Naked Science Forum

On the Lighter Side => New Theories => Topic started by: Ve9aPrim3 on 17/02/2018 19:25:28

Title: x=0±1 Proof
Post by: Ve9aPrim3 on 17/02/2018 19:25:28

Proof:

f(x)=x
f(-x)=f(yz)

f(yz)=x±(0/1)

f(xyz)±f(x)+f(yz)
∅±∞
0±1

         f(yz)
           =
(0/1) ± x ± (0/1)
           =
         f(yz)

...........
f(x)=x
f(-x)=f(yz)
f(yz)=x±(0/1)
f(xyz)=f(x)+f(yz)
∅=∞
0=1

I just pictured equations being balanced differently I guess.
1=1
1≠-1
1±1
All these mean the same to me.
"=" is how you balance an equation horizontally.
"±" is how you balance an equation across 3D space.

...Whoops..I mean
f(x)=x
f(-x)=f(yz)
f(yz)=x±(0/1)
f(xyz)±f(x)+f(yz)
∅±∞
0±1

Title: Re: 0=1 Proof
Post by: Bored chemist on 17/02/2018 19:53:19

Gibberish.

Title: Re: 0=1 Proof
Post by: Ve9aPrim3 on 17/02/2018 20:11:48

Quote from: Bored chemist on 17/02/2018 19:53:19

Gibberish.

f(x) is used to calculate intercept points across 2D space.
0=1 is used to calculate the intercept point across 3D space.

Working with "f(x)" is a great tool in 2D computation, but "0=1" is much more practical in 3D computation.

Title: Re: 0=1 Proof... I mean 0±1 Proof
Post by: Ve9aPrim3 on 17/02/2018 20:50:27

Quote from: Ve9aPrim3 on 17/02/2018 19:25:28

f(yz)=x±(0/1)

         f(yz)
           =
(0/1) ± x ± (0/1)
           =
         f(yz)

Title: Re: 0=1 Proof... I mean 0±1 Proof
Post by: Bored chemist on 17/02/2018 20:56:08

Quote from: Bored chemist on 17/02/2018 19:53:19

Gibberish.

Title: Re: x=0±1 Proof
Post by: jeffreyH on 17/02/2018 21:06:18

Why do you bother? You must have something more productive you could be doing. Like popping bubble wrap.

Title: Re: x=0±1 Proof
Post by: Colin2B on 18/02/2018 09:27:23

OP has requested all further discussion be directed to https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=72397.0

So this topic is now locked