Naked Science Forum

On the Lighter Side => New Theories => Topic started by: Lance Canham on 07/04/2019 05:12:46

Title: Hypothesis of everything
Post by: Lance Canham on 07/04/2019 05:12:46
Experiment in out of the box thinking

Hypothesis of everything - the link between the small looking down (what happened) and the large looking (will happen again)

I think the answer to all the problems with dark matter dark energy is answered by looking up at that structure you see showing up in surveys(knots and voids) and extend it out to infinity (as far as we can tell space is flat so its infinite) then ask what is it - what is it doing. look down ask what did it do. then you wonder does it repeat on larger scales - look up and see that structure and it seems It must - then you see dark matter and dark energy, you see a quark like particle forming in an endless cloud.

You see what happened Before it happened to the small starting to happen in the large scale structure - the link we never saw till now.

we are well away from the Knot in an even larger scale structure in which that future particle will exist. Maybe even the larger structure above that.

there should then be infinitely larger scales infinitely less developed. A Fractal of kinds

There is other thinking on the idea and how it exlains some things in other threads.

edited to add the links.

https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76615.0
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76614.0
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76702.0

missing anti matter
https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76826.0

Title: Re: Hypothesis of everything
Post by: guest39538 on 07/04/2019 11:50:14
Experiment in out of the box thinking

Hypothesis of everything - the link between the small looking down (what happened) and the large looking (will happen again)

I think the answer to all the problems with dark matter dark energy is answered by looking up at that structure you see showing up in surveys(knots and voids) and extend it out to infinity (as far as we can tell space is flat so its infinite) then ask what is it - what is it doing. look down ask what did it do. then you wonder does it repeat on larger scales - look up and see that structure and it seems It must - then you see dark matter and dark energy, you see a quark like particle forming in an endless cloud.

You see what happened Before it happened to the small starting to happen in the large scale structure - the link we never saw till now.

we are well away from the Knot in an even larger scale structure in which that future particle will exist. Maybe even the larger structure above that.

there should then be infinitely larger scales infinitely less developed. A Fractal of kinds

There is other thinking on the idea and how it exlains some things in other threads.
That's not a Hypothesis , in fact it isn't even Psuedo as it lacks any content .  If you're going to have a go at creating theory or Hypothesis you need more effort than that.   However even if you do put in a lot of effort , the chances are you still won't achieve anything . 
Title: Re: Hypothesis of everything
Post by: Lance Canham on 07/04/2019 12:21:06
That's not a Hypothesis , in fact it isn't even Psuedo as it lacks any content .  If you're going to have a go at creating theory or Hypothesis you need more effort than that.   However even if you do put in a lot of effort , the chances are you still won't achieve anything . 

Agreed on Hypothesis and at least I did not use theory. Also you only attacked the use of the word and none of the idea. Ill never take it much past the idea although the idea has evolved over the last 4 years - I posted it in 4 or 5 places over the last 4 or 5 years and it never get gets attacked but also never gets any talk really and that makes it hard to think more on it.

As I said ill never take it farther - mill worker 55 - not a physicist - did take all science in high school and have wondered about this lots. 30 years ago I used to think there was something wrong with our understanding of light.  But recently Something showed up in surveys and it just all seems to make sense. 

Again I get your critique on the use of the word but do you have anything to say about the idea. It funny that it takes this to get any kind of comment - I like the name - think out of it for a day and just wonder.

Why I think no one says much has much to do with what you said also as I found this paragraph in the middle of a story on snowball earth 2 days ago. kinda weird as I been asking wife and friends why this is and I get an answer in the paragraph below.  Hope somebody furthers this idea in ways I simply can't.

------------

My main contribution was making the case that it was a credible scientific hypothesis by arguing, from different disciplines within geoscience, that there was a lot of geological evidence consistent with the predictions. As I often like to say, new ideas or hypotheses are like small children: It’s best not to judge them too early because you don’t know what they are going to be like as adults. Very often, the problem with new ideas is not that they are wrong, but that they are incomplete.

Title: Re: Hypothesis of everything
Post by: guest39538 on 07/04/2019 12:52:39
That's not a Hypothesis , in fact it isn't even Psuedo as it lacks any content .  If you're going to have a go at creating theory or Hypothesis you need more effort than that.   However even if you do put in a lot of effort , the chances are you still won't achieve anything . 

Agreed on Hypothesis and at least I did not use theory. Also you only attacked the use of the word and none of the idea. Ill never take it much past the idea although the idea has evolved over the last 4 years - I posted it in 4 or 5 places over the last 4 or 5 years and it never get gets attacked but also never gets any talk really and that makes it hard to think more on it.

As I said ill never take it farther - mill worker 55 - not a physicist - did take all science in high school and have wondered about this lots. 30 years ago I used to think there was something wrong with our understanding of light.  But recently Something showed up in surveys and it just all seems to make sense. 

Again I get your critique on the use of the word but do you have anything to say about the idea. It funny that it takes this to get any kind of comment - I like the name - think out of it for a day and just wonder.

Why I think no one says much has much to do with what you said also as I found this paragraph in the middle of a story on snowball earth 2 days ago. kinda weird as I been asking wife and friends why this is and I get an answer in the paragraph below.  Hope somebody furthers this idea in ways I simply can't.

------------

My main contribution was making the case that it was a credible scientific hypothesis by arguing, from different disciplines within geoscience, that there was a lot of geological evidence consistent with the predictions. As I often like to say, new ideas or hypotheses are like small children: It’s best not to judge them too early because you don’t know what they are going to be like as adults. Very often, the problem with new ideas is not that they are wrong, but that they are incomplete.


Fare enough pal , I'll consider what you have said in your first post  and reply later .
Title: Re: Hypothesis of everything
Post by: Bored chemist on 07/04/2019 13:15:55
That's not a Hypothesis ,
At least he didn't try to pretend it was a theory like some people do.

https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76601.msg571506#msg571506

https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=72769.msg538639#msg538639
Title: Re: Hypothesis of everything
Post by: Lance Canham on 13/04/2019 21:58:35
Photon - Been wondering if there is a point where a black hole can say No more I have had enough. trying to come up with an idea how it might work if the knots in the large scale stucture of the universe were to form particles much like the way we belive the matter we are made out of came to be as stated above.

this is a weird thought that just hit me like 10 min ago.

What if a galaxy were a photon of sorts. When the knot merges and reaches some critical point The mighty Black whole of Countless Galaxies all in one spot says no more and gives a kick to the leftover - off it goes forming a galaxy or more in different directions with lots of energy slowly cooling (pooling) Now things are more structured and controlled by the forces so it probably just a spiral (particle agn and wave The spiral)  Think im getting lost so to write is to better understand what I just thought.

Edit - The leftover goes out the jets.  There will still be much left over in voids and filaments that the local expansion of space will never let become true particles. There will be plenty left when the first quarks form for dark matter needed for ever lost in the realms of space. Keep in mind that we are only seeing enough space looking up to form a handful of Quarks If that's indeed what its sort of doing.
Title: Re: Hypothesis of everything
Post by: Lance Canham on 15/04/2019 15:07:20
A galaxy  acts like a particle.  There is a link between the large and small

Funny I expected this and have been saying just this.  Put this with the rest on this topic.

We live in the wave structure of a particle - the spiral arms of a galaxy
---------------------------------------
"In retrospect, when I look at the problem now, I'm surprised at how I didn't just guess that that's what it was going to be

https://www.space.com/39881-massive-space-structures-quantum-mechanics-math.html
Title: Re: Hypothesis of everything
Post by: Lance Canham on 17/04/2019 06:00:53
few more links to threads in this forum along this line of thinking to help keep it together

https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76793.0

https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=76800.0