIRST TEST I INFORMED UNIVERSITETS IN POLAND

THEY  TOLD ME THAT I"M IDIOT !!! and I must go sleep ...

IT IS NATURAL
THAT NEW feel OLD RESISTANCE



 THEY WILL SENT ME SORRY ....



my first picture I made during I playwith my daughter !!!

IT IS SIMPLE LOGIC and VERY STRONG DISCOVERY !
( natural observation without mathematica !!!! )

NOBODY BEFORE ME MEASURED SIGNAL's QUALITY
DURING MICHELSON MORLEY !!!!






 FAMOUS DOUBLE SLITS ???
zero logica ? or stupid theories about electron's motion ?

Right now in books we have many problems and secrets ( my simple test is ready to explain many OLD FACTS "




Electron is Moving !
EM waves are hiting Electron

EM WAVES ARE FASTER THAN ELECTRON !!!!




YOUNG TEST IT IS NOT DUALISM !!!
it is unlogic idiotism !!!

OLD NEWTON's idea about light  is much more better !!!!






 

Offline chris

  • Neilep Level Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5339
  • Thanked: 65 times
  • The Naked Scientist
    • View Profile
    • The Naked Scientists
Re: Red Blue Force and Gallileo ( Am I moving ? )
« Reply #6 on: 07/11/2015 17:49:21 »
WHAT IS YOUR QUESTION?

PLEASE RE-FORMAT THE TITLE OF THIS THREAD AS A QUESTION, AS SPECIFIED IN THE USER AGREEMENT AND IN THE THREAD TITLE BOX; OTHERWISE THIS THREAD WILL BE DELETED.

CHRIS SMITH, EDITOR
 

Offline machmarosz

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 73
    • View Profile
Re: (Red Blue Force ) ARE WE ABLE READ MOTION ?
« Reply #7 on: 07/11/2015 20:04:44 »
Dear Chris

in 2012 Poland I made in my private flat very siple test (  please repeat it )


camera -----BULB >>> 30 km/s

BULB-----CAMERA >>> 30 km/s



During test camera is not registering the same brightness (Intensity )
I can see not the same HISTOGRAM for pictures




(NIKON 5000d  remote start,  zero outside light ,stative, manual set ,
 time 10s  , F 8 , Iso 200 -  /10 cm to  bulb /  filtre is important !!!)
MY FIRST  pictures
( camera -----bulb >>> motion  and bulb-----camera >>> motion )



I hope My post will read people who can repeat my test in LAB
I found in books (physics ) good explanation what my camera is registering
I ALSO SHOWING Si units system
I think I found  way how to measure motion !!!

 

The Naked Scientists Forum

Re: (Red Blue Force ) ARE WE ABLE READ MOTION ?
« Reply #7 on: 07/11/2015 20:04:44 »

 

SMF 2.0.10 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums