Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side => New Theories => Topic started by: MichaelMD on 21/04/2019 04:57:14
-
In earlier threads, I have described my model of a universal ether composed of elemental, universal, etheric building-block units, which represent the basic units of everything we observe, including quantum units such as electrons and photons.
One of the fundamental questions in quantum physics is what is the underlying nature of the wave-forms we observe in electrical phenomena and light transmissions. -I propose that their origin lies in an underlying universal ether, which in my ether-model is made up largely of ultra-rarified elemental "building block" units, but which also can contain larger, etheric, units that could be called "etheroidal".units -Using this kind of model, we can propose a mechanism for how such an ether would lead to the kinds of wave-forms that are seen in association with still-larger-size energy units, such as quantal electrons and photons.
With this model of Ether, the larger and larger units (first, etheroidal, then ultimately, quantal) get built-up wherever the underlying ether is subjected to outside energy forces, which cause the elemental ether units to align, entrain, and form other ether linkages, which in turn leads to the formation of the larger energy units. In the case of quantum size units like electrons and photons, their manifestations strongly feature wave-forms, the basic nature of which is still unknown. I propose that explaining the "wave question" involves an analogy, similar to the way ocean waves reach a crescendo as they approach the shore - i.e., both represent a "shoreline effect."
The way that would work is that in the case of ocean waves, those waves become much larger and stronger when they approach the shore. -This is explained as being due to the fact that, out further at sea, the energies producing the relatively smaller waves there, from underlying currents and the like, are being "buffered" by the vast underlying, calmer, deeper waters. Then, as the water comes closer to the shore, that buffering effect is lost, and the energy in the water manifests in the form of the much-stronger waves seen at the shoreline.
In the case of the ether, when it is under low-energy conditions, the ether is mainly composed of elemental units, with low levels of its larger etheroidal units, which results in relatively low levels of quantum units. But if the ether is subjected to an outside energy force, the vast "sea" of elemental units is stimulated to align, entrain, and form larger units. In that case, the ether underlying the quantum units changes, forming wave-forms similar to the way ocean waves are formed as they approach the shoreline. -The ether no longer contains just the ultra-small elemental units, but now, it contains many more larger and larger etheroidal units, and ultimately, quantum units. The way this transition is manifested is by the formation of "shoreline' quantum wave forms, just as the ocean forms shoreline waves.
-
To add a few details that might clarify how the "elemental building-blocks" originated, and how they would work in generating larger energy units, up to the scale of quantum units in my model of the Ether, the concept would be that the smallest ether units, being elemental, are all identical, as well as universal, that their origin was from a "first causal" universal oscillation of point-localities, and that therefore, they became the fundamental constituents of everything that came after, including quantum units. -After being derived from initial oscillating elemental "points," they transitioned from reciprocating oscilllation to independent, now-interactional, vibration. Being identical, and having the energy dynamic of direct vibratory contact between units, their interactions are perfectly linear (unlike quantum dynamics which involve waves, fields, vector distances between units, and the like.) =That is how they are able to align, entrain, and form larger and larger energy units.
-
"Is this how quantum wave-forms are generated by underlying ether?"
No, and it's also not how they are generated by unicorns- for much the same reason.
-
Your criticism is uniquely corny,. You're Bored, but - really want to climb aboard.
-
I don't want to climb aboard anything that relies on an ether that was proven not to exist the century before last.
-
Michelson-Morley, and the subsequent "null" experiments around 100 years ago, all used criteria based on assumptions that the ether could be detected by measuring propagation of light waves. They believed the ether acts as a medium, through which light propagates, and you could detect this with ordinary instruments such as optical devices, and using quantal and inertial criteria, like "the ether wind."
My ether model proposes that elemental ether units are far too rarified to be detected that way, by exponential orders of magnitude. The ether's ultimate origin was from elemental point-localities, originally existing everywhere. The criteria those 1800s and early 1900s experimenters used, such as "an ether wind," could not have detected basic ether forces. In my ether model, the ether's "etheroidal" units, which are built up from elemental units, and come just before light waves are observed, are closer in scale to our familiar quantum scale units, but the etheroidal units are not the preponderant ether units, the elemental units are.
That is why the ether was never "disproven."
-
by exponential orders of magnitude.
That phrase does not mean anything.
Do you know how good the recent "nul" measurements are?
Saying "the hundred year old experiments aren't good enough" is a bit meaningless, because we now have much better ones.
-
The concept of a universal ether that started from a universal oscillation of elemental point localities is the only theory of origins that makes sense that I have seen. Such point-localities would have to have been ultimately-minuscule, to have been elemental. (Such oscillating elements would have to have had tiny "empty" spaces between them to be able to oscillate.) The next step would have been a combination of neighboring "points," in a "Yin and Yang" fashion, due to oscillatory fatigue (which is a known process in oscillation.) Such point-pairs then would necessarily have had to reversibly revert to singleton units, which would have broken the symmetry of oscillation, converting the oscillations to independently vibrating elements, able to interact with each other as they vibrate - So the idea of an ether composed of extremely-minuscule elemental units, I would submit, does "mean something."
I also submit this kind of ether-model represents the only possible model for quantum entanglement (QE). QE, then, would represent radiated packets of ether energy which have the same vibratory pattern. Elemental ether units would be the only actual active participants in this phenomenon, with the two entangled quantum units being "walled-off" cool "arms" of a quiet, purring, ether mechanism.
I can't answer your statement that there have been recent disproofs of ether "better" than Michelson-Morley et al's. All the key references I have seen only cite those older experiments.
-
I can't answer your statement that there have been recent disproofs of ether "better" than Michelson-Morley et al's. All the key references I have seen only cite those older experiments.
How hard did you look?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson%E2%80%93Morley_experiment#Recent_experiments
-
As far as the references in your citation from Wikipedia, those are newer than the experiments of Michelson and Morley (MMX), and their successors, in the first few decades of the 20th century, true, but I myself don't see anything in them that would make them "better" than the earlier ones. These "better recent experiments" you cited from Wikipedia, mostly used optical refraction setups, which is basically the same kind of approach as in the MMX and other older ones. The other newer one cited in your reference mentions "the ether wind," an inertial criterion, which, again, I claim could not co0me close to detecting the presence of extremely-rarified elemental units, which I claim are preponderant, in my model of the ether.
-
t I myself don't see anything in them that would make them "better" than the earlier ones.
Really?
YOu don't see how an experiment that would detect an ether flow equivalent to 2.5 cm per second is better than one that would need an ether drift of about 20 km/s?
Do yu understand that others might see that as better?
Well- never mind.
What experiment would we need to do to find out if your idea is right (or, at least, better than the conventional view)?
-
The only kind of experiment I can see that would detect the ether would be a field test designed to generate a selectively-etheric energy field, and then measuring material within the test setup for decreased density, an effect not produced by known forms of energy. Another term for this would be levitation. (I actually have a design for such a field test, but it would be expensive and I have not found a sponsor to fund it.)
-
The only kind of experiment I can see that would detect the ether would be a field test designed to generate a selectively-etheric energy field, and then measuring material within the test setup for decreased density, an effect not produced by known forms of energy. Another term for this would be levitation. (I actually have a design for such a field test, but it would be expensive and I have not found a sponsor to fund it.)
So, you have an idea that can't be tested.
So, it's not science...
-
Just to return to the concept of how energic (light or electrical) waveforms are generated, and the analogy I propose with ocean waves, this model might become clearer by analyzing the way ocean waves behave, and the pulsation/crescendo effect as ocean waves reach the shoreline.
Far out in the ocean, fluxing energies below the water's surface, by such forces as ocean currents, manifest in the form of separate waves, which are smaller and less forceful than at the shoreline. -On reaching shore, the ocean waves become much stronger and larger, as the buffering effect of the vast deeper waters is lost.
With the model I propose for underlying ether forces generating quantum energic waveforms, the analogy would be that, generally, energic effects within the ether do not occur perfectly uniformly. Overall, there are foci of greater and lesser energy within the ether (as in the ocean), where there are greater or lesser amounts of forces, which in turn causes the smaller ether units to align, entrain, and form larger energy units - first, etheroidal units, and ultimately, when these units reach a peak, or crescendo, quantum units, and the pattern of this transition into the quantum dynamic world becomes that of the waveform - basically pulsations of energy, rather than a smooth pattern.
-
Far out in the ocean, fluxing energies below the water's surface, by such forces as ocean currents, manifest in the form of separate waves, which are smaller and less forceful than at the shoreline. -On reaching shore, the ocean waves become much stronger and larger, as the buffering effect of the vast deeper waters is lost.
This isn’t how ocean waves work so it’s not a good idea to base your aether analogy on it.
-
I grant that my model of how energies produce oceanic wave formation was oversimplified compared to the model of oceanographers. There are multiple factors producing the forces that form waves in the ocean. But that part of the analogy does not bear on my main point, which is how quantum waves basically are generated, and I would still hold that there is an analogy with ocean waves as they approach the shoreline. (The argument shouldn't be about that part of oceanographic theory, which doesn't bear on my main point, that a similarity exists, which could be called a "shoreline effect.") -I'll try stating it a slightly different way.
Analogy between ocean waves and quantum energy waves rests upon the similarity between the crests of the incoming, as compared with the returning, waves. In the case of quantum waves, the similarity is their resemblance to the way ocean-going waves wind-down in returning to the open ocean. where energies wind down over the calmer sea. -In the case of quantum waves having just been formed, the underlying etheric forces in the area are returned to a lower energy state.
-
I grant that my model of how energies produce oceanic wave formation was oversimplified compared to the model of oceanographers.
It's not "oversimplified"; it's wrong.
Since the ether was shown not to exist over a century ago, ideas involving "etheric waves" are also wrong.
-
My Ether Model does not propose a concept of "ether waves." Its concept is of waves, which appear in quantum observations, waves that are formed as etheroidal units, operating through vibratory forces of the underlying ether, transition to quantum units that operate through quantum dynamics.
-
My Ether Model does not propose a concept of "ether waves." Its concept is of waves, which appear in quantum observations, waves that are formed as etheroidal units, operating through vibratory forces of the underlying ether, transition to quantum units that operate through quantum dynamics.
Was that meant to be postmodern poetry?
-
To add to what @Bored chemist said “It's not "oversimplified"; it's wrong.”
There are multiple factors producing the forces that form waves in the ocean.
You didn’t mention any of those factors
But that part of the analogy does not bear on my main point, which is how quantum waves basically are generated, and I would still hold that there is an analogy with ocean waves as they approach the shoreline. ..........
If you are going to use ocean waves as an analogy it’s important you understand them otherwise people will dismiss your theory as wrong. For example, ocean waves increase in amplitude and also decrease in wavelength as they approach the shoreline.
You need a better analogy.
-
I would submit that my analogy between ocean waves and this model of how quantum wave forms are produced is valid, on the basis of a similarity of their alternating "high-crest, followed by nadir-crest." The analogy is that of a shoreline-effect. The "shoreline" in the case of quantum waves comes after an energy build-up in the underlying ether, which has stimulated a peak in formation of etheroidal units, which then further transition to quantum units, which in turn show up when we observe quantum energy waves, as a high-amplitude wave crest, resembling incoming ocean waves at the shoreline.
Again, I don't share your opinion that differences between ocean wave-forming forces, and the forces forming ether/quantum waves, disqualifies, or has any bearing on, the analogy. The point I made just is that of a similarity in wave patterns at two "shorelines." The "shoreline" in the case of my ether model is where the underlying vibratory ether forces have been energized, and have reached a crescendo, and then "emerge," forming a wave crest, where large numbers of them have reacted to the outside energy, forming built-up etheroidal units, which went on to form still-larger quantum units,these transformed units now transitioning to the world of quantum dynamics. -Then, as the energies at the "shorelines" die back, the nadir of the waves appears, analogously in both cases.
-
I would submit that my analogy between ocean waves and this model of how quantum wave forms are produced is valid, on the basis of a similarity of their alternating "high-crest, followed by nadir-crest."
And I submit that it can't be "valid" , because your idea talks about "ether forces" and we know that the ether does not exist.
-
One aspect of my Ether Model would support the idea that an alternating peak-and-nadir energy effect could occur in the ether that could produce a typical quantum wave form, as follows. -In my Model, the underlying ether dynamics are very different from quantum dynamics, and involve vibratory interactions between elemental ether units, also between elemental units and larger units; including quantum units, which is the basis of how it would explain quantum entanglement. -How this ether process could produce quantum wave forms, is that after an ether region is subjected to outside energy, the elemental ether units in the area begin aligning and entraining, which produces larger and larger units. However, in the ether matrix such a process could involve quite-sharp cut-offs between the energic areas and less energic areas of the ether. In parts of the ether where the alignment, entrainment, and build-up of units is occurring, this effect would accelerate participation by nearby parts of the ether in the process, while other ether areas are hardly affected, and remain un-aligned and "quiet." -Thus, once a cascade of built-up larger ether units emerges into the quantum realm, producing a wave-peak, the rest of the ether is at a drastically-lower energy, producing a nadir effect, seen as a trough in the quantum wave.
As the outside energy influence continues, the typical peak-and-trough wave effect continues, as seen in quantum wave patterns. -One should try to appreciate that an underlying ether energy-dynamic totally different from quantum dynamics could behave quite differently.
-
It might help interpret my model by comparing how such forces would be operating in the case of a wire transmitting an electric current between two opposite poles, from the point of view of how the transmission forces differ, going through the wire, and through the space around the wire in the associated magnetic field..
With this Ether Model, there is ether present in both cases, both in the wire and in the space around the wire. However, there is a difference in the modes of conduction. -In the case of the wire, the conducting medium
consists of densely crowded atoms (again, the atoms would be composed of elemental ether units, which are vibrationally in touch with other ether units in the wire. -In the case of the magnetic forces around the wire, there is an ether matrix there too, but there. the spatial state means that the surrounding ether matrix is less quantized than the surrounding ether in the wire. Conduction of forces would differ as a result, in that in the wire, there would be a more accentuated conversion of smaller ether units to units analogous to the atomic units in the wire, producing a more pronounced cascade of larger, more quantized, energy units, producing a ore dramatic, stronger, flux of electrons. -In the space around the wire, the energic forces would be less dramatic, with less quantization (fewer electrons) and less pronounced wave effects, than in the wire.
-
Why are you calling this "thing that isn't ether", ether?
-
When, in the wire, the tiniest elemental ether units of the ether matrix sense there is a directional resonance between the two poles, they undergo increased alignment, and vibratory entrainment, producing larger and larger ether units, on up to the size scale of quantum units (electrons.) It's necessary to appreciate that the vibratory type of dynamics of the ether differs from quantum dynamics. and in the neighborhood of the densely crowded atoms inside the wire, this vibratory dynamic produces a pattern of resonance in the ether shifted toward a higher level of activity of the larger ether units, similar in scale to the denser quantum atomic/electronic units all around them, there. More quantum/electronic forces result. That is why the energies inside the wire are observed to run higher than in the space around the wire.
-
directional resonance
You need to explain what that means.
Ditto
vibratory entrainmen
the vibratory type of dynamics of the ether
a higher level of activity
similar in scale to the denser quantum atomic/electronic units
Let's face it.
It's probably easier to list the bits that do make sense.
-
By "directional resonance" existing between two "opposite" poles, I meant that (1) there must exist compatibility, or resonance, of the two poles in order for the ether between the poles to "feel" the commonality, so the ether starts establishing packets of vibration that have the same vibratory pattern, in common, with the two poles. -This is the same basic concept as in explaining quantum entanglement - the ether between two similar quantum loci "feels" a commonality and establishes a vibrational link between them in the ether, except that in the case of the wire, where an electrical force-gradient exists between the poles, this also produces a directional flow of etheric energy. (In simple entanglement, there is just a connection without forces flowing between the two quantum loci.)
By "vibratory entrainment," I meant that when elemental ether units start aligning in reaction to energy forces in the area, that makes their vibrations come into contact with each other to a greater degree, which then produces entrainments of multiple elemental units, which is what is needed to produce larger and larger energy units, on up to the size of quantum electrons.
By "vibratory dynamic of the ether," i was referring to the difference between the ether, which follows a dynamic in which units interact by vibratory contact, and the quantum mechanical dynamic, where larger, quantum scale, units interact with each other via wave patterns, distance vectors, and spin. (Although I claim the ether is important in quantum dynamics too, because the linearity of the underlying ether vibratory forces is what actually underpins the orderliness of quantum systems, such as atomic structure.)
By "similar in scale to the quantum/electron units" that crowd together in the wire, I was referring to the concept that what accentuates the higher level of energy in the wire (the current") compared to the space around the wire (where the magnetic field lies), means that the ether units inside the wire are more energically attuned to the quantized state of the wire. (The wire is a structure more quantized than is the space around the wire. That's why the current is stronger than the magnetic field, although both conduct forces between the poles.)
-
My kind of Ether Model provides the only answers possible., -A universal ether matrix consisting of elemental ether units, which are the basic building-blocks of everything, including quantum energy units, is the only rational answer. The ether matrix provides a continuum of perfectly-linear transmissions between the quantum units, which underpins the stability and orderliness of all quantum systems, such as atomic structuring.
"Stand-alone" quantum physics is not able to adequately explain these questions, and never will be.
-
The best example to illustrate how my Ether Model works would be to consider how a flashlight beam is propagated in the dark. The flashlight bulb, by emitting photonic energy, sends quantum photons forward into the darkness. However, with my ether model, the actual sequence of energic processes is more complicated than just that.
In quantum entanglement, two quantum units are observed to stay connected even after being separated -I propose that the same kind of effect occurs with the flashlight beam, as follows. -There exist some photons in the space ahead of the flashlight bulb. Even after dark, some ambient photons persist after sunset, and when the flashlight sends out its beam, the ether "feels" there are separated, closely-related, quantum loci - the flashlight and the ambient photons in the space ahead of the flashlight. So, feeling this commonality between two quantum sources, the intervening ether is stimulated to produce a photonic vibratory pattern between the two photonic loci, analogous to what happens in quantum entanglement.
Of course, there would be enormous numbers of photons, and even more of the elemental ether units between them. What is actually happening is that enormous numbers of photons are "dragged into" the beam, producing the light beam we see with our eyes. All the while, ether units are underlying the basic process, because the energy from the light bulb causes the ether units to energically align, entrain, and form even more quantum photons. We do not "see" the ether part of the process, because it occurs at a super-rarified level beyond our senses. Our eyes are atomically structured, and require the quantum photons to produce our vision's perception of the light beam.
-
The main reason physics rejects the ether is still the "null" results obtained in the Michelson-Morley Experiment of 1887 (MMX) and its later successors, all of which used measurementrs of the behavior of optically-refracted ;light beams to "observe the conduction of light through the ether." They assumed that light beams would pass through any type of ether acting as the "medium" for light passing through it. There have even been recent proposals to conduct new MMXs using orbiting satellites. However, according to my Ether Model, those original assumptions were mistaken.
In my Ether Model, the photons which are present in light beams, being of quantum-order size, would be vastly larger than the ether units through which light passes. These ether units are "elemental," meaning they are ultimately-minuscule in size, which means that there would not be an inertial-interface between photons and the ether, contrary to the assumptions the MMX was based upon. (MIchelson, using the concepts of physics in the 1800s, appears to have conceptualized the passage of light through "any" ether as necessarily involving the light burrowing through an ether, in a sort of inertial-mechanical fashion.) -The assumption in MMX that an inertial interface "must" exist between "any" ether and the light passing through it, according to my Model, is mistaken, so MMX should be thrown out as a final disproof of ether.
However, in my Ether Model, ironically, this entire line of reasoning has no bearing upon the actual mechanism involved when light is transmitted through the ether, because the mechanism is actually electrical-vibrational, and no inertial motion is involved. The ether is acting as an underlying matrix, which provides a continuum of perfectly-linear impulse-transmissions, which connect vibrationally-similar quantum loci. The pathways of such transmissions are based on matching vibratory patterns. Thus, the vibrational dynamic of the underlying ether is entirely different from the overlying quantum dynamics, such as that if light beams.
-
The stability and orderliness of quantum systems such as structured atoms requires an underpinning matrix of uniform elemental quantum-building-block ether units, which exists as a vibrating continuum of linear transmissions that connect quantum units that are related and similar. -Not "entangled."
Compare this Model with rival models such as string theory, with its eleven dimensions.
-
The Ether Model described above also leads to a logical and simple model of gravity.
Such an ether, being composed of "elemental" units, would constitute a continuum, cutting seamlessly across quantum/atomic barriers. Therefore, the ether units would be passing across the surface of two gravitating bodies, into the intervening space. These ether units, having just left the inside of the solid body, would retain a greater degree of energy than the ether units in the space between the bodies, and would "carry" this energy into the space as they enter it. This would lead to a higher energy state of the ether in the space between the bodies. That, in turn, would cause increased activity of the ether units in this space. Instead of quietly and randomly vibrating, separately, the higher energy level would make the ether units energically align and entrain to a greater degree, leading to aggregation of some of the ether units into larger sized units, up to the size-scale of quantum units. This would "partially quantize" the space between the two gravitating bodies. The ether in this space would become "tighter," because some of the ether units in it are no longer vibrating quietly and freely, but instead are now aggregating into larger units. -Overall, the ether between the two gravitating bodies has become more tightly contracted, which is what draws the two bodies toward each other.
-
An ether model of gravity like this merits serious consideration. Physics lacks a genuinely satisfactory gravity model. Attempts to link gravity with electromagnetism, dipoles, and the like, have shown them to have no relationship to gravity. Likewise, attempts to link gravity with light or optical transmissions have also failed. This has led physics to link gravity to Einstein's general relativity explanation involving "curvature of space in the presence of mass" as a sort of default explanation, despite the obvious difficulty in adapting that to a rational concept. (Some theorists still cling to the hope that string theory will eventually provide a gravity model. -I would submit that string theory, with its eleven dimensions, will never adapt to explaining such observations as the stability and orderliness of atomic structuring.
I submit that the above model of gravity as an ether-based mechanism involving quantization of the space between gravitating bodies is the most rational one. My Model also accounts for the stability and orderliness of quantum systems like atomic structuring, as involving underpinning of quantum-systems by a matrix of quantum-building-block elemental ether units
-
This is to clarify a key point in the ether/quantization model of gravity given just above (see my post of Oct. 12.) -The reason the space between gravitating bodies becomes partly quantized, as ether units enter it from the surfaces of the bodies, is that the etheric units passing through the atomic boundary from the solid body into the space are, largely, "etheroidal" ether units, which are intermediate ether units smaller than quantum units, but larger than the elemental ether units. These etheroidal ether units are generated inside the solid body, due to the energy processes there, which have mediated underlying etheric forces to the more-quantized quantum/atomic state of the solid bodies. In that state, the ether underlying their atomic structuring consists of a higher level of larger ether units ("etheroidal"). Etheroidal units are larger than the elemental units that predominate in the space outside the bodies, but are small enough to pass through the quantum/atomic boundary into the space between them, where they produce partial quantization of this space, a state which partly replicates the state of the energy units inside the two bodies. This produces more larger energy units, up to quantum units, in this space than were there before. -The ether in the space is now more "connected-up" and less predominantly elemental than before, i.e., the ether between the bodies is more tightly contracted, which pulls the two bodies toward each other.
-
It would further clarify my Ether Model to point out the difference in how it explains not only Gravity, but also Quantum Entanglement (Q.E.)
In the last post, I pointed out that in my Model, the ether units predominant in Gravity are not the elemental, or tiniest, ether units, but rather the larger "etheroidal" units, which are closer in size-scale to the quantum units they are related to, as they transition from the ether to the quantum units in the quantized state, in the space between the solid bodies
In contrast, in Q.E., in my Ether Model, it is the elemental, or tiniest, ether units which are the predominant (in fact only) participants. In my Model, Q.E. represents radiated packets of ether energy which have the same vibratory pattern. The elemental ether units are the only actual participants in Q.E., with the pair of related, but separated, quantum units being kinetically "walled off," but connected to each other, by elemental ether units.
-
In this Ether Model, magnetism is basically the same process as gravity. -Of course, gravity effects usually involve bodies that are larger, and spaces that are greater than in magnetic attraction, and the attractive forces are more spread-out than in magnetism. But in this Model, with magnetism, etheroidal space-quantizing forces involve ether units are coming from bodies that are more similar than in the case of gravitation. Therefore, the ether forces in magnetism being more similar, the spatial vibratory patterns in the space between the bodies are more similar, so the quantization process going on in the space between attracted bodies is stronger, the ether in the space between the bodies becomes more tightly contracted, and the ,magnetic attraction is stronger than in gravitation.
-
A major theoretic question that arises in my Ether Model is how a vibratory dynamic existing in such an underlying, underpinning, ether, can coexist and interface with the overlying quantum dynamics we are familiar with.
In my overall cosmic-model, electrons initially were creationally projected into a "virgin" ether region. Electrons happen to possess the maximum velocity of quantum units, as they are the smallest in dimension. Such projections enabled the electrons to establish a partially-independent quantum dynamic system, via their setting up wave patterns and field patterns, which in turn caused smaller units to transition to larger units (protons, neutrons, atoms), and our present quantum dynamic system was established. (This quantum dynamic world of waves, fields, vectors, and so on, is still not totally independent of the vibrational dynamic of the ether, as shown by the observation of quantum entanglement.)
I submit that a preceding "ether world" was creationally transitioned to our quantized world in order to establish a more magnetically-stable quantum-dynamic macrocosm for the existence of quantized entities, than had existed in the preceding ether macrocosm.
-
It might help evaluate this Ether Model if I point out just its main basic concepts.
The stability and orderliness of quantum systems, such as the structuring of atoms, requires an underpinning matrix of elemental, uniform, quantum-building-block ether units, which make for a continuum of vibrating units, which transmit linearly- conducted impulses connecting larger quantum units that are related and similar.
Quantum entanglement (Q.E.) is an example of this key underlying process. Q.E. is not a rare and peculiar laboratory effect.
Compare the straightforwardness of this model with rival models, such as String Theory, with its eleven dimensions.
-
Stringing together a bunch of sciency sounding words resulting in gibberish is not what is commonly known as science.
-
Reply to Origin
Instead of vaguely criticizing my entire Ether Model, why don't you cite specific points for mutual debate, for example, how to account for quantum entanglement?
-
Reply to Origin
Instead of vaguely criticizing my entire Ether Model, why don't you cite specific points for mutual debate, for example, how to account for quantum entanglement?
How in the world am I supposed to respond to meaningless gibberish like this?
The stability and orderliness of quantum systems, such as the structuring of atoms, requires an underpinning matrix of elemental, uniform, quantum-building-block ether units, which make for a continuum of vibrating units, which transmit linearly- conducted impulses connecting larger quantum units that are related and similar.
I suppose I just need to respond in your native tongue, gibberish.
Quantum entanglement is a result of vibratory cosmic strings in resonance with the radiative geodesic in spacetime.
So clearly ether is not required.
-
The statement "ether is not required" indicates to me that your mind is closed to the possible existence of a universal ether. That in itself would rule out any chance of a debate on the question of quantum entanglement, which in my Ether Model represents radiated packets of etheric energy which have the same vibratory pattern.
In case your position that there is no ether stems from the position of consensus quantum physics that ether was ruled out by the null result of the Michelson-Morley Experiment of 1887 (MMX) and its successors, if you check back in this Thread, I have pointed out what I claim were false assumptions in setting up all the MMX type expreiments. -MMX assumed that any ether would have to be acting as "the medium" in the behavior of light beams (MMX measured optically-refracted light beams in different gravitational reference settings, and concluded that the behavior of the light beams indicated that an ether was not acting.)
In this Thread, I point out that this assumption was false because if (as in my Model of how a universal ether would have originated), the origin of individual units of the ether involved ultimately-rarified, "elemental," point-localities, being derived from universal, elemental, oscillating singleton units, which, through oscillatory fatigue, combined in Yin Yang couplets, which reversibly reverted to singleton units, which broke the perfect symmetry of the universal oscillations, converting space to a vibrating, instead of oscillating, universal ether. -Therefore, light beams, since they contain quantal photons, would lack any kind of inertial interface with these kinds of ultimately-rarified ether units. Therefore, that basic assumption by MMX was false. (Ironically, although this line of reasoning is rational and valid, in my Ether Model, it has no bearing on the actual model of the transmission of light, which actually occurs at the ether level (the photons being generated along the path of a light beam by the energy in the transmission) via an etheric electrical vibratory-contact mechanism, which transmits a continuum of linear impulse transmissions. No inertial motion is involved in this model of how light is primarily transmitted.
-
The statement "ether is not required" indicates to me that your mind is closed to the possible existence of a universal ether.
Then you're probably reading it the wrong way. It's possible to model an unfalsifiable ether and therefore one that could possibly exist despite failed attempts to detect it. Saying that ether isn't needed isn't ruling it out, it's just saying that the Universe is simpler without it and there is therefore no need to invoke it to explain anything.
-
An ether energy technology would probably open up unexpected vistas for us. Even just a better understanding of the fundamental basis of quantum forces would represent a major advance.
I'll repeat another statement made earlier in this Thread. - The stability and orderliness of quantum systems, such as the structuring of atoms, requires an underpinning matrix of elemental, uniform, quantum-building-block ether units, which form a continuum of linear impulse-transmissions, through an electrical vibratory-contact mechanism, connecting quantum units that are related and similar. This is the only rational explanation for quantum entanglement. Compare the straightforwardness of this ether model with rival models, such as String Theory, with its eleven dimensions.
-
To better clarify the basics of this Ether Model -
A universal ether, which formed in original-space, would be composed of elemental etheric units that are able to interact with each other via contact vibrations, which can align and entrain, and transmit impulses. -There would have to be tiny "empty" spaces between the units, to allow for vibration. The "empty" spaces would be the key to gravitational attraction, which involves heightened energy and partial quantization in the space between two bodies, and "tightening" of the ether between them, as ether units change from random vibration to more interaction. As the intervening ether tightens up, the two bodies are drawn toward each other.
Quantum entanglement occurs when two quantum units remain "connected" as their elemental constituent units (shared in common with elemental units of the underlying ether matrix) connect up, via a linear-impulse, transmitted through the ether between the quantum units..
-
To better clarify the basics of this Ether Model -
A universal ether, which formed in original-space, would be composed of elemental etheric units that are able to interact with each other via contact vibrations, which can align and entrain, and transmit impulses. -There would have to be tiny "empty" spaces between the units, to allow for vibration. The "empty" spaces would be the key to gravitational attraction, which involves heightened energy and partial quantization in the space between two bodies, and "tightening" of the ether between them, as ether units change from random vibration to more interaction. As the intervening ether tightens up, the two bodies are drawn toward each other.
You think two paragraphs of word salad improves the clarity?
-
Physicists are still trying to account for quantum entanglement (Q.E.) with strictly-quantum physics theory, which does not accept that any ether exists. Wikipedia, a fair, impartial, authority on questions like this, states that in Q.E., when two closely-related quantum units are separated, changes in one of the pair induces changes in the other. -I reiterate that the only way this could happen is if the quantum units are connected through an intervening etheric matrix, and if their connection is via elemental units common to both the to quantum units, and the ether matrix.
-
Addendum to my last Post on quantum entanglement - Such a connection, passing through the ether matrix, would be via a packet of elemental ether units, having the same vibratory pattern, producing a linear transmission, through a vibratory-contact mechanism. The transmission would be continuous, with no vectors or inertial motion involved.
-
To try to better clarify and expand on my explanation of Quantum Entanglement, with a similar model for light propagation.
Quantum systems operate via waves, fields, spin, and vectors. We perceive light visually because the photons associated with the transmission of light react with our atomically-structured eyes. My Model says that, nonetheless, the ether, which we are not able to detect, comes first, and that there is an underlying ether which operates via a different type of dynamics, vibration. If, for example, you consider how a beam of light is transmitted, in my Model, it is initiated by an energy source - say the sun or a flashlight bulb.This starts a process in the ether matrix, which sends a continuous transmission of tiny elemental ether units, which interact via a vibratory-contact mechanism. These ether units share a common vibratory pattern, and conduct the transmission of this light-beam-type pattern through the ether, as the primary underlying light-transmission. This etheric impulse, in addition to representing the primary transmission, transmits its high energy level, which arose from the original source (sun or light bulb) which passes, virtually unabated with the ether units, through the matrix, inducing the elemental units in the transmission to generate larger and larger units, as the elemental units align and entrain, in response to the energy. That is how large numbers of photons are generated, and appear in association with the transmission.
Quantum physics is wrong here. Photons do not trace out light beams by themselves, traveling through space.
-
They assumed that light beams would pass through any type of ether acting as the "medium" for light passing through it.
No. They were testing the then-current hypothesis that light is a compression wave in something called aether.
They showed that it could not be, and Maxwell showed that there is no requirement for any medium for the propagation of electromagnetic radiation.
-
Countering my particular Ether Model with such assertions by past quantum theorists and mathematicians would not resolve the fundamental theoretic issues of my Model.
The disconnect here would revolve around how my model differs from past working assumptions of physics in addressing certain details as to the nature of ether, and how my Model claims to provide new insights on its type of ether, and whether it indeed fits into current perspectives, using newer information pertaining to quantum entanglement, subquantum forces, and the like. We would have to take a fresh look at this area, and how my Model would fit..
-
The actual point to be made on Alancalverd's Post, as to my Ether Model versus the Michelson Morley sets of experiments (MMX), would be that in my Model, the ether represents a matrix composed of "elemental" (therefore, presumptively- ultimately-minuscule) units, whereas the size-scale of the photon units, in the light beams being measured in MMX, is in the sub-quantal range. In such a case, the ether units would be vanishingly smaller than the photon units. The point I am making is actually as simple as this - If the ether consists of units much smaller than the photons of light being measured, there cannot be an inertial interface between the ether and the light being measured. The ether cannot interact with the light beams. This simple point alone means that MMX does not disprove ether.
-
in my Model, the ether represents a matrix composed of "elemental" (therefore, presumptively- ultimately-minuscule) units, whereas the size-scale of the photon units, in the light beams being measured in MMX, is in the sub-quantal range.
If you expect anyone to pay you any attention, you need to explain what most of the compound nouns there mean
-
The concept that the ether is basically composed of "presumptively ultimately-minuscule," "elemental," ether units is based on my model for how a universal ether had to have been formed in the first place.
A universal ether would have been formed first-causally, from the only possible universal substrate, original space. In my model, original space, being free from everything else, such as energic forces, could well have been more self-compatible than space is now. It, then, could have been oscillational, in which the oscillating "points" would have been "elemental," meaning the point-like localities would have been as minuscule as can possibly be conceived of. -Then, when oscillatory fatigue led adjacent points to come together as "Yin Yang" couplets. the couplets would have had to reversibly revert to singleton units (in a process similar to equilibration in chemical processes). That would have broken the perfect symmetry of oscillation, producing a universal ether, containing elemental units which now independently vibrate, rather than reciprocally oscillating. (Oscillatory fatigue is a known process. It occurs in metals.)
-
I have described how my Ether Model would account for quantum entanglement, the propagation of light, and gravitation, during the course of this Thread. -At this point, I might return to the subject of the Thread's title, i.e., how quantum waveforms would be explained using this Model.
Quantum waveforms are generated by the effect of an outside energy source upon a previously-unenergized region of the ether. A wave's peak represents the point at which multiple "etheroidal" units transition to quantum units, and the quantum dynamic world, leaving the vibrational dynamic world of the ether. A wave's "trough" represents the die-back of larger etheroidal units, and the new quantum units. At this point, much smaller ether units, especially elemental units, predominate again in the ether.
To describe this in more detail, firstly, an outside energy impinges upon an unenergized ether region, starting a reaction in that ether region which could be called an "explosion of linearity", where the ether is changed from its previous state of quiet, random, vibration, to a state where the elemental ether units align, and then entrain, with each other, in a very rapid fashion, leading to a sudden buildup of etheroidal-, and then quantum-, scale units. (A necessary, but reasonable, assumption here is that the vibratory dynamic of the ether is virtually perfect, or "ideal.") The sudden appearance of a cascade of quantum units represents the peak of a waveform.
An analogy here would be with the way ocean waves act as they reach the shore. After the "peak" of the wave breaks on the shore, there ensues a "trough" effect, as water gently recedes back to the ocean.
An ,
-
in my Model, the ether represents a matrix composed of "elemental" (therefore, presumptively- ultimately-minuscule) units, whereas the size-scale of the photon units, in the light beams being measured in MMX, is in the sub-quantal range.
If you expect anyone to pay you any attention, you need to explain what most of the compound nouns there mean
-
In a post like this, I assume the viewer has gone to the effort of looking at my previous posts in the thread, where I discussed the compound words under other parts of the ether model. It would be too involved to go through how each term would fit into the model, in detail, in every post.
-
In case Bored chemist, by complaining about "compound nouns," he meant how I introduced the word "linearity" in my post, I will go further into that. -I probably was too brief, just saying that an outside energy, impinging on an un-energized ether region, induces an "explosion of linearity." I too-quickly assumed that viewers already realized that an "outside energy," such as any electromagnetic transmission, would be linear in nature. Its effect, upon reaching the unenergized ether area., would be that a linear transmission's own etheric forces would interact with, and affect, any new ether region it encounters, by stimulating the un-energized ether to start vigorously aligning and entraining, producing larger energy units, including quantum units (such as electrons.) -Physics still has difficulty accounting for where the very large numbers of electrons (or in the case of light transmissions, photons) are coming from, and how they arrive there.
-
In case Bored chemist, by complaining about "compound nouns," he meant how I introduced the word "linearity" in my post,
Since you don't have a clue what I meant, don't try to tell other people what I meant.In a post like this, I assume the viewer has gone to the effort of looking at my previous posts in the thread, where I discussed the compound words under other parts of the ether model.
That's my point.
You didn't explain what they meant in your earlier posts either.
-
To add several more theoretic points regarding my Ether Model as a "theory of everything."
It is logical to hypothesize that our world of different quantum-unit forces was preceded by an earlier world-setting in which earlier, more-uniform, unit-type forces existed, that led to a subsequent quantization. Any earlier etheric setting of this kind would have had to be universal. The likeliest setting would have involved a first-causal formation of a universal matrix, comprising ultimately-minuscule, first-causal size-scale, units, and also likely that some sequence of universal physical events was what led to a world of forces like ours.
I previously outlined a model for this, involving an initial universal oscillation of ultimately-tiny point-like units, which then transitioned to a universal etheric matrix, composed of post-first-causal ("elemental") units, which interact with each other through a post-oscillational,immediate-vibratory-contact, mechanism (which is a perfect sub-model to account for quantum entanglement.) -Quantum entanglement representing radiated packets of etheric force-units that have the same vibratory pattern, the only actual forces involving elemental etheric units, the quantum units, as a whole, being kinetically uninvolved, but having a composition of identical "building block" elemental ether units, allowing the process to take place.
The chief factor that led physics to reject an ether was Michelson and Morley's 1887 experiment, repeated with modifications by others since then, involving measurements of the behavior of light beams, using optical refraction, which involve a key assumption that the light beams would have to be affected by (interact with) any kind of ether. However, I propose that a universal ether must actually consist mainly of ultimately-minuscule, first-causal-type, units that would be vanishingly-smaller than the photons that transmit visible light beams. So the light beams measured in the Michelson-Morley sets of experiments would not have had any inertial interface with such an ether, which means that the light beams and the ether could not interact, which in turn means that those experiments were based on a false assumption, and that physics is wrong in dismissing the ether.
-
The likeliest ...
Please show how you calculated the probabilities.
The chief factor that led physics to reject an ether was Michelson and Morley's 1887 experiment, repeated with modifications by others since then, involving measurements of the behavior of light beams, using optical refraction, which involve a key assumption that the light beams would have to be affected by (interact with) any kind of ether.
It's hardly an "assumption".
It is true- by definition of the luminiferous ether.
The ether is what carries the light; of course there is an interaction.
-
In my model, the propagation of light falls into the same kind of explanation as does quantum entanglement, above. -With my model, the primary actors in a light transmission are the very same elemental ether units. The energy that starts a light beam's transmission, say a flashlight bulb or the sun, primarily emits an etheric transmission. These ether units "feel," and travel toward, ambient forces in the area having the same kind of vibrations (photonic type.) (There are always a lot of photonic forces in and around an area, even after sunset.) (It's worth noting that a flashlight's illumination occurs even to the rear of the light source, as if there exist ambient light-resonances there) The large numbers of quantum photons seen with the light beam are generated by the energy of the ether units in the transmission, and come from the light source (sun or light bulb)'s ether units. -Ambient ether units in the area, as they "feel" the linear energy coming from the transmission, change from their previous un-energized state, of quiet, random, vibrations, to a state where the linearity of the beam aligns the units, which in turn entrains the ether units, which is what produces larger energy units, up to the size of the photons that are seen.
-
To further clarify as to how my model of the ether relates to light, and to current views of quantum physics. -Quantum physics, in rejecting the ether, largely due to their belief that the Michelson-Morley experiments "disproved ether," views light as arising from a quantum-order unit, the photon. They view photons as massless (although a minority of physicists deny photons are truly massless), and that they move through space at the speed of light, producing the light.
On the other hand. my model claims that photons are generated secondarily, to the primary cause of light transmission, namely ether units, according to the model I outlined in my last Post. -I should add some clarification to this ether-version of light transmission.
I propose that when a light transmission is generated by a source such as a star or the sun, the energy needed for light beams to travel through space is, like the photonic etheric impulse also propagated with it, virtually unabated as it goes. (A necessary, but reasonable assumption here would be that the vibrational dynamic of the ether is virtually perfect, or "ideal," unlike quantum dynamics.) Then, as the transmission passes through space, it "feels," etherically, similarly to the process in quantum entanglement, other photonic resonances elsewhere in space, and the light transmission is directed toward these "areas of resonance." -The fact that photons are generated in such profusion as far away as another solar system is evidence that the etheric transmission has transmitted the energy from its source virtually unabated.
Quantum theory cannot match the logic of this model in terms of accounting for why such quantities of photons (in the trillions) are seen with light beam transmissions moving over such distances.
-
Since this has been a lengthy "theory of everything" thread, at this point I would like to encapsulate what I consider its basic, key, concepts, starting from its view of the beginnings of the Cosmos.
In my Model, what came first was universal Space, a type of space free from everything else, such as forces. It is viewed as thus having been very self-compatible, such that ultimately-rarified point-like localities within it were oscillating with each other, reciprocally. Eventually, here and there, adjacent "points" underwent oscillatory fatigue, and fell toward each other, thus forming first-causal Yin-and-Yang couplets. (Oscillatory fatigue is a known process. It occurs in metals.) -This broke the perfect symmetry of the oscillations in space, producing ultimately-rarified ("elemental") units, which now were vibrating independently, rather than oscillating reciprocally. However, this transition would not have been simultaneously uniform throughout space, so that now there were couplets which were scattered, here and there, and which tended to merge with each other as "matched" doubled-units. -The idea here is that since this first-causal sequence of processes would have been non-uniform, there would have existed within it areas where comparative linearity of the motions of the units would have existed, the linearity then producing alignments of the vibrations of units, which in turn would have produced their entrainment into larger and larger units, at first "etheroidal" in size-scale, and eventually, up to the size of quantum units and atoms.
At this point, there would have existed radiating fluxes of such units in space, which, through mutual resonances, would have formed confluences, or "islands," where intense energic processes occurred, involving both local quantization and outside etheric radiations. The etheric components would have involved extremely rarified and complex processes, affecting any "local" quantum materials. Quantization could have included roundish, or "cosmic egg" shaped moieties, which, because of the outside etheric radiation, developed curving, reverberating, energy circuits, which in turn could have led to the appearance of a sapient Entity (ies.)
Eventually, the overall process in space would have produced a universal Ether, which would have represented an "ether macrocosm." However, the transient type of magnetism which would have been acting upon the quantum moieties (and entity(s) at the "island" would have made things unstable, so it was decided to use the surrounding energies to form a more-stable quantum universe (our universe.) To accomplish this,electrons (the smallest, and speediest, quantum units) were projected into a "virgin" ether region, where no quantum forces existed, inducing the ether there to undergo patterned chain-reactional formation of larger units, up to the scale of atomic units. (Since photon/electron units had been used to produce the quantum universe, it remained the speediest unit in the universe, accounting for why its velocity, the speed of light, remained the highest speed limit in the universe.)
-
In my Model
What evidence is there to support your model?
In what ways is it better than the conventional model?
What quantitative predictions can your model make?
If the answer to any of those isn't clear then, once again, you have just been composing postmodern poetry.
-
Chemist, To apply the technical details you mentioned would require serious scientific interest in this Model, which has yet to happen.
I believe the logic of the model, as described above, is enough to justify some investigative interest.
-
I believe the logic of the model, as described above, is enough to justify some investigative interest.
It seems nobody shares your belief.
This may reflect the fact that the ether was shown not to exist.
-
A brief addendum to the cosmic formation-model just described above: while our universe does have its well-known speed limit (the speed of light. Nothing here can go faster), UFO theorists claim that UFOs must travel faster than light, in order to have bridged the distance-gaps between stars of the order of light-years. -The way my model would answer that would be that UFO space craft are using etheric energies, which would not be subject to the same speed limit that quantum-structured craft in our world are subject to.
-
The claim above, that "the ether has been shown not to exist," is false. The chief reason physics has continued to deny the existence of an ether is the series of experiments called "Michelson-Morley." (MMX). MMX was first performed in 1887 by Michelson and Morley, and has been repeated by others, with various modifications, since then. The MMX sets of experiments have used optical measurements of the refraction of beams of light which have been subjected to different gravity-settings (as in the original MMX) or, since then, to other experimental modifications. MMX experimenters have always assumed that the light beams being measured must necessarily be interacting with any kind of ether. -However, in my model of the ether, a universal ether exists that consists of ether units that are ultimately rarified, and which were formed, universally, when the ether itself originated. Therefore, such ether units would be first-causal, presumptively ultimately-rarified, and thus vanishingly smaller than the photon units which transmit light beams visible to our eyes. So there could be no inertial interface between the ether and the light beams measured in MMX. The basic assumption of MMX being false, physics has been wrong in dismissing the ether.
-
So why call it ether at all? What experiment could reveal that your ether exists?
-
The claim above, that "the ether has been shown not to exist," is false. The chief reason physics has continued to deny the existence of an ether is the series of experiments called "Michelson-Morley." (MMX). MMX was first performed in 1887 by Michelson and Morley, and has been repeated by others, with various modifications, since then. The MMX sets of experiments have used optical measurements of the refraction of beams of light which have been subjected to different gravity-settings (as in the original MMX) or, since then, to other experimental modifications. MMX experimenters have always assumed that the light beams being measured must necessarily be interacting with any kind of ether. -However, in my model of the ether, a universal ether exists that consists of ether units that are ultimately rarified, and which were formed, universally, when the ether itself originated. Therefore, such ether units would be first-causal, presumptively ultimately-rarified, and thus vanishingly smaller than the photon units which transmit light beams visible to our eyes. So there could be no inertial interface between the ether and the light beams measured in MMX. The basic assumption of MMX being false, physics has been wrong in dismissing the ether.
And if I call my cat "The Ether" then clearly "The Ether" exists, but that doesn't stop the MM experiment having shown that the luminiferous ether doesn't exist.
-
There must be an in-between, a buffer, if you will, to allow for transference.
-
There must be an in-between, a buffer, if you will, to allow for transference.
How do you figure?
-
There must be an in-between, a buffer, if you will, to allow for transference.
How do you figure?
My reply is meant for the OP. It seems many people here on this post are having trouble getting past the hurdles to be able to understand what he is explaining from his own level. My attempt is to engage with him at his own level so that he may better understand his own theory in a way that can then be re-conceptualized to a form that many more may understand.
-
So why call it ether at all? What experiment could reveal that your ether exists?
My model of ether has yet to get any real recognition in the science establishment, so it would be premature to outline a way it could be tested. (I do have a protocol for a potential field test, but it would not be appropriate to describe it if my basic theories are unrecognized.)
-
There must be an in-between, a buffer, if you will, to allow for transference.
If by "buffer" you mean there has to be an intermediate stage between the ether in my Model and the quantum unhits familiar to physics, the idea would be this. - The ether units are the primary actors in energic processes. The way they transition to larger units (at first "etheroidal," in my model), and to quantum size-scale units is as follows. -The ether units being vibratory, their vibrations might be un-aligned, or random, as in a non-energized region. But if there is an incoming linear energy, such as an electric or light flow, then as the etheric component of the incoming force interacts with the quieter ether units already there, the vibrations of the "resident" ether units become aligned with each other, and after that, the ether units begin to entrain with each other, forming larger and larger units, up to the scale of quantum units. Once a pair of ether units align vibrationally, or "pair up," if they then interact with a matching pair, they merge, and so on, and this process keeps entraining.
-
My model of ether has yet to get any real recognition in the science establishment, so it would be premature to outline a way it could be tested.
Unless it is testable, it is not science and the scientific community will continue, quite rightly, to ignore you.
Did you not realise that?
-
There must be an in-between, a buffer, if you will, to allow for transference.
If by "buffer" you mean there has to be an intermediate stage between the ether in my Model and the quantum unhits familiar to physics, the idea would be this. - The ether units are the primary actors in energic processes. The way they transition to larger units (at first "etheroidal," in my model), and to quantum size-scale units is as follows. -The ether units being vibratory, their vibrations might be un-aligned, or random, as in a non-energized region. But if there is an incoming linear energy, such as an electric or light flow, then as the etheric component of the incoming force interacts with the quieter ether units already there, the vibrations of the "resident" ether units become aligned with each other, and after that, the ether units begin to entrain with each other, forming larger and larger units, up to the scale of quantum units. Once a pair of ether units align vibrationally, or "pair up," if they then interact with a matching pair, they merge, and so on, and this process keeps entraining.
I understand very well what you are trying to explain, the issue in this realm is the human need for labels. As you can tell from other replies, most are arguing on labels, limitations, and so on. Think of it like you seeing light as a whole, where as most can only see specific colors. A step down transformer would be helpful in such case, for others to get a fuller glimpse as to what you are envisioning. Abstraction is the easiest way to try to relate it to mundane terms, but then others argue their differences instead of climbing the ladder for the expanded view. The theory you are explaining here can be applied to anything and everything we experience here. Particles to atoms to molecules to compounds. Cells to tissue to organs to organ systems, etc. Planets to solar systems to galaxies, etc. Seconds to minutes to hours to days, etc. Pennies to nickles to dimes to quarters, etc. It is all around you. With that in mind, if you want to take your theory even deeper, I would suggest looking at how your theory relates to all of reality from different perspectives. This will help you expand your knowledge. As you look at differences from your model to the reality around you, then you would be contracting the concept. Say you're in a folder on your computer, if you focus on differences, then you would be viewing documents separately within the folder, if you are expanding the topic you would be seeking the parent folder to the one you are looking in. If this is too advanced for you yet, I understand. Know that you are the expert of your own perceptions and experiences of reality. No one can truly tell you what is or isn't. All they can do is explain their perspectives, which may or may not assist you in more clearly defining what it is you are experiencing outside of the 3d/4d.
-
My model of ether has yet to get any real recognition in the science establishment, so it would be premature to outline a way it could be tested.
Unless it is testable, it is not science and the scientific community will continue, quite rightly, to ignore you.
Did you not realise that?
Chemist, You put a significant error into your reply. You said "unless it is testable, it is not science.." However, what I said said in my post just before that was that I do have a potential field test of my theory. My claim was that it is "testable."