0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Experiment in out of the box thinking Hypothesis of everything - the link between the small looking down (what happened) and the large looking (will happen again) I think the answer to all the problems with dark matter dark energy is answered by looking up at that structure you see showing up in surveys(knots and voids) and extend it out to infinity (as far as we can tell space is flat so its infinite) then ask what is it - what is it doing. look down ask what did it do. then you wonder does it repeat on larger scales - look up and see that structure and it seems It must - then you see dark matter and dark energy, you see a quark like particle forming in an endless cloud.You see what happened Before it happened to the small starting to happen in the large scale structure - the link we never saw till now. we are well away from the Knot in an even larger scale structure in which that future particle will exist. Maybe even the larger structure above that.there should then be infinitely larger scales infinitely less developed. A Fractal of kinds There is other thinking on the idea and how it exlains some things in other threads.
That's not a Hypothesis , in fact it isn't even Psuedo as it lacks any content . If you're going to have a go at creating theory or Hypothesis you need more effort than that. However even if you do put in a lot of effort , the chances are you still won't achieve anything .
Quote from: Thebox on 07/04/2019 11:50:14That's not a Hypothesis , in fact it isn't even Psuedo as it lacks any content . If you're going to have a go at creating theory or Hypothesis you need more effort than that. However even if you do put in a lot of effort , the chances are you still won't achieve anything . Agreed on Hypothesis and at least I did not use theory. Also you only attacked the use of the word and none of the idea. Ill never take it much past the idea although the idea has evolved over the last 4 years - I posted it in 4 or 5 places over the last 4 or 5 years and it never get gets attacked but also never gets any talk really and that makes it hard to think more on it.As I said ill never take it farther - mill worker 55 - not a physicist - did take all science in high school and have wondered about this lots. 30 years ago I used to think there was something wrong with our understanding of light. But recently Something showed up in surveys and it just all seems to make sense. Again I get your critique on the use of the word but do you have anything to say about the idea. It funny that it takes this to get any kind of comment - I like the name - think out of it for a day and just wonder. Why I think no one says much has much to do with what you said also as I found this paragraph in the middle of a story on snowball earth 2 days ago. kinda weird as I been asking wife and friends why this is and I get an answer in the paragraph below. Hope somebody furthers this idea in ways I simply can't.------------My main contribution was making the case that it was a credible scientific hypothesis by arguing, from different disciplines within geoscience, that there was a lot of geological evidence consistent with the predictions. As I often like to say, new ideas or hypotheses are like small children: It’s best not to judge them too early because you don’t know what they are going to be like as adults. Very often, the problem with new ideas is not that they are wrong, but that they are incomplete.
That's not a Hypothesis ,